denver public schools
play

Denver Public Schools 2011-2012 School Year 1 1. 2011 Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Denver Public Schools 2011-2012 School Year 1 1. 2011 Assessment Results (Slides 6-35) 2. 2010 Denver Plan Goals (36-49) 3. Four District Priorities for 2011-2012 (50) 2 We have increased by almost 500 graduates over the past 2 years! DPS


  1. Denver Public Schools 2011-2012 School Year 1

  2. 1. 2011 Assessment Results (Slides 6-35) 2. 2010 Denver Plan Goals (36-49) 3. Four District Priorities for 2011-2012 (50) 2

  3. We have increased by almost 500 graduates over the past 2 years! DPS Graduates 2005-2011 * Estimated 3

  4. AP Course Trend Number of students taking AP courses has been increasing Number of Students Enrolled in AP Courses +1854 students in 7 years 3,500 3,329 3,063 3,000 2,767 2,500 2,095 2,000 1,773 1,475 1,500 1,325 1,000 500 0 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 4

  5. Number of AP Tests with Scores of 3, 4, 5: 2005-2011 1,577 1,600 1,462 1,400 1,175 1,200 1,071 1,061 954 1,000 870 800 600 400 200 - 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Note: Data for 2010-2011 is preliminary 5

  6. 2011 Assessment Results

  7. Overall CSAP Improvement Colorado Growth Model Median Growth Percentile • Math median growth 60 percentile has increased 11 points. • Reading median growth 54 percentile increased by 8 53 points. 52 50 • Writing median growth percentile has increased by 46 7 points. 44 Reading 43 Math 40 Writing 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 7

  8. Average MGP for FRL v. Paid in state 53 • Growth rates of F&RL and 52 Paid students have 51 remained 50 fairly stable over time, F&RL (state) 49 with a Paid (state consistent 5% 48 gap over the last 4 years. 47 46 45 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 8

  9. Math MGP for 10 largest districts 65 Math Adams 12 Five Star Schools - 0020 Adams-Arapahoe 28j - 0180 60 Boulder Valley Re 2 - 0480 Cherry Creek 5 - 0130 55 Colorado Springs 11 - 1010 50 Denver County 1 - 0880 Douglas County Re 1 - 0900 45 Jefferson County R-1 - 1420 Poudre R-1 - 1550 40 St Vrain Valley Re 1j - 0470 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 9

  10. Reading MGP for 10 largest districts 65 Reading Adams 12 Five Star Schools - 0020 Adams-Arapahoe 28j - 0180 60 Boulder Valley Re 2 - 0480 Cherry Creek 5 - 0130 55 Colorado Springs 11 - 1010 50 Denver County 1 - 0880 Douglas County Re 1 - 0900 45 Jefferson County R-1 - 1420 Poudre R-1 - 1550 40 St Vrain Valley Re 1j - 0470 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 10

  11. Writing MGP for 10 largest districts 65 Writing Adams 12 Five Star Schools - 0020 Adams-Arapahoe 28j - 0180 60 Boulder Valley Re 2 - 0480 Cherry Creek 5 - 0130 55 Colorado Springs 11 - 1010 50 Denver County 1 - 0880 Douglas County Re 1 - 0900 45 Jefferson County R-1 - 1420 Poudre R-1 - 1550 40 St Vrain Valley Re 1j - 0470 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 11

  12. Average MGP in 2010 and 2011 55.00 54.00 • DPS is the top 53.00 district in MGP in 52.00 2010 and 2011 among the 10 51.00 largest in 50.00 Colorado. 49.00 2010 48.00 2011 47.00 46.00 45.00 44.00 43.00 42.00 Adams 12 Aurora Boulder Cherry Colorado Denver Douglas Jefferson Poudre St Vrain Public Valley Creek Springs Public County County Valley Schools 11 Schools 12

  13. Average MGP High-Poverty Districts in 2005 55 50 45 40 35 30 Pueblo City Greeley Denver Public Harrison Aurora Public Westminster Colorado Schools Schools Springs 11 13

  14. Average MGP High-Poverty Districts in 2011 55 50 45 40 35 30 Pueblo City Westminster Colorado Greeley Harrison Aurora Public Denver Public Springs 11 Schools Schools 14

  15. District Summary % Proficient Change from or Above 2010 Content DPS State DPS State Area Highlights Reading 49% 68% -1% 0% • beat or met the state change on 5 of 8 tests Lectura* • 3 rd grade performance stabilized 51% 60% 0% + 1% • up for the 8 th consecutive year Math 41% 56% + 2% + 1% • increase on 7 of 8 tests • beat or met the state change on 7 or 8 tests • beat or met the state change on 7 of 8 tests Writing 39% 55% + 4% + 2% • this year’s students out - performed last year’s students on all 8 tests Escritura* • increase on both tests. 51% 59% + 4% + 6% • this year’s students out - performed last year’s students on all 3 tests Science 28% 48% + 1% + 1% • 5 th grade scores increased for the 5 th consecutive year 15

  16. 2000-2005 Change in Proficiency- matched grade levels only Change in CSAP % Proficient or Above from 1999/2000 to 2005 District 1999/2000-2005 State 1999/2000-2005 15% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% Mathematics** Reading*** Science** Writing*** -6% *DPS results excluded for state data **Math and Science: 2000 (Grade 8 only) through 2005 (Grade 8 only) ***Reading and Writing: 1999 (Grades 4 and 7 only) through 2005 (Grades 4 and 7 only)

  17. 6-Year Growth in Proficiency Outpaces State Change in CSAP % Proficient or Above Since 2005 District 2005-2011 State* 2005-2011 12% 9% 9% 8% 4% 1% 0% Mathematics Reading Science Writing -3% * DPS excluded in state data 17

  18. Middle School CSAP Performance Reading Writing Math 100% 90% 80% % Proficient and above 70% +13 pts 60% 50% 50% +11 pts 43% 40% 37% 42% 32% 30% +19 pts 23% 20% 10% 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 18

  19. Schools with Cumulative MGPs >180 in All CSAP Content Areas 2011 CSAP CSAP CSAP Cumulative School Name Reading Writing Math Sum MGP MGP MGP MGP West Denver Prep - Harvey Park Campus 71 79 94 244 DSST: HS 72 77 86 235 Steck Elementary 70.5 78 82.5 231 DSST: GVR 63 84 82 229 West Denver Prep - Federal Campus 72 78 77 227 West Denver Prep - Lake Campus 63.5 72.5 87 223 West Denver Prep - Highland Campus 58.5 66 96 220.5 DSST: MS 61 74.5 67 202.5 Beach Court Elementary 67 74 61 202 Cory Elementary 71 64.5 66 201.5 Carson Elementary 69 64 68 201 Lincoln Elementary 59 72.5 68 199.5 KIPP Sunshine Peak Academy 66.5 60 72 198.5 Polaris at Ebert 67.5 64 66 197.5 Garden Place Elementary 54 61.5 81 196.5 Slavens Elementary 63.5 66 65 194.5 19

  20. Schools with Cumulative MGPs >180 in All CSAP Content Areas 2011 CSAP CSAP CSAP Cumulative School Name Reading Writing Math Sum MGP MGP MGP MGP Martin Luther King, Jr. Early College HS 74 60.5 60 194.5 Denver School of Arts HS 70 67 56 193 Ridgeview Academy 56 70 64.5 190.5 Bromwell Elementary 56 75 58 189 Valdez Elementary 59.5 57 72 188.5 Sandoval Elementary 58 64 66 188 Eagleton Elementary 62 72 53.5 187.5 Girls Athletic Leadership 63.5 71 53 187.5 University Park Elementary 55.5 66 65 186.5 Doull Elementary 59 67 58 184 Bradley Elementary 62 70 51 183 McMeen Elementary 57 61 65 183 Castro Elementary 58 59 65.5 182.5 William R. Roberts 61 56 65 182 Montclair Elementary 67 63 52 182 Hallett Fundamental Academy 61 61 59 181 20

  21. Median Growth Percentile CSAP Reading Median Growth Percentile CSAP Reading 70 60 57 52 52 51 50 46 43 40 30 Charter: N 2011= 4,557 Innovation: N 2011= 757 20 Non-Charter: N 2011=27,144 10 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 21

  22. Median Growth Percentile CSAP Writing Median Growth Percentile CSAP Writing 70 60 59 57 55 50 52 49 46 40 Charter: N 2011= 4,543 30 Innovation: N 2011= 759 20 Non-Charter: N 2011=27,143 10 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 22

  23. Median Growth Percentile CSAP Math Median Growth Percentile CSAP Math 70 61 60 57 56 52 50 50 49 40 Charter: N 2011= 4,548 30 Innovation: N 2011= 764 20 Non-Charter: N 2011=27,841 10 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 23

  24. Gap analysis – Ethnicity (old codes) Reading – all grades 100% • Gap increased across all 90% minority groups from 2010 to 2011. 80% – Black students 70% experienced the Percent proficient or above greatest increase in 60% gap. • 7-year trend toward gap 50% reduction American Indian/Alaskan Native – Trend slightly declined in 40% (2011 n= 508) 2011. Asian/Pacific Islander (2011 n= 30% 1749) Black (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 7115) 20% Hispanic (2011 n= 23287) 10% White (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 9659) 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 24

  25. Gap analysis – Ethnicity (old codes) Writing – all grades • 100% Slight increase in overall gap from 2010 to 2011. 90% – Due to sharp increase in White students’ 80% performance. – 70% All other groups Percent proficient or above increased, but at a 60% slower rate. • 7-year trend shows 50% limited gap reduction. 40% American Indian/Alaskan Native (2011 n= 510) 30% Asian/Pacific Islander (2011 n= 1751) Black (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 20% 7120) Hispanic (2011 n= 23271) 10% White (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 9654) 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 25

  26. Gap analysis – Ethnicity (old codes) Math – all grades 100% • Slight increase in overall gap from 2010 to 2011. 90% – Due to sharp increase 80% in White students’ performance. 70% • No substantial 7-year Percent proficient or above trend toward gap 60% reduction. 50% American Indian/Alaskan Native (2011 40% n= 511) Asian/Pacific Islander (2011 n= 1748) 30% Black (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 7105) 20% Hispanic (2011 n= 23884) 10% White (Not Hispanic) (2011 n= 9670) 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend