Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

design and simulation of beam background monitors in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity of the Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the Belle II Experiment Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC 2017 Belle II experiment and SuperKEKB Electron - positron collider


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity

  • f the Electromagnetic Calorimeter

for the Belle II Experiment

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Belle II experiment and SuperKEKB

2

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Electron - positron collider located at KEK Laboratory in Tsukuba, Japan
  • High Energy electron ring (HER) - 7 GeV
  • Low Energy positron ring (LER) - 4 GeV
  • Collisions at the center of mass energy 10.58 GeV ⇒ Y(4S) resonance

L = γ± 2ere ✓I±ξy± β∗

◆ ✓ RL Rξy ◆

  • Successor to the KEKB collider
  • “Nano-beam” and continuous injection scheme
  • Design integrated luminosity
  • Design instantaneous luminosity 8 · 1035 cm−2s−1

50 ab−1

20 times smaller 2 times larger

40-fold increase in instantaneous luminosity
 compared to KEKB

slide-3
SLIDE 3

electron (7GeV) positron (4GeV) KL and muon detector:

Resistive Plate Counter (barrel) Scintillator + WLSF + MPPC (end-caps)

Particle Identification

Time-of-Propagation counter (barrel)

  • Prox. focusing Aerogel RICH (fwd)

Central Drift Chamber

He(50%):C2H6(50%), Small cells, long lever arm, fast electronics

EM Calorimeter:

CsI(Tl), waveform sampling (barrel) Pure CsI + waveform sampling (end-caps)

Vertex Detector

2 layers DEPFET + 4 layers DSSD

Beryllium beam pipe

2cm diameter

Belle II Detector

Belle II experiment and SuperKEKB

3

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Belle experiment ran from 1999 to 2010
  • Important discoveries including first observation of CP violation in the neutral B meson system
  • All sub-detector components upgraded to match 


the new record-breaking luminosity

  • Physics goals:
  • New Physics beyond 


Standard Model

  • Sensitivity to:
  • SUSY
  • charged Higgs
  • dark photon
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Beam backgrounds at SuperKEKB

4

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Deterioration of detector resolution, damage to detector components
  • Expected ~40-fold increase in beam backgrounds compared to KEKB
  • Scattered e-/e+ hit the beam-pipe and create electromagnetic showers and neutrons
  • Simulations used to get an estimate of background rates in each sub-detector

Luminosity backgrounds Beam-gas interactions Touschek scattering Synchrotron radiation Injection background

  • Coulomb scattering of beam 


particles off of residual gas

  • Bremsstrahlung
  • Proportional to beam current
  • Intra-beam scattering
  • Scattering rate inversely 


proportional to beam size, 
 proportional to beam current

  • e-e+ Bhabha scattering
  • Followed by photon emission
  • Rate proportional to luminosity
  • Neutrons copiously produced in a


photo-nuclear reaction of photons 
 and iron

  • New particles injected every 100 ns
  • Newly injected particles interact


with existing beam particles

  • Hard to simulate
  • Collimators and shielding prevent


scattered particles from reaching
 the detector

H.Nakayama, KEK H.Nakayama, KEK

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Beam-background monitors near ECL

5

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Background monitors needed to ensure safe operation of electromagnetic calorimeter (ECL)
  • Live feedback to SuperKEKB control room about the background conditions in the detector
  • Belle used a scintillation detector attached to ECL backward shield
  • New ECL endcap shield design at Belle II
  • High density polyethylene (HDPE) + stainless steel layers
  • Proposal: make recesses in HDPE layer which 


would enclose the scintillation-detector based 
 beam-background monitors

  • Needs:
  • Fast timing for observing the injection backgrounds
  • Wide energy range
  • High radiation hardness

neutrons γ/e± showers

  • A. Beaulieu, UVic
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Beam-background monitors: design

6

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

Hamamatsu R7761-70 Photomultiplier

  • suitable for operation in high magnetic field
  • peak wavelength 420 nm
  • gain 104 at 1.5 T
  • compact design, 39 mm diameter

LYSO crystal

  • wavelength of emission maximum at 420 nm
  • short decay time of 40 ns 


→well matches the beam top-up time of 100 ns

  • high light yield of 32000 photons/MeV
  • radiation length of 1.14 cm
  • good radiation hardness
  • radioactive isotope 176Lu

→ 30×30 mm cylindrical crystals

Hamamatsu Hamamatsu

slide-7
SLIDE 7

x [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 y [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

CoulombLER - Deposited energy in backward endcap

x [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 y [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

TouschekLER - Deposited energy in backward endcap

ECL background simulation

7

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Looking at the ECL background simulation to determine the hit distribution and 


average energy deposition and hit frequency

  • Interval of energy per hit on the order of 1 keV - 100 MeV
  • 8 detectors in total
  • ϕ = {0, 90, 180, 270} degree in forward and backward shield

GeV GeV

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Beam-background monitors: simulation

8

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

Background monitors included in the Belle II simulation

cellID cellID Edep [GeV] Edep [GeV]

2 3 4 1 FWD BWD 5 6 7 8

x y towards the outside of the ring center of the ring

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Beam-background monitors: next steps

9

Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017

  • Read-out system being designed by Université de Montréal
  • Lab tests starting in couple of weeks
  • Installation in summer 2017
  • Phase 2 data taking starting in February 2018
  • Monitors stay active during phase 3 data taking, starting December 2018