Disclaimer Opinions Expressed Herein or Otherwise are those of the - - PDF document
9/9/2016 Steven E. Gordon Assistant United States Attorney Civil Rights Enforcement Coordinator USAO Eastern District of Virginia 1 Disclaimer Opinions Expressed Herein or Otherwise are those of the Speaker and do not Necessarily Reflect the
9/9/2016 1
Steven E. Gordon Assistant United States Attorney Civil Rights Enforcement Coordinator USAO Eastern District of Virginia
1
2
Opinions Expressed Herein or Otherwise are those
Views of the United States Department of Justice.
9/9/2016 2
3
1.
Background on the ADA.
2.
Entities covered by Title II and Title III of the ADA.
3.
Requirements common to Title II and Title III entities.
4.
Unique requirements for Title II entities.
5.
Discussion related to specific types of entities that are required to furnish auxiliary aids and services.
Most Important ADA Resource: ADA.gov
4
9/9/2016 3
5
Congressional Findings Supporting Passage of ADA
6
When the ADA was passed in 1990, Congress found, among other things: “[D]iscrimination against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as . . . education . . . health services . . . and access to public services.” 42 U.S.C. § 12101
9/9/2016 4
7
The Census Bureau reports that approximately 56.7
million people living in the US had some kind of disability in 2010.
The National Institute on Deafness and Other
Communication Disorders (NIDCD) reports that one in eight people in the United States (13 percent, or 30 million) aged 12 or older has hearing loss in both ears, based on standard hearing examinations.
NIDCD reports that approximately 7.5 million people in
the United States have trouble using their voices.
According to the Census Bureau, approximately 7.3
million individuals in the United States report significant vision loss.
8
A physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities (e.g., hearing, speaking, and seeing).
A record of such an impairment. Being regarded as having such an impairment.
42 U.S.C. § 12102; 28 C.F.R. § 36.105 (see the new regulatory definition of disability adopted after ADA Amendments Act of 2008).
9/9/2016 5
9
The ADA prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunities for persons with disabilities in:
(Title II)
All state and local governmental entities are covered by Title II, including the following entities operated by state and local governments: 1) Educational institutions. 2) Courts. 3) County Board and City Council meetings. 4) Law enforcement agencies. 5) State and local social service agencies. 6) Health care providers operated by state and local governments. 7) Jails and correctional facilities. 8) Websites affiliated with state and local agencies.
10
9/9/2016 6
Title III covers a wide range of entities, such as: (1) Privately operated healthcare providers (e.g., hospitals and skilled nursing facilities).
(2) Offices of an accountant or lawyer. (3) Private educational institutions. (4) Theaters. (5) Social service centers, including day care centers and
adoption agencies.
(6) Museums.
42 U.S.C. § 12181(7); 28 C.F.R. § 36.104.
11
Places of public accommodation must ensure that they don’t discriminate in their goods, services, accommodations, etc., including via their website. NAD v. Netflix (DOJ Statement of Interest)
12
9/9/2016 7
The effective communication requirements can be found in the following regulations: Title II: 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.104 (definitions) & 35.160-64 (Communications). Title III: 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.104 (definitions) & 36.303 (Auxiliary aids and services).
13
General Effective Communication Requirements
Covered entities are required to communicate
effectively with people who have communication disabilities (i.e., vision, hearing or speech). The goal is to ensure that individuals with disabilities receive equally effective communication to those who do not have a disability.
Covered entities are required to furnish auxiliary
aids and services in order to ensure effective communication with individuals who have communication disabilities.
14
9/9/2016 8
General Effective Communication Requirements
The key to communicating effectively is to consider the
nature, length, complexity, and context of the communication and the person’s normal method(s) of communication.
Covered entities may not charge the individual with a
disability any surcharge for furnishing auxiliary aids and services.
The rules apply to communicating with the person
who is receiving the covered entity’s goods or services as well as with the person’s parent, spouse, or companion in appropriate circumstances.
15
The ADA Regulations Broadly Define “Companion.”
16
“‘[C]ompanion’ means a family member, friend, or associate
goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a [covered entity], who, along with such individual, is an appropriate person with whom the [covered entity] should communicate.” 28 C.F.R. § 36.303(c)(1)(ii); see also 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(a)(2) (similar definition under Title II).
9/9/2016 9
An individualized assessment is important. One size does not fit all. To determine the type of auxiliary aid or service that will ensure effective communication, the covered entity should consult with the individual with a disability to determine their method of communication. Further, covered entities should consider the nature, duration and complexity of the
C.F.R. § 35.160(a)(2).
17
Factors to Consider To Determine the Type of Auxiliary Aid for Effective Communication
18
(1) What is the method of communication used by the individual? (e.g., ASL, signed English,
(2) How lengthy is the communication? (3) How complex is the communication? (4) What is the nature of the communication?
9/9/2016 10
Communication Request Form in DOJ ADA Settlements Are A Useful Tool To Obtain Individualized Information
19
Communication Request Form in ADA Settlements Are A Useful Form To Obtain Individualized Information
20
9/9/2016 11
21
There are many types of auxiliary aids and services for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, including: Real-time captioning (a.k.a., CART); CapTel Phones; Cued-speech interpreters; Assistive listening systems and devices; Telephone relay service; Hearing-aid compatible telephones; Videophones; and Sign language interpreters (ASL, signed English, etc.); 28 C.F.R. § 35.103; 28 C.F.R. § 36.303 (b).
There are many types of auxiliary aids and services for individuals who have speech disabilities, including: A qualified speech-to-speech transliterator (a person trained to recognize unclear speech and repeat it clearly), especially if the person will be speaking at length, such as giving testimony in court. A communication board. Allowing more time for communication.
22
9/9/2016 12
There are many types of auxiliary aids and services for individuals who have vision loss, including: Qualified reader; Information in large print, Braille, or electronically for use with a computer screen-reading program; and An audio recording of printed information.
23
24
Sign language interpreters are effective only for people who use sign language. Other methods of communication, such as the use of a transcriber may be necessary for those who lose hearing later in life and do not use sign language.
9/9/2016 13
Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART)
25
26
“Computer Assisted Real-Time Transcription (“CART”) Many people who are deaf or hard of hearing are not trained in either sign language or speech reading. CART is a service in which an operator types what is said into a computer that displays the typed words on a screen.” DOJ ADA Business Brief: Communicating with People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings
9/9/2016 14
27
PockeTalker (Used for hard of hearing patients who do not wear hearing aids or do not want to bring their hearing aids to the hospital, or hearing aid wearers with t-coils in their hearing aids if they use a neckloop.)
28
9/9/2016 15
29
Hearing aid compatible telephones and amplified telephones
30
9/9/2016 16
31
32
A doctor uses sign language interpreter to communicate with a patient who is deaf.
9/9/2016 17
If an interpreter is required, a covered entity must furnish a “qualified interpreter.” 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.104 & 35.104.
33
34
Able to interpret: 1. Effectively – interprets both receptively (i.e., understanding what the person with the disability is saying) and expressively (i.e., having the skill needed to convey information back to that person) using the sign language of the individual needing the interpreter (e.g., ASL, Signed English, etc.)
3. Impartially 4. Understanding the necessary specialized vocabulary that is
used for the particular setting (e.g., not all interpreters are qualified for medical settings). 28 C.F.R. § 36.104 (definition of “qualified interpreter”); see also
Technical Assistance Manual, § III-4.3200.
9/9/2016 18
35
service is not equal.
28 CFR 36.303(c)(1)(ii)
36
Can a public accommodation use a staff member who signs “pretty well” as an interpreter for meetings with individuals who use sign language to communicate? Signing and interpreting are not the same thing. Being able to sign does not mean that a person can process spoken communication into the proper signs, nor does it mean that he or she possesses the proper skills to observe someone signing and change their signed or fingerspelled communication into spoken words. The interpreter must be able to interpret both receptively and expressively. Americans with Disability Act, Technical Assistance Manual, §§ II-7.1200 & III-4.3100.
