Elastic Electron Scattering for Proton Charge Radius Determination - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

elastic electron scattering for proton charge radius
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Elastic Electron Scattering for Proton Charge Radius Determination - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CPHI @ Yerevan, Sep. 24-28, 2018 Elastic Electron Scattering for Proton Charge Radius Determination Toshimi Suda Tohoku University Sendai, Japan for ULQ 2 (Ultra-Low Q 2 ) Collaboration Tohoku Univ. K. Tsukada, Y. Honda, T. Tamae. T. Mutoh,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Elastic Electron Scattering for Proton Charge Radius Determination

Toshimi Suda

Tohoku University Sendai, Japan

Tohoku Univ.:K. Tsukada, Y. Honda, T. Tamae. T. Mutoh, K. Takahashi,

  • K. Nambu, M. Miyabe, A. Tokiyasu, K. Nanba, T. Aoyagi

Miyazaki Univ.: Y. Maeda

for ULQ2 (Ultra-Low Q2) Collaboration

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Ee = 20 - 60 MeV !!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Short-Lived Exotic Nuclei

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

RIKEN RI Beam Factory world’s highest intensities of exotic beams ( 2007 ~ )

in-flight fragmentation of U E = 350 MeV/A I ~ 1 pμA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

size shape proton

isotope shift electron scattering

matter

reaction cross section proton scattering

size and shape of neutro- and proton-rich nuclei

⇢c(~ r) = X

p

∗(~ r) (~ r)

< r2

c >=

Z r2⇢c(r) d~ r

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Electron scattering off short-lived exotic nuclei

L ~ 1027 /cm2/s with only ~108 target nuclei

SCRIT ( Self-Confining RI ion Target )

dσ dΩ = dσMott dΩ |Fc(q)|2

Fc(q) =

  • c(⌥

r)ei⇧

q⇧ rd⌥

r

Elastic electron scattering

⇢c(~ r) = X

p

p(~

r) p(~ r)

Short-lived Exotic Nuclei

Production-hard + Short-lived

Nuclei targeted so far for electron scattering

Charge density distribution Charge radius

Expected low luminosities

H.deVries, C. deJager and C. deVries Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 36 (987)495

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Ee Nbeam ρ・t L

Hofstadter’s era (1950s)

150 MeV ~ 1nA (~109 /s) ~1019 /cm2 ~1028 /cm2/s

JLAB

6 GeV ~100μA (~1014 /s) ~1024 /cm2 ~1038 /cm2/s

SCRIT

150 - 300 MeV ~200 mA (~1018 /s) ~ 1010 /cm2 ~1027 /cm2/s

Luminosities

Electrodes for mirror potential ions from an external ion source scattered electron trapped ions electron beam

SCRIT (Self-Confining RI Ion Target) : ion trapping

  • Nucl. Inst. Meth. A532 (2004) 216.
  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 164801.
  • Pbys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 102501.
  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 262501.

Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 96 (2017) 1. ….

~108 ions are trapped on e-beam (~ 1 mm2) Nt ~108 /mm2 => 1010 /cm2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

SCRIT facility in RIKEN/RI Beam Factory

world’s first electron scattering facility for exotic nuclei

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

the latest “Nuclear Physics News”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Proton Charge Radius by Elastic Electron Scattering

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Why is the proton radius a hot topics ?

1) the radius is one of the basic properties of the nucleon 3) possible new physics beyond Standard Model (??)

Lepton Universality (e <-> μ)??

2) the radius is strongly correlated to the Rydberg constant

∆E = α · RRydberg + β· < r2 >

ΔE = RRydberg( 1 n2 − 1 m2 )

R∞ = 10973 731.568 539 ± 0.000 055 m−1

rp uncertainty

4) the neutron-skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei => EOS of neutron matter

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

< r2 >= Z r2⇢(~ r)d~ r = 4π Z r4 ρ(r) dr

Charge radius and charge density

R r r2⇢(r)d~ r R ∞ r2⇢(r)d~ r

Proton < r2 >1/2

~ exponential

Proton(~0.8 fm)

Ratio = 98 %

GE(Q2) ∼ 1 − < r2 >1/2 6 Q2 + < r4 >1/2 120 Q4 − ...

< r2 >≡ −6 dGE(Q2) dQ2 |Q2→0

Mainz (2014) Ee ≥ 180 MeV PRC 90 (2014) 015206.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Absolute GE(Q2) at lower Q2 region

1)no absolute GE(Q2) (“floating”) 2) χ2 is quite similar

< r2 >≡ −6 dGE(Q2) dQ2 |Q2→0

a toy model for larger radius

“floating”

  • I. Sick, Atoms 2018, 6, 2

ABSOLUTE GE(Q2) at lower Q2 region !!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

electron scattering under Ultra-Low Q2

The goal of this project GE(Q2) measurements at 0.0003 ≤ Q2 ≤ 0.008 (GeV/c)2

  • Exp. @ Tohoku Low-Energy Electron Linac (Ee = 20 - 60 MeV)

Absolute cross section measurement with 10-3 precision Rosenbluth separated GE(Q2), GM(Q2) ULQ2

Mainz (2014) Ee ≥ 180 MeV PRC 90 (2014) 015206.

  • nly ~ 2%
slide-15
SLIDE 15

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Tohoku Univ. Sendai

ULQ2 @ Sendai

ULQ2 collaboration (Ultra-Low Q2)

RIKEN RI Beam Factory

60 MeV e-linac 1.3 GeV synchrotron

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Research Center for Electron-Photon Science, Tohoku University

60 MeV electron linac ~10 kW electron beam (150 uA) Radioactive Isotope photo-production

1.3 GeV booster synchrotron

  • Exp. Hall 2

GeV-γ Hall NKS II FOREST 90 MeV e-Linac (injector)

GeV γ beam

60 MeV e-Linac

γ/e beam GeV γ beam

  • Exp. Hall 1

1.3 GeV Booster Ring tagged photons (~ 1 GeV) meson photoproduction, hypernucleus

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

e-scattering off proton at ultra-low Q2 region

Goal of our experiment GE(Q2) measurements in 0.0003 ≤ Q2 ≤ 0.008 (GeV/c)2 Our experiments Low-energy electron scattering Absolute cross section measurement Rosenbluth separation (GE(Q2), GM(Q2)) Challenges Absolute cross section (GE(Q2)) with 10-3 accuracy experimental challenges for measurement theoretical challenges for interpretation 20 ≤ Ee ≤ 60 MeV 30 ≤ θ ≤ 150° Δp/p ~ 10-3 accelerator, instruments Tohoku low-energy electron linac + experimental hall new beam line + double-arm spectrometer

slide-18
SLIDE 18

物理学会シンポジウム 2018.03.22

e e’ θ

momentum transfer energy transfer 4 momentum transfer

Q2 = q2 − ω2 = 4

~ q = ~ e − ~ e0

ω = e − e0

2 = 4 e e0sin2(θ/2)

dσ dΩ = ( dσ dΩ)Mott G2

E(Q2) + ⌧ ✏ G2 M(Q2)

1 + τ

✏ = 1 1 + 2(1 + ⌧)tan2 θ

2

τ = Q2 4m2

p

( dσ dΩ)Mott = z2α2 4e2 cos2(θ/2) sin4(θ/2) ∝ e2 q4

Proton charge radius by e-scattering

One Photon Exchange Approx.

∈ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 ]

2

[(GeV/c)

2

Q

4 −

10

3 −

10

2 −

10

Beam Energy 60MeV 50MeV 40MeV 30MeV 20MeV

°

30

°

40

°

50

°

60

°

70

°

80

°

90

°

100

°

110

°

120

°

130

°

140

°

150

measurable

  • Q
slide-19
SLIDE 19

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Absolute cross section (GE(Q2)) with 10-3 accuracy

Challenges ….

relative measurement to well-known (established) cross section

Moeller cross section : PRAD@JLAB

Ultra Relativistic Limit : me -> 0 ?? finite effects : up to a few % depending on kinematics

12CH2(e,e’) cross section ULQ2@Tohoku

large scattering angle coverage for GE/GM separation Coulomb distortion effects not negligible ( ~ 0.2 % level ) Low energy electron detection with high resolution no tracking, frequent spectrometer setting changes ,,,

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

1.3 GeV booster synchrotron

  • Exp. Hall 2

GeV-γ Hall NKS II FOREST 90 MeV e-Linac (injector)

GeV γ beam

60 MeV e-Linac

γ/e beam GeV γ beam

  • Exp. Hall 1

e-beam

2 m

New beam line and spectrometers

new beam line

+ new spectrometer(s)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Electron spectrometer (P = 20 - 60 MeV/c) Low energy : Ee = 20 - 60 MeV high-resolution without tracking “old-fashioned” spectrometer

1175

910

Electron spectrometer radius 500 mm bending angle 90°

  • max. B

0.4T@60MeV gap 70 mm dispersion 850 mm Δp/p 8×10-4 momentum bite 10% Δθ 5 mrad solid angle 10 mSr

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CPHI @ Yerevan,

  • Sep. 24-28, 2018

Summary

1) elastic e+p scattering at ultra-low Q2 region 2) GE(Q2) at 0.0003 ≤ Q2 ≤ 0.008 (GeV/c)2 3) GE is extracted by Rosenbluth separation 4) Absolute cross section measurement relative to 12C(e,e)12C : sys. err. ~3x10-3 5) Ee = 20 - 60 MeV, θ = 30 - 150° 6) the new beam line, and spectrometer are under construction 7) the experiments will start in 2019