decision on congestion revenue rights load migration
play

Decision on Congestion Revenue Rights Load Migration Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decision on Congestion Revenue Rights Load Migration Process Charles A. King, P.E. Vice President, Market Development and Program Management Board of Governors Meeting General Session July 18-19, 2007 FERC Requirements When customers move


  1. Decision on Congestion Revenue Rights Load Migration Process Charles A. King, P.E. Vice President, Market Development and Program Management Board of Governors Meeting General Session July 18-19, 2007

  2. FERC Requirements When customers move from one LSE to another, allocated CRRs must be transferred to follow the customers. Per FERC’s recent approval of the ISO’s January 2007 Long Term CRR compliance filing, the ISO must perform such transfers of CRRs. Management now proposes rules and procedures for implementing this function. 2

  3. Options Considered Mechanism of Transfer ! Create equal and offsetting sets of new CRRs ! Direct transfer of CRRs or financial equivalent CRRs Subject to Transfer ! Shares of all allocated CRRs ! Allow some CRRs to be ineligible for transfer 3

  4. Options Considered – 2 Renewal of Transferred CRRs ! Allow priority renewal by load-gaining LSE ! Don’t allow priority renewal by either LSE Managing Associated Credit Risk ! Rely on filed credit and default provisions ! Create a new additional credit requirement 4

  5. Decision Criteria 1. Migrating customers retain fair share of value 2. Fair to all LSEs 3. Manage credit risks effectively 4. No disincentives for new investment 5. Feasible to implement for MRTU start-up 6. Consistent with MRTU design, no unintended consequences Stakeholder-proposed criteria: 1. Allow LSE to retain CRRs ineligible for transfer 2. Allow load-losing LSE to recover transferred CRRs 5

  6. Management Recommendation Mechanism of Transfer ! Create equal and offsetting sets of new CRRs CRRs Subject to Transfer ! Shares of all allocated CRRs Renewal of Transferred CRRs ! Allow priority renewal by load-gaining LSE Managing Associated Credit Risk ! Rely on filed credit and default provisions 6

  7. Resulting Allocation of New CRRs LSE A has served Loads of 100 MW. 10% of its Load migrates to LSE B. Before Migration After Migration LSE A serves 100 MW of LSE A serves 90 MW of Load Load & has 100 MW of CRRs & has net 90 MW of CRRs 90 MW 90 MW 90 90 Renewable Renewable 10 MW 10 MW NOT renewable 10 Renewable -10 MW New CRR - NOT renewable LSE B serves 10 MW of Load LSE B serves 0 MW of Load & & has 10 MW of CRRs has 0 MW of CRRs 10 MW 10 New CRR - Renewable 7

  8. Stakeholder Positions Management CPUC AReM PG&E SCE CDWR Proposal Staff 1. Create equal & No Conditional Support Support Support opposite sets of new comment Support CRRs 2. All allocated CRRs Conditional Support Support Oppose Support subject to transfer Support Neither LSE should be 3. Allow priority No allowed to renew renewal by load- Support Support comment transferred CRRs gaining LSE Add credit Details 4. Rely on filed credit No Support Support req't when are & default provisions comment CRRs are sold needed 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend