Food Processing Analysts and authors: Bill Knudson and Steve Miller - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

food processing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Food Processing Analysts and authors: Bill Knudson and Steve Miller - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUSINESS INNOVATION IN FOOD, AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND THE BIOECONOMY The Economic Impact of Food Processing Analysts and authors: Bill Knudson and Steve Miller Presenter: Chris Peterson, Director www.productcenter.msu.edu


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BUSINESS INNOVATION IN FOOD, AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND THE BIOECONOMY

The Economic Impact of Food Processing

Analysts and authors: Bill Knudson and Steve Miller

Presenter: Chris Peterson, Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Overview

  • Impact on Output and Employment
  • Michigan’s rank
  • Potential for Growth
  • Barriers to Growth
slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Summary

Economic & Employment Impact of Food Processing

Within Sector Total

Economic Impact ($ billions) 14.7 25.0 Impact on Employment 40,828 133,980

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Healthy Growth

  • Sector output increased by 19.8%

– CAGR of 3.7%, 2002-2007

  • Employment is holding steady or has

increased slightly

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Breakdown by Industry

  • 5 largest industries
  • Dry/condensed milk

$2.33 billion

  • Soft drinks and ice

$2.16 billion

  • Bread & bakery

$1.32 billion

  • Breakfast cereal

$1.24 billion

  • Animal slaughtering

$1.06 billion

(except poultry)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Top 5 Employers

  • Bread & breakfast product mfg.

6,969

  • Fruit/veg. canning/pickling/drying 4,374
  • Soft drink and ice manufacturing 4,012
  • Breakfast cereal manufacturing

3,908

  • Fluid milk & butter manufacturing 3,196
slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Michigan Rank

  • Michigan ranks 19th in food manufacturing

similar to its ranking in farm output

  • Michigan ranks last in Great Lakes Region

– Relatively weak position in animal processing – Relatively strong position in fruit and vegetable processing

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Potential of Additional Processing

  • Looked at the following
  • dry milk powder plant
  • small scale artisanal cheese facility
  • $20 million fruit juice facility
  • small scale fruit processor
  • small increase in sugar processing
  • large increase in beef processing
  • small scale vegetable processing
slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Activity Direct Total Direct Total Dry Milk Processing Plant $206,954 $459,296 250 2,011 Artisanal Cheese Plant $125 $276 1 Fruit Juice Plant $20,000 $33,315 31 115 Expanded Beef Plant $220,628 $423,324 500 2,288 Small Fruit Processor $500 $832 1 3 Expanded Sugar Processing $300 $650 1 6 Expanded Frozen Vegetable Processing $500 $890 4 7 Employment Impact of Various Food Processing Activities Economic ($1,000s)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Impacts of Projects

  • Large projects have the biggest impact

– Dry milk plant – Beef expansion – But limited potential (one or two of these activities)

  • Small projects have smaller impacts

– However, greater potential for a large number that may spawn later ventures with time

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Michigan’s Advantages

  • Net exporter of feed grains
  • Strong and diverse processing industry in

existence

  • Amble water supply
  • Reasonable access to population centers
slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Barriers to Expansion

  • Taxation, especially Michigan Business

Tax

– Similar to other industries

  • Wastewater treatment/classification of

byproducts

– Low hazard solid waste instead of soil conditioner

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.productcenter.msu.edu

Conclusion

  • Food Processing is Important

– $25 billion in total economic activity – Accounts for almost 134,000 jobs – Has potential for growth – Barriers exist, especially regulatory