dynamics and algebraic integers
play

Dynamics and algebraic integers: Perspectives on Thurstons last - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Theorem ( Thurston, Entropy in dimension one, 2014 ) There exists a post-critically finite map f : I I with entropy h(f) = log( ) Dynamics and algebraic integers: Perspectives on Thurstons last theorem is a weak Perron number. 2


  1. Theorem ( Thurston, Entropy in dimension one, 2014 ) There exists a post-critically finite map f : I → I with entropy h(f) = log( λ ) Dynamics and algebraic integers: ⇔ Perspectives on Thurston’s last theorem λ is a weak Perron number. 2 Curtis McMullen algebraic integer Harvard University 1 λ ’ λ > 1 -2 -1 1 2 -1 PCF Perron -2 Examples of the h-principle Theorem ( Thurston, Entropy in dimension one, 2014 ) There exists a continuous, nowhere ( Weierstrass ) For any Perron number λ , differentiable function. there exists an f : I → I with h(f) = log( λ ) 0.3 0.2 0.1 Thesis: This result is an instance of the h-principle . 1.0 0.5 1.5 - 0.1 Given enough flexibility, anything that is not Defn. ``Every continuous section of a suitable partial differential relation - 0.2 obstructed will actually occur. in a jet bundle is homotopic to a holonomic section.’’ - 0.3 ( tennis ) ( Riggs lost )

  2. A closed hyperbolic surface embeds The sphere can be turned inside-out. ( Smale ) isometrically (C 1 ) into R 3 . ( Nash-Kuiper ) ( Thurston ) There exists a path-isometry f : S 2 ➝ R 2 . A manifold admits a codimension 1 ( Thurston ) foliation ⇔ χ (M) = 0 (Length of γ = length of f ∘ γ .) ( Gromov ) f ( Lawson, Haefliger, Bott )

  3. Constructing P from λ deg( λ ) = d There exists a Perron-Frobenius matrix P in M n ( Z ) with spectral radius ρ (P) = λ T in M d ( Z ) ( Lind ) PR d T ⇔ Tv = λ v λ is a Perron number. Q find convex n-gon Q, T(Q) ⊂ Q [v] algebraic integer ⇒ PF matrix P in M n ( R ) , Perron-Frobenius means P ij ≥ 0 ρ ( P ) = λ . λ ’ and P kij > 0 for some k. λ > 1 Even for cubic λ , we may be forced (M, Lind) Perron to take n ≫ 0. Golden mean example Theorem ( Thurston ) There exists a post-critically finite map f : I → I with entropy h(f) = log( λ ) A B � ⇔ 0.8 B λ is a (weak) Perron number. 0.6 ! 0 1 P = 1 1 Why is entropy is Perron? Markov partitions 0.4 A 0.2 =unifies= √ λ = ρ ( P ) = 1 + 5 PCF multimodal maps 2 A B 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 pseudo-Anosov maps automorphisms of free groups For any pcf f, h(f) = log(Perron)

  4. Constructing f from λ Quadratic Entropy Problem UNSTABLE Describe M 2 = { λ arising from quadratic f}. For any Perron number λ , there exists an f : I → I with h(f) = log( λ ) λ λ is in M 2 ⇔ 0 has finite orbit {Perron numbers λ } = ∪ M k under T λ (x) = λ (1 - |1-x|) M k = { λ arising from f with k laps} Q. Does there exist STABLE 0 2 an algorithm to test At any stage in the construction one can if λ is not in M 2 ? Known: Pisots ⊂ M 2 increase # laps or size of post-critical set. Unknown (e.g.): Is Lehmer’s number in M 2 ? [Proof. First step is Lind’s theorem. ] Surface Entropy Conjecture STABLE Minimum entropy problem for surfaces (open) There exists a pseudo-Anosov map log( δ g ) = min {h(f) : f pseudo-Anosov f : S → S with h(f) = log( λ ) ( Fried 1985, Thurston) on a surface of genus g} ⇔ λ is a biPerron number. = length of shortest geodesic on M g . ! 2 1 Example: δ 1 = root of t 2 -3t+1 1 1 algebraic unit δ 2 = root of t 4 -t 3 -t 2 -t+1 (Cho-Ham) (Lanneau--Thiffeault) λ -1 λ > 1 Problem: Determine δ g for all g. biPerron

  5. Q. Where do f with h(f) = O(1/g) come from? Minimum entropy problem for surfaces A. Fibered 3-manifolds. Known: δ g = 1+ O(1/g) (Penner, 1991) M = hyperbolic 3-manifold fibering over S 1 , Question: Does lim ( δ g ) g exist? (M, 2000) b 1 (M) > 1 ⇒ M fibers in infinitely many ways Conjecture: lim ( δ g ) g = δ 1 ⇒ infinitely many f : S → S whose (E. Hironaka, 2010) Theorem: limsup ( δ g ) g ≤ δ 1 mapping torus is M. • Among these are f with h(f) = O(1/g) (M, 2000) • All such f arise from finitely many M. (Aaber-Dunfield, Kin, ...) (Farb-Leininger-Margalit, 2011) Entropy of other fibrations M 3 → S 1 A manifold M from δ 1 (E. Hironaka, 2010) Teichmüller polynomial H 1 (M) M 3 = S 3 -L -1 � ⇥ 2 1 ∈ SL 2 ( Z ) 1 -1 1 1 1 = Mod 1 ∼ = Mod 0 , 4 -1 ⇔ t 2 -3t+1 Braids on 3 strands L 2g (t) = t 2g - t g (t+1+t -1 ) + 1 M 3 = S 3 -L fibers over S 1

  6. Teichmüller polynomial: Remaining problem: lower bounds for δ g . specializations Is there a more tractable, algebraic problem? L 4 (t) = t 4 - t 3 - t 2 - t + 1 ⇒ minimal genus 2 example [f : S → S] ⇒ genus g examples with δ (f) g ∼ δ 1 , train track map [F : τ → τ ] ⇒ L 2g (t) ⇒ in agreement with conjecture Perron-Frobenius P , δ (f) = ρ (P) . L 2g (t) = t 2g - X g (X+1+X -1 ) + 1 ≈ t 2g - 3t g + 1 Symplectic structure on P ML ⇒ P is reciprocal. (eigenvalues invariant under t → 1/t) Conclusion: limsup ( δ g ) g ≤ δ 1 Q. Can we give a lower bound on ρ (P)? Minimum entropy problem for graphs Scheme of the proof P in M n ( Z ), Perron-Frobenius Theorem (M, 2013) ↺ ↺ ⇒ metrized directed graph ( Γ ,1) Min ρ (P) : P in M 2g ( Z ) is reciprocal and Perron-Frobenius #(closed loops ≤ T) ≍ ρ (P) T = Optimal metric on Γ ⇒ invariant λ ( Γ ) T Largest root of ρ (P) n ≥ λ ( Γ ) L 2g (t) = t 2g - t g (t+1+t -1 ) + 1 • Fact: { Γ : λ ( Γ ) < M} is finite Corollary Case at hand, take M=8. ρ (P) g ≥ δ 1 for all P and g. ( δ 1 ) 2 = (golden ratio) 4 =6.854...

  7. 1556 different Γ with λ ( Γ ) ≤ 6 Scheme of the proof Analyze each Γ : λ ( Γ ) < 8. (2009) List of G with λ (G) < 8 Scheme of the proof (2013) G λ (G) Γ ⇒ curve complex G ... nA 1 2 ≤ n ≤ 7 V(G) = {simple loops C in Γ } A 2 * 4 E(G) = {disjoint (C,D)} 5.82... = 3+2 √ 2 A 2 ** A 2 *** 7.46... = 4+2 √ 3 • G carries key info of Γ A 3 * 5.82... = 3+2 √ 2 • New invariant: λ ( Γ ) ≥ λ (G) Y* 7.46... = 4+2 √ 3 • {G : λ (G) < 8} = 11 G 2 A 1 3 A 1 4 A 1 5 A 1 6 A 1 7 A 1 A ∗ A ∗∗ A ∗∗∗ A ∗ Y ∗ 2 2 2 3 (RAAGs, Cartier-Foata 1968) # Γ 1 2 14 119 1556 26286 1 5 42 5 42 (Birman, 2011) Table 2. Number of trivalent Γ with a given curve complex G .

  8. These Γ all have G = 4A 1 = Example: Concluding Remarks M : Teichmüller polynomial Γ : Perron polynomial G : Clique polynomial thermodynamic formalism convexity of pressure Problem: Determine δ g for all g? ⇒ rest of proof is SEMISTABLE now tractable. EPILOGUE SPOKEN BY PROSPERO Now my charms are all o'erthrown, * * * Gentle breath of yours my sails Must fill, or else my project fails, Which was to please. B etter for more people to be involved... it’s a fun and interesting topic.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend