SLIDE 1 Documenting In The Age
SPAP 2019
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3 EMR/EHR Beginnings
- Mid 1960’sClinical Information Systems
- Lockheed -> Tenhnicon -> TDS Healthcare -> Eclipsys -> Allscripts
- University of Utah with 3M developed Health Evaluation through Local
Processing (HELP)
- Mass General with Harvard made Computer Stored Ambulatory Record
(COSTAR) in 1968
- 1970’s Department of Veteran Affairs made VistA
- 1980-90’s Institute of Medicine published a study to argue the case
for using EHR
SLIDE 4 Recent Developments
- President Bush mentioned in 2004 State of the Union
- President Obama incorporated EHR into the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH)
- Where “Meaningful Use” started which mandates transition to HER treating
patients covered by government programs
SLIDE 5
SLIDE 6
Most Common EMRs
SLIDE 7
SLIDE 8
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
SLIDE 12
Pediatric patient safety event report data from inpatient and outpatient settings that were entered in the period 2012–17 were retrieved from three large academic health care institutions (two stand-alone pediatric institutions and one adult and pediatric institution) that used Epic and Cerner EHRs (two institutions used Epic, and one used Cerner).
SLIDE 13
More than 3,000 medical errors at pediatric hospitals from 2012 to 2017 were due in part to EMR/EHR problems, a study in Health Affairs found. About 1 in 5 of these could have caused patient harm.
SLIDE 14
In the first evaluation of its kind, we found that nearly two-thirds of safety reports related to the EHR and medication at three pediatric hospitals were associated with usability issues.
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17 Where We Make Mistakes
- Demographics
- Templates
- Importing (copy and paste)
- Actual/factual documentation
- Privacy
SLIDE 18 Demographics
- Name issues
- Gender issues
- Wrong chart
SLIDE 19 Name Issues
- Sound alike names
- Spacing or punctation
- Computer problems
SLIDE 20 Gender Issues
- EMR limitations
- Insurance companies
- Need factual information
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23 Wrong Patient
- Same issues from paper charts,
but can be easier to miss
- More mistakes in a busier
practice
- Name issues (demographics)
SLIDE 24 Templates
- Insurance companies
- Personalization
- Right template
- Time saver?
SLIDE 25 Insurance Companies
- MagMutual one of the first to oppose templates
- Templates the most common place for errors to
happen
SLIDE 26 Personalization
- Make it your own
- Metadata mark
SLIDE 27 Make It Your Own
templates with your wording
- Document
- r change something
SLIDE 28
Metadata
SLIDE 29 Importing
- Cloning
- Every chart looks the
same
SLIDE 30
Cloning
SLIDE 31
SLIDE 32 Documenting
- Did you actually do it?
- Did you do it and not
document?
SLIDE 33
In the past: You did not do it if you did not document it!
SLIDE 34
SLIDE 35 Did you do it?
elements are left unaltered its harder to prove they were done
incomplete at times
SLIDE 36
SLIDE 37
SLIDE 38
SLIDE 39
SLIDE 40
SLIDE 41
SLIDE 42
SLIDE 43
SLIDE 44
SLIDE 45
SLIDE 46
SLIDE 47
SLIDE 48
SLIDE 49
SLIDE 50
SLIDE 51
SLIDE 52
SLIDE 53
SLIDE 54
SLIDE 55
SLIDE 56
SLIDE 57 Privacy
- Portals
- Printed notes
- Insurance EOB
- Can lead to missed information
SLIDE 58
SLIDE 59
SLIDE 60
Restrictions not always good
SLIDE 61
SLIDE 62
SLIDE 63
SLIDE 64
SLIDE 65