Paris, 18 February 2016
11h00
Catherine L. Mann
OECD Chief Economist
OECD INTERIM ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Stronger growth remains elusive: Urgent policy response is needed
www.oecd.org/economy/economicoutlook.htm ECOSCOPE blog: oecdecoscope.wordpress.com/
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Stronger growth remains elusive: Urgent policy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OECD INTERIM ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Stronger growth remains elusive: Urgent policy response is needed Paris, 18 February 2016 11h00 Catherine L. Mann OECD Chief Economist www.oecd.org/economy/economicoutlook.htm ECOSCOPE blog:
www.oecd.org/economy/economicoutlook.htm ECOSCOPE blog: oecdecoscope.wordpress.com/
2
3
Source: OECD Economic Outlook databases; and OECD calculations.
4
Economic Outlook forecasts.
2015 Column2 Column3 February 2016 Interim Projections difference from November Economic Outlook2 February 2016 Interim Projections2 difference from November Economic Outlook22 World 3.0 3.0
3.3
United States 2.4 2.0
2.2
Euro area 1.5 1.4
1.7
Germany 1.4 1.3
1.7
France 1.1 1.2
1.5
Italy 0.6 1.0
1.4 0.0 Japan 0.4 0.8
0.6 0.1 Canada 1.2 1.4
2.2
United Kingdom 2.2 2.1
2.0
China 6.9 6.5 0.0 6.2 0.0 India3 7.4 7.4 0.1 7.3
Brazil
0.0
Rest of the World 2.1 2.5
3.1
2016 2017
5
Source: OECD Economic Outlook Database
6
Note: Manufacturing (secondary) includes construction. Source: Chinese National Bureau of Statistics; People’s Bank of China; and Thomson Reuters.
7
The sharp fall in oil and commodity prices reflects supply running ahead of demand Lower oil prices should help consumers, but have depressed investment
Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; and Thomson Reuters.
8
Note: World trade is goods plus services trade volumes. World GDP growth is measured at purchasing power parities. Source: OECD Economic Outlook database.
9
Note: Latest month available. Core inflation is for consumer prices excluding food and energy. The private consumption deflator is used for the United States. Source: OECD Economic Outlook databases.
10
Source: Thomson Reuters.
11
Source: OECD Exchange Rate database; and Thomson Reuters.
EMBI Composite, basis points
12
Percent of GDP
Percent of GDP, 2014 or latest available
Note: Credit to non-financial corporates. For South Africa, 2008 rather than 2007. Source: OECD November 2015 Economic Outlook database; BIS; and OECD calculations.
13
14
Note: Policy rate shows the top of the target range.
Source: Thomson Reuters; Bloomberg; and OECD calculations.
15
Note: For China, change in the general government balance as a per cent of GDP from 2014-15. Source: OECD Economic Outlook databases.
2014-16
Tighter policy
16
Source: Thomson Reuters.
17
1st year effects of a ½ per cent of GDP public investment stimulus by all OECD economies
Change from baseline
Note: Simulation using the NiGEM model, based on a two-year increase in the level of government investment equivalent to ½ per cent of GDP per annum in all OECD countries. The euro area figures are a weighted average of Germany, France and Italy. Source: OECD calculations.
18
Note: Calculated for all countries for which recommendations are available. Emerging market economies include Brazil, Chile, China, Columbia, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Turkey and South Africa; Mexico and Turkey only prior to 2011. Advanced includes the rest of the OECD. Source: OECD Going for Growth 2016 (forthcoming).
Share of recommendations implemented
Deleveraging proceeded faster and further in the US than the euro area
19
Source: European Commission; Eurostat; and Fournier et al. (2015). Source: Eurostat; OECD Main Statistical Database; and OECD National Accounts Database.
Household and non-financial corporate debt
Harmonising and reducing regulation in the EU could raise FDI, and boost trade intensity by 10-25%
20
Note: The investment decline scenario reduces the growth rate of business investment in all European Economic Area countries by 2½ percentage points in both 2016 and 2017 due to higher policy uncertainty and expectations of weaker medium-term growth. The shock is equivalent to around one fifth of the policy uncertainty shock of 2011. The second scenario adds a 50 basis point increase in equity and investment risk premia in all EU countries, returning approximately one sixth of the financial conditions prevailing at the height of the euro area crisis. Source: OECD calculations.
Per cent
21