Ecosystem-based Adaptation and Insurance: Success, Challenges and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ecosystem based adaptation and insurance success
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ecosystem-based Adaptation and Insurance: Success, Challenges and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome to the webinar within the discussion series of the international EbA Community of Practice Ecosystem-based Adaptation and Insurance: Success, Challenges and Opportunities Thursday, 14 November 2019 Agenda Introducing the findings of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Welcome to the webinar within the discussion series of the international EbA Community of Practice

Ecosystem-based Adaptation and Insurance: Success, Challenges and Opportunities

Thursday, 14 November 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

Introducing the findings of the study on Ecosystem-based Adaptation and Insurance: Success, Challenges and Opportunities Panelists:  Michael Beck (University of California Santa Cruz)  Kerstin Pfliegner (The Nature Conservancy)  Oliver Quast (Social Impact Partners)  Daniel Stadtmüller (InsuResilience Secretariat, GIZ) Questions & Answers Facilitation: Andrea Bender (GIZ)

This webinar is being recorded and will be published on:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who we are

3

Insurance and Ecosystem-based Adaptation: Successes, Challenges and Opportunities

14th November 2019 Mike Beck, Oliver Quast, Kerstin Pfliegner

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Foto Kerstin Mike Beck Academia Oliver Quast Risk Management Kerstin Pfliegner NGO

The authors A mix of a variety of backgrounds

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Definitions What is CRFI and EBA?

5

Climate Risk Financing and Insurance (CRFI)

The ability of the insurance industry to support people to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change through

  • knowledge or
  • risk transfer or
  • direct investment

Ecosystem Based Adaptation (EbA)

The use of biodiversity and ecosystem services as part of an

  • verall adaptation strategy to help people to adapt to the

adverse effects of climate change

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Scientific background

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10 yr with Habitat 10 yr w/out Habitat Estimate Waves Offshore Estimate Waves Nearshore Estimate Effects

  • f Habitats

Estimate Flooding Storm Freq.

Assess Damages

Damages

World Bank. 2016. Guidelines for Measuring and Valuing the Coastal Protection Services of Mangroves and Coral Reefs. M.W. Beck & G-M. Lange, editors.

Scientific Background Recommended approach: Expected damage function

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Beck et al. 2018. The global flood protection savings provided by coral reefs. Nature Communications 9:2186

Scientific Background Annual expected benefit from reefs: avoided flood damage in USD M / 20km

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Losada, Beck et al. 2018. The global value of mangroves for risk reduction. TNC, Berlin.

Scientific Background Annual flood reduction benefits from mangroves

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 625 Million US$
  • 15% avg reduction

Difference in Losses (%)

<-60

  • 60 to - 50
  • 50 to -25
  • 25 to -10
  • 10 to -5
  • 5 to -0.5
  • 0.5 to 0.5

0.5 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 >100

Narayan, Beck et al. 2017. The value of coastal wetlands for flood damage reduction in the northeastern USA. Scientific Reports 7:9463.

Scientific Background Value of marshes for property damage reduction during hurricane Sandy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

$1.5 Billion in Avoided Property damages during Irma 25% Annual Reductions

Narayan, Thomas, Shepard, K. Nzerem, M. W. Beck et al. 2019. Valuing the Flood Risk Reduction Benefits of Florida’s Mangroves. TNC.

Scientific Background Value of mangroves for property damage reduction during hurricane Irma

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Annual Expected Benefits

$1.8 Billion

Storlazzi, Reguero, Beck et al. 2019. Rigorously valuing the role

  • f U.S. coral reefs in coastal hazard risk reduction. USGS.

Scientific Background High resolution valuation for US reef benefits

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case Studies –methods of analysis and examples

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Case Studies - Methods Qualitative assessment of successes, challenges and gaps for 11 cases

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2 4 6 8 10 12

Climate Risk Identified EBA Solution identified Ecosystem service function identified Climate Risk rigorously assessed EBA Benefits rigorously assessed CRFI Product Developed Seller Identified Buyer Identified EBA Project Designed EBA Project Implemented Project Implementer Identified Monitoring protocol developed Monitoring implemented

Case Studies - Methods Criteria-based analysis

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FEMA (2019): National Flood Insurance Program, available online at: https://www.fema.gov/national-flood- insurance-program.

Case Studies US FEMA: Community Rating System (CRS) and cost benefit analysis (CBA)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Benefit:Cost Ratio

< 0.5 > 0.5 > 0.75 > 1 > 2

Case Studies FEMA recovery efforts: Benefits / Costs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case Studies: Example Mesoamerican Reef Insurance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Findings

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lack of understanding EbA solutions are not well understood by the risk industry No pilot projects No fully implemented CFRI and EbA demonstration projects as yet (pre-disaster financing and post- disaster financing) General quantification is missing Risk reduction benefits available for only a few ecosystems and are not yet broadly evaluated, wetlands have been considered in industry risk models Funding is available High level interest and key funding are available for solutions that meet multiple objectives Involvement of many parties necessary Multi-stakeholder interests make EbA implementation difficult

Findings Selection of observations

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Recommendations

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

vs.

Perception Reality

Recommendations Educate stakeholders about facts

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reality Perception

vs.

Grey infrastructure Green / blue EbA measures Financial benefits

  • Less costs
  • Additional revenue

>

Biodiversity

Benefits for the Environment

Social Aspects

Generation of employment

Recommendations Look at EbA from a holistic perspective

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Quantification is needed EbA benefits need to be better quantified and with tools and approaches of industry (e.g. surveys) Modelling tools need to reflect EBA measures The key data (e.g. bathymetry) are in many models however EbA is not fully reflected Build from easier solutions to integrate insurance and EbA Social impact bonds offer great opportunities Focus: Start where financial benefits are greatest To combine private insurance and EbA will require focusing where (private) assets are greatest Cover frequency events through EbA measures Effects are more visible and stakeholders easier to convince Innovative insurers Innovative insurers will invest time and recognize the bis overlaps between concepts

Recommendations Key recommendations

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you More in the report, online available here: https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/EbA_insurance_publication_2019_web.pdf

Mike Beck

mwbeck@ucsc.edu

Oliver Quast

  • .quast@socialimpactpartners.eu

Kerstin Pfliegner

Kerstin.pfliegner@tnc.org

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Questions or comments?

Please use the chat box

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Thank you for your participation! Was this webinar useful for you? Please give us feedback via the chat box or email to:

andrea.bender@giz.de

Implemented by:

The recording of this webinar will be published on: