daniela kirilova
play

Daniela Kirilova Institute of Astronomy and NAO Bulgarian Academy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

XI Bulgarian-Serbian Astronomical Conference Belogradchik, May 14-18, 2018 Daniela Kirilova Institute of Astronomy and NAO Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Astrophysical and cosmological observations data necessity of BSMs


  1. XI Bulgarian-Serbian Astronomical Conference Belogradchik, May 14-18, 2018 Daniela Kirilova Institute of Astronomy and NAO Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

  2. Astrophysical and cosmological observations data – necessity of BSMs physics The contemporary LCDM contains already considerable DE+DM, unknown nature components constitute 95% of Universe matter! Inflation, Baryon Asymmetry, etc. to understand these puzzles beyond SM physics is required to propose the DM, DE, inflaton candidates , etc OR change the theoretical basis of SCM (alternative grav. theory, etc.) Neutrino : experimental data firmly established beyond SM physics SMP assumptions: m=0, N eff =3, L=0, equilibrium FD distribution . Neutrino oscillations experiments challenged all these This talk : BBN constraints on beyond SMP

  3.  BBN - the deepest reliable early Universe probe and SMP test  BBN baryometer – constraints on matter content of the Universe hidden baryons, nonbaryonic dark matter baryogenesis, antimatter in the Universe  Neutrino beyond SMP and BBN constraints inert neutrino, number of families, neutrino oscillations, lepton asymmetry dark radiation problem - eV neutrino saga  Chiral tensor particles cosmological influence and BBN constraints

  4. Theoretically well established - based on well-understood SM physics Precise data on nuclear processes rates from lab expts at low E (10 KeV – MeV) Precise observational data on light elements abundances Predicted abundances in good overall agreement with the ones inferred from observational data Most early and precision probe for physical conditions in early Universe and for new physics at BBN energies. Universe baryometer George Gamow the best speedometer at RD stage 1904 – 1968 the most exact Universe leptometer In 1946 – 1948 develops BBN theory. In the framework of this model B aryon fraction, N eff , L, etc. measured by CMB predicts CMB and its T.

  5. BBN – the only reliable probe of RD epoch Processes cosmic time T GUT 10 -35 s 10 15 GeV Inflation BA generation EW symmetry breaking 10 -10 s 100 GeV QCD 10 -5 s 0.3 GeV CNB formation 1 s 3 - 1 MeV BBN 1 s – 3 m 1 - 0.1 MeV CMB formation 300 000 y 0.3 eV Galaxy formation ~10 9 y Today 13.7 10 9 y 0.0003 eV ~ 3K

  6. The Abundances of Light Elements • Main problem : Primordial abundances are not D is measured in high z low-Z H-rich observed directly (chemical evolution after BBN). clouds absorbing light from background QSA. • He in clouds of ionized H (H II regions), Observations the most metal-poor blue compact galaxies. in systems least contaminated by stellar evolution. ICooke et al. (2014-2017) regression to zero Z Y p =0,245  0,003 • Li in Pop II (metal-poor) stars in the spheroid Account of our Galaxy, which have Z<1/10 000 Z ☼ ). for galactic chemical evolution Peimbert,2016;Aver et al. 2015 Cooke et al. 2017 Sbordone et al. 2010 Y p =0,245  0,003 D/H=(2.527 ± 0.03) 10 -5 Li/H=(1.58 ± 0.31) 10 -10

  7. According to SBBN 4 light elements: D, He-3, He-4, Li-7 produced during the hot stage of the Universe evolution, 1 s – 3 m 1 - 0.1 MeV. The primordially produced abundances depend on:  baryon-to-photon ratio (CMB measured now),  relativistic energy density (effective number of neutrino) ( nonst interactions, extra rel degrees of freedom, exotic physics ) 4/3   7 4      (?)   N    X   8 11  n lifetime: 879.5 ± 0.8s (Serebrov et al. 2015)  10 9 ~10 10 K T Evolution of Light element abundances . PArthENoPE, AlterBBN, PRIMAT Y P (N  ,  ), X D (N  ,  ) Y т =(H(  (g)),  ) = 0,24709  0,00017 Over 400 reactions considered. D/H =(2.459  0,036) 10 -5 More and more precise BBN codes used. Pitrou, Coc et al. 2018

  8. Pitrou, Coc et al. 2018 The primordially produced abundances of the light elements as functions of η . Observational data (horizontal bands) compared with theory predictions for He-4 (top)., D and He-3 (middle ) and Li-7 (bottom) . Vertical band gives baryon density measured by CMB (Planck). BBN predictions are in agreement with observational data for Ω B ~ 0.05.

