Cardiovascular disease in Diabetes and Kidney Disease:
Inflammation as target to reduce residual risk? May 25th, 2018. ERA-EDTA
Erik S Stroes Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Diabetes and Kidney Disease: Inflammation as target to reduce - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cardiovascular disease in Diabetes and Kidney Disease: Inflammation as target to reduce residual risk? May 25 th , 2018. ERA-EDTA Erik S Stroes Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Disclosures
Erik S Stroes Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Boren J. Curr Opin Lipidol 2016
Fatty streak Intermediate lesions Atheroma Fibrous plaque Complicated lesion/rupture
Koenig W, ATvB 2007
The lower The better
Giugliano RP, Lancet 2017
LDL-C (mM) Adj HR (95% CI) <0.5 0.69 (0.56-0.85) 0.5-1.3 0.75 (0.64-0.86) 1.3-1.8 0.87 (0.73-1.04) 1.8-2.6 0.90 (0.78-1.04) > 2.6 referent
P = 0.0001
1 2 3 4 5 5 10 15 20
Control 22% relative risk reduction with 1.0 mmol/L reduction Statin 15% relative risk reduction with 0.5 mmol/L more reduction More statin 34% relative risk reduction with 1.5 mmol/L reduction Statin-ezetimibe 33% relative risk reduction With 1.6 mmol/L reduction* PCSK9 addition * Extrapolated > 1yr treatment
0.8
Residual inflammatory risk ? Irreversible risk
Koenig W, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:15–26.
Foam cell Fatty streak Intermediate lesions Atheroma Fibrous plaque Complicated lesion/rupture
▲patients treated with statins
FH patients Healthy controls 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 p = 0.003
TBRmax Ascending aorta
Van Wijk, Stroes, JACC 2014
Bone marrow Control Hyperlipidemia
Yellow = FDG uptake
Bernelot-Moens, Stroes, Kroon, ATvB 2017
Control Hyperlipidemia
C o n tro s A c u te p h a s e 3 m o n th s 1 2 3 4 5
B M S U V m e a n A * * *
C
t r
s a c u t e p h a s e a f t e r 3 m
t h s 2 4 6 8
B M S U V m a x B * * *
c o n tro ls A c u te p h a s e 3 m o n th s 2 4 6 8
S p le e n S U V m a x * C ns
SUV Mean BM SUVmax BM SUVmax Spleen
Verweij, Stroes, Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imaging 2018
Van der Valk, Stroes, Eur Heart J 2016
Spleen and BM activity increased in ACS patients Spleen and BM-activity correlates with arterial activity Spleen and BM activity Correlate with CVD risk
Emami, JACC CV imaging 2015
Swirski & Nahrendorf, Science 2013;339:161-6
Bernelot, Stroes, Eur Heart J 2017
CTT, Lancet Diab endocrin 2016; Ridker, N Engl J Med 2008; Tonelli, JASN 2013
Bernelot-Moens, JASN 2017
Bernelot-Moens, JASN 2017
Seshasai, N Engl J Med 2011
Ray, Lancet 2009
CHD, coronary heart disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina. Shepherd et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1220–6 (TNT); Cannon et al, NEJM 2015;362:2387–97 and supplemental data (IMPROVE-IT).
*Cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, rehospitalisation for UA, coronary revascularisation (occurring at least 30 days after randomisation) or stroke *Cerebrovascular event, CHF with hospitalisation, CHD death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, coronary revascularisation and documented angina
Bernelot-Moens, BMC Cardiovascular disorders 2016
Renata Micha, Am J Cardiol 2011 Nidorf, JACC 2015
Colchicine, LoDoCo study Methotrexate, CIRT study
Stable CAD (post MI) On Statin, ACE/ARB, BB, ASA Persistent Elevation
Randomized Canakinumab 150 mg SC q 3 months Randomized Placebo SC q 3 months Primary CV Endpoint: Nonfatal MI, Nonfatal Stroke, Cardiovascular Death (MACE) Randomized Canakinumab 300 mg SC q 3 months* Key Secondary CV Endpoint: MACE + Unstable Angina Requiring Unplanned Revascularization (MACE+) Randomized Canakinumab 50 mg SC q 3 months
N = 10,061 39 Countries April 2011 - June 2017 1490 Primary Events
Ridker PM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017
25 50
25 50
25 50
Percent Change in hsCRP Percent Change in IL-6 Percent Change in LDL-C Placebo Canakinumab 50 mg Canakinumab 150 mg Canakinumab 300 mg
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119-31
Placebo SC q 3 months Canakinumab 150/300 mg SC q 3 months
HR 0.85 95%CI 0.76-0.96 P = 0.007
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119-31
Cumulative Incidence (%) Follow-up Years
HR 0.83 95%CI 0.74-0.92 P = 0.0006
Follow-up Years
1 2 3 4 5
Cumulative Incidence (%)
1 2 3 4 5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Cumulative Incidence
Placebo On Treatment hsCRP: Top Tertile On Treatment hsCRP: Middle Tertile On Treatment hsCRP: Lowest Tertile
Confirmed MACE by Tertiles of 3 Month hsCRP
HR (95% CI) P ___________________________________________________________ 1.0 (ref) (ref) 0.99 (0.86,1.14) 0.93 0.83 (0.72,0.96) 0.014 0.71 (0.61,0.82) <0.0001
Follow-up (years)
Placebo 3182 3014 2853 2525 1215 200 Canakinumab: Top Tertile 2090 1983 1866 1632 789 139 Middle Tertile 2044 1947 1866 1660 821 146 Lowest Tertile 2218 2147 2056 1856 888 153
Placebo Tertile 1 (hsCRP>2.6mg/L) Tertile 2 (hsCRP >1.2-<2.6) Tertile 3 (hsCRP <1.2mg/L)
MACE 29% reduction for those achieving lowest hsCRP tertile 17 % reduction for those achieving middle hsCRP tertile 1 % reduction for those achieving highest hsCRP tertile
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119-31
Clinical Outcome Placebo (N = 3182) Canakinumab On-treatment hsCRP > 2mg/L (N = 2868) Canakinumab On-treatment hsCRP < 2 mg/L (N = 3484) MACE HR (adjusted) 95% CI P 1.0 Referent Referent 0.90 0.79-1.02 0.11 0.75 0.66-0.85 <0.0001 MACE - Plus HR (adjusted) 95% CI P 1.0 Referent Referent 0.91 0.81-1.03 0.14 0.74 0.66-0.83 <0.0001 CV Death HR (adjusted) 95% CI P 1.0 Referent Referent 0.99 0.82-1.21 0.95 0.69 0.56-0.85 0.0004 All-Cause Mortality HR (adjusted) 95% CI P 1.0 Referent Referent 1.05 0.90-1.22 0.56 0.69 0.58-0.81 <0.0001
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119-31
Li, Carmeliet, Science 2018 Lameijer, Duivenvoorden, Nature Biotechnology 2018 Nicchols, Am J Cardiov Drugs 2018; Leentjes, Riksen, Circ Res 2018;
De Rosa, Frontiers in Endocrinology 2018 R Sallerman, 2012
Kingma, J Cardiov Dev Disease 2017