developing co ops with incarcerated and returning citizens
play

Developing Co-ops with Incarcerated and Returning Citizens J e s s - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Developing Co-ops with Incarcerated and Returning Citizens J e s s i c a G o r d o n N e m b h a r d , P h . D . J o h n J a y C o l l e g e , C U N Y j g o r d o n n e m b h a r d @ g m a i l . c o m NASCO Institute 2016 Ann Arbor November


  1. Developing Co-ops with Incarcerated and Returning Citizens J e s s i c a G o r d o n N e m b h a r d , P h . D . J o h n J a y C o l l e g e , C U N Y j g o r d o n n e m b h a r d @ g m a i l . c o m NASCO Institute 2016 Ann Arbor November 2016

  2. Gratitude/Acknowledge  T h e o r i g i n a l o c c u p a n t s o f t h e l a n d  Remember our ancestors,  the struggles of enslaved laborers, & all those who labor without just compensation,  and the efforts for liberation through cooperative ownership. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  3. Introductions  Who are we in this room?  What is the Prison Industrial Complex? Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  4. Definition of Prison Industrial Complex  PIC is a political economic system of interlocking institutions based in the criminal justice system and incarceration processes.  Network of political, economic, social and ideological interests and institutions that mass incarcerate primarily poor people of color. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  5. Elements of PIC  History of government policies – enslavement, 13 th amendment, free labor?, convict leasing system, immigration policies  Political – current government policies  Institutional/Economic – low-income assaulted; global economy; privatization; prison system most profitable industry  Media/ideology– coverage is uneven & derogatory Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  6. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  7.  Previous graphic from: http://www.prisonabolition.org/what-is-the-pr ison-industrial-complex/  Vicious cycle/ multiple systems map: http://correctionsproject.com/prisonmaps/pi c4.htm Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  8. Media  Message conveyed - Blackness and criminality are inextricably related. Difference highlighted  Media reinforce this: The media provide readily accessible depictions of criminality, which may help to shape perceptions about crime and subsequent justice practices.  Disproportionate amount of the media coverage devoted to violent crimes for which Black males are more likely than others to be arrested. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  9. Scope  The US Criminal justice system is raced and gendered at every stage:  Arrests (racial profiling; media portrayals, neighborhood characteristics)  Charges (prosecutors decisions, no role for judges or communities)  Sentencing (mandatory minimums; plea bargaining; lawyer quality)  Incarceration (convict leasing; unequal conditions, death row)  Parole Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  10. US Incarceration Rates Growing Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  11. By Race & Ethnicity Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  12. PIC and Community Justice  What is the relationship between the Prison Industrial Complex and community-based approaches to justice/ community justice?  Are they compatible, or opposite kinds of strategies, and why or how? Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  13. Co-ops as a Grassroots Comm Econ Dev Tool  Cooperatives address market failure, and are both anti-poverty strategies and community building strategies.  Cooperative ownership helps address underdevelopment and economic isolation and marginality.  Co-ops anchor the local economy. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  14. A n c h o r i n g  K e e p t h e b e n e f i t s o f c a p i t a l & production recirculating among those who produce them, service them, and need them. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  15. Co-ops for Incarcerated or Formerly Incarcerated  Exploited populations –within and without PIC  Employers won’t hire – must legally identify themselves; or use as slave labor in prison  Need new or different skills;  Newcomer in some way;  Bad previous experience(s) Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  16. Discussion  Why would incarcerated citizens own their own worker cooperates?  Benefits?  Challenges?  Know examples?  Why would returning citizens own their own worker cooperatives?  Benefits, challenges, examples? Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  17. Examples  Co-op Solutions  Italy  Puerto Rico  Canada Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  18. Italy  The MoU of Federsolidarietà with the Ministry of Justice and Prison Administration Department (DAP) in 1998  commitment of social cooperatives in promoting services towards prisoners and their needs, especially entrepreneurial activities inside and outside jails Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  19. Italy, con’t  Support by the Prison Administration Department to the work of directors of prisons building with social cooperatives at local level for the creation of work opportunities for prisoners;  Realisation of a survey of facilities and spaces inside prisons that could be used for entrepreneurial activities. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  20. S o c i a l C o o p e r a t i v e “ i n P r i s o n s ”  There are about 100 social cooperatives in Italy working in prisons  of “type b” of the social cooperatives (52 social cooperatives employing 370 prisoners)  Ministry statistics: recidivism rate is about 80% - very critical situation of prisons in Italy  Recidivism rate for those employed by social cooperatives: less then 10%  Single cases tend to confjrm even lower rates (Ghelos, Menatwork) Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  21. Learning From Italian Practices (Weaver)  The co-ops provide support to the families of imprisoned workers and facilitate family mediation; create the space for family contact to occur in more natural and private environments.  Also provide work within the co-operative as well as supporting access to ‘mainstream’ employment, drawing on their network of professional relationships. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  22. D e s i s t e n c e  Provide values driven work and sense of family or reconnection to people and “family”  Paid employment for those disadvantaged in the labour market includes prisoners and former prisoners – those in custody, on partial release and post release.  Solidarity, cultural and relational environment in the co-ops generates resources that enable desistance, recovery and integration. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  23. Cooperativa ARIGOS, Puerto Rico  Began with art therapy  Learned about co-op model and demanded co- op education  Changed co-op law – meeting with Governor  Rephrased the 7 principles; internal rules  MOU with Corrections Department – 15% (office space, electricity, etc); have to pay for extra security  10% retained; 75% to owners  Only 2 recidivists of 50 + who got out over 10 years. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  24. Future in Puerto Rico  3 M o r e C o - o p s  Men’s: technology, solar  Women’s: Tanos Co-op: bakery now sewing  Much slower development  Challenges of what to do with returning citizens Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  25. InsideArt, Canada  I m p r i s o n e d a r t i s t s a n d c o m m u n i t y a r t i s t s own a marketing craft cooperative together.  The co-op aids the incarcerated artists in obtaining the supplies they need, supports their art, and sells the finished products at fairs and through the internet.  Once released, the artists already own part of a business, have a job and have a community to connect with. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  26. Barriers to developing & supporting such worker co-ops/social co-ops  Prison bureaucracies,  Corrections administrations/prison directors keep changing and not always interested,  Lack of information about cooperatives,  Social inequalities and potential for elitism  Society’s view of prisoners as non- deserving of human rights,  Commodification of prisoners and prison slave labor. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  27. Benefits  More control over one’s life and work  Decent humanized work with living wages and ownership equity  Develop trust and solidarity relationships  Increase skills and capacities, new kinds of leadership  Change behavior in prison  True rehabilitation, resocialization, reintegration  Reduce recidivism Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  28. Tansformative Roberto Rodriguez:  This model is the only option we have for jobs to support our families. But also:  “I will say anywhere that the program with the co-op model changes lives” - it’s a transformative process. We are not the same after engaging with the co-op  Weaver finds same: importance of work, sense of family, ability to support family Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  29. USA?  How do we bring these models to the USA?  What do we need to know?  Who do we need to influence?  What policies/laws need to change  Who will lead this movement? Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

  30. Wrap Up  Last Comments around room  Thank you!  jgordonnembhard@gmail.com Jessica Gordon Nembhard (c) 2016

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend