even better cameras even better cameras are they needed
play

Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible and Are they needed, possible and will I be able to afford one? will I be able to afford one? Greg McMullan MRC-LMB Cambridge, U.K. Perfect image Perfect image Perfect


  1. Even better cameras? Even better cameras? Are they needed, possible and Are they needed, possible and will I be able to afford one? will I be able to afford one? Greg McMullan MRC-LMB Cambridge, U.K.

  2. Perfect image Perfect image Perfect detector Perfect detector Perfect sample Perfect sample 20 el/pixel 20 el/pixel

  3. Radiation Damage => DQE Radiation Damage => DQE Falcon II image

  4. What do we have now? What do we have now? ● CryoEM maps now show CryoEM maps now show β- -sheets, side chains … sheets, side chains … β Higher resolution Higher resolution ● Smaller molecules Smaller molecules ● Fewer particles Fewer particles ● McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 147, (2014) 156-163

  5. What was wrong with film? What was wrong with film? ● DQE of film was not much lower DQE of film was not much lower Huge field of view Huge field of view ● Great archival media Great archival media ● Fog level restricts imaging conditions (OD=1) Fog level restricts imaging conditions (OD=1) ●

  6. MAPS MAPS Detector Detector Detector must Detector must be be backthinned! backthinned! Detector must Detector must be mounted be mounted carefully carefully

  7. Single Single electron electron events events All three All three can be used can be used in counting in counting mode! mode!

  8. Which is the better detector? Which is the better detector? ● All better than film All better than film ● All can collect movies All can collect movies All can be used in counting All can be used in counting ● mode mode McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 147, (2014) 156-163

  9. Comparison of K2 vs Falcon II? Comparison of K2 vs Falcon II? ● K2 better at low K2 better at low resolution resolution ● Falcon II better at Falcon II better at high resolution high resolution ● Low resolution can be Low resolution can be more radiation hard more radiation hard ● Tomography Tomography

  10. Noise whiten Falcon II Noise whiten Falcon II Pre-irradiated carbon 1.04 Å sampling Å sampling Pre-irradiated carbon 1.04

  11. Are Better detectors needed? Are Better detectors needed? ● CryoEM maps now show CryoEM maps now show β- -sheets, side chains … sheets, side chains … β Even higher resolution Even higher resolution ● Smaller molecules Smaller molecules ● Fewer particles Fewer particles ● Allegretti et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014 Allegretti et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014

  12. Why the jump in resolution? Why the jump in resolution? Better detectors Better detectors ● Better software Better software ● Better computers Better computers ● Better samples Better samples ● Better ways of processing images Better ways of processing images ● More data More data ● McMullan et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014 McMullan et al, eLife 3, e01963, 2014 Higher expectations Higher expectations ●

  13. Are better detectors possible? Are better detectors possible?

  14. Multiple companies competition Multiple companies competition → →

  15. Falcon III is probably as good as Falcon III is probably as good as it gets for integrating detectors it gets for integrating detectors The future is counting detectors The future is counting detectors Want counting detector to be Want counting detector to be better than integrating detector better than integrating detector over whole range (not just at low over whole range (not just at low spatial frequency) spatial frequency)

  16. 300 keV electrons are difficult 300 keV electrons are difficult Taken with ~ one electron per frame!

  17. Fundamental limit on the DQE for Fundamental limit on the DQE for integrating detector integrating detector Reference: Hans Bichsel, Straggling in thin silicon detectors Straggling in thin silicon detectors Rev. Mod. Phys 60, 701 (1988) Rev. Mod. Phys 60, 701 (1988) Reference: Hans Bichsel,

  18. Difference between integrating Difference between integrating and counting and counting McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 147, (2014) 156-163

  19. Counting is hard Counting is hard ● Shows up every Shows up every defect in your chip defect in your chip ● Can not distinguish Can not distinguish between big and between big and multiple events multiple events ● 1 in 80 (5 el/pixel/s) 1 in 80 (5 el/pixel/s)

  20. Counting is hard! Counting is hard! ● Gatan have done a Gatan have done a very good job. very good job. ● How do you do better! How do you do better! ● (1) A thin as possible (1) A thin as possible ● (2) Better algorithms (2) Better algorithms ● (3) Better hardware (3) Better hardware

  21. Vanilla detector Vanilla detector Vanilla Vanilla detector detector 120 keV 120 keV 7416 7416 frames frames McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416

  22. Vanilla detector Vanilla detector McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416 McMullan et al, Ultramicroscopy 109, (2009) 1411-1416

  23. Counting algorithms Counting algorithms ● Don't commit to FPGA too early Don't commit to FPGA too early ● Don't put events in a single particle Don't put events in a single particle ● Every defect hurts Every defect hurts ● Filter images Filter images

  24. MAPS detector design parameters MAPS detector design parameters ● Number of pixels Number of pixels ● Size of pixels Size of pixels ● Pixel design Pixel design ● Technology to use Technology to use ● Thickness of sensor layer Thickness of sensor layer ● Type of sensor layer Type of sensor layer ● Speed Speed ● Low noise (use CDS) Low noise (use CDS)

  25. Future Future ● Show counting can be done better Show counting can be done better ● DE and FEI will introduce counting DE and FEI will introduce counting modes (hopefully) modes (hopefully) ● Gatan will improve the K2 Gatan will improve the K2 ● Prices will come down! Prices will come down!

  26. Summary Summary ● Counting is the future (but not yet) Counting is the future (but not yet) ● Must be better than integrating Must be better than integrating ● Perfect images will still be horrible Perfect images will still be horrible ● Prices will come down! Prices will come down!

  27. Thanks Thanks ● Richard Henderson Richard Henderson ● Renato Turchetta ● Wasi Faruqi Renato Turchetta Wasi Faruqi ● Shaoxia Chen ● Nicola Guerrini Shaoxia Chen Nicola Guerrini ● Vinoth Kumar Vinoth Kumar ● Sjors Scheres ● Matthijn Vos Sjors Scheres Matthijn Vos ● … …. .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend