Endoscopic Therapy of Colorectal Polyps Douglas K Rex Indiana - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

endoscopic therapy of colorectal polyps
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Endoscopic Therapy of Colorectal Polyps Douglas K Rex Indiana - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Endoscopic Therapy of Colorectal Polyps Douglas K Rex Indiana University Medical Center Indianapolis, IN Topics listed in the brochure Realistic miss rate of significant polyps during colonoscopy Is withdrawal time a realistic quality


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Endoscopic Therapy of Colorectal Polyps

Douglas K Rex Indiana University Medical Center Indianapolis, IN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Topics listed in the brochure

  • Realistic miss rate of significant polyps during

colonoscopy

  • Is withdrawal time a realistic quality indicator?
  • Is repeat colonoscopy ever justified for missed polyps?
  • Does the data showing the reduction of colon cancer

by screening colonoscopy factor in missed polyps and flat lesions?

  • What to do with diminutive polyps?
  • Not covered: Endoscopic therapy of colorectal polyps

(but we can discuss it in the Q and A)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Realistic miss rate for “significant polyps”

  • Rex tandem colonoscopy study: 6% (2/32) for

adenomas ≥ 10 mm

  • CTC studies

– Pickhardt: 12% – Van Gelder: 17%

  • In clinical practice you can’t measure the miss

rate: you can only infer it from what is detected (the adenoma detection rate)

– Barclay (Rockford) and Chen (Indiana): a group of endoscopists misses more than half of the large adenomas

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why don’t we measure large adenoma detection rates?

  • Harder to specify the expected range and

acceptable thresholds

  • Subject to operator error in measuring

polyp size

  • Have to examine 5-10 times as many

records

  • In both the Rockford and Indiana studies

large adenoma detection correlated with

  • verall adenoma detection
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is withdrawal time a realistic quality indicator?

  • Primary measure of the quality of mucosal

inspection is the ADR

  • Withdrawal time is a secondary indicator; it

does not explain all variation in ADR

– Consistent statistical correlation across studies – Increasing WT increased ADR in the Rockford study (not in a study from Boston)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Withdrawal time as a quality indicator

  • Easy to measure (record cecal intubation

times – WT counted only if no polypectomy or biopsies performed)

  • Emerging as a standard of care issue

despite warnings of USMSTF and ASGE/ACG

  • Should be measure in all patients
  • Should be first focus if the ADR is low
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Does the reduction of colon cancer by screening colonoscopy factor in missed polyps and flat lesion?

  • Which data are you speaking of?

– No RCT of screening colonoscopy – 1 cohort study of screening colonoscopy (Kahi et al CGH 2009) – Multiple adenoma cohorts: NPS, U.S. dietary trials, U.S. chemoprevention trials, Funen adenoma study – Case control studies: Brenner, Muller – Sonnenberg, Singh, Baxter

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Does the reduction of colon cancer by colonoscopy factor in missed polyps and flat adenomas?

  • Of the various causes of interval cancers,

quantitative assignment of the causes is not currently possible

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why do interval cancers occur?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What to do with diminutive polyps?

  • Current policy: resect all except ok to

sample multiple diminutive rectosigmoid polyps that look hyperplastic

  • Future policies:

– Leave diminutive HP polyps in the distal colon in place; use photo as documentation

  • f histology

– “Resect and discard” diminutive polyps

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Accurate real time histology techniques

  • Narrow band imaging with and without HM
  • FICE
  • I Scan
  • Confocal laser microscopy
  • Endocytoscopy
  • Chromoendoscopy with high magnification
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17