development fl rural summit november 6 2014
play

Development FL Rural Summit November 6, 2014 . Alex McCoy, MBA, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ED 101: Understanding Organized Economic Development FL Rural Summit November 6, 2014 . Alex McCoy, MBA, CEcD Putnam County Chamber Abbreviations (a.k.a. Alphabet Soup) ED = Economic Development EDO = Economic Development


  1. ED 101: Understanding Organized Economic Development – FL Rural Summit November 6, 2014 . Alex McCoy, MBA, CEcD – Putnam County Chamber

  2. Abbreviations (a.k.a. Alphabet Soup) • ED = Economic Development • EDO = Economic Development Organization • BRE = Business Retention and Expansion • SBD = Small Business Development • BA = Business Attraction • WIB = Local Workforce Investment Board • RFP = Request for Proposal

  3. DEFINING ED

  4. ED has Different Meanings to Different Constituents • Average citizens – Attracting/retaining jobs that pay living wages which they can perform; improve quality of life • Elected officials – Generate non-residential revenues to pay for services; jobs for constituents; political success • Existing business community – New customers; improved/new workforce skills; economies of scale; shared service burden; innovation

  5. What is ED? Organized ED’s Working Definition: – Organized ED is a deliberate set of programs, policies, or activities intended to improve the economic well being and quality of life, and to create or retain jobs within a community over time Goals of Organized ED efforts: a) Create/Retain higher wage jobs b) Grow the community’s non -residential tax base c) Create and distribute wealth d) Help local government plan for the future

  6. ED Is/Isn’t • Is NOT an event • Is an ongoing-process • Is about doing a lot of • Is NOT a single act little things right by performed by a various players single person • Requires a serious • Is NOT something long term view/ that can be switched commitment from the ON and OFF on a public to build the whim, with one community’s wealth year’s lost efforts taking several years to recover from

  7. What’s in ED? • BRE • Workforce Development • SBD & Entrepreneurship • Strategic Planning / Public Policy • BA • Tech-Led Development • Tourism • Neighborhood • Real Estate Development Development & Reuse • Development Finance – Brownfields – Downtown – Projects – Infrastructure – Product – Product

  8. The ED Process

  9. What’s Your Version of ED? Generate Leads Marketing Relationships Competitiveness

  10. Each of us has a position to play, and our performance affects the entire team

  11. The County Store • Cashier Tax Collector • Security Law Enforcement • Maintenance Public Works • Interior Design Planning & Zoning • Price Marker Property Appraiser • Management Elected Officials/Manager • Landscapers Parks & Recreation • Human Resources/Training Public Education • Sales, Marketing, Business Economic Development Customer Service, Product Organization Research and Development, & Growth Strategy Advisor

  12. Local Partners Local Govt Local EDO Development Authorities CRAs / DDAs / Main Street Airport / Port Authorities Tourism Dev State / Regional Partners Council (TDC) EFI / DEO SBDC Chambers Regional Utility Providers Partnerships (FPL, Duke) Transportation Regional Council (Rail, Port, DOT) Workforce (WIB, Prospect, Banks WF, Schools / Consultant; College) Client Others!!!!

  13. Why is ED Important?

  14. Successful ED Generates: Economic Security for All!!! • Average Citizens Want: – Jobs that pay living wages so citizens can have the “American Dream” • Existing Businesses Want: – New markets and customers so they can grow • Public Officials Want: – Non-residential tax revenue – People with good jobs can afford to pay their taxes – Growing businesses generate more revenue

  15. The Tax Base Tax Base Tangible Personal Property

  16. Located in Putnam County

  17. What Does This Have To Do With Us? • Take ownership over their Tax Base • Many communities are passive when it comes to growing their tax base and could do a better job expanding it by: – Be proactive with infrastructure expansions, transportation enhancements, & creating product – Aggressively pursue producer projects – Engage existing stakeholders / businesses to improve the existing business climate – Assist smaller businesses – Promote leadership development throughout community

  18. American Farmland Trust • A group that assists farmers & ranchers protect their land, produce a healthier environment, & build successful communities • Created a Cost of Community Service model to examine the cost / benefit impact of various land uses on local government • Performed more than 125 studies in: CO, CT, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, & WI

  19. Study’s Limitations • Only one coastal community studied • No really large MSA’s studied • Communities provide different services depending on the desires of the public • Communities provide different levels of service depending on the desires of the pubic

  20. Cost of Service Study Cost of Community Service Study North- Leon ampton Appling Brooks Colquitt Miller Mitchell Thomas Ratios Co., FL Co., VA Co., GA Co., GA Co., GA Co., GA Co., GA Co., GA Residential $ 1.39 $1.13 $ 2.27 $ 1.56 $ 1.28 $ 1.54 $ 1.39 $ 1.64 Com/Ind $ 0.36 $0.97 $ 0.17 $ 0.42 $ 0.45 $ 0.52 $ 0.46 $ 0.38 Ag/Open $ 0.42 $0.23 $ 0.42 $ 0.39 $ 0.80 $ 0.53 $ 0.60 $ 0.66 Producers – Commercial, Source: American Farmland Trust Industrial; Ag / Open Land Consumers – Residential

  21. Economic Base Theory “ Primary Employer / Job ” • Firms that “Export” their goods outside the community actually “Import” new wealth • “Export” firms tend to have higher multiplier impacts within local economies and create demand for “Secondary Employers / Jobs”

  22. Primary Vs. Secondary Employers • Primary Employers (ex: manufacturing, distribution, high-end services, etc.) – bring cash into the community by selling their goods/services outside the community $ • Secondary Employers (ex: retail, most service based firms, etc.) – recycle cash already in the local economy – usually driven by local business conditions (ex: amount of area disposable income, number of customers, etc.)

  23. )

  24. A Look at Residential • Assumptions: • $24.92 Million / 5,444 Units – 1) only source of $ is taxes; • Unit owes $4,577.52 in taxes to County – 2) only homes are taxed • (Fair Market Value (FMV) – Homestead) x .0083114 Mils • Jefferson County, 2014: • $4,577.52 / .0083114 = $550,751.98 – $24.92 Million Budget • $550,751.98 + $50,000 = $600,751.98 – 5,444 Est. # Households, 2008- 2012 (U.S. Census) • Fair Market Value of each housing unit – Median Value of owner- must be $600,751.98 for COUNTY to occupied housing units = break even $113,800, 2008-2012 (U.S. Census) • Ratio: $1 received for $5.28 spent – Required FMV / Actual Value of Home

  25. Relaxing the Model • • Assumptions: $4.59 Million / 5,444 Units – 1) taxes are 18.4% of revenue; • Unit owes $843.13 in taxes to County – 2) only homes are taxed • (Fair Market Value (FMV) – Homestead) x .0083114 Mils • Jefferson County, 2014: • $843.13 / .0083114 = $101,442.60 – $24.92 Million Budget • $101,442.60 + $50,000 = $151,442.60 – $4.59 Million in Ad Valorem • Fair Market Value of each housing unit – 5,444 Est. # Households, 2008- must be $151,442.60 for COUNTY to 2012 (U.S. Census) break even – Median Value of owner- occupied housing units = $113,800, 2008-2012 (U.S. • Ratio: $1 received for $1.33 spent Census) – Required FMV / Actual Value of Home

  26. Putnam County Parcel Type with Tax Value Parcel Type Number % Ave Value Total Value % Total 99,098 100.0% $ 37,558 $ 3,721,874,216 100.0% Vacant Parcels 53,613 54.10% $ 2,080 $ 111,490,784 3.00% Single Family 16,611 16.76% $ 68,549 $ 1,138,670,948 30.59% Mobile Homes 15,301 15.44% $ 29,188 $ 446,610,734 12.00% Ag/Green Belt 4,113 4.15% $ 14,556 $ 59,868,067 1.61% Commerce, Ind* 1,294 1.31% $ 1,026,757 $ 1,328,623,675 35.70% Government 1,092 1.10% $ 4,215 $ 4,602,336 0.12% Institutional 451 0.46% $ 69,397 $ 31,297,848 0.84% All Others 6,623 6.68% $ 90,701 $ 600,709,646 16.14% * Includes Tangible Personal Property Property Appraiser - Parcel Count Nov 11, 2010 Property Appraiser – Tax Value Oct 18, 2010

  27. T Taxbase without (re)investment a x b Inflation a s e Residential Growth Baseline Level of Service Tangible Asset Deprecation Today Time

  28. Putnam Co. Top 2013 Taxpayers TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE * NAME 20-Oct-08 17-Oct-13 1. Seminole Electric $267,161,206 $305,652,382 2. Georgia Pacific Corp. $274,885,961 $303,854,430 Est. $113 MM 3. Florida Power & Light $157,885,864 $203,440,556 4. Continental / Lafarge $81,354,979 $65,102,556 5. Clay Electric Coop., Inc. $41,643,939 $45,480,880 6. Wal-Mart $13,733,574 $17,285,084 7. Putnam Community Medical Center $16,144,023 $16,256,378 8. BellSouth Telecommunications / AT&T $23,868,261 $15,758,581 9. CSX Transportation $14,738,976 $15,484,750 10. ComCast N/A $10,148,303 * Total taxable value includes real, tangible personal and centrally assessed properties. Putnam County Property Appraiser: Final Tax Roll - Oct 17, 2013

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend