Estimation of causal direction from time series in the presence of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

estimation of causal direction from time series in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Estimation of causal direction from time series in the presence of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estimation of causal direction from time series in the presence of mixed and colored noise G. Nolte Fraunhofer FIRST, Berlin EEG Typical Properties of Data > 10 minutes measurement > 100 samples/sec 19-128 channels Some millions of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Estimation of causal direction from time series in the presence of mixed and colored noise

Fraunhofer FIRST, Berlin

  • G. Nolte
slide-2
SLIDE 2

EEG

Typical Properties of Data > 10 minutes measurement > 100 samples/sec 19-128 channels ⇒ Some millions of data points

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Divide data into epochs (e.g. of 1 sec)
  • 2. Make an analysis in each epoch and average over epochs
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Problem of volume conduction T1 T2 T1<< T2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

= ∗

=

K k j i ij

k f z k f z K f S

1

) , ( ) , ( 1 ) (

Cross-spectrum:

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( f S f S f S f C

jj ii ij ij

=

Coherency: Data:

) , ( k f zi

Channel Frequency Epoch

slide-6
SLIDE 6

)) ( Re( ) (

12 12

f S f S

=

)) ( Im(

12 f

S i

+

Independent sources do not contribute to the imaginary part of the cross-spectrum

T M

L P P P L S

              =

      

2 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

independent

Imaginary parts

Interaction

PISA sPCA MOCA PSI

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Granger causality

x y E

1

        =

2 1

log E E F

x y

x y y x

F F G

→ →

− =

ˆ

) ˆ ( ˆ G std G G =

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Source Channel A Channel B Noise

Motivation

  • Many measurements like EEG/MEG/fMRI are extremely noisy

Source 1 Channel A Channel B Noise Source 2

Mixtures of independent sources: Do we estimate fake direction? Additive noise: Do we estimate wrong direction?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Source Channel A Channel B Granger Causality Noise

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Observations: A Independent sources do not contribute to the imaginary part of the cross-spectrum B Slope of phase of cross-spectrum indicates direction Phase Slope Index (PSI)(ψ)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Slope of phase-spectrum indicates temporal ordering

B

Data Decomposition

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Combining A and B: Average of Phase-Slope such that it is insensitive to mixtures

Nolte, et.al., Phys Rev Let., 2008

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

White Noise Source 1 Source 2

        =

5 . 95 . 95 . ) 1 ( A

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Simulation: (1-γ) true flow + γ mixed noise Comparison with Granger Causality

γ

No Noise Only Noise No Noise Only Noise

slide-17
SLIDE 17

“I know that I don’t know anything” Sokrates

No Noise Only Noise

slide-18
SLIDE 18

wrong wrong correct correct wrong wrong correct correct

Granger causality

wrong wrong correct correct

Phase Slope Index

I don’t know

Correct wrong Total points 638 6 578 Correct wrong Total points 736 100

  • 264

Challenge

  • correct: +1 point
  • wrong: -10

points

  • “I don ‘t know”: 0 points
slide-19
SLIDE 19

What matters:

Simulated challenge data:

  • problem is generic (details are open to discussion)
  • evidence is weighted
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Nonlinearity of order k Granger Causality

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Nonlinearity of order k PSI

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FAQ

Nonlinear systems? Direct vs. indirect ? Bidirectional flux? Question alright with exceptions In general; it possible but difficult to construct counterexamples partialing (rarely) possible PSI is (trivially) correct, (impossible to resolve completely) Answer Estimate delay? Not in the presence of noise, Results are really binary

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Alpha rhythm, Eyes closed, 88 subjects

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Surrogate Data to test for artefacts of volume conduction

( )

) ( , ), ( ) ( Data

1

t x t x t x

n

 

=

) ( ) ( t x W t s  

=

ICA Demix with 1. T * 1)

  • (i

by component i.th Delay 2.

 ) 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (

3 3 2 2 1 1

T t s t v T t s t v t s t v

+ = + = =

) ( ) ( x

1 surr

t v W t  

=

Remix 3.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Granger Causality, Data vs. Surrogates

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Phase Slope Index, Data vs. Surrogates

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary

  • Imaginary parts of cross-spectra is not affected by

non-interacting sources ⇒ valuable quantity to study interactions

  • Direction with “Phase Slope Index” (PSI)
  • Surrogates with ICA
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Mark Hallett Ou Bai Lewis Wheaton Masao Matsuhashi Zoltan Mari Sherry Vorbach

Thanks to

Stefan Haufe Andreas Ziehe Vadim Nikulin Nicole Krämer Alois Schlögl Frank C. Meinecke Florin Popescu Klaus-Robert Müller Arne Ewald Forooz Shahbazi Tom Brismar Laura Marzetti Gian Luca Romani