Developments in Geothermal Drilling Sverrir Thorhallsson Head of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

developments in geothermal drilling
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Developments in Geothermal Drilling Sverrir Thorhallsson Head of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ENGINE Mid-Term Conference 10-12 January 2007, Potsdam Developments in Geothermal Drilling Sverrir Thorhallsson Head of Engineering Department SOR Iceland GeoSurvey s@isor.is 1 2007 - Sverrir 2007 - Sverrir Outline 2 Geothermal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2007 - Sverrir 1

ENGINE Mid-Term Conference 10-12 January 2007, Potsdam

Developments in Geothermal Drilling

Sverrir Thorhallsson Head of Engineering Department ÍSOR Iceland GeoSurvey

s@isor.is

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2007 - Sverrir 2

Outline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2007 - Sverrir 3

Geothermal drilling methods

Various methods found in geothermal drilling. Yellow indicate the most common ones.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2007 - Sverrir 4

Icelandic Geothermal Drilling Industry

National companies for:

  • Jardboranir hf. for drilling deep wells. 4 drilling contractors in all.
  • Cementing, fishing etc. done by the drilling contractor.
  • Iceland GeoSurvey for geoscientific services and logging.
  • Consulting engineering companies for tendering and supervision.

International companies for:

  • Mud motors, MWD.
  • Aerated drilling.

Pre-drilling with a truck mounted rig

  • Surface casing 60-90 m, drilled dia. 24“- 28" with air-hammers.

Water used as drilling fluid whenever possible. Only large losses are cemented (>10 l/s). No delays due to coring. No cores taken. Logging or testing only at casing points. Rigs and crew only drill geothermal wells.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2007 - Sverrir 5

Geothermal drilling rigs in Iceland

S leipnir Trölli Jötunn

Óðinn JB 4000 m Geysir JB 4000 m Jötunn JB 3300 m Sleipnir JB 2400 m Nýr bor RFS 1600 m Saga JB 1350 m Trölli RFS 1100 m Langþr. RFS 600 m Glámur RFS 600 m Einráður RFS 500 m Ýmir JB 1000 m Hrímnir JB 300 m Alvarr 300 m Trítill RFS 120 m

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2007 - Sverrir 6

Temperature profiles - ICELAND

Ref: Guðmundur Pálmason

Depth (m)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2007 - Sverrir 7

Casing profiles of Icelandic geothermal wells

High temp. Low temp.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2007 - Sverrir 8

Drilling methods used in Iceland

Rotary Hammer Odex Holte Pressure bal.

Most common Simlutaneous casing Aerated drilling

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2007 - Sverrir 9

Vertical vs. directional drilling

The casing programmes are virtually the same. The build-up starts at the kick off point (KOP) at 300-500 m. Inclination of 30-40° is common in geothermal wells.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2007 - Sverrir 10

Main Types of Low Temp. Wells

  • Temperature gradient wells

– Depth 40-100 m (used in Iceland for exploration) – Well diameter 3-4", plastic liner HDPE where needed Cost 150 €/m

  • Production wells

– Depth 400-2000 m – Casing sizes, mainly three diameters for production casing 14", 10 3/4" and 8 5/8" or 7 5/8". – Casing depth í 150-800 m. Barefoot - no liner. – Cost 500-1000 €/m

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2007 - Sverrir 11

Main Types of High Temp. Wells

  • Typical well profile:

– Depth of well 1200-2800 m – Production casing depth 600-1100 m – Production casing dia. 9-5/8", liner 7" or 7-5/8" – Cost 1200-1800 €/m. For 2500 m, 4 million €

  • Large diameter well profile:

– Depth of well 1200-3000 m – Production casing depth 600-850 m – Production casing dia. 13-3/8", liner 9-5/8" or barefoot – Cost 1500-2000 €/m

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2007 - Sverrir 12

HT drilling activity in Iceland

1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Lengd holu (m) Samtals 144 háhitaholur lengri en 500 m

Sverrir 2006-02-17

Measured depth (m) 144 wells deeper than 500 m

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2007 - Sverrir 13

Drilling progress – days vs. depth

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Sverrir 03.05.2004

New bit

  • incl. 5 days waiting

for csg. shipment

Days Days from start of rig move

No liner Open hole Slotted liner inst. Stimulation Rig move

Drilling 12-1/4"

Runing production casing 13-3/8" and cementing Runing anchor casing and cementing

Drilling 21-1/2" Drilling 17-1/2"

Conventional rotary drilling Drilling with mud motor to TD

Depth (m)

Note: Doubling of ROP when drilling with mud motor. Trouble free drilling. Few bit changes.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2007 - Sverrir 14

Well Cost

Geothermal wells are more expensive than

  • il and gas wells
  • f the same depth

2500 m well 2.5 million € in 2004, now ~3.5 million €

Ref: Tester et al 2006

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2007 - Sverrir 15

The cost is higher due to:

  • Directional drilling with a mud motor and

measurement while drilling (MWD) and gyro.

  • Drilling rig with a top-drive.
  • Aerated drilling fluid. Extra compressors.
  • Using premium casing connections.
  • Using cementing services from the oil industry.
  • Logging services from the oil industry.
  • Mobilization for only a few wells.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

2007 - Sverrir 16

Rig control consoles

Old type: SCR-DC motor contr. Rig with rotary table.

Photo: Sverrir Thorhallsson

New: All hydraulic rig. Iron roughneck.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2007 - Sverrir 17 Jarðboranir hf.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2007 - Sverrir 18 Jarðboranir hf.

Iron roughneck Top drive

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2007 - Sverrir 19

Hook Load

  • vs. Depth

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 20 40 60 80 100

5" 4 1/2" 4" 3"

S.Þ. 1.12.2001

Hook load vs. depth capacity

13 3/8" 9 5/8" 7" 5" 4 1/2" 4" 3" Rig #2 with S.F. Rig #2 hook loadrating 50 t Rig #1 with safety factor 1.33 S.F. Rig #1 hook load rating 100 t

Weight in water (tonnes) Depth (m)

Casings 20 t weight on bit 10 t weight on bit

The diagram shows how deep a rig can drill, based on the hook load rating. Example. 100 tons rig can reach 2300 m with 5" drillpipe 2700 m with 4-1/2" dp

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2007 - Sverrir 20 Jarðboranir hf.

200 t

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2007 - Sverrir 21

“SLEIPNIR “SLEIPNIR”

Jarðboranir hf.

100 t

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2007 - Sverrir 22

“SLEIPNIR “SAGA”

Jarðboranir hf.

50 t

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2007 - Sverrir 23

Three Cement Tanks, 50 m3 each CROWN single skid cementing unit. The unit is comprised of a high-pressure pumping system, recirculating mixing system, all required controls, instrumentation and a hydraulic system to drive fluid handling and mixing. The system includes CAM - Continuous Automatic Mixing, which is a computer

  • perated cement density control system

with features like: Automatic Density Control Pre-job system check Real time data storage of density, pump rate, total volume and pressure Stores three cement slurry designs

Cementing unit - from drilling contr.

Jarðboranir hf.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2007 - Sverrir 24

Output curves for wells in Iceland

13 3/8” 9 5/8”

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2007 - Sverrir 25

Icelandic bid forms

Drilling of a vertical geothermal well to 2500 m Cased to: 50 m/ 450 m/ 1000 m/ TD 2500 m

Number Work Item Unit Unit price Quantity Sum total III.1 Transportation III.1.1 Preparations, mobilisation and demobilisation total 1 III.1 Transportation Total: III.2 Specific site preparation for drilling III.2.1 Site preparation changing from pre-drilling to drilling(cellar, mu total 1 III.2 Specific site preparation for drilling Total: III.3 Drilling of a straight vertical well III.3.1 Drilling operation: III.3.1-A Drilling with ø 24” drill bit Fixed price total 1 Price per meter drilled m 50 III.3.1-B Drilling with ø17½” drill bit Fixed price total 1 Price per meter drilled m 400 III.3.1-C Drilling with ø12¼” drill bit Fixed price total 1 Price per meter drilled m 550 III.3.1-D Drilling with ø8½” drill bit Fixed price total 1 Price per meter drilled m 1,500 III.3.1 Drilling operation: Total: III.3.2 Casing runing services III.3.2-A ø18 5/8” casing m 50 III.3.2-B ø13 3/8” casing m 450 III.3.2-C ø9 5/8” casing m 1,000 III.3.2-D ø7” liner m 1,500 III.3.3 Casing runing services Total:

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2007 - Sverrir 26

Some “Problems” of Geothermal Drilling

1. High cost of geothermal wells. 2. Well sites in protected areas. Permitting. 3. Large loss of circulation zones. 4. Drilling “blind” after total loss of circulation. 5. Slow drilling in hard lava formations. 6. Well stability during drilling. 7. Wells with low permeability / low output. 8. High pressures while drilling through a steam cap. 9. Temperature limitations of logging tools.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2007 - Sverrir 27

Conclusions

  • New top-drive rigs with “iron roughnecks”,

directional drilling + MWD and instrumentation are a part of a modern drilling operations.

  • Better environment: noise, wastes, mud disposal.
  • Big diameter casings are required for large flows.
  • Incentive drilling contracts have lead to improved

drilling efficiency.

  • Standardized well designs and uninterrupted

drilling operations will lead to lower costs.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2007 - Sverrir 28

REMINDER: ENGINE Workshop (WP4)

See you in Reykjavík, June 28-29 Drilling cost effectiveness and feasibility of high-temperature drilling