example the binary tree of example 2 1 2 the outcomes are
play

Example: the binary tree of Example 2.1.2: The outcomes are the 8 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Martingales Mathematical background of random variables and stochastic processes: A sample space with outcomes ; A collection of subsets F ; F is a -field; F , and F is closed under complementation and


  1. Martingales • Mathematical background of random variables and stochastic processes: – A sample space Ω with outcomes ω ∈ Ω; – A collection of subsets F ; F is a σ -field; Ω ∈ F , and F is closed under complementation and countable unions; – A probability measure P defined on F ; P is countably ad- ditive . 1

  2. • Axioms of probability: – 0 ≤ P [ A ] ≤ 1 for all A ∈ F ; – P [Ω] = 1; – P [ A ∪ B ] = P [ A ] + P [ B ] for any disjoint A, B ∈ F ; – If A n ∈ F for all n ∈ N and A 1 ⊆ A 2 ⊆ . . . , then P [ A n ] ↑ P [ n A n ] as n ↑ ∞ . � • These imply countable additivity: if B n ∈ F for all n ∈ N and { B n } are disjoint , then P [ n B n ] = � n P [ B n ]. � 2

  3. • Example: the binary tree of Example 2.1.2: • The outcomes are the 8 possible paths from t = 0 to t = T . • That is, Ω = { uuu, uud, udu, udd, duu, dud, ddu, ddd } , (or equiv- alently { 000 , 001 , 010 , 011 , 100 , 101 , 110 , 111 } ). • F is the power set 2 Ω : the collection of all subsets of Ω. 3

  4. • Random variable: a real-valued function X on Ω that is F - measurable : { ω ∈ Ω : X ( ω ) ≤ x } ∈ F for all x ∈ R ; – that is, the probability P [ X ≤ x ] = P [ { ω ∈ Ω : X ( ω ) ≤ x } ] is defined. • The cumulative distribution function of X is F ( x ) = P [ X ≤ x ] . 4

  5. • Example: the binary tree. • Because Ω is discrete and F = 2 Ω , every real-valued function on Ω is measurable. • Define X 1 and X 2 on Ω by X 1 ( uuu ) = X 1 ( uud ) = X 1 ( udu ) = X 1 ( udd ) = 120 , X 1 ( duu ) = X 1 ( dud ) = X 1 ( ddu ) = X 1 ( ddd ) = 80 , X 2 ( uuu ) = X 2 ( uud ) = 140 , X 2 ( udu ) = X 2 ( udd ) = 100 , X 2 ( duu ) = X 2 ( dud ) = 100 , X 2 ( ddu ) = X 2 ( ddd ) = 60 . and similarly X 3 . 5

  6. • Note that X 1 is also measurable with respect to F 1 = { Ω , ∅ , { uuu, uud, udu, udd } , { duu, dud, ddu, ddd }} = { Ω , ∅ , { X 1 = 120 } , { X 1 = 80 }} ⊂ F . • We can similarly construct F 2 , with F 1 ⊂ F 2 ⊂ F , such that X 2 is F 2 -measurable, as well as F -measurable. 6

  7. • A filtration is a σ -field F and a sequence of sub-fields {F n } with F n ⊆ F n +1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ F . • A stochastic process is a sequence of random variables { X n } n ≥ 0 on Ω. • The stochastic process { X n } n ≥ 0 is adapted to the filtration {F n } if X n is F n -measurable for each n ≥ 0. • Note that the definition of a stochastic process and its adap- tation do not depend on the existence of any probability measure P . 7

  8. • Conditional expectation: – After one step in the tree, the remaining possible paths form a subtree. – We can define risk-neutral probabilities on the subtree, and hence the conditional expectation of the claim X 3 : E [ X 3 | X 1 = 120] and E [ X 3 | X 1 = 80]. • The conditional expectation is a function of X 1 , and therefore a random variable, measurable with respect to F 1 . 8

  9. • The formal definition is less obvious: – Suppose that X is F -measurable with E [ | X | ] < ∞ and G ⊆ F is a sub- σ -field. – The conditional expectation of X given G is a G -measurable random variable E [ X |G ] such that, for any A ∈ G , � � A E [ X |G ] d P = A Xd P . • The conditional expectation always exists and is essentially unique. 9

  10. • The “tower property:” if F i ⊆ F j , then E [ E [ X |F j ] |F i ] = E [ X |F i ] . • That is, we can calculate conditional expectation in steps: – First condition on detailed information ( F j ); – Then take the expected value conditional on less informa- tion ( F i ). • “Taking out what is known:” if E [ | X | ] < ∞ and E [ | XY | ] < ∞ , and Y is F n -measurable, then E [ XY |F n ] = Y E [ X |F n ] . 10

  11. � � • Martingale: Suppose that Ω , {F n } n ≥ 0 , F , P is a filtered prob- ability space. The stochastic process { X n } n ≥ 0 adapted to {F n } is a martingale with respect to this space if, for any n ≥ 0, E [ | X n | ] < ∞ and E [ X n +1 |F n ] = X n . • On the binomial tree with zero interest rate, both S n and the price of the option are martingales. • With positive interest, the martingales are the discounted S n = e − rnδt S n and the discounted option price. stock price ˜ 11

  12. � � • Conditional expectation of a claim: as before, Ω , {F n } n ≥ 0 , F , P is a filtered probability space (not necessarily a binary tree). If C N is F N -measurable with E [ | C N | ] < ∞ , and X n = E [ C N |F n ] , � � then { X n } 0 ≤ n ≤ N is a P , {F n } 0 ≤ n ≤ N -martingale. • More generally, if V n = e − r ( N − n ) δt E [ C N |F n ] is the expected value of the claim, discounted from t = N to t = n , and V n = e − rnδt V n ˜ is V n discounted from t = n to t = 0, then { ˜ V n } 0 ≤ n ≤ N is a � � P , {F n } 0 ≤ n ≤ N -martingale. 12

  13. • New martingales from old. In the binary tree model for pric- ing a European option, we write ( φ n , ψ n ) for the amounts of stock and cash held for the time step [( n − 1) δt, nδt ). • If V n is the value of the portfolio at t = nδt , then V n = φ n +1 S n + ψ n +1 B n and because the strategy is self-financing, φ n +1 S n + ψ n +1 B n = φ n S n + ψ n B n or φ n +1 ˜ S n + ψ n +1 = φ n ˜ S n + ψ n . 13

  14. • So � � V n +1 − ˜ ˜ S n +1 − ˜ ˜ V n = φ n +1 S n and, summing, n − 1 � � V n − ˜ ˜ S j +1 − ˜ ˜ � V 0 = φ j +1 S j . j =0 • We can verify directly that { ˜ V n } is a martingale, using the fact that φ n is known at time ( n − 1) δt ( φ n is F n − 1 -measurable). Such a process { φ n } n ≥ 1 is called {F n } n ≥ 0 -predictable or {F n } n ≥ 0 - previsible. 14

  15. • In general, if { X n } n ≥ 0 is a ( P , {F n } n ≥ 0 )-martingale and { φ n } n ≥ 1 is {F n } n ≥ 0 -previsible, then n − 1 � � � Z n = Z 0 + X j +1 − X j φ j +1 , j =0 where Z 0 is a constant, is also a ( P , {F n } n ≥ 0 )-martingale. • We can view this sum as a discrete stochastic integral . 15

  16. • Key theorem: Consider a more general multi-period market model with several assets. • No arbitrage: in this market model, there is no arbitrage if and only if there is a measure Q such that the discounted stock price vector is a Q -martingale. • In that case, the market price at t = 0 of an attainable claim C N at t = Nδt is unique and is given by E Q [ ψ 0 C N ] where 1 ψ ( i ) ψ 0 = � N is the discount factor over N periods. 0 • Q is the equivalent martingale measure . 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend