cs 451 software engineering winter term
play

CS 451 Software Engineering Winter Term Yuanfang Cai Room 104, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CS 451 Software Engineering Winter Term Yuanfang Cai Room 104, University Crossings 215.895.0298 yfcai@cs.drexel.edu 1 Drexel University PROCESS MODEL A structured collection of practices Describe characteristics of effective process


  1. CS 451 Software Engineering Winter Term Yuanfang Cai Room 104, University Crossings 215.895.0298 yfcai@cs.drexel.edu 1 Drexel University

  2. PROCESS MODEL  A structured collection of practices  Describe characteristics of effective process  CMMI is not a process  CMMI describes the characteristics of effective processes 2 Drexel University

  3. Prescriptive Models 3 Drexel University

  4. PRESCRIPTIVE MODELS  Regardless of the model, all models contain the following components:  communication  planning  modeling  construction  deployment  Which of these phases do you think is most difficult and in what situations? 4 Drexel University

  5. PROCESS MODELS  What do you think the most popular process model is?  Waterfall  Incremental  Evolutionary  Formal 5 Drexel University

  6. PROCESS MODELS – WATERFALL  The “Classic Life Cycle”, The “Textbook Cycle”  A systematic, sequential approach with the following steps:  Customer Specification of Requirements (Communication)  Planning (Estimating, Scheduling, Tracking)  Modeling (Analysis and Design)  Construction (Code and Test)  Deployment (Delivery, Support, and Feedback) 6 Drexel University

  7. PROCESS MODELS – WATERFALL  The book calls the first phase communication. I do not like this definition as communication must occur at all stages. 7 Drexel University

  8. PROCESS MODELS – WATERFALL  When is the waterfall process model appropriate?  In a purest sense, probably never. I have never worked on a project that follows a completely linear progression.  However, the waterfall process is appropriate if followed in spirit if not the letter of the model in some situations:  Well defined projects  Projects with no technology risks  Well defined domains  Stable requirements 8 Drexel University

  9. PROCESS MODELS – WATERFALL  Why is it difficult to follow?  Hard to follow a strictly sequential path.  Customers have difficulty stating ALL the requirements explicitly  Customers business model changes during the course of developing the application  Customers are required to have patience, since a working program is not available until very late in the process. 9 Drexel University

  10. PROCESS MODELS – INCREMENTAL PROCESS MODEL  Even with well defined projects, a linear approach is often difficult.  Additionally, sometimes a portion of the software needs to be delivered early.  The incremental model combines elements of the waterfall model applied in an iterative fashion.  Incremental model delivers an operational product with each increment.  Works well for project resource management (staffing). 10 Drexel University

  11. PROCESS MODELS – INCREMENTAL PROCESS MODEL 11 Drexel University

  12. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL - PROTOTYPING  Customers define general objectives, but does not identify the details.  Often, the customer doesn’t know what they want the system to look like.  A repeating cycle of the following steps include:  Communication  Quick Plan  Modeling Quick Design  Construction of Prototype  Deployment & Feedback 12 Drexel University

  13. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL - PROTOTYPING  Depending upon the complexity I recommend a first pass with “Paper Prototypes”.  “Paper” can be virtual with mockups of the application being developed in either a development environment like Visual Studio or even HTML.  Second pass could be a semi functional application with no data connectivity. 13 Drexel University

  14. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL - PROTOTYPING  Third pass for the developers to try any unknown technical issues.  Often good for these prototypes to be used for requirements gathering and to reduce technology risks. Best if the prototype is a throw-away. One good reason to develop your prototype in a different language/system than the final project 14 Drexel University

  15. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL - PROTOTYPING  Drawbacks:  Customers like the prototype and want to place it in production.  Developers forget the design decisions and their mistakes leak into the production system. 15 Drexel University

  16. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL – SPRIAL MODEL  An evolutionary software model that couples the iterative nature of prototyping with the controlled and systematic aspects of the waterfall model.  This is true, but with one addition: risk analysis.  At each cycle through the spiral, milestones are achieved and risk is reevaluated. 16 Drexel University

  17. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL – SPRIAL MODEL 17 Drexel University

  18. PROCESS MODELS – EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS MODEL – SPRIAL MODEL  Most developers lean towards evolutionary process models.  They have inherent problems:  Prototyping and similar evolutionary models are hard to plan, thus hard to estimate, thus hard to contract. How many cycles will there be?  Speed of evolution is difficult to dictate  Is the third statement true? Why is this a goal? 18 Drexel University

  19. PROCESS MODELS – SPECIALIZED PROCESS MODEL FORMAL METHODS MODEL  The Formal Methods Model encompasses a set of activities that leads to formal mathematical specification of computer software.  In theory, the following is reduced when using formal methods:  Ambiguity  Incompleteness  Inconsistency  Do you agree? 19 Drexel University

  20. PROCESS MODELS – SPECIALIZED PROCESS MODEL FORMAL METHODS MODEL  Drawbacks:  The development of formal models is currently quite time consuming and expensive  Few software developers have the background, thus extensive training is required. (is training viable? COBOL -> OOP)  Difficult to use formal model to communicate with a non- technical customer.  Forest and Trees.  Useful for safety critical application or anywhere failure is highly costly. 20 Drexel University

  21. Agile Development 21 Drexel University

  22. Manifesto  Value individuals and interactions over processes and tools  Value working software over comprehensive documentation  Value customer collaboration over contract negotiation  Value responding to changes over following a plan 22 Drexel University

  23. AGILE ≠ HACK OUT SOLUTONS!  A process is required  Discipline is essential  12 principles 23 Drexel University

  24. Agile Principles Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer 1. through early and continues delivery of valuable software. Welcome changing requirements, even late in 2. development. Agile processes harness change for the customer’s competitive advantage. Deliver working software frequently, from a 3. couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale 24 Drexel University

  25. Agile Principles Business people and developers must work 4. together daily throughout the project. Build projects around motivated individuals. 5. Given them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done. The most efficient and effective method of 6. conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation. Working software is the primary measure of 7. progress. 25 Drexel University

  26. Agile Principles Agile processes promote sustainable 8. development. The sponsors, developers and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely. Continuous attention to technical excellence 9. and good design enhances agility. 10. Simplicity---the art of maximizing the amount of work not done---is essential 11. The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams 26 Drexel University

  27. Agile Principles 12. At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly. 27 Drexel University

  28. AGILE PROCESS MODELS  Each has a set of “ideas” that represent a significant departure from conventional software engineering.  Are the agility ideas really new? 28 Drexel University

  29. Agile Process Models  Agile Unified Process (AUP)  Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM)  Essential Unified Process (EssUP)  Extreme Programming (XP)  Feature Driven Development (FDD)  Open Unified Process (OpenUP)  Scrum  Velocity tracking 29 Drexel University

  30. EXTREME PROGRAMMING  Planning  User stories  Values  Acceptance test criteria  Iteration plan  Design  Simple design  CRC cards  Spike solutions  prototypes 30 Drexel University

  31. EXTREME PROGRAMMING  Coding  Pair programming  Refactoring  Test  Unit test  Continuous integration  Acceptance testing  Release  Software increment 31 Drexel University

  32. EXTREME PROGRAMMING 32 Drexel University

  33. EXTREME PROGRAMMING 33 Drexel University

  34. EXTREME PROGRAMMING 34 Drexel University

  35. EXTREME PROGRAMMING 35 Drexel University

  36. Summary  Prescriptive Models  Waterfall  Incremental  Evolutionary  Agile 36 Drexel University

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend