Critical Research Questions for Improving the Full Integration of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

critical research questions for improving the full
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Critical Research Questions for Improving the Full Integration of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Critical Research Questions for Improving the Full Integration of Persons with Disabilities in the Workforce Presented at the April 5, 2005 Disability Research Institute Symposium Washington, DC Craig Thornton Research Focus All people


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Critical Research Questions for Improving the Full Integration of Persons with Disabilities in the Workforce

Presented at the April 5, 2005

Disability Research Institute Symposium

Washington, DC

Craig Thornton

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research Focus

All people with impairments or chronic

illnesses who are limited in age-appropriate activities

Working–age adults Youth

and

Beneficiaries of disability insurance

programs, particularly SSDI and SSI

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Understanding Beneficiaries

Go beyond simple counts and demographics Examine the 4 Es:

Employment Experience Education Expectations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Would They Change Their Lives?

Leaving the rolls is a major life change Where do beneficiaries turn for guidance and

information?

What criteria are important in their

decisions?

How can policies help them to understand or

improve their options?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why Did They Apply for Benefits?

What options did they see at the time of

application?

Why do some people with similar

impairments choose not to apply?

How can public policy effectively provide

  • ther options?
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Understanding Employers

What do they look for in an employee? How do they make hiring and retention

decisions?

What interventions would increase employer

willingness and ability to hire/retain workers with disabilities?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology Matters

Identify valid comparison groups Consistently measure outcomes for treatment

and comparison groups

Study enough people to produce clear findings Study people long enough to observe

  • utcomes of interest
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Effect on Employment Rates (STETS Demonstration) 41

  • St. Paul

43

New York Difference Control Group Treatment Group Site

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Effect on Employment Rates (STETS Demonstration) 23 18 41

  • St. Paul

11 32 43

New York Difference Control Group Treatment Group Site

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Ave. Monthly Earnings for TETD Dem
  • nstration

Participants and Nonparticipants

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00 200.00 1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85

Months Pre- and Post- Random ization A v e r a g e M

  • n

th ly E a r n in g

Control Treatment Elig . Nonparticipant

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SSA Employment Program Paradoxes

1.

The programs promote employment for people who have gone to great lengths to prove they cannot work.

2.

To promote equity, programs must be very large, but may actually serve only a few beneficiaries.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Citations

  • Kerachsky

Kerachsky, Stuart et al. , Stuart et al. “ “Impacts of Transitional Impacts of Transitional Employment for Mentally Retarded Young Adults: Employment for Mentally Retarded Young Adults: Results of the STETS Demonstration. Results of the STETS Demonstration.” ” New York: New York: MDRC, April 1985. MDRC, April 1985.

  • Decker, Paul and Craig Thornton.

Decker, Paul and Craig Thornton. “ “The Long Term The Long Term Effects of Transitional Employment Services. Effects of Transitional Employment Services.” ” Social Social Security Bulletin Security Bulletin, , vol vol 58, no 4 (Winter) 1995. 58, no 4 (Winter) 1995.