Extended Scalar Searches at ATLAS & CMS
Allison McCarn (University of Michigan) On behalf of the CMS and ATLAS Collaborations
!
Rencontres de Moriond EW 2016
1
Extended Scalar Searches at ATLAS & CMS Allison McCarn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Extended Scalar Searches at ATLAS & CMS Allison McCarn (University of Michigan) On behalf of the CMS and ATLAS Collaborations ! Rencontres de Moriond EW 2016 1 Beyond the Standard Model BSM physics was not observed in run-1, but there are
1
Two-Higgs Double Models (2HDM):
Additional Higgs Doublet gives rise to 5 Higgs bosons (H,h,A,H±)
Higgs Triplet:
An additional scalar triplet results in charged, doubly-charged, and neutral bosons.
2HDM+S: Two Higgs Doublets and an additional complex singlet (e.g. NMSSM) Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model: Higgs Sector is Type-II
common benchmark is hMSSM.
2
Electroweak Singlet (EWS): Additional singlet, resulting in 2 CP-even bosons.
3
with 7 and 8 TeV centre-of-mass energy at the LHC, but physics beyond the Standard Model has not yet been observed.
for the future of the LHC can be seen in the hMSSM overlay and prospect plots.
– Much parameter space is excluded, but there is still room for high mass Higgs to be found!
Djouadi et al: hMSSM (arXiv:1502.05653)
In 2015, ATLAS collected 3.2 fb-1 and CMS collected 2.8 fb-1 of data at 13 TeV!
This is already enough in many cases to exceed run-1 sensitivity!
H±àτν (13 TeV) H±àtb (8 TeV) φ±±φ±±àlllν/4l (8 TeV)
4
HàZZà4l (13 TeV) HàZZàllνν (13 TeV) Boosted Resonances (13 TeV) HàZZàllqq (13 TeV) ZH, Hàinv (13 TeV) XàZγ (13 TeV)
5
– CP-odd scalar a – CP-even s
6
Current channels include: hà2aà2b2μ (CMS-PAS-HIG-14-041) hà2aà4μ (CMS:Phys. Lett. B 752 (2016) 221) hà2aà2μ2τ (CMS-PAS-HIG-15-011, ATLAS:Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 052002) hà2aà4τ (CMS-PAS-HIG-14-022, CMS:JHEP 01 (2016) 079) hà2aà4γ (ATLAS:CERN-PH-EP-2015-187)
Summary plot of μ/τ channels
7
2 b-jets, 2 μ, ET
miss significance < 6
|Mbbμμ - 125|< 25 GeV
Signal Modeling: Weighted sum of Voigt profile and Crystal ball. Background Modeling: Polynomial functions, fit to mμμ in data.
5 final states: μμτeτe, μμτμτe, μμτhadτe, μμτhadτμ, μμτhadτhad
|Mττμμ - 125|< 25 GeV (Mμμ – Mττ)/Mμμ < 0.8 |Mvis
eeμμ- 125| > 15 GeV
Irreducible backgrounds from MC, reducible from data-driven methods.
CMS-PAS-HIG-14-041 CMS-PAS-HIG-15-011
8
Predicted in models with extended Higgs Sector (e.g. 2HDM):
✓ H± dominantly produced in association with a top quark.
✓ H±àtb is a dominant decay mode for heavy H±. Search in lepton+jets final state. Fit is performed on 5 regions:
had in 4 Control Regions: [4j(2b),
5j(2b), ≥6j(2b), 4j(≥3b)]
[GeV]
+H
m 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 tb) [pb] →
+
)xBR(H
+
tH → (gb σ
10 1 10
Observed limit (CLs) Expected limit (CLs) σ 1 ± σ 2 ± xBR=1.65 pb σ =300 GeV,
+ Hm
=0.5 β tan
mod- h
xBR m σ =0.7 β tan
mod- h
xBR m σ =0.9 β tan
mod- h
xBR m σ
ATLAS
=8 TeV, 20.3 fb s (tb)
+
tH → gb
ATLAS:CERN-PH-EP-2015-290
BDT includes Ht
had, lead jet pT, mbb of 2 b-jets
closest in ΔR, second Fox-Wolfram moment, and average ΔR between all b-jet pairs.
CMS: JHEP 11 (2015) 018
9
CMS-PAS-HIG-14-039
with a Higgs triplet.
associated production or pair-produced left-handed H±± into 3 or 4 leptons, respectively.
[GeV]
X
m
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
HH) [pb] → BR(X × X) → (pp σ
10
10 1 10
Observed 95% upper limit Expected 95% upper limit σ 1 ± Expected limit σ 2 ± Expected limit = 3 TeV)
R
Λ radion ( = 1 TeV)
R
Λ radion (
= 8 TeV s at
, 18.3 fb τ τ bb → CMS Preliminary, HH
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
[1/GeV]
HH
dN/dm
5 −
10
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1
τ τ bb → HH → X Observed τ τ → Z t t Electroweak Multijets SM Higgs Uncertainty
CMS Preliminary
(8 TeV)
18.3 fb
2jet2tag Resonant
[GeV]
HH
m
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Simulation Data - Simulation
1 2
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
[1/GeV]
HH
dN/dm
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
τ τ bb → HH → X Observed τ τ → Z t t Electroweak Multijets SM Higgs Uncertainty
CMS Preliminary
(8 TeV)
18.3 fb
2jet1tag Resonant
[GeV]
HH
m
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Simulation Data - Simulation
1 2
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
[1/GeV]
HH
dN/dm
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
τ τ bb → HH → X Observed τ τ → Z t t Electroweak Multijets SM Higgs Uncertainty
CMS Preliminary
(8 TeV)
18.3 fb
2jet0tag Resonant
[GeV]
HH
m
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Simulation Data - Simulation
1 2
10
CMS-PAS-HIG-15-013
ATLAS: Phys. Rev. D 92, 092004 (2015)
2 hadronic τhad and 2 jets 80 < mττ < 140 GeV and 80 < mjj < 170 GeV mHH calculated using a kinematic fit
Backgrounds Multi-jet: Data-driven methods Z/γ∗ àτhadτhad: Embedding of µµ data events Others: Simulation
Fit to three regions with 0, 1, or 2 b-tagged jets. See Seth Zenz’s talk for non-resonant analysis.
11
H± predicted in 2HDM/MSSM:
✓ H± dominantly produced in association with a top quark.
✓ H±àτν decay channel represents a clean signature and substantial BR (~10%) in several MSSM benchmarks.
CERN-PH-EP-2016-056
11
[GeV]
+
H
m 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 ) [pb] ν
+
τ →
+
BR(H × )
+
[b]tH → (pp σ
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 Observed (CLs) Expected (CLs) σ 1 ± σ 2 ± =60 β hMSSM tan
+
H ATLAS Preliminary
= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s
ET
miss trigger
≥3 jets including ≥1 b-tagged jet 1 τ and no e or μ ET
miss > 150 GeV
mT > 50 GeV
Backgrounds:
validated in CR)
V+jets, diboson: Shape from MC, norm. from data. ~5% of background.)
12
[GeV]
+
H
m 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Observed exclusion Expected exclusion
±
± Run 1 result Observed Expected
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s ; hMSSM scenario
H
CERN-PH-EP-2016-056
Final discriminant in both channels
Single lepton triggers 1 τ and 1 OS e/μ and Δφ(τ, e/μ ) > 2.4 MT(e/μ, MET) < 40 GeV or > 150 GeV In e-channel: mvis < 80 and > 110 GeV
Single τhad trigger 2 τhad with OS charge Δφ(τhad,1, τhad,2 ) > 2.7
Hàττ provides sensitivity in MSSM at high tanβ, and in 2HDM at the alignment limit. Analysis targets two channels with different τ decay modes.
14
ATLAS-CONF-2015-061
No evidence for BSM Higgs, but sensitivity already exceeds run-1.
15
✓ True τ backgrounds (e.g. Zàττ, tt) are taken from simulation.
✓ Jetàτ backgrounds (e.g. W+jets, multi-jets) are estimated using data-driven methods. ATLAS-CONF-2015-061 gluon fusion b-associated
16
hh production can be resonantly enhanced by many BSM models (Singlet, MSSM, etc.).
γγ signature.
in Max Bellomo’s talk tomorrow.
17
2γ within 105 < mγγ < 160 GeV 2 central jets within 95 < mjj < 135 GeV 2 (0) b-tag as SR (CR) at 85% efficiency bb 4-momenta scaled by mh/mbb |mγγ – mh| < 2σ(mγγ) Mbbγγ within window of 95% signal efficiency ATLAS-CONF-2016-004
See Seth Zenz’s talk for non- resonant analysis.
[GeV]
kinfit H
m
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
[1/GeV]
kinfit H
dN/dm
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
CMS
preliminary (13 TeV)
2.7 fb Data t t QCD Drell-Yan Other bkg.
= 800 GeV
H
m = 450 GeV
H
m = 300 GeV
H
m
hh) = 10 pb → BR (H × H) → (pp σ
h
τ bb e channel
[GeV]
kinfit H
m
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
[1/GeV]
kinfit H
dN/dm
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
CMS
preliminary (13 TeV)
2.7 fb Data t t QCD Drell-Yan Other bkg.
= 800 GeV
H
m = 450 GeV
H
m = 300 GeV
H
m
hh) = 10 pb → BR (H × H) → (pp σ
h
τ µ bb channel
18
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-013
Backgrounds
methods
regions.
[GeV]
H
m
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
) [pb] τ τ bb → hh → BR (H × H) → (pp σ 95% CL limit on
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
Observed CLs Expected CLs σ 1 ± Expected σ 2 ± Expected
CMS
preliminary (13 TeV)
2.7 fb
h
τ
h
τ + bb
h
τ + bb e
h
τ µ bb combined channels
[GeV]
kinfit H
m
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
[1/GeV]
kinfit H
dN/dm
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
CMS
preliminary (13 TeV)
2.7 fb Data t t QCD Drell-Yan Other bkg.
= 800 GeV
H
m = 450 GeV
H
m = 300 GeV
H
m
hh) = 10 pb → BR (H × H) → (pp σ
h
τ
h
τ bb channel
Backgrounds
methods
regions.
19
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-013
See Seth Zenz’s talk for non- resonant analysis.
20
GeV
X
m
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
σ(gg→ X→ ZZ→ 4)fb
1 10
2
10
Preliminary CMS
(13 TeV)
2.8 fb
Observed 95% CLs Γ=0, expected ± 1 sd. Γ=0, expected ± 2 sd. Γ = 5 GeV Γ = 20 GeV Γ = 40 GeV
The 4l final state gives a clean signature with low background, predicted in EWS and 2HDM. The search is for a resonance of mH = 140 (200)-1000 GeV for CMS (ATLAS).
21
ATLAS-CONF-2015-059 CMS-PAS-HIG-15-004
[GeV]
S
m 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 )[fb] l 4 → ZZ → BR(S × σ 95% Limit on 1 10
2
10
Expected Observed σ 1 ± σ 2 ±
ATLAS Preliminary
13 TeV, 3.2 fb
l 4 → ZZ → S
22
CMS-PAS-HIG-15-004
(GeV)
H
m
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
β tan
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4l (HIG-15-004) → ZZ → H Non-perturbative region
(13 TeV)
2.8 fb )=0.1 α
2HDM Type I, cos( + 100 GeV
H
= m
±
H
= m
A
m
CMS
Preliminary (GeV)
H
m
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
β tan
0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4l (HIG-15-004) → ZZ → H Non-perturbative region
(13 TeV)
2.8 fb )=0.1 α
2HDM Type II, cos( + 100 GeV
H
= m
±
H
= m
A
m
CMS
Preliminary
Events / 40 GeV
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
Data t t Z + jets WZ ZZ → qq Single Top ZZ → gg WW Triboson VV t V+t t t W + jets
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13TeV, 3.2 fb s 3l control region
[GeV]
miss T
E
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Data/SM Pred.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Missing transverse energy [GeV]
100 200 300 400 500
Events / GeV
3 −10
2 −10
1 −10 1 10
210
310
410
510
610
710 data
Top/W/WW ZVV WZ ZZ ggH(400) qqH(400) ggH(750) qqH(750) ggH(1000) qqH(1000)
Syst + Stat. 100 200 300 400 500
Bkg. Σ Data/
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
(13 TeV)
2.3 fb
CMS
Preliminary
23
Searching for an additional scalar boson, as predicted in EWS/2HDM. The search is for a narrow resonance of mH = 300-1000 GeV (ATLAS) or 200-1500 GeV (CMS).
Backgrounds
✓ ZZ/WZ: From simulation, WZ scaled using data- driven methods (ATLAS) ✓ Others: Predicted using data-driven methods.
ATLAS:WZ Control Region CMS: Data-driven Z+jets prediction
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-001
6
24
Event Selection
2 same flavor, opposite sign charge leptons 76 < mll < 106 GeV and ET
miss > 120 GeV
ΔRll < 1.8 and Δφ(Z, ET
miss) > 2.7
Fractional pT difference < 0.2 Δφ(jet (pT > 100 GeV), ET
miss) > 0.4
ZPT/MT < 0.7 and no b-jet
Final Discriminant:
[GeV]
H
m 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ZZ) [fb] → * BR(H
ggF
σ 95% Limit on 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
Expected Median σ 1 ± Expected σ 2 ± Expected Observed
ATLAS Preliminary
13TeV, 3.2 fb
ν ν ll → ZZ → H
Events / 50 GeV
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
Data ggF H (300 GeV) ggF H (600 GeV) ggF H (1000 GeV) ZZ → qq WZ ZZ → gg )+jets µ µ Z(ee/ )+jets/WW τ τ /Wt/Z( t t Triboson VV t V/t t t Fake Lepton
⊕ Stat.
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13TeV, 3.2 fb s ν ν ll → ZZ → H
[GeV]
ZZ T
m
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Data/SM Pred.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
6
25
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-001
Event Selection 2 same flavor, opposite sign charge leptons ET
miss > 125 GeV and Δφ(nearest jet, ET miss) > 0.5
No b-tagged jets
3 Signal Region Categories: VBF: ≥ 2 forward jets with |Δη| > 4 and m > 500 GeV. ≥ 1 jets: at least 1 jet, fails VBF = 0 jets: No jets.
Final Discriminant:
– For details of the analyses, see Max Bellomo’s talk Thursday.
26
ATLAS-CONF-2015-075 ATLAS-CONF-2015-071 ATLAS-CONF-2015-068 HàWWàlνqq HàWWàlνqq
27
Merged Analysis
2 same flavor leptons and 1 large-R jet (pT > 200 GeV) consistent with Z decay PT(ll) > 0.3mll
Resolved Analysis
2 same flavor leptons and 2 small-R jets consistent with Z decay
Two categories: 2 and <2 b-tagged jets
10−3 10−2 10−1 1.0 101 102 103 Events / GeV ATLAS Preliminary √s = 13 TeV, 3.2 fb−1 X → ZZ → ``qq Merged SR Data NWA H (750 GeV) Z + jets SM Diboson Top Quarks Stat.LSyst. Uncert. Pre-fit background 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 m(``J) [GeV] 0.5 1.0 1.5 Data/Pred 10−3 10−2 10−1 1.0 101 102 103 104 Events / GeV ATLAS Preliminary √s = 13 TeV, 3.2 fb−1 X → ZZ → ``qq Untagged Resolved SR Data NWA H (750 GeV) Z + jets Top Quarks SM Diboson Stat.LSyst. Uncert. Pre-fit background 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 m(``jj) [GeV] 0.5 1.0 1.5 Data/Pred 10−3 10−2 10−1 1.0 101 102 103 Events / GeV ATLAS Preliminary √s = 13 TeV, 3.2 fb−1 X → ZZ → ``qq Tagged Resolved SR Data NWA H (750 GeV) Z + jets Top Quarks SM Diboson Stat.LSyst. Uncert. Pre-fit background 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 m(``jj) [GeV] 0.5 1.0 1.5 Data/Pred
[GeV]
H
m 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ZZ) [pb] → BR(H × H) → (gg σ 95% C.L. limit
1 −
10 1 10
NWA H Observed (CLs) NWA H Expected (CLs) [5%] Observed (CLs)
H H H H H
[5%] Expected (CLs) [10%] Observed (CLs) [10%] Expected (CLs) [15%] Observed (CLs) [15%] Expected (CLs)
H
ΓH/m ΓH/m ΓH/m ΓH/m ΓH/m ΓH/m
llqq → ZZ → H
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s
28
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-008
Motivated by supersymmetry, search is for a scalar boson, H, with m=110-600 GeV, decaying to invisible particles.
Analysis Selection 2 same flavor OS e or μ |mll-mZ| < 15 GeV and pT
ll > 60 GeV
≤ 1 jet, no b-jets or soft muons ET
miss > 100 GeV, Δφ(ll, ET miss) > 2.8 and
|ET
miss - pT ll|/pT ll < 0.4
29
Analysis Strategy
1. 0/2-leptons 2. pT
Z < or > 500 GeV (defining the resolved/
boosted transition) 3. 1/2 b-tagged jets
lepton and for 0-lepton:
See talk in YSF4 by Carlo Pandini for more details. Dominant backgrounds of Z+jets and ttbar are validated and constrained in control regions. Signal Region
6
Limits on ggF and b-associated production from simultaneous binned-likelihood fit for signal and control regions.
30
6
Analysis Strategy
A signal region (S) is defined for each mA-mH hypothesis in the plane of mbb-mllbb
tt and Drell-Yan processes are corrected through a fit to data of the mll distribution for events not in S.
The final limit is calculated from the single bin of S.
31
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-010 Motivated by 2HDM with twisted custodial symmetry, which gives a heavier scalar H and a lighter pseudoscalar A boson.
32
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-010
Limits are set on cross section times branching ratio for three mH hypotheses, as a function of mA.
[GeV]
A
m
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
BR [fb] × σ
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
= 300 GeV
Hm Observed
sCL Expected
sCL 1 std. deviation ± 2 std. deviation ± = 0.5) β (tan
thσ = 1) β (tan
thσ = 1.5) β (tan
thσ
2HDM type-II ) = 0.01 α
cos(
(13 TeV)
2.3 fb
CMS
Preliminary
[GeV]
A
m
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
BR [fb] × σ
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
= 800 GeV
Hm Observed
sCL Expected
sCL 1 std. deviation ± 2 std. deviation ± = 1) β (tan
thσ = 1.5) β (tan
thσ 2HDM type-II ) = 0.01 α
cos(
(13 TeV)
2.3 fb
CMS
Preliminary
[GeV]
A
m
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
BR [fb] × σ
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
= 500 GeV
Hm Observed
sCL Expected
sCL 1 std. deviation ± 2 std. deviation ± = 1) β (tan
thσ = 1.5) β (tan
thσ 2HDM type-II ) = 0.01 α
cos(
(13 TeV)
2.3 fb
CMS
Preliminary
[GeV]
γ J
m
700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880 900
]
[GeV
γ J
1/N dN/dm
0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 q q → , Z γ Z → X → gg =800 GeV
X
m =13 TeV s
ATLAS Simulation Preliminary
33
ATLAS-CONF-2016-010
Analysis Strategy
–2 same flavor, opposite sign leptons consistent with Z.
–Jets reconstructed as a single large-radius jet with pT > 200 GeV.
mass as a final discriminant.
[GeV]
γ ee
m
700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880 900
]
[GeV
γ ee
1/N dN/dm
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 ee → , Z γ Z → X → gg =800 GeV
X
m =13 TeV s
ATLAS Simulation Preliminary
Leptonic Hadronic
34
ATLAS-CONF-2016-010
Background Modeling
production of Z+γ (leptonic) and γ +jets events (hadronic).
falling spectrum as a function of minv, parameterized as:
Largest deviation from background is 2σ at 350 GeV.
Observed limits range between 295 fb at mX = 340 GeV to 8.2 fb at mX = 2.15 TeV.
Events / 20 GeV
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
ATLAS Preliminary
=13 TeV, 3.2 fb s Data b Background-only fit,
[GeV]
γ J
m
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Data - b 20 − 10 − 10 20
[GeV]
X
m 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 ) [fb] γ Z → BR(X × X) → (pp σ 95% CL limit on 10
2
10
Observed Expected σ 1 ± Exp. σ 2 ± Exp. µ µ ee, → Z q q → Z
ATLAS Preliminary γ Z → X → pp
=13 TeV, 3.2 fb s
Events / 20 GeV
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
Data b Background-only fit,
ATLAS Preliminary
=13 TeV, 3.2 fb s
[GeV]
γ ll
m
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Data - b 20 − 10 − 10 20
35
36
Event Selection ET
miss trigger
≥3 jets including ≥1 b-tagged jet 1 τ and no e or μ ET
miss > 150 GeV
mT > 50 GeV
[GeV]
T
m Events / 5 GeV 100 200 300 400 500 600
Diboson W+jets Z+jets & single-top t t
MisID e/
Data Diboson W+jets Z+jets & single-top t t
MisID e/
Data
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s control region
[GeV]
T
m 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Data / SM 0.5 1 1.5 2
Uncertainty
[GeV]
T
m Events / 5 GeV 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Diboson W+jets Z+jets & single-top t t
MisID e/
Data Diboson W+jets Z+jets & single-top t t
MisID e/
Data
ATLAS Preliminary
= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s control region t t [GeV]
T
m 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Data / SM 0.5 1 1.5 2
Uncertainty
37
✓ τ pT , ✓ τ decay mode, ✓ Light/heavy flavor bins
38
[GeV]
T
p 40
2
10
2
10 × 2
3
10
3
10 × 2 Fake Factors
10
10 1 10
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Light-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Light-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Light-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Light-flavour region
ATLAS Preliminary
1p0n 1p1n 1pXn 3p0n 3pXn
[GeV]
T
p 40
2
10
2
10 × 2
3
10
3
10 × 2 Fake Factors
10
10 1 10
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Heavy-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Heavy-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Heavy-flavour region
=13TeV, 3.2 fb s Heavy-flavour region
ATLAS Preliminary
1p0n 1p1n 1pXn 3p0n 3pXn
Final discriminant in both channels
Single lepton triggers 1 medium τ, pT > 20 GeV 1 medium, isolated e/μ, pT > 30 GeV τ and e/μ of opposite sign charge Δφ(τ, e/μ ) > 2.4 MT(e/μ, MET) < 40 GeV or > 150 GeV
In e-channel: mvis < 80 and > 110 GeV
Single τhad trigger 2 τhad with OS charge No loose e/μ Δφ(τhad,1, τhad,2 ) > 2.7 Leading τhad is medium, trigger-matched, pT > 135 GeV Subleading τhad is loose, pT > 55 GeV
Hàττ provides sensitivity in MSSM at high tanβ, and in 2HDM at the alignment limit. Analysis targets two channels with different τ decay modes.
39
ATLAS-CONF-2015-061
40
41
42
– Continuum from data – SM h & hh from MC – Cut-and-count in 95% mbbγγ window with data- driven continuum background:
43
ATLAS-CONF-2016-004
0 events in mass window
44
ATLAS-CONF-2016-004
Mass constraint does not dramatically change the background shape. Limit in terms of # of events.
45
# Not Yet Available
[GeV]
X
m 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 ) [fb] γ Z → BR(X × X) → (pp σ 95% CL limit on 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ± ATLAS Preliminary µ µ ee, → , Z γ Z → X → pp
=13 TeV, 3.2 fb s [GeV]
X
m 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 ) [fb] γ Z → BR(X × X) → (pp σ 95% CL limit on 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ± ATLAS Preliminary q q → , Z γ Z → X → pp
=13 TeV, 3.2 fb s
46
# Not Yet Available
[GeV]
γ µ µ
m
700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880 900
]
[GeV
γ µ µ
1/N dN/dm
0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 µ µ → , Z γ Z → X → gg =800 GeV
X
m =13 TeV s
ATLAS Simulation Preliminary [GeV]
γ ee
m
700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880 900
]
[GeV
γ ee
1/N dN/dm
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 ee → , Z γ Z → X → gg =800 GeV
X
m =13 TeV s
ATLAS Simulation Preliminary
47
CMS-PAS-HIG-16-001
searches in ATLAS have also been interpreted in terms of a heavy Higgs-like boson.
– For details of the analyses, see Max Bellomo’s talk Thursday.
approximation, as well as for widths ranging from 5-15%.
48
HàWWàlνqq HàZZàννqq HàZZàllqq ATLAS-CONF-2015-075 ATLAS-CONF-2015-071 ATLAS-CONF-2015-068
searches in ATLAS have also been interpreted in terms of a heavy Higgs-like boson.
– For details of the analysis, see Max Bellomo’s talk Thursday.
approximation, as well as for widths ranging from 5-15%.
49
HàWWàlνqq HàZZàννqq HàZZàllqq ATLAS-CONF-2015-075 ATLAS-CONF-2015-071 ATLAS-CONF-2015-068