Digital Publishing, Media Delivery, and the W3C Ivan Herman W3C Day - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

digital publishing media delivery and the w3c
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Digital Publishing, Media Delivery, and the W3C Ivan Herman W3C Day - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Digital Publishing, Media Delivery, and the W3C Ivan Herman W3C Day Berlin, Germany, 2014-09-10 1. Digital Publishing Why is W3C interested in this area? We know that digital publishing formats rely heavily on W3Cs core


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Digital Publishing, Media Delivery, and the W3C

Ivan Herman W3C Day Berlin, Germany, 2014-09-10

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Digital Publishing
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why is W3C interested in this area?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

We know that…

  • …digital publishing formats rely heavily on W3C’s

core technologies

  • (X)HTML5, CSS 3, SVG, MathML, SMIL, scripting…
  • …publishing workflow systems are also moving

towards OWP (O’Reilly’s Atlas, Chaucer, Inkling, …)

  • …publishing represents one of the biggest use cases

for the OWP after “traditional” browsers

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The technology evolution of the Web has been driven by “traditional” Web browsing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The technology evolution of the Web has been driven by “traditional” Web browsing

The specific needs and priorities of the publishing industry may not be reflected in the evolution of the Web!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

It is time for the Publishing Industry and the traditional Web community to cooperate in defining the Open Web Platform

slide-8
SLIDE 8

How to achieve that?

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Co-chaired by Markus Gylling (IDPF) and Liza Daly

(Safari Books Online)

“The mission of the Digital Publishing Interest Group, [is to be] a forum for experts in the digital publishing ecosystem [to have] technical discussions, gather use cases and to better align existing formats and technologies (e.g., EPUB) with the broader Open Web Platform.”

Creation of a “Digital Publishing Interest Group”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

In practice…

  • The Interest Group has defined a series of Task

Forces

  • the task forces collect use cases and requirements
  • these are, eventually, passed on to the relevant W3C groups

(HTML, CSS, etc.)

  • Reviews, from the publishers’ point of view, other

groups’ relevant draft specifications

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Some examples for concerns addressed by the W3C Group

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Books that require rich media…

  • Requirements:
  • high quality graphics,

video, interactive graphics

  • complex layout (text

flowing through different part of the page)

  • user specific notes,

bookmarks, annotations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

… but with high quality aesthetics and ergonomics

  • Requirements:
  • control over headers,

footers, running elements

  • control over widows,
  • rphans, hyphenation,

justification

  • fixed or reflowable layout
  • high quality graphics, both

in terms of bitmap images as vector graphics

  • drop caps
  • font management
slide-14
SLIDE 14

DPUB Aesthetics/Ergonomy Task Force

  • Addresses these fundamental rendering issues
  • text flows, drop caps
  • hyphenation, widow, orphan, etc., control
  • video, audio
  • page layout with headers, footers, running heads
  • These requirements are translated into specific

requirements to be taken up by the CSS, HTML5, and SVG Working Groups

slide-15
SLIDE 15

STEM publishing

  • Requirements:
  • font management
  • high quality graphics
  • mathematical formulae
  • extensions to HTML for

specific content (e.g., chemical formulae)

  • separation of “content” from

explanations, notes, etc.

  • powerful indexing, table of

contents

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DPUB IG Structural Semantics Task Force

  • Identifies ways to add structural information to the

raw content:

  • terms to be indexed; sections that are used for notes,

sidebars, explanations; accessibility information

  • The Task Force will come up with specific technical

proposals on how to do this in a OWP compliant manner

slide-17
SLIDE 17

STEM Task Force

  • The DPUB IG STEM Task Force will interview

different stakeholders for use cases/requirements

  • issue: are there specific markup languages that could be

developed/finalized at W3C? (e.g., chemistry)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Annotations

  • Annotations belongs to the

traditions of reading

  • Annotations can be private,

can also be shared among friends, colleagues, …

  • classroom usage in

education

  • sharing notes among friends
  • n a new publication
  • Annotations can be text,

drawings, different types of media

slide-19
SLIDE 19

W3C Work in Annotations

  • The DPUB IG Annotation Task Force has collected

a number of eBook specific use cases and requirements

  • W3C has just started an Annotation Working Group

to define a standard, interoperable environment to create, store, and share annotations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Search and discovery

  • Information on books

should be discoverable

  • n the open Web
  • basic information
  • reviews
  • Not only on one,

proprietary site…

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DPUB IG Discovery Task Force

  • Looks at issues on making books discoverable on the

Web through metadata

  • A series of interviews were conducted within the

community, as well as use cases collected

  • The results are synthesized and recommendations are

still discussed, e.g.:

  • define a version of ONIX to be used with schema.org?
  • being able to define the right granularity to attach metadata

(e.g., right information)

  • best practices to attach metadata to documents
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why does this matter to publishers?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reading systems: “We’re lazy”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reading system developers would much rather differentiate on custom features than re-implement EPUB 3 from scratch.

  • Pushing features into the Open Web lets

these developers get back to their innovations.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Publishers: “We’re busy”

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Publishers can’t invest in massive efforts just to make use of advanced features.

  • Advocating for adoption of Web-based

eBook standards lets them get back to publishing.

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 2. Media Delivery
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Media Delivery on the Web

  • The ¡traditional ¡broadcasting ¡model ¡

has ¡been ¡disrupted

  • Web ¡APIs ¡are ¡interoperable, ¡

meaning ¡new ¡interactive ¡media ¡ experiences

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Media Delivery on the Web

  • The ¡ubiquity ¡of ¡the ¡Web ¡brings ¡TV-­‑

like ¡content ¡to ¡diverse ¡devices

  • Content ¡creators, ¡regardless ¡of ¡

size, ¡have ¡access ¡to ¡a ¡worldwide ¡ distribution ¡system

  • Consumers ¡have ¡almost ¡unlimited ¡

choice ¡of ¡content ¡providers

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Achievements: Web & TV Interest Group

  • Proposed ¡adaptive ¡streaming ¡for ¡HTML5 ¡video, ¡resulting ¡in ¡

Requirements ¡for ¡Adaptive ¡Bit ¡Rate ¡Streaming.

  • Proposed ¡extended ¡functionality ¡of ¡media ¡streams ¡in ¡HTML5, ¡

resulting ¡in ¡the ¡Media ¡Source ¡Extensions ¡and ¡Encrypted ¡ Media ¡Extensions ¡specifications.

  • Second ¡screen ¡requirements ¡offered ¡to ¡Device ¡APIs ¡WG, ¡

resulting ¡in ¡the ¡Network ¡Service ¡Discovery ¡specification.

  • TV ¡industry ¡input ¡led ¡to ¡additions ¡to ¡the ¡DOM ¡Level ¡3 ¡Events ¡

specification.

  • Timed ¡Text ¡Task ¡Force ¡developed ¡recommendations ¡to ¡

facilitate ¡the ¡use ¡of ¡TTML ¡and ¡WebVTT ¡content ¡on ¡the ¡Web.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Web & TV Upcoming work

  • TV Control API
  • In-band tracks (and control of audio, video)
  • Second screen
  • Fingerprinting
  • Watermarking
  • Synchronization
slide-32
SLIDE 32

But, once more… today the technology evolution of the Web has been driven by “traditional” Web browsing

The specific needs and priorities of the publishing and media industries may not be reflected in the evolution

  • f the Web!
slide-33
SLIDE 33

We need the participation of the publishing and media industries W3C cannot do this by itself

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thank you for your attention!

http://www.w3.org/2014/Talks/0910-Berlin-IH/Slides.pdf