eos constraints from a model independent approach
play

EoS constraints from a model-independent approach Francesca - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EoS constraints from a model-independent approach Francesca Gulminelli, Debarati Chatterjee - LPC Caen Jerome Margueron IPNL Adriana Raduta IFIN EoS and empirical constraints E o S c a n b e c ha ra c te rize d b y e mpiric a


  1. EoS constraints from a model-independent approach Francesca Gulminelli, Debarati Chatterjee - LPC Caen Jerome Margueron – IPNL Adriana Raduta – IFIN

  2. EoS and empirical constraints • E o S c a n b e c ha ra c te rize d b y e mpiric a l pa ra me te rs � � � � � �/�� � e x:J,L ,… • DF T mo de ls c o rre spo nding to diffe re nt E o S a re c o mpa re d to e xp.da ta � � � ∆� � de te rmine d • fitting the mo de l to the da ta • Co rre la tio ns a mo ng � � a re typic a lly o b se rve d M.Fortin et al, PRC 94,035804

  3. Problems • Nuc le i a re no t simply dro ple ts o f nuc le a r ma tte r! E ne rg y func tio na ls c o nta in ma ny te rms => Unc e rta inty in g ra die nt c o upling s g e ts mixe d up with unc e rta inty in P k • Phe no func tio na ls c o nta in spurio us c o rre la tio ns a mo ng e mp.pa ra me te rs => re sults a re mo de l de pe nde nt C.Ducoin et al PRC 2011

  4. Problems • Nuc le i a re no t simply dro ple ts o f nuc le a r ma tte r! E ne rg y func tio na ls c o nta in ma ny te rms => Unc e rta inty in g ra die nt c o upling s g e ts mixe d up with unc e rta inty in X n • Phe no func tio na ls c o nta in spurio us c o rre la tio ns a mo ng e mp.pa ra me te rs  re sults a re mo de l de pe nde nt C.Ducoin et al PRC 2011

  5. A model independent approach • Nuc le i a re no t simply dro ple ts o f nuc le a r A single effective isoscalar ma tte r! E ne rg y gradient term func tio na ls c o nta in to be fitted on nuclear masses � �, � � � �� � � �� � ma ny te rms => Unc e rta inty in g ra die nt c o upling s g e ts mixe d up with � � � � � � � unc e rta inty in P k � � � � � � � /� • Phe no func tio na ls Taylor expansion around n 0 c o nta in spurio us � � �� �, � � � 1 � � � � �� � � � �� � � �! � � c o rre la tio ns a mo ng 3� � � e mp.pa ra me te rs Steiner, Lattimer, Brown ApJ722(2010)33 => re sults a re mo de l de pe nde nt

  6. HNM: Quality of the Taylor expansion Sly5 E.Chabanat, P.Bonche, P.Hansel, J.Meyer, R.Schaeffer, NPA627(1997)710 Chiral EFT I.Tews, T.Kruger,K.Hebeler,A.Schwenk PRL110(2013)032504

  7. Symmetry energy

  8. Present uncertainty on P k : prior distribution

  9. HNM: Constraints from neutron star physics Ca usa lity: 0 � � � � � • NS sta b ility: �� � 0 fo r � � � � in � -e q uilib rium • • � ��� � 0 • M ma x >2M o • L imit o n DURCA: No DURCA up to 2M o – DURCA0 o DURCA o nly fo r M>1.8M o – DURCA1 o DURCA o nly fo r M>1.6M o – DURCA2 o

  10. Results

  11. Finite nuclei • Nuc le i a re no t simply dro ple ts o f nuc le a r A single effective isoscalar ma tte r! E ne rg y gradient term to be fitted on nuclear masses func tio na ls c o nta in � �, � � � �� � � �� � ma ny te rms Observables from � � -ETF with => Unc e rta inty in g ra die nt parametrized density profiles c o upling s g e ts mixe d up with � �� unc e rta inty in P k � � � � ��� � � � 1 � � Analytical integration of the Fermi integrals F.Aymard et al., J.Phys.G43,045105(2016)

  12. Calibrating the gradient term � �, � � � ���� � � �� � • � �, � � � ���� � � �� � N= Z � � � ∆� � C � 20 Optimized C Sly4 • Residual deviations are due to the semi- classical approximation

  13. Semi-magic isotopic chains + Z= 2 0 Z= 2 8 Z= 5 0 Z= 8 2 (N-Z)/ A

  14. Exploring the parameter space Average binding-energy deviation Average binding-energy deviation

  15. Results: radii Afte r filte r;  c uto ff =0.2 Me V • Exp data

  16. Results: n-skin

  17. Results: correlations � � � � � � � � � ��� � ∗ � � � � ∆� � ∆� � � � � � � � � � � � ��� � ∗ � � � � � � � � � � ��� � ∗ � � � � ∆�

  18. Conclusions • Co nstra ints o n E o S e mpiric a l pa ra me te rs ne e d b o th NS physic s a nd la b o ra to ry e xpe rime nts • We pro po se a n e mpiric a l E o S a vo iding spurio us c o nstra ints fro m the e ne rg y de nsity func tio na l fo rm • F inite nuc le i o b se rva b le s fro m E T F with a sing le g ra die nt te rm fixe d fro m nuc le a r ma ss • Ba ye sia n de te rmina tio n o f pa ra me te rs with fla t o r g a ussia n prio r • T hird orde r de riva tive s still la rg e ly unc onstra ine d • SKIN CORRE L AT E D T O L • AL MOST NO CORRE L AT ION AMONG E MP.PARAME T E RS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend