FA FASB SB St State tement No. o. 157 57 Fair ir Value lue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fa fasb sb st state tement no o 157 57 fair ir value lue
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FA FASB SB St State tement No. o. 157 57 Fair ir Value lue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FA FASB SB St State tement No. o. 157 57 Fair ir Value lue Me Measurement surements John R. Null July 16, 2009 Objec bjectiv tives Overview of fair value Valuation techniques and guidance Specific application to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FA FASB SB St State tement No.

  • . 157

57 – Fair ir Value lue Me Measurement surements

John R. Null July 16, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Objec bjectiv tives

  • Overview of fair value
  • Valuation techniques and guidance
  • Specific application to non-profits
  • Disclosure requirements and examples
  • Planning and other considerations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Overview iew of

  • f SF

SFAS AS 15 157

  • Effective for fiscal years beginning after

November15, 2007

  • Applies to financial and nonfinancial assets

and liabilities measured at fair value

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Overview iew of

  • f SF

SFAS AS 15 157 (cont.

t.)

  • The goal of SFAS 157 is to improve financial

reporting by:

– Providing a common definition of fair value

  • Almost 70 FASB pronouncements that require or allow fair

value measurement

– Establish a framework for measuring fair value – Expand disclosures on use of fair value measurements – Create principles-based standard

  • Increase transparency
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Eff ffectiv tive Date te

  • Financial assets/liabilities and nonfinancial

assets/liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis - effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2007.

  • Other nonfinancial assets/liabilities -

effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2008.

  • Primarily applied prospectively as of the

beginning of the fiscal year in which the statement is initially applied.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

De Defi finition nition of

  • f Fair

ir Valu lue

  • “Fair value is the price that would be

received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”

  • Fair value is an exi

xit price. Previously, fair value generally thought to be an entry price

  • what a company would pay to acquire an

asset

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Keys to to Fair ir Value lue Me Measurement surement

  • Measurement assumes an orderly transaction

in the principal or most advantageous market

– Market with the greatest volume or level of activity in which an entity could sell an asset

  • r transfer a liability
  • Fair value should reflect the highest and best

use from a market participant perspective, regardless of management’s intended use

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Valu luation tion Te Techn hnique iques un unde der FA FAS 15 157

  • Market Approach – uses prices and other relevant

information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities

  • Income Approach – uses valuation techniques to

convert future amounts to a single present amount

– Discounted cash flows – Swaps

  • Cost Approach- based on the amount that

currently would be required to replace the service capacity of the asset

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Fair ir Value lue Hi Hiera rarch rchy

Fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair

  • value. Valuation techniques should maximize

the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

– Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

  • Example – Stock Prices
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Fair ir Value lue Hi Hiera rarch rchy (co

cont. t.) – Level 2 – Inputs that are directly or indirectly

  • bservable in the marketplace
  • Examples - matrix pricing, yield curves

– Level 3 – Unobservable information

  • Examples – Company’s internal information,

investment manager information for private placement, private equity or hedge funds

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Goo Good or Bad? d? There is no formula for calculating fair

  • value. Judgment plays a role in the

fair value measurement and level determination.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Appli Applicabili bility to to Non-

  • n-Prof

rofits its

  • Certain statements that are specific to Non-

Profits:

– Statement 116 (Contributions) – Statement 124 (Marketable Securities) – Statement 136 (Beneficial Interests) – Statement 159 (Contributions Receivable, Split- Interest Obligations, etc.) – Statement 164 (NFP mergers and acquisitions)

  • In addition to the many other general GAAP

standards that apply to Non-Profits

– Asset impairments, derivatives, pension assets, etc.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

In Investm stment nt Co Considera iderations ions

  • Determination Level Reports can be

provided from custodians/investment advisors to assist in determining the levels.

  • Custodians should also provide a client

communication package detailing the valuation process utilized regarding their methodology on the level determination.

  • Are there any restrictions? If so, consider

Level 3 inputs.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Al Alte terna rnati tive In Investm stment nt Co Consi nside derations tions

  • Primary issue: Does the Net Asset Value (NAV)

constitute fair value presentation?

– Presently, it is common for investors to estimate the fair value of investments using the net asset value per share without additional adjustment – Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds

  • Proposed guidance FSP FAS 157-g

– Final comments due July 8, 2009 – When issued will be effective immediately

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Co Cont ntri ribut utions ions Re Receiv ivable ble

  • If expected to be collected in less than one

year, may be measured at net realizable value as this is a reasonable estimate of fair value

  • If expected to be collected greater than one

year, income approach is appropriate

– Present Value Techniques

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Split Split –Int nterest rest Agree reement nts

Generally:

– Assets are typically cash or marketable investments and are fairly straightforward to determine measurement – Liabilities – income approach used

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Di Disclos sclosure ure Re Requiremen quirements ts

  • Fair value measurement on the reporting

date

  • Level within fair value hierarchy each

measurement falls

  • A description of the valuation techniques

used to measure fair value

  • Discussion of any changes in fair value

measurement which occurred throughout the period

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Di Disclos sclosure ure Re Requiremen quirements ts (co

cont. t.) Level 3 disclosures have expanded requirements:

– Reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements including the following:

  • Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses
  • Changes in Unrealized Gains and Losses
  • Purchases, Sales, Issuances and Net Settlements
  • Fair Value items that transfer in or out of Level 3

classification

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Di Disclos sclosure ure Example ple

Effective the beginning of 2008, the Company implemented FAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for its measurement and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The adoption

  • f FAS 157 did not have an impact on the measurement on the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, but did

result in additional disclosure. FAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 requires disclosures that categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. The FAS 157 fair value hierarchy is defined as follows: Level 1 - Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical assets

  • r liabilities.

Level 2 - Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,

  • r quoted prices in markets that are not active for which significant inputs are observable, either

directly or indirectly. Level 3 - Valuations are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Di Disclos sclosure ure Example ple (co

cont. t.)

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, contributions receivable, investments, accounts payable and long-term borrowings. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, contributions receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The fair value of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2008 is as follows: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Investments $ 10,000,000 $

  • $

2,000,000 $ 12,000,000 ` Total assets at fair value $ 10,000,000 $

  • $

2,000,000 $ 12,000,000 Liabilities: Long-term borrowings $ 2,000,000 $ 11,000,000 $

  • $ 13,000,000

Total liabilities $ 2,000,000 $ 11,000,000 $

  • $ 13,000,000

The fair value of investments categorized as Level 1 are based on quoted market prices for identical securities traded in active markets that are readily and regularly available to the Company.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Di Disclos sclosure ure Example ple (co

cont. t.)

The valuation of the Company’s investments in limited partnerships requires significant judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, heavy reliance on Level 3 inputs, and the long-term nature of such investments. Limited partnership investments are valued initially at their transaction value, and subsequently adjusted to reflect expected exit values at the measurement date by utilizing assumptions that market participants would normally use in estimating a fair market value. These valuation adjustments include, but are not limited to, material changes in a company’s operations and or financial performance, subsequent or anticipated rounds of equity financings, specific rights or terms associated with the investment (e.g., conversion features, liquidation preferences or restrictions), expected exit timing and strategy, industry valuations

  • r comparable public companies, changes in economic conditions, and changes in legal or regulatory

environments. The changes in investments measured at fair value for which the Company has used Level 3 inputs to determine fair value are as follows: Balance, June 30, 2008 $ 3,000,000 Purchases 2,000,000 Realized loss, net (1,000,000) Unrealized depreciation, net (2,000,000) Balance, June 30, 2009 $ 2,000,000

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Di Disclos sclosure ure Examples ples (cont.

t.)

The carrying value of the Company’s long-term borrowings for its line of credit agreement approximates fair value at June 30, 2009, since the interest rates are market-based and are generally adjusted periodically, represent Level 1 measurements. The remaining long-term borrowings primarily contain interest rates that are fixed and market-based. The fair value of these borrowings are based on inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, which represent a Level 2 in the FASB hierarchy.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Exp xpect your Au Auditors to do or ask the the fol

  • llow
  • wing:
  • Does management have a documented

process for determining fair value, particularly for alternative investments?

  • Test management’s assumptions

– Are they reasonable and consistent with market information? If assistance is coming from third parties, are they competent?

  • Develop an independent estimate of fair

value to corroborate management’s measurement.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Exp xpect your Au Auditors to do or ask the the fol

  • llow
  • wing:
  • Ensure levels are appropriate based upon

the valuation methodologies used.

  • How are prices determined? How recent is

the pricing data? Is there a review process to ensure pricing is accurate?

  • Compare prior year fair value

measurements to actual results to determine reliability of management’s assumptions.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Oth ther Conside

  • nsidera

rations tions

  • FASB’s continued efforts to improve

transparency and provide necessary implementation guidance

  • Regulatory reform
  • Convergence with international

standards/IFRS

  • Economy in general, including liquidity

concerns

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Plann nnin ing Co Consi nside derations/Act tions/Action ion Ite Items

  • BE PROACTIVE – communicate internally and

with auditors, custodians, fund managers and investment advisors

  • Prepare an inventory of existing financial

assets and liabilities along with corresponding fair value measurements

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Plann nnin ing Co Consi nside derations/Act tions/Action ion Ite Items

  • Determine and document valuation

methodology for assets/liabilities

  • Perform preliminary identification of

hierarchy inputs

  • Determine information needed for

disclosures, especially information needed for Level 3 inputs

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Questions ??

FA FASB SB St State tement No.

  • . 157

57