Environmental modifiers: Prospects for rehabilitation in Huntingtons - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

environmental modifiers prospects for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Environmental modifiers: Prospects for rehabilitation in Huntingtons - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Environmental modifiers: Prospects for rehabilitation in Huntingtons disease Jan Frich Oslo University Hospital / University of Oslo EHDN 8th Plenary Meeting, Sept 19, 2014 Background Growing interest in studying effects of exercise and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Environmental modifiers: Prospects for rehabilitation in Huntington’s disease

Jan Frich

Oslo University Hospital / University of Oslo EHDN 8th Plenary Meeting, Sept 19, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Growing interest in studying effects of exercise and

rehabilitation in patients with Huntington’s disease (HD)

  • Programs may have different formats:

– Home-based exercise programs – Community-based exercise/rehabilitation programs – Inpatient (intensive/multidisciplinary) rehabilitation programs

(For example: Khalil et al, 2013; Busse et al 2013; Zinzi et al 2007; Piira et al 2013)

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Activities

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo

(Photo: North Norway Rehabilitation Center)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Research

  • Target groups: Early- to mid-stage HD
  • Observational studies indicate positive effects of

multidisciplinary rehabilitation on physical function/balance, swallowing, independence, mood and social relationships

(Zinzi et al, Clin Rehab 2007; Ciancarelli et al, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2013; Thompson et al Eur J Neurol 2013)

  • A randomized study of a 12-week community based program

found that the program was safe, feasible, acceptable and suggests beneficial effects of rehabilitation

(Busse et al, JNPT, 2013)

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Norwegian Project

  • Intensive rehabilitation programs for patients with HD was

funded by the Norwegian Directorate of Health in 2009

  • The initiative was inspired by the results from a landmark
  • bservational study (Zinzi et al, Clin Rehab, 2007)
  • The aim of the mixed-method evaluation was to assess the

feasibility and the effects of participating in a one-year multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

Ethical approval by Norwegian Social Science Data Services (ref. 26587) and The Regional Ethics Committee, Health Region South-East (ref. 2010/1026-1)

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Participants

  • Inclusion

– Clinical diagnosis of Huntinton’s disease – Early- to midphase (Shoulson & Fahn, stage I-III) – Age > 18 years

  • Exclusion

– Serious psychiatric conditions – No apparent severe impairment in general cognitive function at the time of first admission

Piira A, van Welsam MR, Mikalsen G, Nilsen KH, Knutsen S, Frich JC. Effects of a one year intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Huntington’s disease: a prospective intervention study. PLOS Curr 2013. doi: 10.1371/currents.hd.9504af71e0d1f87830c25c394be47027

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Stay 1 (3 weeks) Stay 3 (3 weeks) Stay 2 (3 weeks) Evaluation stay 3 months (95.4 days (SD ±34.2) after discharge of the last stay

One year program: 3 x 3 weeks stay + evaluation stay

North Norway Rehabilitation Center Vikersund

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Start of each stay Cognitive function (MSSE), depression (HADS), motor function, balance, gait (ABC, 6 Min. Walk Test …) ADL (Barthel) End of each stay Motor function, balance, gait

Three weeks stay

  • 8 hours of various activities 5 days a week
  • Groups of 4-6
  • Physiotherapy / exercise
  • Group meetings, trips, making food, etc

3 months …

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-9
SLIDE 9

The multidisciplinary team

  • Physician/neurologist
  • Nurses
  • Physical therapist
  • Occupational therapist
  • Speech therapist
  • Dietician
  • Social worker
  • Psychologist
  • The institutions are specialised

regional rehabilitation centres (stroke rehabilitation etc.)

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Characteristics of the sample (baseline), n = 37

Variables

Male N = 18 (48,6%) Female N = 19 (51,4%) Age 52,4 SD = 13,1 Symptom duration 7,2 år SD = 5,7 Total Functional Capacity (0-13) 8,9 SD = 2,3 Stage (Shoulson & Fahn) I 9 (24,3%) II 21 (56,8%) III 7 (18,9%) UHDRS motor 36,6 16,8 UHDRS behavior 9,2 8,5

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Clinical measures Mean SD

MMSE 25,4 3,5 BMI 22,8 3,2 Activities of Balance Confidence (ABC) 72,6 23,9 Bergs Balance Scale (BBS) 52,1 3,8 Timed up and og (TUG) 8,1 3,1 10 Meter Walk test (10MWT) 6,8 2,6 6 Min Walk test (6MWT) 484,9 147,5 Barthel index 19,2 1,3 HADS 8,2 8,7 SF-12 (physical health) 43,9 9,4 SF-12 (mental health) 52,2 11,2

Clinical measures at baseline, n = 37

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 31 out of 37 completed the one-year program as

planned (83,8 %)

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fig 1. Mean change in health-related quality of life (SF-12)

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

10 20 30 40 50 60

Mental health Physical health

Score Baseline Evaluation stay

ns

p=0,000

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fig 2) Mean change in 6 Minutes Walk Test (meters)

440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 6 Minute Walk Test Meter

Baseline Evaluation stay

p=0,000

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fig 3) Change in gait function

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Baseline Evaluation stay

M/S or seconds Timed-up-and-go and 10 Meter Walk Test Timed-up-and-go test (Seconds) 10 Meter Walk Test (m/s) p=0,000 p=0,000

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fig 4) Mean change in balance: Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Activities of Balance Confidence scale (ABC)

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 BBS ABC

Scores Baseline Evaluation stay p= 0.032

ns

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fig 5) Mean change in BMI, HADS and Barthel Index

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

5 10 15 20 25

HADS BMI Barthel index Score Baseline Evaluation stay p=,013 p=,004 ns

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Fig 6) Mean change in cognitive scores

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Stroop word Stroop colour Stroop interference Verbal fluency Symbol digit modality test MMSE

Score

Baseline Evaluation stay

ns ns ns ns p=0,019 ns

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Main findings

Piira A, et al PLOS Curr 2013

  • Significant improvements were observed in gait function,

balance, in physical quality of life, anxiety and depression, as well as in BMI

  • ADL-function remained stable with no significant decline
  • One cognitive measure (SDMT) showed significant

decline, while no decline was observed for the remaining cognitive measures

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Feasibility?

  • A qualitative, explorative study
  • In-depth interviews with 11 patients and 9 family caregivers
  • Focus groups with 15 health professionals
  • Research questions:

– How did participants experience the structure and content? – What outcomes did patients experience? – What challenges and success factors did health professionals report?

Frich JC, Røthing M, Berge AR. Participants’, caregivers’, and professionals’ experiences with a group-based rehabilitation program for Huntington’s disease: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 395.

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Participants’ experiences

  • Some had difficulties defining individual rehabilitation goals:

– “Goal setting for individuals with HD is not necessarily a straightforward process. Perhaps that’s exactly what they need to work

  • n … then need to find out what they need to work on”

(interview with health professional)

  • Written individualised plans and schedules were appreciated
  • Being member of an “HD-group” was valuable, though there

could be tensions and conflicts in groups

Frich JC et al 2014

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Participants typically reported improved gait and balance,

increased self-confidence, and social outcomes:

– “ I have become more open, in a way, and if I fall, I will get back on my feet again … this is not how it used to be. I used to be afraid of walking around, in case I would fall” (interview with participant)

  • The intensive schedule was acceptable for most participants
  • Adjustments had been made to allow for more time between

sessions

Frich JC et al 2014

Participants’ experiences

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Health professionals - success factors were

– Assigning every patient with a contact person – Using clinical test results as motivation – Supervising health professionals in patients’ local municipalities

Frich JC et al 2014

Participants’ experiences

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusions

  • Intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for individuals with

early- to mid-stage HD is feasible and associated with improved motor function and physical quality of life

  • Participants emphasise mental and social outcomes in

addition to physical outcomes

  • An individually tailored plan, a contact person, a peer group

approach and communication between institutions and primary health professionals could be mediators of outcomes

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conclusions

  • Randomised controlled trials are needed to study effects of

various interventions, as well as cost-benefit analysis of interventions

  • Future research should aim at studying effects of specific

components in rehabilitation programs

  • Tensions between a standardised “intervention” and an

individually tailored approach?

Busse, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation: what future? EHDN News, 2014

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Acknowledgements

  • The research team:

Anu Piira, Jan Frich, Marleen van Walsem, Synnøve F. Knutsen, Geir Mikalsen, Kjell Havik Nilsen, Alf Reiar Berge, Merete Røthing, Lars Øie

  • Thanks to:

– Patients, families and The Norwegian Association for HD – North Norway Rehabilitation Center – Vikersund Rehabilitation Center – Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital – The Norwegian Directorate of Health – Bodil Stokke & Arvid Heiberg

  • Prof. Jan Frich, University of Oslo