Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

even better cameras even better cameras are they needed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible and Are they needed, possible and will I be able to afford one? will I be able to afford one? Greg McMullan MRC-LMB Cambridge, U.K. Perfect image Perfect image Perfect


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Even better cameras? Even better cameras?

Greg McMullan MRC-LMB Cambridge, U.K.

Are they needed, possible and Are they needed, possible and will I be able to afford one? will I be able to afford one?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Perfect image Perfect image

Perfect sample Perfect sample Perfect detector Perfect detector 20 el/pixel 20 el/pixel

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Radiation Damage => DQE Radiation Damage => DQE

Falcon II image

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What do we have now? What do we have now?

  • CryoEM maps now show

CryoEM maps now show β β-

  • sheets, side chains …

sheets, side chains …

  • Higher resolution

Higher resolution

  • Smaller molecules

Smaller molecules

  • Fewer particles

Fewer particles

McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 147, (2014) 156-163

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What was wrong with film? What was wrong with film?

  • DQE of film was not much lower

DQE of film was not much lower

  • Huge field of view

Huge field of view

  • Great archival media

Great archival media

  • Fog level restricts imaging conditions (OD=1)

Fog level restricts imaging conditions (OD=1)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MAPS MAPS Detector Detector

Detector must Detector must be be backthinned! backthinned!

Detector must Detector must be mounted be mounted carefully carefully

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Single Single electron electron events events All three All three can be used can be used in counting in counting mode! mode!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Which is the better detector? Which is the better detector?

  • All better than film

All better than film

  • All can collect movies

All can collect movies

  • All can be used in counting

All can be used in counting mode mode

McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 147, (2014) 156-163

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comparison of K2 vs Falcon II? Comparison of K2 vs Falcon II?

  • K2 better at low

K2 better at low resolution resolution

  • Falcon II better at

Falcon II better at high resolution high resolution

  • Low resolution can be

Low resolution can be more radiation hard more radiation hard

  • Tomography

Tomography

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Noise whiten Falcon II Noise whiten Falcon II

Pre-irradiated carbon 1.04 Pre-irradiated carbon 1.04 Å sampling Å sampling

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Are Better detectors needed? Are Better detectors needed?

  • CryoEM maps now show

CryoEM maps now show β β-

  • sheets, side chains …

sheets, side chains …

  • Even higher resolution

Even higher resolution

  • Smaller molecules

Smaller molecules

  • Fewer particles

Fewer particles

Allegretti et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014 Allegretti et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Why the jump in resolution? Why the jump in resolution?

McMullan et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014 McMullan et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014

  • Better detectors

Better detectors

  • Better software

Better software

  • Better computers

Better computers

  • Better samples

Better samples

  • Better ways of processing images

Better ways of processing images

  • More data

More data

  • Higher expectations

Higher expectations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Are better detectors possible? Are better detectors possible?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multiple companies competition → Multiple companies competition →

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Falcon III is probably as good as Falcon III is probably as good as it gets for integrating detectors it gets for integrating detectors The future is counting detectors The future is counting detectors Want counting detector to be Want counting detector to be better than integrating detector better than integrating detector

  • ver whole range (not just at low
  • ver whole range (not just at low

spatial frequency) spatial frequency)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Taken with ~ one electron per frame!

300 keV electrons are difficult 300 keV electrons are difficult

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fundamental limit on the DQE for Fundamental limit on the DQE for integrating detector integrating detector

Reference: Hans Bichsel, Reference: Hans Bichsel, Straggling in thin silicon detectors Straggling in thin silicon detectors Rev. Mod. Phys 60, 701 (1988)

  • Rev. Mod. Phys 60, 701 (1988)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Difference between integrating Difference between integrating and counting and counting

McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Counting is hard Counting is hard

  • Shows up every

Shows up every defect in your chip defect in your chip

  • Can not distinguish

Can not distinguish between big and between big and multiple events multiple events

  • 1 in 80 (5 el/pixel/s)

1 in 80 (5 el/pixel/s)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Counting is hard! Counting is hard!

  • Gatan have done a

Gatan have done a very good job. very good job.

  • How do you do better!

How do you do better!

  • (1) A thin as possible

(1) A thin as possible

  • (2) Better algorithms

(2) Better algorithms

  • (3) Better hardware

(3) Better hardware

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Vanilla detector Vanilla detector

McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416

7416 7416 frames frames

Vanilla Vanilla detector detector 120 keV 120 keV

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Vanilla detector Vanilla detector

McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Counting algorithms Counting algorithms

  • Don't commit to FPGA too early

Don't commit to FPGA too early

  • Don't put events in a single particle

Don't put events in a single particle

  • Every defect hurts

Every defect hurts

  • Filter images

Filter images

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MAPS detector design parameters MAPS detector design parameters

  • Number of pixels

Number of pixels

  • Size of pixels

Size of pixels

  • Pixel design

Pixel design

  • Technology to use

Technology to use

  • Thickness of sensor layer

Thickness of sensor layer

  • Type of sensor layer

Type of sensor layer

  • Speed

Speed

  • Low noise (use CDS)

Low noise (use CDS)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Future Future

  • Show counting can be done better

Show counting can be done better

  • DE and FEI will introduce counting

DE and FEI will introduce counting modes (hopefully) modes (hopefully)

  • Gatan will improve the K2

Gatan will improve the K2

  • Prices will come down!

Prices will come down!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Summary Summary

  • Counting is the future (but not yet)

Counting is the future (but not yet)

  • Must be better than integrating

Must be better than integrating

  • Perfect images will still be horrible

Perfect images will still be horrible

  • Prices will come down!

Prices will come down!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Thanks Thanks

  • Richard Henderson

Richard Henderson

  • Wasi Faruqi

Wasi Faruqi

  • Shaoxia Chen

Shaoxia Chen

  • Vinoth Kumar

Vinoth Kumar

  • Sjors Scheres

Sjors Scheres

…. .

  • Renato Turchetta

Renato Turchetta

  • Nicola Guerrini

Nicola Guerrini

  • Matthijn Vos

Matthijn Vos