Denver District-Charter Collaborative Council November 5 th 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

denver district charter collaborative council
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Denver District-Charter Collaborative Council November 5 th 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Denver District-Charter Collaborative Council November 5 th 2012 Alyssa Whitehead-Bust, Chief of Innovation & Reform, DPS Chris Gibbons, CEO, STRIVE Prep Denvers Three Equities DPS commits to ensuring that all schools whether


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Denver District-Charter Collaborative Council

November 5th 2012 Alyssa Whitehead-Bust, Chief of Innovation & Reform, DPS Chris Gibbons, CEO, STRIVE Prep

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Denver’s Three Equities

DPS commits to ensuring that all schools– whether district-run or charter –

  • pen and operate on the basis of three equities that apply to all our schools:
  • Equity of opportunity means that the schools have the same access to per

pupil dollars, support services from the district, and access to district facilities on the same cost basis.

  • Equity of responsibility and access means that the schools must offer

equitable and open access to all our students—regardless of socio- economic, disability, language or other status—and share an equal burden in district-wide responsibilities such as the cost of pension obligations and district-wide special education funding needs.

  • Equity of accountability means that all schools have the same

accountability system under our School Performance Framework, including charter schools. In the last three years, the District has worked to close or turnaround seven charter schools whose performance has been in the lowest category on the SPF.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose Statement of Collaborative Council (excerpt)

The purpose of the Collaborative Council is to discuss and develop policy recommendations to improve the way that Denver Public Schools and its charter schools work

  • together. The Council brings together senior leaders from

the district and elected school leaders. Members of the Council are guided by commitments to:

  • the three equities of opportunity, responsibility and

accountability

  • the value of sharing best practices and collaborating

among multiple school types

  • sustaining charter school autonomy
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Context: Enrollment Growth in Charters

8,546 9,619 11,780 13,550 15,325 R² = 0.9946

  • 5,000

10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (est) 2014-15 (est)

Charter Enrollment

Enrollment in charter schools has increased by an average of 20% over the past three years and will reach close to 20,000 students by 2016-17

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Context: Count of Charter Schools

2011-12 31 charters 9,830 1 contract 127 1 BOCES 400 33 Total: 10,357 Opened Aug 2011 DSST @ Cole MS KIPP Montbello SOAR @ Oakland University Prep Closed at EOY Manny Martinez 118 Life Skills 222 2012-13 39 charters* 11,780 1 contract 125 1 BOCES 400 41 Total: 12,305 Opened Aug 2012 DSST @ College View MS Monarch Montessori Rocky Mountain Prep Sims-Fayola STRIVE Montbello STRIVE GVR STRIVE HS SW Closed at EOY TBD 2013-14 44 charters 13,550** 1 contract 125 1 BOCES 400 46 Total: 14,075 Opening Aug 2013 Academy 360 Downtown Denver ES DSST @ Byers MS Highline Academy #2 STRIVE HS NW Closed at EOY TBD

*Also added two DSST’s and one Venture Prep by virtue of splitting HS/MS into separate campuses. **Very rough estimate (real projections come out in Dec 2012).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Context: Equity of Students Served

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% % FRL % ELL % SPED

2011-12 Student Demographics

Charter District

Charter students are generally similar in demographic data to the overall district – with higher percentages of FRL students in charters.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Context: Charter Performance as Compared to District

A significantly higher portion of students in charters (20%) are attending schools that are Distinguished on the SPF, as compared to students in District-run schools (5%). However, the same applies for the lowest two rankings (Accredited on Priority Watch & Probation).

20% 1% 42% 7% 0% 0% 17% 13%

% of Charter Students Attending Schools by SPF Ratings

Distinguished

  • n track to distinguished

Meets Expectations

  • n track to meets

Accredited On Watch

  • n track to on watch

Accredited On Priority Watch Accredited On Probation 5% 45% 32% 6% 11%

% of Students Attending Traditional District-run Schools by SPF Ratings

Distinguished Meets Expectations Accredited On Watch Accredited On Priority Watch Accredited On Probation

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • All school types showed greater than

expected growth in all subjects in 2012.

  • Charter schools outperformed innovation

and traditional schools in MGP for all subjects in 2012.

  • Innovation schools nearly matched

traditional schools’ MGP in Reading and Writing.

Median Growth Percentile (MGP) on TCAP (standardized test)

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Evolution in Collaboration

District Charter Compact (Dec 2010) Collaborative Council (Dec 2011) Compact Blue & Ongoing Collaboration

The Collaborative Council is an evolution in our approach to district-charter collaboration that began to take shape with the first Gates Compact and has continued to develop so that best practices are disseminated district-wide.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Working Groups

Collaborative Council

Four Elected Charter Representatives and

  • ne Appointed Charter

Representative Four District Representatives from the Senior Leadership Team, including the Chief of Innovation & Reform Charter Co-Chair District Co-Chair Special Education Alternative Education Finance Serving ELLs OSRI Advisory

Superintendent Board of Education

Structure of Collaborative Council

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reflection: First 6 Months – Helping/ Hindering Us to Achieve Purpose

Helping

  • Composition of Group
  • Communication
  • Purpose
  • Group Norms

Hindering

  • Broader Stakeholder

Involvement & Engagement

  • Time
  • Translation of Policy to

Action

  • Prioritization
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Looking Forward: Collaborative Council Priorities for 12-13

  • Create, monitor, and improve policies that

impact DPS and charters

  • Help direct and monitor and provide feedback
  • n Working Group priorities
  • Creating and leveraging a meaningful

connection to the superintendent and the board