09/06/2010 1
Markku Oksanen & Niclas Lindgren
Independent Conceptual Study
- Exploring a new Financial and Funding Model for AIT -
FINAL REPORT executive summary Markku Oksanen & Niclas Lindgren - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Independent Conceptual Study - Exploring a new Financial and Funding Model for AIT - FINAL REPORT executive summary Markku Oksanen & Niclas Lindgren 09/06/2010 1 The components of the study Background studies: Landscape of higher
09/06/2010 1
09/06/2010 09/06/2010 2
3
– Government programs and policies for investment into higher education => the national
higher education sectors will develop
– The need for higher education on all levels is increasing with socio-economic
development (undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate) - enrollments are expected to double in five years in many countries
– The market potential is increasing rapidly – The need for private education is increasing
– International and renown universities establish branch campuses at an increasing
speed both in number and size
– Higher education becomes business – global players emerge on the market
– As national HE systems develop and high-profile universities establish themselves
regionally, the need for the student to travel decreases
– Still: Student mobility is expected to rise from 2,7 million students studying abroad in
2006 to 7,2 million students by 2025
4
INDIA IRAN MALAYSIA BANGLADESH NEPAL CHINA KOREA MYANMAR LAO PDR PHILIPPINES PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN SRI LANKA BHUTAN CAMBODIA VIETNAM INDONESIA JAPAN TAIWAN MONGOLIA KAZAKHSTAN KYRGYZSTAN UZBEKISTAN
09/06/2010 09/06/2010 5
CRITERIA
INDIA BANGLADESH NEPAL CHINA LAO PDR PAKISTAN SRI LANKA VIETNAM INDONESIA CAMBODIA
MOTIVATION
country profiles
Vietnam Indonesia India Nepal Pakistan
09/06/2010 7
8
– AIT was the first choice of the students (50 %) – Academic program was the main reason to come to AIT (18%) among several other
reasons
– AIT should retain its original mission (80%) – AIT should offer both undergraduate and graduate programs (67%) – Undergraduate programs will dilute AIT’s brand (51%) – I am supporting the PPP model (66 %)
– AIT was my first choice (73 %) but I could not come due to lack of financing (76%)
– AIT should retain its original mission (72%) – AIT should offer both BSc and MSc programs (58%) – BSc programs will improve AIT’s brand (47%) and they should be offered both in Thailand
and in the satellites (52 %)
9
–
Laureate is the biggest global university (600.000 students)
–
High-profile investors and associations (e.g. Harvard, Mandela, Clinton..)
–
Laureate can have several roles and the roles are defined case-by-case
–
Laureate strives for control
–
Laureate brings a management model where corporate management and academic leadership are separated from each other
–
Laureate provides generous funds for investment
–
Tuition fees the main source of income – profits are both reinvested and, as indicated by universities, paid as dividends
–
Professional student marketing and enrollment (“sales management”)
–
Laureate focuses primarily on undergraduate education and on applied research
–
Market driven and active development of academic offering
–
High tuition fees, motivated by market driven programs and student centered campuses – high quality education with high employability
–
Provides mobility of faculty and students in the Laureate global network
–
Implementing any one of the studied Laureate-models at AIT is not to be recommended
–
Laureate could be one of several partners in our proposed AIT-funding model
10
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
TOTAL REVENUES TOTAL EXPENSES NET EXCESS OF REVENUE
11
Year MBaht
12
13
The model must be in-line with the new charter and AIT will remain non-profit
The model must be in-line with the vision and strategy recently developed
The model must be self- sustainable and cannot be based on charity
The model must be implementable from an academic, a financial and a timetable point of view
14
15
Highlights
funding
and diversity
strategic development, not on developing the network
multiple fronts simultaneously with multiple implementation models
Lowlights
lacks
investments in order to cover possible long run processes for start up of satellites (and hence academic fee revenue stream )
with high global status
AIT-share (%) of each contract
model
enhance internationality (else: model 4)
making – impact on management model?
17
18
Owns: 100%
Global/local business partner(s)
Ownership depending on selected model (BTO, BOT…) Possible ownership BOT-/BTO-scenarios
Global/local business partner(s)
THE STUDENT
Bangkok HQ
Scholarships (Masters, Doctorate) Tuition fees (Masters, Doctorate) Tuition fees (Satellite) University services Service fee for university services Return on investment depending on selected model (BTO, BOT..)
Governments & private donors
(incl. alumni)
Donations
HQ in Bangkok
FOUNDATION
COUNCIL
“Board of Trustees”
CHAIRMAN
Foundation board
CHAIRMAN PRESIDENT AIT FUNDS, each with its own mission
ExCom
University management team
Competence area Competence area Competence area Competence area
VP VP VP VP Fund manager For each competence area:
Academic co-ordination and quality assurance process
* Program development * Quality assurance * Resource sharing Academic council
VP << separate academic council for each competence area run by the VP of the CA Competence areas Programs
Satellite(s)
MD MD MD
Spun-off units
21
–
Should be planned in more detail when the model and its main principles are agreed
1.
Review and recommendation on specific Funding Model for Board approval in the Excom meeting
2.
Preliminary legal evaluation of the selected model(s), possibly fine-tuning the model(s)
3.
AIT Board (06/2010): preliminary decision on model and its general principles
4.
Identification and initial negotiations of potential pilot case(s) and partners
5.
Analyzing the implications of pilot negotiations
6.
Development of internal organizational structure, management model, processes
7.
AIT Board (11/2010): final decision on model and its general principles
8.
Starting implementation of pilots
9.
Development of more detailed roadmap for regional expansion
starts
2012 -2020
”approval
model” ”preliminary selection of model”
2011
22
Fine tuning of model
2010
Strategy &
06/2010 11/2010 Gate 1 Gate 2
AIT BOARD AIT
”approval
xx/2011 Gate 3 Pilot case(s) & negotiations Implementation of pilot(s) Implementation of expansion (according to plan)
”start expansion”
xx/2011 Gate 4
Internal development of AIT (management model, internal organization , ways of working…)
”follow-up”
xx/2011 Gate 5 Prepa- rations
SUGGESTED IMPLEMENTATION PHASING OF MODELS