Finite generation of the cohomology rings of some pointed Hopf - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

finite generation of the cohomology rings of some pointed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Finite generation of the cohomology rings of some pointed Hopf - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Finite generation of the cohomology rings of some pointed Hopf algebras Van C. Nguyen Hood College, Frederick MD nguyen@hood.edu joint work with Xingting Wang and Sarah Witherspoon Maurice Auslander Distinguished Lectures and International


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Finite generation of the cohomology rings

  • f some pointed Hopf algebras

Van C. Nguyen

Hood College, Frederick MD nguyen@hood.edu joint work with Xingting Wang and Sarah Witherspoon

Maurice Auslander Distinguished Lectures and International Conference April 25 – 30, 2018

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Setting & Motivation

Let k be a field and H be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over k. The cohomology of H is H∗(H, k) :=

  • n≥0

Extn

H(k, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Setting & Motivation

Let k be a field and H be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over k. The cohomology of H is H∗(H, k) :=

  • n≥0

Extn

H(k, k).

Conjecture (Etingof-Ostrik ’04)

For any finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H, H∗(H, k) is finitely generated.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Setting & Motivation

Let k be a field and H be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over k. The cohomology of H is H∗(H, k) :=

  • n≥0

Extn

H(k, k).

Conjecture (Etingof-Ostrik ’04)

For any finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H, H∗(H, k) is finitely generated. GOAL: Study the finite generation of H∗(H, k), for some pointed Hopf algebras.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Finite generation of cohomology ring

F.g. Cohomology Conjecture Applications: Quillen’s stratification theorem, modular representation theory, support variety theory, algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, some homological conjectures Partial Results: finite group algebras over pos. char., finite group schemes over pos. char., Lusztig’s small quantum group over C, Drinfeld double of Frob. kernels of finite alg. groups, certain pointed Hopf algebras Remarks: H∗(H, k) is a graded-commutative ring. H∗(H, k) is a finitely generated k-algebra ⇐ ⇒ H∗(H, k) is left (or right) Noetherian ⇐ ⇒ Hev(H, k) is Noetherian and H∗(H, k) is a f.g. module over Hev(H, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Finite generation of cohomology ring

F.g. Cohomology Conjecture Applications: Quillen’s stratification theorem, modular representation theory, support variety theory, algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, some homological conjectures Partial Results: finite group algebras over pos. char., finite group schemes over pos. char., Lusztig’s small quantum group over C, Drinfeld double of Frob. kernels of finite alg. groups, certain pointed Hopf algebras Remarks: H∗(H, k) is a graded-commutative ring. H∗(H, k) is a finitely generated k-algebra ⇐ ⇒ H∗(H, k) is left (or right) Noetherian ⇐ ⇒ Hev(H, k) is Noetherian and H∗(H, k) is a f.g. module over Hev(H, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Finite generation of cohomology ring

F.g. Cohomology Conjecture Applications: Quillen’s stratification theorem, modular representation theory, support variety theory, algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, some homological conjectures Partial Results: finite group algebras over pos. char., finite group schemes over pos. char., Lusztig’s small quantum group over C, Drinfeld double of Frob. kernels of finite alg. groups, certain pointed Hopf algebras Remarks: H∗(H, k) is a graded-commutative ring. H∗(H, k) is a finitely generated k-algebra ⇐ ⇒ H∗(H, k) is left (or right) Noetherian ⇐ ⇒ Hev(H, k) is Noetherian and H∗(H, k) is a f.g. module over Hev(H, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Finite generation of cohomology ring

F.g. Cohomology Conjecture Applications: Quillen’s stratification theorem, modular representation theory, support variety theory, algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, some homological conjectures Partial Results: finite group algebras over pos. char., finite group schemes over pos. char., Lusztig’s small quantum group over C, Drinfeld double of Frob. kernels of finite alg. groups, certain pointed Hopf algebras Remarks: H∗(H, k) is a graded-commutative ring. H∗(H, k) is a finitely generated k-algebra ⇐ ⇒ H∗(H, k) is left (or right) Noetherian ⇐ ⇒ Hev(H, k) is Noetherian and H∗(H, k) is a f.g. module over Hev(H, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preliminary Ingredients

Definition

A Hopf algebra H over a field k is a k-vector space which is an algebra (m, u) ♥ a coalgebra (∆, ε) ♥ together with an antipode map S : H → H.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Preliminary Ingredients

Definition

A Hopf algebra H over a field k is a k-vector space which is an algebra (m, u) ♥ a coalgebra (∆, ε) ♥ together with an antipode map S : H → H.

Example

group algebra kG, polynomial rings k[x1, x2, . . . , xn], universal enveloping algebra U(g) of a Lie algebra g, etc.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Today’s Object: p3-dim pointed Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and H be a p3-dim pointed Hopf algebra. The classification of H is done by (V.C. Nguyen-X. Wang ’16).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Today’s Object: p3-dim pointed Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and H be a p3-dim pointed Hopf algebra. The classification of H is done by (V.C. Nguyen-X. Wang ’16). We are interested in the case when H0 = kCq = g, q is divisible by p (more general), grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq, where V = kx ⊕ ky is kCq-module.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Today’s Object: p3-dim pointed Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and H be a p3-dim pointed Hopf algebra. The classification of H is done by (V.C. Nguyen-X. Wang ’16). We are interested in the case when H0 = kCq = g, q is divisible by p (more general), grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq, where V = kx ⊕ ky is kCq-module. B(V ) is a rank two Nichols algebra of Jordan type over Cq. B(V ) = kx, y/(xp, y p, yx − xy − 1 2x2). with action gx = x and gy = x + y.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Today’s Object: p3-dim pointed Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and H be a p3-dim pointed Hopf algebra. The classification of H is done by (V.C. Nguyen-X. Wang ’16). We are interested in the case when H0 = kCq = g, q is divisible by p (more general), grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq, where V = kx ⊕ ky is kCq-module. B(V ) is a rank two Nichols algebra of Jordan type over Cq. B(V ) = kx, y/(xp, y p, yx − xy − 1 2x2). with action gx = x and gy = x + y.

B(V ) Hopf alg in YD

Cq Cq

grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq bosonization pointed Hopf algebras H lifting

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Today’s Object: two Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and w = g − 1. Consider the following Hopf algebras over k:

1

The p2q-dim bosonization grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq is isomorphic to kw, x, y subject to w q, xp, y p, yx − xy − 1 2x2, xw − wx, yw − wy − wx − x.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Today’s Object: two Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and w = g − 1. Consider the following Hopf algebras over k:

1

The p2q-dim bosonization grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq is isomorphic to kw, x, y subject to w q, xp, y p, yx − xy − 1 2x2, xw − wx, yw − wy − wx − x.

2

The 27-dim liftings in p = q = 3 are H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) ∼ = kw, x, y subject to w 3 = 0, x3 = ǫx, y 3 = −ǫy 2 − (µǫ − τ − µ2)y, yw − wy = wx + x − (µ − ǫ)(w 2 + w), xw − wx = ǫ(w 2 + w), yx − xy = −x2 + (µ + ǫ)x + ǫy − τ(w 2 − w), with ǫ ∈ {0, 1} and τ, µ ∈ k.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Today’s Object: two Hopf algebras

Let k = k with char(k) = p > 2 and w = g − 1. Consider the following Hopf algebras over k:

1

The p2q-dim bosonization grH ∼ = B(V )#kCq is isomorphic to kw, x, y subject to w q, xp, y p, yx − xy − 1 2x2, xw − wx, yw − wy − wx − x.

2

The 27-dim liftings in p = q = 3 are H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) ∼ = kw, x, y subject to w 3 = 0, x3 = ǫx, y 3 = −ǫy 2 − (µǫ − τ − µ2)y, yw − wy = wx + x − (µ − ǫ)(w 2 + w), xw − wx = ǫ(w 2 + w), yx − xy = −x2 + (µ + ǫ)x + ǫy − τ(w 2 − w), with ǫ ∈ {0, 1} and τ, µ ∈ k.

Main Results (N-Wang-Witherspoon ’17)

The cohomology rings of B(V )#kCq and of H(ǫ, µ, τ) are finitely generated.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Strategy: May spectral sequence & permanent cocycles

Take H as B(V )#kCq or H(ǫ, µ, τ) (p = q = 3). Assign lexicographic order on monomials in w, x, y with w < x < y.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Strategy: May spectral sequence & permanent cocycles

Take H as B(V )#kCq or H(ǫ, µ, τ) (p = q = 3). Assign lexicographic order on monomials in w, x, y with w < x < y. N-filtration on H, grH ∼ = k[w, x, y]/(w q, xp, y p).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Strategy: May spectral sequence & permanent cocycles

Take H as B(V )#kCq or H(ǫ, µ, τ) (p = q = 3). Assign lexicographic order on monomials in w, x, y with w < x < y. N-filtration on H, grH ∼ = k[w, x, y]/(w q, xp, y p). H∗(grH, k) = k3 ⊗ k [ξw, ξx, ξy], deg(ξi) = 2.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Strategy: May spectral sequence & permanent cocycles

Take H as B(V )#kCq or H(ǫ, µ, τ) (p = q = 3). Assign lexicographic order on monomials in w, x, y with w < x < y. N-filtration on H, grH ∼ = k[w, x, y]/(w q, xp, y p). H∗(grH, k) = k3 ⊗ k [ξw, ξx, ξy], deg(ξi) = 2. (May ’66) May spectral sequence E ∗,∗

1

∼ = H∗(grH, k) = ⇒ E ∗,∗

∞ ∼

= gr H∗(H, k). with respect to the cup product.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Strategy: May spectral sequence & permanent cocycles

Take H as B(V )#kCq or H(ǫ, µ, τ) (p = q = 3). Assign lexicographic order on monomials in w, x, y with w < x < y. N-filtration on H, grH ∼ = k[w, x, y]/(w q, xp, y p). H∗(grH, k) = k3 ⊗ k [ξw, ξx, ξy], deg(ξi) = 2. (May ’66) May spectral sequence E ∗,∗

1

∼ = H∗(grH, k) = ⇒ E ∗,∗

∞ ∼

= gr H∗(H, k). with respect to the cup product.

Lemma (Friedlander-Suslin ’97)

If ξw, ξx, ξy are permanent cocyles (meaning they survive at E∞-page), then gr H∗(H, k) and H∗(H, k) are noetherian over k[ξw, ξx, ξy]. Consequently, H∗(H, k) is finitely generated as a k-algebra. = ⇒ Need to find such permanent cocycles!

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolution (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16)

Let A and B be associative k-algebras. A twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B is a bijective k-linear map that respects the identity and multiplication maps of A and of B.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolution (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16)

Let A and B be associative k-algebras. A twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B is a bijective k-linear map that respects the identity and multiplication maps of A and of B. The twisted tensor product algebra A ⊗τ B is the vector space A ⊗ B together with multiplication mτ given by such a twisting map τ.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolution (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16)

Let A and B be associative k-algebras. A twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B is a bijective k-linear map that respects the identity and multiplication maps of A and of B. The twisted tensor product algebra A ⊗τ B is the vector space A ⊗ B together with multiplication mτ given by such a twisting map τ. Let P•(M) be an A-projective resolution of M and P•(N) be a B-projective resolution of N

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolution (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16)

Let A and B be associative k-algebras. A twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B is a bijective k-linear map that respects the identity and multiplication maps of A and of B. The twisted tensor product algebra A ⊗τ B is the vector space A ⊗ B together with multiplication mτ given by such a twisting map τ. Let P•(M) be an A-projective resolution of M and P•(N) be a B-projective resolution of N = ⇒ Construct a projective resolution Y• of A ⊗τ B-modules from P•(M) and P•(N)??

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolution (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16)

Let A and B be associative k-algebras. A twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B is a bijective k-linear map that respects the identity and multiplication maps of A and of B. The twisted tensor product algebra A ⊗τ B is the vector space A ⊗ B together with multiplication mτ given by such a twisting map τ. Let P•(M) be an A-projective resolution of M and P•(N) be a B-projective resolution of N = ⇒ Construct a projective resolution Y• of A ⊗τ B-modules from P•(M) and P•(N)?? Twisted tensor product resolution: (Shepler-Witherspoon ’16) introduced some compatibility conditions that are sufficient for constructing a projective resolution Y• = Tot(P•(M) ⊗ P•(N)) of M ⊗ N as a module over A ⊗τ B.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

H = B(V )#kCq ∼ = (A ⊗τ B) ⊗µ C. A = k[x]/(xp), B = k[y]/(y p), C = k[w]/(w q).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

H = B(V )#kCq ∼ = (A ⊗τ B) ⊗µ C. A = k[x]/(xp), B = k[y]/(y p), C = k[w]/(w q). The twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B: τ(y r ⊗ xℓ) =

r

  • t=0

r t ℓ(ℓ + 1)(ℓ + 2) · · · (ℓ + t − 1) 2t xℓ+t ⊗ y r−t.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

H = B(V )#kCq ∼ = (A ⊗τ B) ⊗µ C. A = k[x]/(xp), B = k[y]/(y p), C = k[w]/(w q). The twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B: τ(y r ⊗ xℓ) =

r

  • t=0

r t ℓ(ℓ + 1)(ℓ + 2) · · · (ℓ + t − 1) 2t xℓ+t ⊗ y r−t. Let PA

  • (k) : · · ·

xp−1· A x·

A

xp−1· A x·

A

ε

k 0,

PB

  • (k) : · · ·

yp−1· B y·

B

yp−1· B y·

B

ε

k 0.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

H = B(V )#kCq ∼ = (A ⊗τ B) ⊗µ C. A = k[x]/(xp), B = k[y]/(y p), C = k[w]/(w q). The twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B: τ(y r ⊗ xℓ) =

r

  • t=0

r t ℓ(ℓ + 1)(ℓ + 2) · · · (ℓ + t − 1) 2t xℓ+t ⊗ y r−t. Let PA

  • (k) : · · ·

xp−1· A x·

A

xp−1· A x·

A

ε

k 0,

PB

  • (k) : · · ·

yp−1· B y·

B

yp−1· B y·

B

ε

k 0. The total complex: K• := Tot(PA

  • (k) ⊗ PB
  • (k)) with differential

dn =

  • i+j=n

(di ⊗ 1 + (−1)i ⊗ dj).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

H = B(V )#kCq ∼ = (A ⊗τ B) ⊗µ C. A = k[x]/(xp), B = k[y]/(y p), C = k[w]/(w q). The twisting map τ : B ⊗ A → A ⊗ B: τ(y r ⊗ xℓ) =

r

  • t=0

r t ℓ(ℓ + 1)(ℓ + 2) · · · (ℓ + t − 1) 2t xℓ+t ⊗ y r−t. Let PA

  • (k) : · · ·

xp−1· A x·

A

xp−1· A x·

A

ε

k 0,

PB

  • (k) : · · ·

yp−1· B y·

B

yp−1· B y·

B

ε

k 0. The total complex: K• := Tot(PA

  • (k) ⊗ PB
  • (k)) with differential

dn =

  • i+j=n

(di ⊗ 1 + (−1)i ⊗ dj). (K•, d) is a resolution of k over A ⊗τ B. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗ B, k) ∼ = H∗(A, k) ⊗ H∗(B, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

Kn =

i+j=n

PA

i (k) ⊗ PB j (k) ∼

=

  • i+j=n

(A ⊗τ B) φij. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗τ B, k).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

Kn =

i+j=n

PA

i (k) ⊗ PB j (k) ∼

=

  • i+j=n

(A ⊗τ B) φij. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗τ B, k). K• is Cq = g-equivariant.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

Kn =

i+j=n

PA

i (k) ⊗ PB j (k) ∼

=

  • i+j=n

(A ⊗τ B) φij. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗τ B, k). K• is Cq = g-equivariant.

P

kCq

  • (k) : · · · kCq

(g−1)· kCq (q−1

s=0 gs)·

kCq

(g−1)· kCq ε

k 0. Twisted tensor resolution Y• := Tot(K• ⊗ PkCq

  • (k)) with twisted chain map

µ• : kCq ⊗ K• → K• ⊗ kCq given by the Cq-action.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

Kn =

i+j=n

PA

i (k) ⊗ PB j (k) ∼

=

  • i+j=n

(A ⊗τ B) φij. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗τ B, k). K• is Cq = g-equivariant.

P

kCq

  • (k) : · · · kCq

(g−1)· kCq (q−1

s=0 gs)·

kCq

(g−1)· kCq ε

k 0. Twisted tensor resolution Y• := Tot(K• ⊗ PkCq

  • (k)) with twisted chain map

µ• : kCq ⊗ K• → K• ⊗ kCq given by the Cq-action. Described all Hn(B(V )#kCq, k) as k-vector space. Found ξw, ξx, ξy ∈ H2(B(V )#kCq, k), needed permanent cocycles.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Twisted tensor product resolutions over B(V )#kCq

Kn =

i+j=n

PA

i (k) ⊗ PB j (k) ∼

=

  • i+j=n

(A ⊗τ B) φij. H∗(K•) = H∗(A ⊗τ B, k). K• is Cq = g-equivariant.

P

kCq

  • (k) : · · · kCq

(g−1)· kCq (q−1

s=0 gs)·

kCq

(g−1)· kCq ε

k 0. Twisted tensor resolution Y• := Tot(K• ⊗ PkCq

  • (k)) with twisted chain map

µ• : kCq ⊗ K• → K• ⊗ kCq given by the Cq-action. Described all Hn(B(V )#kCq, k) as k-vector space. Found ξw, ξx, ξy ∈ H2(B(V )#kCq, k), needed permanent cocycles.

Theorem (N-Wang-Witherspoon ’17)

H∗(B(V )#kCq, k) is finitely generated as a k-algebra.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y. T = {tips}, reduced words (monomials) whose all proper subwords are irreducible; T ← → relations (I).

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y. T = {tips}, reduced words (monomials) whose all proper subwords are irreducible; T ← → relations (I). R = {all proper prefixes (left factors) of the tips}.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y. T = {tips}, reduced words (monomials) whose all proper subwords are irreducible; T ← → relations (I). R = {all proper prefixes (left factors) of the tips}. (Cojocaru-Ufnarovski ’97): Quiver Q = Q(B, T ): – Vertices: {1} ∪ R. – Arrows: 1 → v for v ∈ B and all f → g for f , g ∈ R where gf uniquely contains a tip as a prefix.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y. T = {tips}, reduced words (monomials) whose all proper subwords are irreducible; T ← → relations (I). R = {all proper prefixes (left factors) of the tips}. (Cojocaru-Ufnarovski ’97): Quiver Q = Q(B, T ): – Vertices: {1} ∪ R. – Arrows: 1 → v for v ∈ B and all f → g for f , g ∈ R where gf uniquely contains a tip as a prefix. In each homological degree n of the Anick resolution, define a free basis Cn = {all paths of length n starting from 1 in Q}.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Tool 2: Anick resolution (Anick ’86)

H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) = T(V )/(I). B = {w, x, y}, a basis of V with the ordering w < x < y. T = {tips}, reduced words (monomials) whose all proper subwords are irreducible; T ← → relations (I). R = {all proper prefixes (left factors) of the tips}. (Cojocaru-Ufnarovski ’97): Quiver Q = Q(B, T ): – Vertices: {1} ∪ R. – Arrows: 1 → v for v ∈ B and all f → g for f , g ∈ R where gf uniquely contains a tip as a prefix. In each homological degree n of the Anick resolution, define a free basis Cn = {all paths of length n starting from 1 in Q}. The differentials d are defined recursively, with a simultaneous recursive definition of a contracting homotopy s: · · ·

d3 H ⊗ kC2 s2

  • d2 H ⊗ kC1

s1

  • d1

H

s0

  • ε

k

η

  • 0.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

Example (H = H(ǫ, µ, τ) ∼ = kw, x, y subject to)

w 3 = 0, x3 = ǫx, y 3 = −ǫy 2 − (µǫ − τ − µ2)y, yw − wy = wx + x − (µ − ǫ)(w 2 + w), xw − wx = ǫ(w 2 + w), yx − xy = −x2 + (µ + ǫ)x + ǫy − τ(w 2 − w), with ǫ ∈ {0, 1} and τ, µ ∈ k. 1

  • w
  • x
  • y
  • w 2
  • x2
  • y 2
  • Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon

Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

1

  • w
  • x
  • y
  • w2
  • x2
  • y2
  • C1 = {w, x, y} = B,

C2 = {w 3, x3, y 3, xw, yw, yx} = T , C3 = {w 3+1, x3+1, y 3+1, xw 3, yw 3, yx3, x3w, y 3w, y 3x, yxw}.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

1

  • w
  • x
  • y
  • w2
  • x2
  • y2
  • C1 = {w, x, y} = B,

C2 = {w 3, x3, y 3, xw, yw, yx} = T , C3 = {w 3+1, x3+1, y 3+1, xw 3, yw 3, yx3, x3w, y 3w, y 3x, yxw}.

Define differentials, · · ·

d3

H ⊗ kC2

s2

  • d2 H ⊗ kC1

s1

  • d1

H

s0

  • ε

k

η

  • 0.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

1

  • w
  • x
  • y
  • w2
  • x2
  • y2
  • C1 = {w, x, y} = B,

C2 = {w 3, x3, y 3, xw, yw, yx} = T , C3 = {w 3+1, x3+1, y 3+1, xw 3, yw 3, yx3, x3w, y 3w, y 3x, yxw}.

Define differentials, · · ·

d3

H ⊗ kC2

s2

  • d2 H ⊗ kC1

s1

  • d1

H

s0

  • ε

k

η

  • 0.

= ⇒ Found ξw, ξx, ξy ∈ H2(H(ǫ, µ, τ), k), needed permanent cocycles.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

1

  • w
  • x
  • y
  • w2
  • x2
  • y2
  • C1 = {w, x, y} = B,

C2 = {w 3, x3, y 3, xw, yw, yx} = T , C3 = {w 3+1, x3+1, y 3+1, xw 3, yw 3, yx3, x3w, y 3w, y 3x, yxw}.

Define differentials, · · ·

d3

H ⊗ kC2

s2

  • d2 H ⊗ kC1

s1

  • d1

H

s0

  • ε

k

η

  • 0.

= ⇒ Found ξw, ξx, ξy ∈ H2(H(ǫ, µ, τ), k), needed permanent cocycles.

Theorem (N-Wang-Witherspoon ’17)

H∗(H(ǫ, µ, τ), k) is finitely generated as a k-algebra.

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Anick resolution for some liftings H = H(ǫ, µ, τ)

d2(1 ⊗ w3) = w2 ⊗ w, d2(1 ⊗ x3) = x2 ⊗ x − ǫ ⊗ x, d2(1 ⊗ y3) = y2 ⊗ y + ǫy ⊗ y + (µǫ − τ − µ2) ⊗ y, d2(1 ⊗ xw) = x ⊗ w − w ⊗ x − ǫw ⊗ w − ǫ ⊗ w, d2(1 ⊗ yw) = y ⊗ w − w ⊗ y − w ⊗ x − 1 ⊗ x + (µ − ǫ)w ⊗ w + (µ − ǫ) ⊗ w, d2(1 ⊗ yx) = y ⊗ x − x ⊗ y + x ⊗ x − (µ + ǫ) ⊗ x − ǫ ⊗ y + τw ⊗ w − τ ⊗ w. d3(1 ⊗ w4) = w ⊗ w3, d3(1 ⊗ x4) = x ⊗ x3, d3(1 ⊗ y4) = y ⊗ y3, d3(1 ⊗ xw3) = x ⊗ w3 − w2 ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ x3w) = x2 ⊗ xw + w ⊗ x3 + ǫwx ⊗ xw + ǫx ⊗ xw + ǫw ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ yw3) = y ⊗ w3 − w2 ⊗ yw + w2 ⊗ xw + w ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ yxw) = y ⊗ xw − x ⊗ yw + w ⊗ yx + ǫw ⊗ yw + x ⊗ xw + (µ + ǫ)w ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ y3w) = y2 ⊗ yw + w ⊗ y3 + wy ⊗ yx + wx ⊗ yx + (ǫ − µ)wy ⊗ yw +(µ − ǫ)wx ⊗ yw − τw2 ⊗ yw + y ⊗ yx − (ǫ + µ)y ⊗ yw +τw2 ⊗ xw + x ⊗ yx + (µ − ǫ)x ⊗ yw + (µ2 − ǫµ)w ⊗ yw + τw ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ yx3) = y ⊗ x3 − x2 ⊗ yx + τwx ⊗ xw + ǫx ⊗ yx − τx ⊗ xw + ǫτw ⊗ xw, d3(1 ⊗ y3x) = y2 ⊗ yx + x ⊗ y3 − xy ⊗ yx − τwx ⊗ yw − τwy ⊗ yw +τw2 ⊗ yx + τwx ⊗ xw + ǫτw2 ⊗ yw + (ǫτ + µτ)w2 ⊗ xw +µy ⊗ yx + τy ⊗ yw − µx ⊗ yx + τx ⊗ xw +τw ⊗ yx + (ǫτ + µτ)w ⊗ yw + ǫτw ⊗ xw. Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Recap – The Menu

F.g. of cohomology rings of (Hopf) algebras? p2q-dim Hopf algebra B(V )#kCq 27-dim Hopf algebra H(ǫ, µ, τ) Tool 1: Twisted tensor product resolutions Tool 2: Anick resolutions Other algebras? Other tools?

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018

slide-52
SLIDE 52

References

  • D. J. Anick, On the homology of associative algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 296

(1986), no. 2, 641–659.

  • S. Cojocaru and V. Ufnarovski, BERGMAN under MS-DOS and Anick’s resolution,

Discrete Math. Theoretical Comp. Sci. 1 (1997), 139–147.

  • E. Friedlander and A. Suslin, Cohomology of finite group schemes over a field,
  • Invent. Math., 127 (1997), no. 2, 209–270.
  • J. P. May, The cohomology of restricted Lie algebras and of Hopf algebras, J.

Algebra 3 (1966), 123–146.

  • V. C. Nguyen and X. Wang, Pointed p3-dimensional Hopf algebras in positive

characteristic, to appear in Alg. Colloq., arXiv:1609.03952.

  • A. V. Shepler and S. Witherspoon, Resolutions for twisted tensor products, preprint,

arXiv:1610.00583.

Thank You!

Nguyen*–Wang–Witherspoon Finite generation of cohomology Auslander Conference - April 29, 2018