dignity for all ensuring economic s ecurity as america
play

Dignity for All: Ensuring Economic S ecurity as America Ages A S - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dignity for All: Ensuring Economic S ecurity as America Ages A S enior Poverty Forum November 15, 2016 Panel 1:Understanding Low-Income Older Adults through Research and Data Moderator: Emily Allen, AARP Foundation Retirement Security


  1. Dignity for All: Ensuring Economic S ecurity as America Ages A S enior Poverty Forum November 15, 2016

  2. Panel 1:Understanding Low-Income Older Adults through Research and Data Moderator: Emily Allen, AARP Foundation

  3. Retirement Security for Older Americans Why Health Coverage Matters November 15, 2016 Justice in Aging Dignity for All: Ensuring Economic Security as America Ages Tricia Neuman, Sc. D. Director, Program on Medicare Policy Kaiser Family Foundation

  4. Figure 6 More than 4 in 10 seniors live below twice the poverty level based on the SPM which takes health costs into account Poverty rates are higher under the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) Official Poverty Supplemental Poverty Measure (OPM) Measure (SPM) 43% with incomes 2015 Poverty Level  $11,367/individual below 200% of  $14,342/couple the poverty threshold 25% with incomes below 200% of 29% the poverty threshold 100%-199% FPL 16% 14% 9% Under 100% FPL Official Measure Supplemental Measure SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Current Population Survey 2015 Annual Social Economic Supplement.

  5. Figure 7 Under the SPM, at least 35% of people ages 65 and older lived below 200% of poverty in every state and DC (2011-2013) People Ages 65+ Below 200% of Poverty (SPM) = 45% Nationwide 40% 44% 40% 38% 40% 46% 42% 50% 44% 51% 42% 36% 49% 40% 40% 47% 36% 44% 46% 43% 41% 43% 42% 44%44% 50% 47% 42% 42% 42% DC 57% 42% 38% 39% 48% 54% 52% 47% 38% 46% 48% 45% 44% 44% 44% 48% 51% 47% 43% 52% 54% Less than 35% 35% < 50% 50% or higher 0 states 42 states 8 states + DC NOTE: SPM is supplemental poverty measure. Estimates are based on pooling three years of data. SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Current Population Survey, 2012, 2013, and 2014 Annual Social and Economic Supplement.

  6. Figure 8 Poverty rates rise with age, are higher for older women than men, and much higher for Black and Hispanic than White seniors Share of people ages 65+ with incomes below 200% of poverty, 2014: 68% 60% 57% 50% 45% 41% 39% 36% 60-69 70-79 80+ Men Women White Black Hispanic Gender Age Race/ethnicity SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Current Population Survey 2014 Annual Social Economic Supplement.

  7. Figure 9 Median income and savings are significantly lower for Black and Hispanic than White Medicare beneficiaries Median income Median savings per capita= $24,150 per capita= $63,350 $91,950 $27,450 $16,150 $12,800 $12,350 $9,800 White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic SOURCE: Urban Institute / Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of DYNASIM, 2014.

  8. Figure 10 Health problems are more common among seniors with low incomes (below $15,000) Share of seniors age 65+ with health concern, by income Total <$15,000 >$15,000 47% 39% 34% 32% 29% 29% 24% 20% 14% Fair/poor health Functional impairment Cognitive/mental impairment NOTE: Income is calculated in a per person basis. For married couples, income is divided equally. SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Cost and Use File, 2012.

  9. Figure 11 Even with Medicare, medical costs consume a significant portion of seniors' budgets Medicare Household Spending Non-Medicare Household Spending Transportation Transportation Health $9,479 $5,277 Care 17% $3,511 Housing 15% Housing 7% $12,468 $17,855 Health Care 35% 33% $5,342 15% Food $8,070 15% Food Other $5,400 Other $7,593 15% $15,316 21% 28% Average Household Spending = Average Household Spending = $36,080 $54,232 SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2014.

  10. Figure 12 Premiums + Deductibles + Cost-Sharing + Gaps in Medicare benefits lead to affordability challenges Gaps in Coverage:  No dental care, or dentures  MIND THE GAP No hearing aids, eye glasses  Part D “donut hole” until 2020; no hard cap on out-of-pocket drug costs  No long-term care benefit (limited SNF and home health Other Expenses:  Medicare premiums; deductibles and cost-sharing (with no out- of-pocket limit)  Premiums for supplemental insurance

  11. Figure 13 Medicare premiums and cost-sharing are projected to continue to rise as a share of Social Security benefits 33% 24% 14% 7% 1980 2000 2020 2040 Source: Social Security Trustees Report, 2015 Note: Includes Medicare SMI premiums and cost-sharing. Does not include other out-of-pocket health spending

  12. Figure 14 About half of all Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+ with incomes below 200% FPL do not get low-income assistance with Medicare premiums/cost-sharing (Medicaid) 200% Poverty Threshold (2011): $22,968 (individual) • • $29,314 (couple) 49.5% 50.5% Received Did not receive low-income low-income assistance assistance (9.8 million) (10 million) Total Medicare Beneficiaries < 200% FPL, 2011 = 19.8 million in 2011 NOTE: Premium/cost sharing assistance refers to assistance under Medicaid/Medicare Savings Programs, but not Part D LIS. SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of CMS’ CCW, standard 5 percent sample of Medicare beneficiaries 2011, Urban Institute analysis of DYNASIM income and assets 2011. 2011 Census poverty thresholds from

  13. Figure 15 Looking Forward: Key Issues • How would ACA repeal affect low-income seniors and younger adults with disabilities on Medicare? • What would a Medicaid block grant mean for low- income beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid?

  14. Figure 16 Additional Resources on kff.org  Old and Poor: America’s Forgotten  An Overview of Medicare  Poverty Among Seniors: An Updated Analysis of National and State Level Poverty Under the Official and Supplemental Poverty Measures  Income and Assets of Medicare Beneficiaries, 2014 – 2030  Key Issues in Understanding the Economic and Health Security of Current and Future Generations of Seniors  Comparing Poverty Rates under the Official Census Poverty Measure and the Supplemental Poverty Measure For more information, visit kff.org/medicare

  15. Who Are Low-income Older Adults? Hidden Poor The Officially Poor and Hidden Poor Steven P. Wallace, PhD UCLA Fielding School of Public Health UCLA Center for Health Policy Research November 15, 2016

  16. Acknowledgements  Funding – The California Wellness Foundation & others  Partners – Insight Center for Community Economic Development, Wider Opportunities for Women, University of Mass-Boston Gerontology Center  Researchers – D. Imelda Padilla-Frausto & others

  17. Key points  The “federal poverty line” (FPL) is inadequate  Many older adults are economically insecure, with incomes above poverty but not enough for basic needs (the hidden poor)  The health status of the hidden poor worsens the mismatch between resources and needs

  18. FPL vs. Elder Economic Security Standard™ Index FPL Elder Index  50 year old standard of  Current standard of living (CPI adjusted) living  Single national amount  County level  Based on consumption  Uses costs of basic of average family goods and services needed by average  Same amount whether older adult (e.g. higher renter or owner of health care costs) home  Varies by type of housing

  19. Any problem poverty = $11,880 in 2016 everywhere? https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines

  20. Housing Costs Vary Geographically HUD Fair Market Rents, 2016 1-br apartment  San Francisco, CA $1,814  New York, NY $1,357  Los Angeles, CA $1,154  Chicago, IL $1,001  Atlanta, GA $ 820  Houston, TX $ 773  Des Moines, IA $ 682 See: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr_il_history/select_Geography.odn

  21. Housing type varies, U.S., age 65+, <200% FPL Latino African white American Rent 42.4% 42.9% 24.9% Own, paying mortgage 23.1 22.6 18.4 Own w/o 31.7 31.2 53.2 mortgage Source: American Community Survey, 2011-13

  22. Distribution of household expenditures, 2015 17.9 18.4 18.8 20.0 Other 12.0 11.9 12.6 12.1 Food 30.9 Housing 30.3 33.3 37.4 Transportation 17.1 16.9 16.2 13.7 Healthcare 6.7 8.7 11.6 15.3 14.0 13.0 Personal insurance and 7.5 3.7 pensions 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 and over Source: 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey

  23. Alternative to FPL: Elder Economic Security Standard™ Index (Elder Index)  Health care costs  Housing (3-types)  Food (at home) costs  Transportation, local  Misc. (phone, clothing, home repair, etc.)

  24. Elder Standard Index 2013 LA City & Humboldt County Los Angeles City Humboldt County Owner w/o Renter, One Owner w/o Renter, Monthly Expenses Mortgage Bedroom Mortgage One Bedroom Housing $544 $1,171 $372 $715 Food 264 264 254 254 Transportation 233 233 233 233 Health Care=Good 166 166 359 359 Miscellaneous 241 241 243 243 $1,448 $2,075 $1,461 $1,804 Elder Index Per Month $17,376 $24,900 $17,532 $21,648 Elder Index Per Year Note: Numbers may not add up to total due to rounding.

  25. Gap in Measuring Economic Need, Elder Index vs. FPL, California average 2013 $34,560 - 11,622 $23,112 $17,976 $11,490 EI, Owners w mortgage EI, Renters EI, Owner wo mortgage FPL http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/programs/health-disparities/elder-health/elder-index-data/Pages/Cost-Of-Living.aspx

  26. Who is overlooked by FPL? http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/search/pages/detail.aspx?PubID=1417

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend