Developing the Most Significant and Suitable Smart City Indicators - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Developing the Most Significant and Suitable Smart City Indicators - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Developing the Most Significant and Suitable Smart City Indicators for Smart City Pilot in Knowledge Oasis Muscat (KOM), Sultanate of Oman Shaima Al Mahrooqi Government Fellow| UNU-EGOV Agenda Agenda List Introduction Smart City Pilot
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 2
Agenda Agenda List
- Introduction
- Smart City Pilot in Knowledge Oasis Muscat (KOM)
- Measurement Tool Selection
- Background to the Indicator Selection
- Methodological Approach
- Findings and Results
- Conclusion
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 3
Before we Start!
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 4
Before we Start!
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 5
Introduction
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 6
Smart City Pilot in Knowledge Oasis Muscat (KOM)
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 7
Smart City Pilot in Knowledge Oasis Muscat (KOM) Smart City Pilot Project
- National project to transforming Knowledge
Oasis/Muscat into a Smart City
- Cooperation with a distinguished group of
stockholders and Omani innovators
- To showcase the advantage of using fourth
industrial revolution technology and develop national strategy for smart city and smart infrastructure
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 8
Why Knowledge Oasis Muscat (KOM)
- Unique Area
- High collaboration
- Challenges the area is suffering
- People Crowed
- Parking Spaces
- Waste Management
- Utility Management
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 9
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Smart Parking Features:
- Poor parked vehicle (PPV)
- Real-time Parking
- Occupancy Availability
- Real-time turnover information Parking Guidance
- Parking Enforcement
- Parking Policy setting:
- Overstay violation
- No-parking zone
- Loading zone violations
- Reports and Administration:
- Occupancy, revenue, enforcement reports
- Events, Polices and Actions management
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 10
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Smart Lighting Features:
- Enhanced Scheduling
- Fault Model & Power Meter parameters
- Dynamic profile (ambient, daylight harvesting, motion sensing)
- Group light control
- Lighting Control:
- ON/OFF
- Dimming Percentage
- Energy Use
- Power Status
- Physical Map of Lights
- Reports and Administration:
- Energy Usage Reports
- Asset Reporting
- Schedule Definition – time based schedule
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 11
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Smart Traffic Management Features :
- Traffic Vehicle count
- Vehicle classification
- Vehicle direction
- Distribution of Incidents
- Incident management
- Traffic
- Vehicle
- Crowd Associated device dwell time
and count
- All Device dwell time and count
- Pedestrian, Vehicle count
- Dwell time,
- Crowd Heat map Motion sensing
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 12
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Safety and Security Features :
- Incidents, Situation and Response
- Direction Controller
- Command and Controller
- Distribution of Incidents
- Over Crowding Analysis
- Alert
- Intrusion/Object detection
- License Plate Recognition
- Facial Recognition
- Slip and Fall Detection
- Fire and Smoke
- Loitering
- Queue Alert
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 13
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Smart Waste Management Features :
- Bin Fill Level Monitoring
- Bin Overflow Alert
- Fire Alert
- Optimize collection route
- Reduce operational cost
- Tracking of Garbage Trucks
- Reports
- Fill Level Trend
- Temperature Trend
- Origin Definition analysis
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 14
Smart City Pilot Scope
- Environment Features :
- Air Quality Index (AQI)
- Color Code
- Remark
- Customizable Settings for equations, colors from Dashboard
(Settings available in 4.0 for operators)
- Provider based heat map visualization
- Mobile Air Pollution Sensing
- Structural/Vibration Monitoring
- Fixed Air Quality Sensing
- Units Normalization
- Pollution Playback in dashboard to view playback
- Reports
- Air Pollution Reports
Selecting the Most Suitable Indicators
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 16
Why we need measuring tools
- Monitor and evaluate the pilot progress performance overtime
- Set targets
- Identify challenges
- Provide recommendation for improvement
- Formulate concrete policies and framework
Measuring Tools
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 17
Measuring Tools Selection
Indicators
Nature of the indicators and transparency Where they
- riginate
The purpose from creating the indicators What they measure Who is able to use them
The Pilot
Strategic objective
- f implementing
the pilot Phase in pilot development The spatial scale of the pilot The time scale of the pilot The purpose of the assessment
The selection of the tools were based on the following aspects.
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 18
Key performance indicators Background - Standard Indicators
- Seven international & regional standards indicators
- Four different sources ( ISO, ITU, ETSI and UN Habitat)
- A total of 410 indicators were reviewed and analyzed
Name Description #
- f Indicators
ISO 37122:2019 Sustainable development in communities-indicators for Smart cities 82 ISO 37120:2018a Sustainable development of communities –indicators for city services and quality of life 104 ETSI TS 103 463: 2017a Key performance indicators for sustainable digital multi service cites 76
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 19
Background - Standard Indicators
Name Description #
- f Indicators
ITU 4901: 2016b Key performance indicators related to the use of information and communication technology in Smart sustainable cities 48 ITU 4902: 2016c Key performance indicators related to the sustainability impacts of information and communication technology in Smart sustainable cities 30 ITU 4903: 2016d Key performance indicators for Smart sustainable cities to assess the achievement of sustainable development goals 52 UN SDG 11+ Montering framework (UN-habitat etal.,2016) 18 Total 410
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 20
- Each indicators should have a strong link to the subthemes of the framework
and should have a significant importance for the evaluation process. Relevance
- The definitions of the indicators should be clear.
- The calculation methods behinds the indicators.
- Guidance on how to be applied.
Reliability
- Data for the indicators should be easily available, or easy to collect.
Data Availability
- The indicators should be capable of being measured ( Quantitative, Qualitative
and descriptive ). Measurability
Background - Acceptance Criteria
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 21
- Alignment of the indicators with the rationale behind implementing the smart
city pilot and the purpose of the assessment. Alignment
- The set of indicators should be defined in a way that data can be compared
between different phases of urban development. Comparability
- The indicators should be easy to understand by the users.
Familiarity
- Indicators within a framework should not measure the same aspect of a
subtheme.
Non Redundancy
Background - Acceptance Criteria
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 22
Background - Indicator Classification
- Taxonomy for indicator analysis
- Huovila, Bosch & Airaksinen
- Comparative analysis of standardized
indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 23
Background - Indicator Classification
- Urban Focus
- Balance of Sustainability & Smartness
- City Dimension
- Environment Dimension (air Quality, energy, waste, and water)
- Quality of Life Dimension (safety and security, public services like
parking app, and public transportation)
- Infrastructure Dimension ( Urban mobility)
- Indicator Type
- Balance of input, process, output, outcome and impact indicators
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 24
Methodological Approach
Step 5
- Indicators with the
total of 8 scores will be selected
Step 4
- Score indicator
based on its alignment to the acceptance criteria
Step3
- Classify indicators
with the three aspects
Step 2
- Identify the
acceptance criteria
Step 1
- Identify best
standard indicators
Indicators analyses and scoring
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 25
Findings
410
Indicators were reviewed and analyzed
236
Indicators cover the environment, quality of life, and infrastructure dimensions
88
Indicators focus on achieving sustainability and smartness
- bjectives
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 26
Results
A total of 31 indicators are suitable for the pilot 4 primary sources are ISO 37122, ISO 37120, ETSI TS 103 463, and ITU 4903 ISO 37122 and ITU 4903 are more appropriate standards ITU 4902, ITU 4901 and UN SDG 11+ were excluded from the report
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 27
Results
- 55% of the indicators are coming from ISO 37122 standard and 26% from
ITU 4903 and followed by ETSI with 13% and ISO 37120 with 6%.
ISO 37122 ISO 37120 ETSI ITU 4903 % 55% 6% 13% 26% Indicatores 17 2 4 8 17 2 4 8 55% 6% 1… 2… 5 10 15 20
Indicators Distribution by Standard
Indicatores %
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 28
Results
- 45% of the indicators are covering the environment dimension, 36%
quality of life dimension, and 19 % urban mobility.
Environment Dimension Quality of life Dimension Urban Mobility Dimension % 45% 36% 19% # of indicatores 14 11 6 14 11 6 45% 36% 19% 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Indicators Distribution by City Sector
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 29
Results
Input Process Output Outcome Impact Persentage 0% 6% 36% 52% 6% 0% 6% 36% 52% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Indicator Typology Distribution
- 52% of the indicators are outcome indicators, 36% are output indicators.
Both impact and process indicators represent only 6% and with no input indicators 0%.
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 30
Results
Air Quality Energy Waste Water Security and Safty Transportation Urban Mobility Input Process 1 1 Output 2 4 1 2 1 1 Outcome 1 2 3 1 5 4 Impact 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6
Indicators Typology Distribution by City Aspect
Input Process Output Outcome Impact
Presentation Title Guimarães | 11 December 2019 | 31
Conclusion
- The result partially fulfills the purpose of this report.
- Study on-going
- Create balance in the existing framework ( input &
process indicators)
- Uncertainty about data availability
- Guidance for other entities