Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity
- f the Electromagnetic Calorimeter
for the Belle II Experiment
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC 2017
Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Design and Simulation of Beam- Background Monitors in the Vicinity of the Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the Belle II Experiment Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC 2017 Belle II experiment and SuperKEKB Electron - positron collider
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC 2017
2
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
y±
50 ab−1
20 times smaller 2 times larger
40-fold increase in instantaneous luminosity compared to KEKB
electron (7GeV) positron (4GeV) KL and muon detector:
Resistive Plate Counter (barrel) Scintillator + WLSF + MPPC (end-caps)
Particle Identification
Time-of-Propagation counter (barrel)
Central Drift Chamber
He(50%):C2H6(50%), Small cells, long lever arm, fast electronics
EM Calorimeter:
CsI(Tl), waveform sampling (barrel) Pure CsI + waveform sampling (end-caps)
Vertex Detector
2 layers DEPFET + 4 layers DSSD
Beryllium beam pipe
2cm diameter
3
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
the new record-breaking luminosity
Standard Model
4
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
Luminosity backgrounds Beam-gas interactions Touschek scattering Synchrotron radiation Injection background
particles off of residual gas
proportional to beam size, proportional to beam current
photo-nuclear reaction of photons and iron
with existing beam particles
scattered particles from reaching the detector
H.Nakayama, KEK H.Nakayama, KEK
5
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
would enclose the scintillation-detector based beam-background monitors
neutrons γ/e± showers
6
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
Hamamatsu R7761-70 Photomultiplier
LYSO crystal
→well matches the beam top-up time of 100 ns
→ 30×30 mm cylindrical crystals
Hamamatsu Hamamatsu
x [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 y [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
CoulombLER - Deposited energy in backward endcap
x [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 y [cm] 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
TouschekLER - Deposited energy in backward endcap
7
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
average energy deposition and hit frequency
GeV GeV
8
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017
Background monitors included in the Belle II simulation
cellID cellID Edep [GeV] Edep [GeV]
2 3 4 1 FWD BWD 5 6 7 8
x y towards the outside of the ring center of the ring
9
Andrea Fodor, McGill University WNPPC, February 2017