Development, Simulation, and Prototype Performance Measurements of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development simulation and prototype performance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development, Simulation, and Prototype Performance Measurements of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development, Simulation, and Prototype Performance Measurements of the Mu2e Straw Tracker Richie Bonventre Fermilab Users Meeting June 20th, 2018 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Outline 1. Brief overview of Mu2e and physics motivation 2.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development, Simulation, and Prototype Performance Measurements of the Mu2e Straw Tracker

Richie Bonventre Fermilab Users Meeting June 20th, 2018

Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. Brief overview of Mu2e and physics motivation
  • 2. Mu2e straw tracker design
  • 3. Tracker Prototype low level measurements
  • 4. Simulating the tracker
  • 5. Comparing resolution + efficiency from prototype data and

simulation

See upcoming talk by Tomonari Miyashita for more details on the experiment!

1 / 23

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Charged Lepton Flavor Violation

  • Mu2e will search for neutrinoless conversion of a muon to an

electron in a nuclear environment: µ−N → e−N

  • This would violate charged lepton flavor, something that

has never been seen before

  • Any detection of charged lepton flavor violation would be an

unambiguous sign of new physics! (SM contribution is < 10−50)

  • Mu2e goal is a 104 improvement!

2 / 23

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab

  • Stop 1018 muons on Aluminum
  • Conversion produces monoenergetic 105 MeV electrons
  • Main background is decay-in-orbit electrons
  • Only distinguishable by momentum, want high precision

measurement that can handle high rate

3 / 23

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Straw Tracker Detector

  • Cylindrical straw tracker operating in uniform field
  • Tracker is in vacuum
  • Measurement is multiple scattering dominated
  • Entire detector much less than one radiation length of material

4 / 23

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tracker Configuration

  • 18 stations, each containing 12x 120◦ panels for

stereo measurement

  • Blind to DIO electron momentum peak and

beam flash

  • Expected resolution better than 200 keV/c

5 / 23

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Straw Tracker Detector

  • ∼21,000 low mass straw tubes in vacuum
  • 5mm diameter, 0.5-1.2m long
  • 15µm mylar wall, 25µm tungsten wire
  • 1 atm of 80/20 Ar:CO2, wire at 1425V

6 / 23

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What are we measuring

  • Individual threshold crossings digitized in time (TDC)
  • Drift time → radial resolution ∼200 µm
  • Straws are instrumented on both sides
  • Time division → longitudinal resolution ∼4 cm
  • Falling edge digitized for Time over threshold
  • Measure of path length / radius independent of t0
  • ADC measures pulse waveform for background rejection

7 / 23

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tracker Electronics

(*) Summing optional

Discrete Coercial Aalog ICs FPGA FPGA

ADC TDC TDC

PCB transmission line

Preamp Preamp

Readout Controller

DAQ

Straw

Output Control & Buffer

8 / 23

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Tracker Electronics

8 / 23

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tracker FPGAs and Firmware

  • Most of functionality in FPGAs - highly configurable
  • Have already taken advantage to add new features (Time over

threshold)

  • Originally had Altera FPGAs, now using Microsemi SmartFusion2

for radiation tolerance

  • 2x Digi FPGAs that digitize 48 channels each
  • Separate TDCs for each end of straw
  • Continous readout of summed ADC waveform at 50 MHz
  • Data buffering, DAQ communication, tracker slow controls in

ROC FPGA

9 / 23

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Firmware TDC Design

  • Need ∼4cm resolution longitudinally along straw
  • Near speed of light signal → <100ps time resolution
  • Achieve resolution in firmware while minimizing resource

usage

  • Initial design based on wave-union design by Jinyuan Wu
  • Delay chain for sub-clock tick precision
  • Average multiple chains to subdivide large delays
  • Auto calibration of bin widths

1 delay chain 3 delay chains 8 delay chains

10 / 23

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Firmware Design

FPGA resource usage for 48 channel design

  • Have managed to implement design that fits all 48 channels in

a single chip

  • Learning process dealing with Microsemi FPGAs
  • Architecture changes from Altera version
  • Much smaller community, support resources
  • Difficulties with timing constraints - manual placement of delay

chains and ADC interface

  • Several hour compilation time for full design
  • Demonstrated readout chain from digitizing FPGAs through

to DAQ computer over SERDES

11 / 23

slide-14
SLIDE 14

An 8-straw tracker prototype for testing and performance mea- surements

  • Portable self-contained setup
  • Cross talk → proton beam from 88” cyclotron at Berkeley Lab
  • Radiation sensitivity → UC Berkeley High Flux Neutron Source
  • Straw and electronics parameters → radioactive sources
  • Efficiency/resolution → cosmic rays
  • Read out over USB serial using custom DAQ

12 / 23

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sources used to measure gain, energy resolution, time division, simulation tuned to results

(mm) T + z ∆ ⋅ /2)

eff

(v 400 − 300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 400 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Mu2e Straw Longitudinal Resolution

0.7 mm ± = 29.9

z

σ z = -175.0 mm, 0.6 mm ± = 30.3

z

σ z = -87.5 mm, 0.5 mm ± = 26.3

z

σ z = 0.0 mm, 0.9 mm ± = 34.7

z

σ z = 87.5 mm, 0.9 mm ± = 35.0

z

σ z = 175.0 mm,

0.5 mm/ns ± = 203.0

eff

gain v

4

10 ⋅ Fe source at 1.33

55

(Tom-Erik Haugen)

  • Gas gain by measuring current

with 55Fe

  • Energy resolution using 5.9 keV

x-ray peak

ADC peak value (counts) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 8-Straw Prototype G4 + Straw Simulation Fe Peak

55

5.9 keV

High Voltage [V]

1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 4

10 × Gain

5 10 15 20 25

ax + b

Fit = e Fe Data)

55

Prototype ( Prototype (Fit)

(Andrew Edmonds)

13 / 23

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Simulation of the straw tracker response

  • Detailed Geant4 simulation of full detector
  • Custom code takes energy deposition in each straw and

models physics and electronics response

14 / 23

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Simulation of the straw tracker response

Simulation of waveform threshold crossing at each end of straw

1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 time (nSec) 5 − 5 10 15 20 Waveform (mVolts) 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 time (nSec) 5 − 5 10 15 20 Waveform (mVolts)

  • Each ion cluster modelled individually, including drift, wire

propagation, and electronics response

15 / 23

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Simulation of the electronics response

Input pulse shape → Apply electronics response

Time (ns) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Signal (mV) 10 20 30 40 50 Fe waveform, 0 cm

55

Fe waveform, 120 cm

55

Fit

(Data from Manolis Kargiantoulakis) (SPICE sim from Vadim Rusu)

  • Use unshaped waveforms from source at different distances to

model attenuation, dispersion

  • Fit for transfer function describing preamp and integrator

response

  • Model includes saturation effects, pulse shape distortion
  • Important for accurately determining proton discrimination,

modelling pileup

16 / 23

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Reconstructing track position for performance measurements

  • Use PMT trigger and ATLAS FEI4 pixel

detectors to allow precise reconstruction

  • f cosmic ray tracks
  • MIPs similar to conversion electron signal
  • Allow resolution and efficiency

measurements

17 / 23

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reconstructing track position for performance measurements

STRAW MEASUREMENT Drift time (ns) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 PIXEL MEASUREMENT Track position (mm) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Straw 2 Straw 3 Straw 4 Straw 5 Straw 6

  • ATLAS FEI4 detectors measure track position
  • 2.0x1.9cm chips, 250x50µm pixels
  • PMT trigger gives t0 for drift time measurement
  • ∼600ps time resolution
  • Reconstruct relative position and timing of pixels, PMTs,

straws, wires with maximum likelihood fit

18 / 23

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Transverse resolution

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035

8-Straw Prototype G4 + Straw Simulation 0.0 < DOCA < 0.5

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

0.5 < DOCA < 1.0

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

1.0 < DOCA < 1.5

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

1.5 < DOCA < 2.0

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07

2.0 < DOCA < 2.5

  • Agrees with simulation tuned to low level

parameters

  • Model and simulation include full DOCA

dependence of resolution

  • gaussian smearing × exponential with constant τ
  • τ encodes effect of cluster statistics

19 / 23

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Transverse resolution

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 8-Straw Prototype 8-Straw Prototype Fit G4 + Straw Simulation G4 + Straw Simulation Fit

0.0 < DOCA < 0.5

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

0.5 < DOCA < 1.0

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

1.0 < DOCA < 1.5

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

1.5 < DOCA < 2.0

Drift Radius Residual (mm) 0.5 − 0.5 1 1.5 Arbitrary Units 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07

2.0 < DOCA < 2.5

  • Agrees with simulation tuned to low level

parameters

  • Model and simulation include full DOCA

dependence of resolution

  • gaussian smearing × exponential with constant τ
  • τ encodes effect of cluster statistics

19 / 23

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Longitudinal resolution and efficiency

Distance from wire [mm]

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Efficiency

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

8-Straw Prototype 8-Straw Prototype Fit G4 + Straw Simulation G4 + Straw Simulation Fit 0.006 ± = 0.947 ε 0.001 ± = 0.950 ε

Longitudinal Positon Resolution [mm]

  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300

Arbitrary Unit

20 40 60 80 100 120

8-Straw Prototype 8-Straw Prototype Fit G4 + Straw Simulation G4 + Straw Simulation Fit

1.422 ± = 43.371 σ 1.277 ± mean = 0.653 1.245 ± = 41.733 σ 1.308 ± mean = 2.232

  • Efficiency measured at many voltages/thresholds to determine
  • ptimal running conditions

20 / 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Time over threshold

  • With just hit time measurement, require t0 estimate from

track reconstruction before drift time can be determined

  • Time over threshold allows a measure of path length (and thus

radial distance) independent of t0

  • Implemented in firmware, being added to reconstruction
  • Simulation agrees well with data
  • Shows predictive power of detailed model

21 / 23

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Track Resolution

(MeV/c)

true

  • p

measured

p 4 − 3 − 2 − 1 − 1 2 3 4 Entries / 0.010 MeV/c 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

Core width = 159 keV/c

momentum resolution at start of tracker (simulation)

  • Sensitivity studies now include results of simulation tuned to

prototype measurements

  • Track resolution depends on hit level resolution and efficiency,

as well as reconstruction techniques

22 / 23

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conclusion

  • Mu2e will search for CLFV with greatly improved sensitivity
  • Straw tracker provides a precise momentum measurement,

made possible by timing and waveform measurements from the straws

  • 8-straw prototype was used to tune detailed simulation of

straw physics and electronics

  • Hit level performance proven with prototype
  • Momentum resolution will allow us to reach our sensitivity

goals!

23 / 23