9/9/2016 19
37
If a sign language interpreter is required for effective communication, must only a certified interpreter be provided? No. The key question in determining whether effective communication will result is whether the interpreter is “qualified,” not whether he
qualified interpreter is one “who is able to interpret effectively, accurately and impartially, both receptively and expressively, using necessary specialized vocabulary.” An individual does not have to be certified in order to meet this standard. A certified interpreter may not meet this standard in all situations, e.g. , where the interpreter is not familiar with the specialized vocabulary involved in the communication at issue. Americans with Disability Act, Technical Assistance Manual, § III-4.3100 (emphasis added).
Perhaps the biggest misconception concerning interpreting for people who are deaf or hard of hearing is the generally- held assumption that a beginning course in sign language or fingerspelling is a sufficient qualification to work as an
language does not necessarily possess the expertise required to perform well in the role of an interpreter. Professional interpreting requires intense training and experience before proficient levels of skill are attained. VDDHH, Directory of Qualified Interpreters for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, at 3 (emphasis in original).
9/9/2016 20
Generally, covered entities may not rely upon companions to interpret or facilitate communication. 28 C.F.R. § § 35.160(c)(2) & 36.303(c)(3).
39
ADA Prohibition On Relying Upon Adult Companions To Facilitate Communication
40
A covered entity shall not rely on an adult accompanying an individual with a disability to interpreter or facilitate communication except – In an emergency involving an imminent threat to the safety or welfare
Where the individual with a disability specifically requests that the accompanying adult interpret or facilitate communication, the accompanying adult agrees to provide such assistance, and reliance on that adult for such assistance is appropriate under the circumstances. 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.160(c)(2) & 36.303(c)(3).
9/9/2016 21 ADA Prohibition On Relying Upon Child Companions To Facilitate Communication
41
“A [covered entity] shall not rely on a minor child to interpret or facilitate communication, except in an emergency involving an imminent threat to the safety or welfare of an individual or the public where there is no interpreter available.” 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.160(c)(3) & 36.303(c)(4).
VRI is a fee-based service that uses video
conferencing technology to access an off-site interpreter to provide real-time interpreting.
VRI is not effective in all circumstances. For
example, if someone is in extreme pain and cannot focus on a screen.
In order for VRI to be effective communication,
users must be trained to quickly and efficiently set up and operate the VRI.
42
9/9/2016 22
If VRI is chosen, specific performance standards must be met:
Real-time, full motion video and audio over a
dedicated high speed, wide-bandwidth video connection or wireless connection.
No lags, choppy, blurry, or grainy images, or irregular
pauses in communication.
A sharply delineated image that is large enough to
display the both interpreter’s and the individual using sign language face, arms, hands, and fingers. 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.160(d); 36.303(f).
43
Substantive Requirements. Procedural Requirements. Structural Requirements.
44
9/9/2016 23
No qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason
be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity. 42 U.S.C. § 12132; see also 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.130(a); 35.152(b)(1).
The Consultation Requirement
“When an auxiliary aid or service is required, the public entity must provide an opportunity for individuals with disabilities to request the auxiliary aids and services of their choice and must give primary consideration to the choice expressed by the individual. It is important to consult with the individual to determine the most appropriate auxiliary aid or service, because the individual with a disability is most familiar with his or her disability and is in the best position to determine what type of aid or service will be effective.” Americans with Disability Act, Technical Assistance Manual, § II-7.1100 (emphasis added).
9/9/2016 24
Consultation Requirement Ongoing
“A public entity has a continuing obligation to assess the auxiliary aids and services it is providing, and should consult with the individuals with disabilities on a continuing basis to assess what measures are required to ensure effective communication.” Section-by-Section discussion of 2010 ADA Regulations (emphasis added).
The ADA regulations state that: “[i]n determining what types of auxiliary aids and services are necessary, a public entity shall give primary consideration to the request of individuals with disabilities.” 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(b)(2) (emphasis added).
48
9/9/2016 25
Head of the Agency Makes Decision in Writing Regarding Fundamental Alteration or Undue Burden
The head of a public entity or his or her designee is responsible for making the determination that would result in “a fundamental alteration in the nature of a service, program, or activity or in undue financial or administrative burden . . . after considering all resources available.” 28 C.F.R. § 35.164. This decision must be accompanied by “a written statement of the reason for reaching that conclusion.” Id.
49
The ADA regulations provides that: “A public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under this part [of the ADA Regulations].” “The public entity shall make available to all interested individuals the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees designated pursuant to this paragraph.” 28 C.F.R. 35.107.
9/9/2016 26
The section-by-section Analysis of the ADA Regulations explain the rationale for the designation of an ADA Coordinator: “The requirement for designation of a particular employee and dissemination of information about how to locate that employee helps to ensure that individuals dealing with large agencies are able to easily find a responsible person who is familiar with the requirements of the Act [ADA] and this part [of the ADA regulations] and can communicate those requirements to other individuals in the agency who may be unaware of their responsibilities.”
52
9/9/2016 27
53
Through the Barrier-Free Health Care Initiative, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and DOJ’s Civil Rights Division are targeting their enforcement efforts
facilities to ensure effective communication for people who are deaf or have hearing loss.
DOJ Publication Provides Very Helpful Guidance For Healthcare Settings
54
9/9/2016 28
Healthcare Settings: “ADA Business Brief: Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings”
Situations where an interpreter may be required for effective communication: Discussing a patient’s symptoms and medical condition, medications, and medical history Explaining and describing medical conditions, tests, treatment options, medications, surgery and other procedures Providing a diagnosis, prognosis, and recommendation for treatment Obtaining informed consent for treatment Communicating with a patient during treatment, testing procedures, and during physician’s rounds
55
ADA Business Brief: Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings
56
Situations where an interpreter may be required for effective communication (continued): Providing instructions for medications, post-treatment activities, and follow-up treatments Providing mental health services, including group or individual therapy, or counseling for patients and family members Providing information about blood or organ donations Explaining living wills and powers of attorney Discussing complex billing or insurance matters Making education presentations, such as birthing and new parent classes, nutrition and weight management counseling, and CPR and first aid training
9/9/2016 29
Fairfax Nursing Center Failure to provide a qualified ASL interpreter to the daughter and granddaughter of a resident at FNC during a six week physical rehabilitation stay. Equitable relief, $80,000 in compensatory damages, $12,500 to train other skilled nursing facilities in Virginia
effectuate the public interest. Commonwealth Health & Rehab Center Failure to provide ASL Interpreter to rehab patient, who is deaf. and his Mother and Sister, who are also deaf, during 27-day physical rehabilitation stay at the facility. Equitable relief, $160,000 in compensatory damages & $2,500 civil penalty
57
Very helpful publication issued jointly by the United States Department of Justice and United State Department of Education: “Frequently Asked Questions on Effective Communication for Students with Hearing, Vision, or Speech Disabilities in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools.”
58
9/9/2016 30
Under Title II, what must public school districts do to provide effective communication to students with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities?
districts to ensure that communication with students with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities is as effective as communication with students without disabilities. To do this, public schools must provide appropriate “auxiliary aids and services” where necessary to provide effective communication; that is, schools must provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services so that students with disabilities have an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, the services, programs, and activities of the public school district.
59
Under what circumstances is a public school required to provide auxiliary aids and services to persons with a hearing, vision, or speech disability who are not students, such as parents, other relatives, and members of the public, who seek to participate in or benefit from a district's services, programs, or activities?
just to students - schools are obligated to provide effective communication to all individuals who seek to participate in or benefit from a school district’s services, programs, or activities such as student registration, parent-teacher conferences, meetings, ceremonies, performances, open houses, and field trips. All of the same Title II requirements and considerations discussed in the context of students with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities apply to other individuals with disabilities who are covered by this requirement.
60
9/9/2016 31
Settlement Agreement with edX, Inc. 4/2/2015 Provider of massive open online courses (MOOCs) agreed to make its website, platform, and mobile applications accessible to individuals with disabilities. Settlement Agreement with Louisiana Tech University 7/22/2013 Addressed use of an Internet-based learning product for university course work (homework, testing) that was inaccessible to a student who is blind.
61
Access to state and local courts and the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to participate in such proceedings were a special concern that Congress considered when it enacted the ADA. See, e.g., Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509, 527 (2004) (explaining that “Congress learned that many individuals, in many States across the country, were being excluded from courthouses and court proceedings by reason of their disabilities,” and citing legislative testimony concerning the “failure of state and local governments to provide interpretive services for the hearing impaired”).
62
9/9/2016 32
“Because of the importance of effective communication in State and local court proceedings, special attention must be given to the communications needs of individuals with disabilities involved in such proceedings. Qualified interpreters will usually be necessary to ensure effective communication with parties, jurors, and witnesses who have hearing impairments and use sign language. For individuals with hearing impairments who do not use sign language, other types
computer-assisted transcription services, which allow virtually instantaneous transcripts of courtroom argument and testimony to appear on displays, may be required.” Title II Technical Assistance Manual, II-7.1000
63
In Prakel v. Indiana, 100 F.Supp.3d 661 (S.D. Ind. 2015), the court held that because there is a clear history of the public’s right to attend criminal proceedings, being a spectator of a court proceeding is included within Title II’s protections. Settlement Agreement with Orange County Clerk of Courts (DOJ case) Inaccessibility of filed court documents for blind
accessible format upon request.
64
9/9/2016 33
“A deaf individual does not receive an equal opportunity to benefit from attending a city council meeting if he or she does not have access to what is said.” Title II Technical Assistance Manual, II-3.3000.
65
A DOJ Technical Assistance Publication “Commonly Asked Questions About The Americans With Disabilities Act And Law Enforcement” explains that: “[t]he ADA affects virtually everything that [police]
arresting, booking, and holding suspects.”
9/9/2016 34
“Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), people who are deaf or hard of hearing are entitled to the same services law enforcement provides to anyone else. . . Law enforcement agencies must make efforts to ensure that their personnel communicate effectively with people whose disability affects hearing.” “When you are interviewing a witness or a suspect or engaging in any complex conversation with a person whose primary language is sign language, a qualified interpreter is usually needed to ensure effective communication.” DOJ Publication: Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing; ADA Guide for Law Enforcement Officers
67
“A municipal police department encounters many situations where effective communication with members of the public who are deaf or hard of hearing is critical. Such situations include interviewing suspects prior to arrest (when an officer is attempting to establish probable cause); interrogating arrestees, and interviewing victims or critical witnesses. In these situations, appropriate qualified interpreters must be provided when necessary to ensure effective communication.” U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Americans with Disabilities Act: Title II Technical Assistance Manual 1994 Supplement § II- 7.1000(B),
68
9/9/2016 35
DOJ recently filed an amicus brief in City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehans, No. 13-1412 (United States Supreme Court), in which the Solicitor General (“SG”) expressed the view of the United States Government with regard to the ADA’s coverage to local law enforcement activities as follows: “[t]he statutory text [of the ADA] further demonstrates that law enforcement entities are subject to Title II’s anti- discrimination mandate with respect to all of their operations, including arrests.” Id. at 19 (emphasis added). The SG went on to explain: “[b]ecause law enforcement entities are subject to Title II, they must ‘make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures when the modifications are necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis
Assistance § II-3.6100, at 14).
