FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES ARLINGTON - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fitness and fun in the 4mrv
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES ARLINGTON - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES ARLINGTON SPORTS COMMISSION FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV Arlington is an active community with diverse recreational interests. Meeting the recreational needs of a growing and changing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV

OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES

ARLINGTON SPORTS COMMISSION

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FITNESS AND FUN IN THE 4MRV

▪ Arlington is an active community with diverse recreational interests. ▪ Meeting the recreational needs of a growing and changing community requires thoughtful and creative use of new and existing spaces. ▪ The 4MRV is a vital part of the recreational landscape, now and in the future.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MANY RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

Arlington provides a impressive range of recreational facilities and services, including parks, fitness centers, swimming pools, sports fields, bike trails, camps and classes.

89 miles of bike trails. 7 fitness rooms/15 centers. community centers 44 outdoor basketball courts. 85 tennis courts and 5 half tennis courts. 3 indoor high school pools, 1 outdoor regional pool. 43 rectangular, 35 diamond and 19 combo fields.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GROWING POPULATION AND SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS

▪ Overall population has increased to 220,000 in 2016 and is projected to reach 283,000 by 2040. ▪ Slightly more than half the population (52%) is under 35 years old. ▪ Three age groups have increased since 2000. ▪ Under 5 (from 5.5 to 6.2%) ▪ 25-34 (from 25.2 to 27.1%) ▪ 45-64 (from 21.3 to 22.1%)

Under 5 6% 5-19 12% 20-24 7% 25-34 27% 35-44 17% 45-64 22% 65-84 8% 85 and

  • ver

1%

* *

Arlington Population by Age, Jan. 2016

Source: Profile 2016, Department of Community, Planning, Housing and Development/Planning Division

*

* Age groups with proportional growth since 2000.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PUBLIC SPACES PLANNING PROCESS (POPS)

Survey respondents indicated a need for a wide range of sports and recreation related facilities.

Top sports and recreational facilities needs (ranked by % of respondents)

  • Q. Do you or a member of your household have a need for….?

Paved, multi-use trails 87% Playgrounds 41% Hiking trails 74% Gymnasiums 38% Swimming pool 63% Tennis courts 36% Exercise/fitness equipment 59% Rectangular fields 35%

Note: Facilities that do not have a direct and clear connection to sports are not included in the

  • above. These include natural areas & wildlife habitat (76%), park shelters and picnic areas (50%),

nature centers (48%), community centers (46%), and parks and plazas along metro and Columbia Pike corridors (47%).

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PUBLIC SPACES PLANNING PROCESS (POPS)

People aged 25-34 were the single largest age-based demographic in planning areas near the 4MRV (26% based on 2010 Census data for Columbia Pike and Nauck). The next two largest groups were people aged 35-44 and 45-54 (27-30% combined). Sports and recreation needs for respondents ages 35-54 were consistently higher than the average for all POPS survey respondents.

  • Q. Do you or a member of your household have a need for….?

Outdoor facilities Indoor facilities Rectangular fields Diamond fields Water spray grounds Playgrounds Tennis courts Basketball courts Volleyball courts Pool Gyms Indoor space Survey average 35% 20% 26% 41% 36% 28% 11% 63% 38% 25% Ages 35U 40%

  • 31%
  • 40%

31% 17% 65% 43% 30% Ages 35-44 58% 34% 57% 71% 44% 36%

  • 81%

51% 45% Ages 45-54 52% 28%

  • 44%

42% 18% 72% 49% 40% Age-based needs for selected program and activities where need was HIGHER than survey average

“- -” means % mirrored or was lower than survey average

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PUBLIC SPACES PLANNING PROCESS (POPS)

Sports and recreation also figure prominently in these respondents’ needs for programs and activities.

  • Q. Do you or a member of your household have a need for….?

Sports leagues Gymnastics teams Aquatics teams Sports drop-in play (un-programmed) Special events Survey average 33% 7% 11% 24% 57% Ages 35U 44%

  • 14%

31% 70% Ages 35-44 55% 18% 20% 39% 65% Ages 45-54 44%

  • 15%

30%

  • Age-based needs for selected program and activities where need was HIGHER than survey average

“- -” means % mirrored or was lower than survey average

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

INADEQUATE CAPACITY AND HEAVY USAGE

▪ Demand for recreational services and facilities consistently exceeds supply. ▪ Survey and other information shows that ▪ current capacity is not enough to meet growing demand; ▪ facilities suffer from overuse; ▪ maintenance resources are stretched thin; ▪ facilities cannot be taken off-line without causing significant disruptions; and ▪ the system cannot easily accommodate new interests.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MORE ON CAPACITY ISSUES

▪ Youth sports registrations have expanded (45% increase between 2010-2015 in all types of DPR and league-run sports). ▪ Classes are oversubscribed, children are turned away from some programs (an average

  • f 789 children are waitlisted per session for gymnastics and aquatics classes).

▪ Arlington has fewer gyms, practice fields, skate parks, and park-based restrooms than comparable locations nationwide. ▪ Lighting more fields would expand capacity by adding nighttime hours, but neighborhoods have pushed back against lights. ▪ Squeezing more teams and participants into existing spaces means shorter practice and game times, less time to learn the sport. ▪ Grass and synthetic turf fields are used 2-3 times more intensively than recommended and don’t last as long as they should. ▪ Limited maintenance means some facilities are in below average condition. ▪ Closing fields for maintenance or renovation further strains capacity.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PUBLIC SPACES PLANNING PROCESS (POPS)

Top Unmet or Partly Met Needs (ranked by % of respondents) Outdoor Indoor Programs & Activities Volleyball courts Indoor sports Special programs and inclusion support for people w/disabilities Other courts (not defined) Indoor facilities (metro corridors & Columbia Pike) Sport drop-in (unprogrammed) play Rentable space Exercise & fitness equipment Aquatic & gymnastics teams Community gardens Swimming pools Early childhood programs Bike park Gyms Wifi access Skate park Community & nature centers Gardening

In addition to identifying citizens’ interest in parks, trails, and other amenities, the POPS survey also identified a range of unmet or partly met needs.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OPTIONS FOR ADDRESSING CAPACITY

▪ Multi-use fields ▪ Indoor sports facilities ▪ Vertical capacity ▪ Public/private partnerships

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MULTI-USE FIELDS

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

INDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

INDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR:

▪ Turf fields for indoor soccer, field hockey, lacrosse, football, baseball, softball ▪ Exercise equipment ▪ Health and fitness classes for all ages ▪ Basketball courts ▪ Volleyball courts ▪ Gymnastics ▪ Batting cages ▪ County offices ▪ Public meeting space ▪ Classroom space ▪ Camps and child care ▪ Wifi access ▪ Special events ▪ Rentable space ▪ Food and beverage service ▪ Indoor tennis ▪ Pickleball ▪ Handball, racquet ball ▪ Climbing walls ▪ Activities for the disabled ▪ Yoga ▪ Fencing ▪ Parkour ▪ Tournaments

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

VERTICAL CAPACITY

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS

Public/private partnerships, such as joint investment and ownership, sponsorship or naming rights, can bring better facilities to communities at a lower cost to taxpayers.

Lynch Family Skate Park in Boston – $5 million 40,000 sq.

  • ft. facility for skateboarders, BMX riders, inline skaters

and spectators. Partly funded by the Lynch Foundation, Vans, and the Tony Hawk Foundation. GWU baseball field (Barcroft #6) – University invested $3 million to improve the field, add press box, install turf field, and other amenities. Arlington leagues and high schools use the field 75% of the time. The county and GWU share maintenance costs 75/25.

16