Evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite locus in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite locus in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite locus in Acipenseriforms Eric Rivals LIRMM - M ethodes Algorithmes pour la Bioinfo www.lirmm.fr/~rivals Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution 1 / 17


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite locus in Acipenseriforms

Eric Rivals

LIRMM - M´ ethodes Algorithmes pour la Bioinfo

www.lirmm.fr/~rivals

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 1 / 17

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Paddlefishes and Sturgeons

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 2 / 17

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Paddlefishes and Sturgeons

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 2 / 17

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Characteristics

Acipenseriforms : Two subfamilies, 4 genera, 27 extant species 200 million years of evolution ; living fossils Many species produce viable hybrids Several levels of polyploidy

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 3 / 17

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

Phylogeny from [Peng et al. 06]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 4 / 17

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

Phylogeny from [Krieger et al. 08]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 5 / 17

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A composite microsatellite Spl-106

A composite microsatellite Spl-106

Species Lg Repeat like

Repeat AG 199 (taaaa)(aaaa)(taaa) (taga)2(taaa)12 AT 198 (taaa−)(aaaa)(taaa) (taga)2(taaa)(taga)2(taaa)7(gaaa)2 AS 170 − (taaa)9(gaaa)4 HD 263 (taaa)(aaaa)(taaa) (taga)23(tagga)((taaa)(aaaa))2(taaa)2 94 orthologous alleles ; lengths comprise in [139, 263] bps ; size homoplasy

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 6 / 17

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A composite microsatellite Spl-106

Microsatellite sequence recoding

Encoding each variant repeat unit by a distinct symbol Repeat like Repeat Sequence (taaaa) (aaaa) (taaa) (taga)2 (taaa)12 Map O′ J O U2 O12 Sequence (taaa−) (aaaa) (taaa) (taga)2 (taaa) (taga)2 (taaa)7 (gaaa)2 Map O J O U2 O U2 O7 Q2 Sequence − − − (taaa)9 (gaaa)4 Map − − − O9 Q4

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 7 / 17

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Methods

Allele comparison by alignment

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 8 / 17

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Methods

Example of an alignment of 2 maps

( ) c d ) ( d d d a a a a a d d d d d b b b b c c c c b c ( ) c c c c b b b c c c c c c c c c c b ( ) c

contexte dependency - non commutativity Version 1 : correspondance with a graph algorithm stable max in a circle graph [B´

erard Rivals J Comp Bio 2003] Version 2 : dynamic programming [B´ erard et al., Evol. Bioinfo. 2006]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 9 / 17

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances FastME [Desper, Gascuel, 2002]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances FastME [Desper, Gascuel, 2002]

3

Test robustness of the trees w.r.t. alignment parameters

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances FastME [Desper, Gascuel, 2002]

3

Test robustness of the trees w.r.t. alignment parameters Criterion : Percentage of explained variance (VAF)

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances FastME [Desper, Gascuel, 2002]

3

Test robustness of the trees w.r.t. alignment parameters Criterion : Percentage of explained variance (VAF)

4

Assess confidence of the tree internal nodes

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Methods

Protocol of the analysis

Input : set of sequences (maps)

1 Comparison all against all ⇒ pairwise distance matrix

MS Align [B´

erard, Rivals, 2003]

2

Inference of evolutionary tree from the distances FastME [Desper, Gascuel, 2002]

3

Test robustness of the trees w.r.t. alignment parameters Criterion : Percentage of explained variance (VAF)

4

Assess confidence of the tree internal nodes Criterion : Rate of elementary well designed quartets (Re) Qualitree [Garreta, Gu´ enoche, 2000]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 10 / 17

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Methods Robustness and confidence

Rate of elementary well designed quartets (Re)

For an internal edge e, for all quartets (i, j, k, l) s.t. e splits (i, j) and (k, l) : R(e) = percentage of these quartets satisfying D(i, j) + D(k, l) < min (D(i, l) + D(j, k), D(i, k) + D(j, l)) where D(i, j) : alignment distance between i and j Value in [0, 1] [Garreta, Gu´

enoche, 2000]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 11 / 17

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Results

Evolution of Spl-106

Development of the composite microsatellite : from (taga)m in S. platorynchus to (taga)m(taaa)n with m > n to (taga)m(taaa)n with n > m in most Atlantic species to (taaa)p(gaaa)q in A. sinensis, A. dabryanus, most recent state

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 12 / 17

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Results

Evidence for sturgeons phylogeny

Spl-106 and flanking regions phylogenies support : Huso species are not monophyletic Uniformity of type of repeat region in Atlantic clade Separate evolution of Atlantic and Pacific clades An early separation of A. sturio and A. oxyrinchus from other subfamilies Spl-106 allows to investigate intra-species relationships

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 13 / 17

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Results

Phylogeny of A. sinensis with Spl-106

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 14 / 17

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Results

Co-authors : ZhaoJun Shao, Patrick Berrebi, ISEM, Montpellier. Bin Zhu, Na Zhao and Jianbo Chang, Wuhan, China Sovan Lek, Ichthyology & Ecological Modelling, UMR 5174 Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse

Thanks for your attention

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 15 / 17

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results

Evolutionary model

Substitution : WGY → WKY Deletion : WGY → WY Insertion (dual) : WY → WGY Tandem duplication : WKY → WKKY Tandem contraction (dual) : WKKY → WKY

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 16 / 17

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results

Evolutionary model

Substitution : WGY → WKY Deletion : WGY → WY Insertion (dual) : WY → WGY Tandem duplication : WKY → WKKY Tandem contraction (dual) : WKKY → WKY ⇒ variation in their number of units

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 16 / 17

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Results

Percentage of explained variance (VAF)

VAF = 1 −

  • (i,j):i<j(D(i, j) − T(i, j))2
  • (i,j):i<j(D(i, j) − Dm)2

where D(i, j) : alignment distance between i and j T(i, j) : tree distance between i and j Dm : average alignment distance over all pairs (i, j) Value in [0, 1]

Eric Rivals (LIRMM) Microsatellite and sturgeons evolution www.lirmm.fr/~rivals 17 / 17