Dark Forces in Language Comprehension The Case of Neuroticism and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dark forces in language comprehension
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dark Forces in Language Comprehension The Case of Neuroticism and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dark Forces in Language Comprehension The Case of Neuroticism and Disgust in a Pupillometry Study Isabell Hubert & Juhani Jrvikivi isabell.hubert@ualberta.ca Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Montral, QC July 2019


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dark Forces in Language Comprehension

The Case of Neuroticism and Disgust in a Pupillometry Study

Isabell Hubert & Juhani Järvikivi isabell.hubert@ualberta.ca Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Montréal, QC July 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

linguistics has not always considered “hot cognition” & individual differences

e.g. Van Berkum et al. 2005

slide-3
SLIDE 3

individuals use world knowledge & real world context in language comprehension

Kamide et al. 2003, Nieuwland et al. 2006, Sedivy et al. 1999, Tanenhaus et al. 1995, Traxler 2014

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Boland & Queen 2016, Havas et al. 2007, Van Berkum et al. 2008, Van Berkum et al. 2009, Van den Brink et al. 2010

social context, beliefs, & values

personality? political views? disgust sensitivity?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Disgust Sensitivity

protects from novel pathogens general cognition ➜ out-group stereotyping, political views differs between individuals language processing?

Inbar et al. 2011, Smith et al. 2011

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Pupillometry Paradigm

cognitive effort mental workload attention arousal

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Materials

Type of clash Example morpho-syntactic error She often ride her bike to work in the summer. semantic anomaly People often read heads for pleasure before bed. socio-cultural clash I always wear hair bands to hold in my bangs.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Post-Tests

Big Five personality inventory Disgust Scale - Revised

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Participants

n 76 male/ female 18 / 58 age (yrs) min - max 18 - 83 age (yrs) mean 25.0

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data Pre-Processing

○ downsampled to 125 Hz ○ blinks removed ○ numerical predictors normalized & centered interest period:

  • 500ms to 2000ms around clash
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Analysis: GAM Modelling in R

➔ no data lost in time-binning ➔ modelling non-linear relationships Interaction of interest Extra-linguistic variable x Time x Item rating Random structure Participant x Time random slope Item random intercept

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Morpho-Syntactic Errors

She often ride her bike to work... Neuroticism x Time x Item rating

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Morpho-Syntactic Errors

She often ride her bike to work... Neuroticism x Time x Item rating

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Neuroticism

➔ morpho-syntactic errors ➔ more ➜ larger

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Socio-Cultural Clashes

I always wear hair bands... Disgust sensitivity x Time x Item rating

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Socio-Cultural Clashes

I always wear hair bands... Disgust sensitivity x Time x Item rating

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Disgust Sensitivity

➔ socio-cultural clashes ➔ higher ➜ larger

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results

  • disgust sensitivity ➜ language comprehension
  • extra-linguistic variables / listener-internal

aspects do not affect comprehension across the board

  • support one-step models of language

comprehension

Kamide et al. 2003, Sedivy et al. 1999, Tanenhaus et al. 1995, Traxler 2014

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Open Questions / Future Research

  • ther Big Five traits

○ different methodologies/paradigms ➔ tie-in with: ◆ linguistic anticipation? ◆ bio-energetic account?

Havas et al., 2007; Zadra & Clore, 2011; Van Berkum et al., 2013

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank You!

Questions?

slides design: based on “Cymbeline” by SlidesCarnival images: Unsplash Isabell Hubert & Juhani Järvikivi isabell.hubert@ualberta.ca Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Montreal, QC July 2019