69
The ADA’s Title II implementing regulations expressly cover “jails, detention and correctional facilities” run by state and local governments. 28 C.F.R. § 35.152. The Supreme Court expressly held (in a unanimous decision) that the ADA’s requirements apply to state and local detention centers. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206 (1998); See also Title II Regulations, 2010 Guidance and Section-by-Section Analysis.
9/9/2016 36
Individuals with Communication Disabilities Are Entitled to Equal Access To Communication
State and local detention facilities are required to take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with inmates with disabilities are as effective as communications with others, including furnishing appropriate auxiliary aids and services. 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.130(b)(1)(ii) & 35.160(b)(1). One example: the Section-by-Section Analysis of the ADA regulations explain: “that correctional facilities and jails must ensure that inmates who are deaf or hard of hearing actually receive the same information provided to other inmates.”
In Pierce v. District of Columbia, 128 F.Supp.3d 250 (D.D.C. 2015), an individual who is deaf was incarcerated for 51 days. The prison staff never assessed Plaintiff’s communication needs, and instead assumed lip- reading and written notes were sufficient. Plaintiff asserts he asked for an interpreter for medical intake, health services and various classes. The court granted summary judgment for Plaintiff on effective communication and intentional discrimination and denied prison’s motion for summary judgment. The Court also held that the jail violated the ADA as a matter of law by failing to evaluate Plaintiff’s need for accommodation when taken into custody.
72
9/9/2016 37
Pursuant to the ADA, Prisons Have An Affirmative Duty To Assess Inmates With A Disability
“[B]ased on its reading of federal law, this Court holds that prison officials have an affirmative duty to assess the potential accommodation needs of inmates with known disabilities who are taken into custody and to provide the accommodations that are necessary for those inmates to access the prison’s programs and services, without regard to whether or not the disabled individual has made a specific request for accommodation and without relying solely on the assumptions of prison officials regarding that individual’s needs.” Pierce v. District of Columbia, Pierce v. District of Columbia, 128 F.Supp.3d 250, 272 (D.D.C. 2015)
Common Issues That Have Arisen in Failure To Provide Effective Communication Cases
Failure to obtain interpreter for late night emergency admissions to hospital; Relying upon family members, friends and/or unqualified staff members to facilitate communication; Failing to recognize that a companion with disabilities is entitled to effective communication; VRI issues: (1) staff does not know to set up VRI and/or (2) the VRI system is not working properly; Inappropriate reliance on hand-written notes for individuals whose primary means of communication is ASL;
74
9/9/2016 38
Common Issues That Have Arisen in Failure To Provide Effective Communication Cases
Erroneously assuming that an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing can read lips and does not need an
auxiliary aid or service;
Refusal to provide auxiliary aids and services due to cost; Failure to train staff on the ADA’s requirements and the services available to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing; and Failure to ensure website accessibility to individuals with
disabilities.
75
The ADA Requires Hospitals To Ensure That Interpreters are Available For After-Hours Emergencies
76
Hospitals are required to ensure that qualified interpreters are readily available for after-hours emergencies. A Department of Justice publication, entitled, “ADA Business Brief: Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings,” explains that: “Hospitals should have arrangements in place to ensure that qualified interpreters are readily available on a scheduled basis and
call arrangements for after-hours emergencies. Larger facilities may choose to have interpreters on staff.” (Emphasis added).
9/9/2016 39
Covered entities are required to furnish auxiliary aids and services including interpreters and may not require the person with a disability to bring their own. 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(b)(1) & (c)(1) & 36.303(c)(2). Covered entities may not enlist companions to interpret. 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(c)(1) & 36.303(c)(3). ADA regulations define “qualified interpreter” to be someone who can interpret effectively, accurately, impartially and understands the necessary specialized vocabulary. 28 C.F.R. § 35.104; 36.104. A patient’s companion, who is deaf or hard of hearing, is also entitled to effective communication. 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(a)(1) & 36.303(c)(1). In order for VRI to be effective communication, users must be trained to quickly and efficiently set up and operate the VRI. 28 C.F.R. § 35.160(d)(4) & 36.303(f)(4).
77
Individuals Who Are Deaf Often Lack Good English Reading and Writing Skills
The ADA Technical Assistance Publication entitled “Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: ADA Guide for Law Enforcement Officers” explains that: “[w]hen communicating by writing notes, keep in mind that some individuals who use sign language may lack good English reading and writing skills.” (Emphasis added).
9/9/2016 40
Public Accommodation Must Absorb Costs Associated With ADA Compliance
79
“Although compliance [with the ADA] may result in some additional cost, a public accommodation may not place a surcharge only on particular individuals with disabilities or groups of individuals with disabilities to cover these expenses.” “ILLUSTRATION 2: In order to ensure effective communication with a deaf patient during an office visit, a doctor arranges for the services of a sign language interpreter. The cost of the interpreter’s services must be absorbed by the doctor.” Technical Assistance Manual, § III-4.1400 (Emphasis added).
80
someone can lip read a few words, they understand everything.
9/9/2016 41
Ignorance of the ADA’s Legal Requirements Is Not a Valid Defense
81
A covered entity’s subjective belief that it is complying with the ADA -- when in fact it is not in compliance -- is not a valid defense. The plain language of the ADA places liability upon a public accommodation for simply failing to comply with the ADA’s requirements. Thus, “discrimination” under the ADA is broadly defined to include: “the failure to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no individual with a disability is excluded [or], denied services. . .” 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii).
82
As one court recently noted: “[t]he ADA seeks to prevent not only intentional discrimination against people with disabilities but also – indeed primarily – discrimination that results from ‘thoughtlessness and indifference,’ that is, from ‘benign neglect.’” Brooklyn Cntr for Independence of the Disabled v. Bloomberg, 980F. Supp.2d 588, 640 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting, H.R.Rep. No. 101–485(II), at 29 (1990)).
9/9/2016 42 Medicare & Medicaid Providers Have An Affirmative Obligation To Inform Themselves and Comply with the ADA and Rehab Act
83
The courts have long-held that those impacted by a legal requirement, particularly those who seek funds from the public fisc, are presumed to have knowledge of the applicable laws, including statutes and
“[p]rotection of the public fisc requires that those who seek public
funds act with scrupulous regard for the requirements of law; respondent could expect no less than to be held to the most demanding standards in its quest for public funds. This is consistent with the general rule that those who deal with the Government are expected to know the law . . . ”
Heckler v. Community Health Serv., 467 U.S. 63 (1984) (emphasis
added).
84
Injunctive Relief (e.g., establishing new
policies and procedures, and training).
Compensatory Damages (actual
damages and pain and suffering).
Civil Penalty
42 U.S.C. § 12188.
9/9/2016 43
85
Understand the ADA and how it relates to your
Designate an ADA Coordinator or Administrator, who has sufficient authority within the organization to ensure
compliance.
Train staff who have direct contact with the public on the requirements of the ADA and on how to use equipment that supports individuals with disabilities. Develop a process within the organization to handle ADA Accommodation requests that include communication with individuals with disabilities to ascertain their needs.
86
Easy access to auxiliary aids, including sign language
interpreters, for staff.
Proper documenting/charting when dealing with ADA
issues.
Effective grievance procedure for ADA issues. Develop a procedure to assess and monitor ADA
compliance.
9/9/2016 44
87
A critical and often overlooked component of ensuring success is comprehensive and ongoing staff training. Covered entities may have established good policies, but if front line staff are not aware of them or do not know how to implement them, problems can arise. Covered entities should teach staff about the ADA’s requirements for effective communication, HIV and accessible
ADA trainings.
Reminder: ADA.gov Is Great Resource
88
9/9/2016 45
89
Steven Gordon Civil Rights Enforcement Coordinator Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Virginia Steve.Gordon@usdoj.gov (703) 299-3817