Enhancing the Child’s Voice in Clinical Care and Research
Bryce B. Reeve, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Health Policy and Management Member, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center bbreeve@email.unc.edu
Enhancing the Child s Voice in Clinical Care and Research Bryce B. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Enhancing the Child s Voice in Clinical Care and Research Bryce B. Reeve, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Health Policy and Management Member, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center bbreeve@email.unc.edu No Disclosures Standardized, routine
Enhancing the Child’s Voice in Clinical Care and Research
Bryce B. Reeve, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Health Policy and Management Member, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center bbreeve@email.unc.edu
Standardized, routine assessment of symptoms, functional status, needs and
children (and their caregivers) integrated within the healthcare delivery system.
Are clinicians & caregivers a reliable source?
undergoing chemotherapy.1
– Child and Parent: r = 0.35 – Child and Clinician: r = 0.16
– Child and Clinicians: pain (r = .25), energy (r = .23), mental health (r = .31)
– Child and Clinicians: pain (k = .52), emotion (k = .27)
– Child and Clinicians: pain (k = .14), emotion (k = .14)
1Hockenberry MJ, et al. Three instruments to assess fatigue in children with cancer: the child, parent and staff perspectives. Journal
2Parsons SK, et al. Health-related quality of life in pediatric bone marrow transplant survivors: according to whom? International
Journal of Cancer Supplement. 1999;12:46-51.
3Le Gales C, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of a health status classification system in children with cancer. First results of the French
adaptation of the Health Utilities Index Marks 2 and 3. International Journal of Cancer Supplement . 1999;12:112-8.
4Glaser AW, et al. Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous
system tumors in childhood. Quality of Life Research. 1997;6(1):43-53.
and the treatments on children’s lives.
Dynamic, integrated, electronic system to routinely screen children for symptoms (and other key outcomes) and to provide real time feedback to clinicians EMR IT PRO measures
Funded by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI): R01CA175759 & Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
Design and Validation of a self-report measure of symptom toxicities children (7-20 years) experience while undergoing cancer treatment
University of North Carolina Children’s National Medical Center
Children’s Research Hospital Children’s Hospital Los Angeles DFCI / Boston Children’s Hospital Palmetto Health Hospital for Sick Children
http://unclineberger.org/pedpro
University of North Carolina
Children’s National Medical Center, DC
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Palmetto Health
Hospital for Sick Children
Children’s Hospital (LA)
16 Core CTCAE terms Abdominal Pain Cough Anxiety Anorexia Pain Depression Nausea Headache Fatigue Vomiting Fever Insomnia Constipation Peripheral sensory neuropathy Diarrhea Mucositis oral 47 Other selected CTCAE terms Abdominal distension Epistaxis Restlessness Alopecia Fall Skin ulceration Arthralgia Fecal incontinence Sneezing Blurred vision Flashing lights Sore throat Bruising Flatulence Suicidal Ideation Chills General muscle weakness Tinnitus Concentration impairment Hiccups Urinary frequency Dizziness Hoarseness Urinary incontinence Dry eye Hot flashes Urinary tract pain Dry mouth Hyperhidrosis Urinary urgency Dry skin Memory Impairment Urine discoloration Dysgeusia Myalgia Urticaria Dyspepsia Palpitations Voice alteration Dysphagia Photosensitivity Watering eyes Dyspnea Pruritus Wheezing Edema limbs Rash acneiform
dysphagia = “problems with swallowing” abdominal pain = “stomach pain” nausea = “feel sick to your stomach” fatigue = “feeling tired” urinary incontinence = “wet yourself on accident”
Translate Medical Jargon to Child and Adolescent Friendly Terms
1) How often did you have pain? 2) How bad was your pain? 3) How much did pain keep you from doing things you usually do?
not at all some a lot a whole lot did not have any a little bad very bad never sometimes most of the time almost all the time
CTCAE Term Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
Pain
No pain Mild pain Moderate pain; limiting activities
Severe pain; limiting self care
7 days,
e-PRO EMR Dashboard
Clinicians
Data Warehouse
Comparative Effectiveness Research Quality Improvement
IOM and National Cancer Policy Forum workshop Washington, DC; Oct. 5-6, 2009
– Expand testing and use of patient-reported (and proxy) tools across life span – Build evidence base on value of PROs as a process variable or predictor – Integrate patient-reported data with clinical data to inform guidelines – Identify optimal ways to present data to clinicians and patients (& caregivers) – Lessons learned from existing systems
– Collaborate with EMR vendors and Office of National Coordinator – Educate clinicians and administrators on value of patient-reported data – Make PRO assessment a vital sign
– Develop guidelines for care – Establish quality standards – Align PRO assessment and reimbursement
their care
treatment enhancing the odds for better
impact of cancer and treatment on the children’s lives
Interviewer: Why do you think the questions were easy to answer? 9-year old girl’s response: “Because it was mainly stuff about myself and I know everything about myself.”
Let’s do this together.