  9. BBN - observational milestone of SCM • Homogeneity and isotropy and structures in the Universe • The expansion of the Universe • The abundances of the light elements The light elements abundances provide evidence for a hotter and denser early Universe, when these elements have been fused from protons and neutrons.   0 , , , , , H N L etc  B eff • The cosmic microwave background radiation

  10. BBN constrains physics beyond SM • BBN depend on all known interactions - constrains modification of those • Additional light (relativistic during BBN, i.e. m< MeV) particles species (generations) effecting radiation density (H), pre-BBN nucleon kinetics or BBN itself • Additional interactions or processes relevant at BBN epoch (decays of heavy particles, neutrino oscillations) • Depart from equilibrium distributions of particle densities of nucleons and leptons (caused by nu oscillations, lepton asymmetry, inhomogeneous distribution of baryons, etc.) • SUSY, string models, extradimensional models,

  11. BBN baryometer Deuterium – the most sensitive baryometer.   5.8 x 10 -10 <  BBN < 6.6 x 10 -10 95% 2 3         H 2 7 3 . 65 10 , , h b   b b c 8 G c N    2 0.021 0.024(95% . .) b h C L matter budget of the Universe     D = 6.  0.3 x 10 -10 , 95%CL (Pettini 2012) 0.0219 0.00025(95% . .) baryonic ~ 0.05 visible ~ 0.005, b h C L gravitating ~ 0.3.  CMB anisotropy measurements : Planck    0.0223 0.0002(95% . .) (Planck2016) -  CMB = 6.11  0.04 x 10 -10 , 68% CL b h C L Form of maxima depends on density of matter and baryons. Courtesy Wayne Hu – http://background.uchicago.edu

  12. Baryon density is 0.05 of the total density  Nonbaryonic matter exists! Our nucleonic matter building the planets, the stars... is a negligible fraction <5% ! “Baryons” 4.9% Dark Energy 69% Cold Dark Matter 26%

  13. Combined Results of Hubble ST + WMAP + clusters point to the existence of DM > baryon density. What is nature of nonbaryonic matter?

  14. Matter budget of the Universe The 'before Planck' figure is based on the WMAP 9-year data release presented by Hinshaw et al., (2012).    0.001 0.02 

  15. Baryon density is 0.05 of the total density  Nonbaryonic matter exists! much bigger than the luminous matter (0.005)  Most of the baryons are optically dark. considerably less than the gravitating matter (0.3)  There exists nonbaryonic Dark Matter. Why baryonic matter is such a small fraction? What is the nature of nonbaryonic matter? Where are the dark baryons? Where are the antibaryons?`How and when the net baryon number was generated?

  16. Half of the dark baryons are in the space between galaxies In the spectra of the light from distant quasars (several billion ly away) the absorption lines of ordinary baryonic matter were found. Where is the other half of dark baryons? MACHOS, BH,.. C. Danforth & M. Shull, ApJ, 2008 The analysis of HST FUSE observations taken along sight-lines to 28 quasars represents how the intergalactic medium looks within 4 billion ly of Earth.

  17. Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe Standard cosmology predicts equal quantities at the hot stage and now the relic density should be: b ~ 10 -18 However Why baryon density is so big? Where are the antibartyons? Is the asymmetry local or global? How and when the asymmetry was produced? Saharov’s baryogenesis conditions: BV, CPV, nonequilibrium baryogenesis models (GUT, SUSSY, BTL, SCB..) If the symmetry is local what were the separation mechanisms? Dolgov, DK 89 ; DK, Chizhov MNRAS 2000; DK, NPB2002 Missions searching for traces of antimatter: anti p, anti-nuclei, annihilation radiation: PAMELA, BESS, AMS, AMS 2, PEBS, etc • CR data from search of anti p, positrons and antinuclei indicate that there is no significant quantity of antimatter objects within a radius 1 Mpc. • Gama ray: no significant amounts of antimatter up to galaxy cluster scales ~ 10 -20 Mpc Steigman 79;08, Stecker 85 Locally, up to ~10-20 Mpc, the Universe is made of matter. Both theory and observations allow astronomically significant quantities antimatter.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend