Exercise for Cancer Patients and Survivors Kerry S. Courneya, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

exercise for cancer patients and survivors
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Exercise for Cancer Patients and Survivors Kerry S. Courneya, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exercise for Cancer Patients and Survivors Kerry S. Courneya, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Physical Activity and Cancer Director, Behavioral Medicine Laboratory Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation University of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Exercise for Cancer Patients and Survivors

Kerry S. Courneya, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Physical Activity and Cancer Director, Behavioral Medicine Laboratory Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Canadian Cancer Statistics

 >200,000 Canadians diagnosed each year.  lifetime probability of getting cancer almost 50%.  >80,000 deaths from cancer (25% of all deaths).  5 year relative survival rate about 60% .  over 1.7 million cancer survivors in Canada!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cancer Survivorship Issues

treatments are complex, difficult, prolonged. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy,

hormone therapy, immunotherapy.

acute effects include nausea and vomiting,

diarrhea, fatigue, neuropathy, pain, menopausal symptoms, insomnia, depression.

chronic/late effects include cancer recurrence,

second cancers, heart problems, osteoporosis.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Exercise Oncology Questions

 is it safe/feasible to exercise during cancer treatment?  will exercise interfere with treatment or response?  can exercise help manage treatment side effects?  can exercise improve recovery after cancer and lower

the risk of cancer recurrence?

 what is the optimal exercise program for benefit?  are there any exercise programs for cancer patients?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Exercise Oncology Reviews

 >1,000 EX intervention studies in cancer patients.  dozens of systematic reviews in past 20 years.  early reviews on “exercise oncology”.  targeted reviews have focused on specific:

 cancers (e.g., breast, prostate, hematologic, lung, CRC)  phases (pre-treatment, treatment, survivorship, palliative)  outcomes (e.g., fatigue, depression, QoL, sleep, survival)  exercise interventions (e.g., aerobic, resistance, combined)  combinations (breast on Tx, prostate on ADT)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Supervised Trial of Aerobic versus Resistance Training (START)

 RCT examining AET versus

RET versus UC in 242 BC patients on chemotherapy.

 multicenter trial: Edmonton,

Ottawa, and Vancouver.

(Courneya et al. JCO 2007;25:4396-4404)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chemotherapy Received (RDI)

75 80 85 90 95

Relative Dose Intensity

UC RET AET

(Courneya et al. JCO 2007;25:4396-4404)

P=.033 P=.266

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Disease-Free Survival

8-year DFS was 82.7% for EX vs. 75.6% for UC

(Courneya et al. MSSE 2014;46:1744-51)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Healthy Exercise for Lymphoma Patients (HELP) Trial

 RCT comparing AET to UC in 122 lymphoma

patients on chemotherapy (n=54) or off Tx (n=68).

 12 weeks supervised exercise training.  primary endpoint was QoL.  secondary endpoints were treatment outcomes.

(Courneya et al. J Clin Onc 2009;27:4605-12)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy Completion Rate

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

% Completion Rate

% of minimum % of maximum

UC AET

(Courneya et al. J Clin Onc 2009;27:4605-12)

P=.45 P=.20

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Effects of Exercise on Treatment Response

10 20 30 40 50 60

% With Response

Stable Partial Complete

UC AET

(Courneya et al. J Clin Onc 2009;27:4605-12)

13/28 8/26 P=.24

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Effects of Exercise on Treatment Response

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

% With Response

Partial Complete

UC AET

(Morielli et al., unpublished)

P=.020 3/17 10/18

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary of Evidence

 EX is safe/feasible during cancer treatment and does

not interfere with treatments or worsen symptoms.

 EX maintains/improves health-related fitness even

during difficult cancer treatments.

 EX prevents/manages some side effects during

treatment (especially for symptomatic patients).

 EX during treatment may improve treatment

completion, response, and long term cancer outcomes.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Don’t Take Cancer Lying Down!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Exercise Recommendations

 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity aerobic EX.  75 minutes/week of vigorous intensity aerobic EX.  2-3 days/week of strength exercises of major muscle

groups using 8-12 repetitions and 1-2 sets.

 add “activity supplements” throughout the day.  older adults may add balance exercises.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

General Exercise Principles

 avoid inactivity; sedentary behavior may be bad.  some exercise is better than none.  more exercise is better (dose-response).  start easy/progress slowly (exercise to tolerance).  exercise must be individualized based on patient

function, side effects, goals, and preferences.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

(Cormie et al. Med J Aus 2018;1-4)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How Do We Move Exercise Oncology Research into Cancer Care?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Two Models of Exercise Promotion

 CLINICAL MODEL: (on treatment/late stage)

 higher risk:benefit ratio.  medical consultation often needed.  personalized exercise prescription needed.  supervised exercise recommended  focus on cancer-specific outcomes.

 PUBLIC HEALTH MODEL: (off treatment/cured)

 lower risk:benefit ratio.  home-based exercise feasible/distance-based support.  general exercise recommendations more appropriate.  focus on disease prevention and health promotion.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

(https://www.albertacancerexercise.com/)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Cancer-specific Motives/Benefits

 prepare for treatments (“prehabilitation”).  complete treatments.  respond to treatments.  manage treatment side effects.  recover after treatments.  reduce risk of recurrence/death from cancer.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cancer-specific Social Influencers

 oncologists (medical, radiation, surgical).  oncology care providers (nurse, phyiso/nut., psych.).  cancer treatment centers.  cancer societies/support groups (CCS, ACS).  other cancer survivors.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cancer-specific Barriers/Constraints

 side effects/toxicities from treatment (fatigue,

nausea, diarrhea, neuropathy, pain, hand-foot syndrome, urinary incontinence, skin problems, dyspnea, mouth problems, anxiety, depression).

 medical appointments, work-related issues.  access to programs/qualified personnel.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Safety (risks) of EX in Cancer Patients

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Who is Likely to Benefit from a Cancer-Specific EX Intervention?

 newly diagnosed cancer patients starting treatments.  patients receiving or recovering from treatments.  cancer patients with poor or modest prognosis.  patients with advanced or metastatic cancer.  EXCEPTION: long term survivors of early stage

cancers with good prognosis and few morbidities.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

EX Intervention Recommendations in Cancer Survivors

 incorporate cancer-specific benefits where supported

by the evidence,

 invoke cancer-specific social influencers important to

the individual,

 address cancer-specific barriers and precautions,  all of which may vary by cancer type, disease stage,

treatments received, and cancer trajectory.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary and Conclusions

 cancer is a compelling disease for most people.  most cancer patients want cancer-specific EX

information, not general health information.

 cancer affects all aspects of EX behavior change

interventions including motives, barriers, social influences, and delivery (who, what, when, where).

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Acknowledgements

Many colleagues, students, staff and study

participants have contributed to this research.

K.S. Courneya is supported by the Canada

Research Chairs Program, a CIHR Foundation Grant, and Apple Fitness.