dyn am i c equi val en ce i n an asl i nt er pr et at i o
play

Dyn am i c Equi val en ce i n an ASL I nt er pr et at i o n Ni cho - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dyn am i c Equi val en ce i n an ASL I nt er pr et at i o n Ni cho l as Jam es Ro essl er What i s Dyn am i c Equi val en ce? A t r an sl at i o n t hat i s i d i o m at i c, m ak es ever y ef f o r t to co m m un i cat e t he m ean i ng


  1. Dyn am i c Equi val en ce i n an ASL I nt er pr et at i o n Ni cho l as Jam es Ro essl er

  2. What i s Dyn am i c Equi val en ce? A t r an sl at i o n t hat i s i d i o m at i c, m ak es ever y ef f o r t to co m m un i cat e t he m ean i ng i n t he so ur ce t ext i n t he n at ur al f o r m o f t he r ecepto r l anguage. (Lar so n,198 4 ) A t r an sl at i o n t hat ai m s at co m pl et e n at ur al n ess o f expr essi o n, an d t r i es to r el at e t he r ecepto r to m o d es o f behavi o r r el evant wi t hi n t he co nt ext o f hi s o wn cu lt ur e. (Ni d a, 1964 )

  3. What i s Not Dyn am i cal l y Equi val ent Tr an sl at i o n s t hat ar e n ot based o n t he o ver al l co n cept o f a t ext, exam pl e: l i t er al t r an sl at i o n . Tr an sl at i o n s t hat d o n ot m atch t he go al o f t he so ur ce t ext. Tr an sl at i o n s t hat evok e em ot i o n s i n t ar get u ser s t hat d if f er f r o m t he em ot i o n s evok ed i n so ur ce l anguage u ser s.

  4. T he Quest i o n I f a per so n fl uent i n Am er i can S i gn Language ( ASL) vi ews a d yn am i cal l y equi val ent t r an sl at i o n o f a so ng, wo u l d t hey exper i en ce si m i l ar em ot i o n s an d m em o r i es t hat n o n ASL u ser s exper i en ce when l i st en i ng to t he sam e so ng?

  5. Met ho d Dat a was co l l ect ed by r esear chi ng t en subj ect s. Ei g ht o f t he subj ect s vi ewed t wo d yn am i cal l y equi val ent t r an sl at i o n s, whi l e t he ot her t wo On l y l i st en ed to t he t wo so ng s. Fo ur o f t he subj ect s wer e Deaf , m o r e speci fi cal l y ASL m o n o l i ngual s. Fo ur o f t he subj ect s wer e n ot d eaf (hear i ng ) an d fl uent i n ASL. Two o f t he subj ect s wer e hear i ng an d n ot fl uent i n ASL.

  6. T he "ASL" subj ect s vi ewed bot h so ng t r an sl at i o n s, t wo o f t he hear i ng peo pl e f r o m t hi s g r o up watched t he so ng s wi t h so un d whi l e t he ot her t wo watched t hem wi t ho ut so un d . T he t wo n o n ASL u ser s o n l y l i st en ed to t he so ng s an d d i d n ot vi ew t he t r an sl at i o n s. Af t er wo r d s al l t he subj ect s wer e i nt er vi ewed to d i scu ss an y em ot i o n s o r m em o r i es t hey exper i en ced whi l e vi ewi ng t he d at a.

  7. Resu lt s When vi ewi ng t he fi r st so ng al l t he t he subj ect s exhi bi t ed si gn s o f bei ng r el axed an d t hey al l sm i l ed at so m e po i nt. A m aj o r i t y o f t he hear i ng subj ect s exper i en ced m em o r i es o f fi shi ng. T he seco n d so ng exhi bi t ed a cl ear d if f er en ce i n r eact i o n, t he ASL hear i ng subj ect s f o un d i t hum o r o u s an d exper i en ced m em o r i es o f i n fi d el i t y, whi l e t he t wo n o n ASL hear i ng subj ect s d i d n ot fi n d i t hum o r o u s an d exper i en ced d if f er ent m em o r i es al l to get her.

  8. T he Deaf subj ect s d i d n ot r eveal an y i n f o r m at i o n d ur i ng t he i nt er vi ew pr o cess, ho wever o n e subj ect sai d t hey f elt happy f o r t he fi r st so ng an d ang r y f o r t he seco n d so ng. T he Deaf subj ect s d i d exhi bi t a l ot o f f aci al f eat ur es t hat wer e si m i l ar to t he hear i ng subj ect s, r el axed f ace, sm i l i ng, t en se f ace, fi xed eye gaze. T he r eact i o n to t he seco n d so ng s t hem e o f i n fi d el i t y cr eat ed t en se f aci al expr essi o n s an d t hey d i d n ot fi n d i t as hum o r o u s as t he Hear i ng ASL subj ect s f o un d i t.

  9. Di scu ssi o n When t he subj ect s sho wed i nt er est i n t he so ng s t hey d i spl ayed a fi xed eye gaze. When t he subj ect s sho wed l i tt l e o r n o i nt er est i n t he so ng t hei r eye gaze was n ot fi xed an d en d ed up m u lt i t ask i ng i n o r d er to k eep t hei r att ent i o n . When t he go al o f a so ng i s cl ear i t i s easi er to cr eat e a d yn am i cal l y equi val ent t r an sl at i o n . I t can be d if fi cu lt to t r an sl at e am bi gui t y.

  10. Co n cl u si o n When a so ng t r an sl at i o n u ses ASL po et r y o r sto r yt el l i ng t echn i ques t he i m pl i ci t n at ur e o f m u si c can m o r e ef f ect i vel y be t r an sl at ed . T he go al o f t hese t r an sl at i o n s wer e to m i r r o r ho w hear i ng peo pl e l i st en to m u si c r ecr eat i o n al l y. Wo u l d t he t r an sl at i o n change if t he sett i ng wer e at a co n cer t ven ue? What wo u l d change abo ut t he t r an sl at i o n s if t he sett i ng wer e acto r s si gn i ng so ng s i n a m u si cal an d t hey wer e d an ci ng? T hi n k i ng o ut si d e t he box i s t he fi r st st ep to war d s d yn am i c equi val en ce.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend