covering graphs and linear extensions of signed posets
play

Covering Graphs and Linear Extensions of Signed Posets Eric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Covering Graphs and Linear Extensions of Signed Posets Eric Fawcett, Torey Hilbert, Mikey Reilly Joint work with Jake Huryn, Kat Husar and Hannah Johnson under Dr. Sergei Chmutov The Ohio State University August 14th, 2020 The Big Picture


  1. Covering Graphs and Linear Extensions of Signed Posets Eric Fawcett, Torey Hilbert, Mikey Reilly Joint work with Jake Huryn, Kat Husar and Hannah Johnson under Dr. Sergei Chmutov The Ohio State University August 14th, 2020

  2. The Big Picture Stanley’s work in [1]: This presentation:

  3. (Unsigned) Graphs and Orientations A graph G is a set of vertices V with edges E connecting vertices. An orientation τ on the edges assigns each edge a direction. An orientation is acyclic if every cycle has a sink or a source.

  4. (Unsigned) Posets Associated to Acyclic Orientations A poset P is a set with a partial order < P (written < when there’s no ambiguity). Partial orders are transitive and antisymmetric. We can define a poset from an acyclic orientation τ by letting u < τ v when an edge points from u to v .

  5. (Unsigned) Linear Extension Given a poset P , a linear extension P ∗ is a total order which preserves P . Namely for any u � = v ∈ P ∗ : 1. Either u < P ∗ v or v < P ∗ u 2. If u < P v , then u < P ∗ v

  6. Signed Graphs and Orientations [Zaslavsky [2]] A signed graph Σ is a graph where every edge is given a sign ± 1. An orientation τ now assigns to each half edge (i.e. the part of the edge next to a vertex) an arrow such that: 1. For positive edges the arrows face the same direction 2. For negative edges they face opposite directions An orientation is acyclic if every cycle has a source or a sink.

  7. Do Signed Acyclic Orientations define a Poset? For positive edges, we have no issues. However, for negative edges, it’s unclear which edge is bigger in the poset. For example, if the arrows on edge ( u , v ) point both into u and into v , then neither u < τ v nor v < τ u . But then we’re ignoring all of the negative edges from our poset!

  8. The Root System Approach [Reiner [3]] Instead of writing v i < P v j , we use the vector e j − e i . If we have n elements in our poset, then these vectors live in R n . For negative edges where both arrows point into the vertices, we then have no problem writing e j + e i ∈ R n .

  9. The A n Root System For (unsigned) posets, we use the A n root system, Φ = Φ + ∪ − Φ + , where Φ + = { e i − e j | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n } For the orientation shown below, the arrow pointing from v 2 to v 1 tells us e 1 − e 2 ∈ P . Furthermore, P = { e 1 − e 2 , e 2 − e 3 , e 1 − e 3 }

  10. The B n Root System For signed posets, the vectors live in the B n root system, Φ = Φ + ∪ − Φ + , where Φ + = { e 1 , e 2 , ..., e n } ∪ { e i − e j | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n } ∪ { e i + e j | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n } Some examples of elements in Φ: e 3 + e 17 ∈ Φ + e 7 , e 2 − e 4 , ◮ ◮ − e 7 , e 4 − e 2 , − e 3 − e 17 ∈ − Φ + .

  11. Signed Posets A subset P ± ⊆ Φ is a (signed) poset if it satisfies: 1. If v ∈ P ± then − v / ∈ P ± 2. For v , u ∈ P ± and a , b ≥ 0, if w = av + bu ∈ Φ, then w ∈ P ±

  12. Signed Poset Example In the orientation of graph below, the visible edges give us: P ± = { e 1 − e 4 , e 1 + e 3 , e 4 − e 2 , − e 3 − e 4 } Additionally, we have a implied edges e 1 − e 2 and − e 3 − e 2 .

  13. B-Symmetric Signed Permutations A B-Symmetric signed permutation is a bijective function π : {− n , ..., n } \ { 0 } → {− n , ..., n } \ { 0 } such that π ( i ) = − π ( − i ). Notice that this condition means it suffices to specify where the first n positive integers map to define the function. Example: � � � � − 2 − 1 1 2 1 2 π = ≡ 1 − 2 2 − 1 2 − 1

  14. The Jordan-H¨ older Set Given a signed poset P ± on n elements, the Jordan-H¨ older set is denoted L ( P ± ) where L ( P ± ) = { π ∈ B n : P ± ⊆ π Φ + } where π ( e i ) = sign( π ( i )) e | π ( i ) | .

  15. Jordan-H¨ older Set Example

  16. Covering Graphs Given an oriented signed graph Σ( V , E , τ ), the covering graph Σ( V ′ , E ′ , τ ′ ) is created as follows: 1. For each v ∈ V , + v , − v ∈ V ′ 2. If v i v j ∈ E is a positive edge, then + v i + v j , − v i − v j ∈ E ′ . 3. If v i v j ∈ E is a negative edge, then + v i − v j , − v i + v j ∈ E ′ . 4. The orientation at + v i is ”the same” as v i . 5. The orientation at − v i is ”the opposite” as v i

  17. Covering Graph Example

  18. Covering Relation to Root System We can lift a signed poset on n vertices P ± to an unsigned poset P on 2 n vertices by the following: 1. If i � = j , ( ǫ i e i − ǫ j e j ) ∈ P ± iff ( e ǫ i i − e ǫ j j ) ∈ P and ( e − ǫ j j − e − ǫ i i ) ∈ P 2. if e i ∈ P ± then e i − e − i ∈ P 3. if − e i ∈ P ± then e − i − e i ∈ P where e ± 1 , ..., e ± n form an orthonormal basis of R 2 n .

  19. Example of Lifting Signed Poset

  20. Motivating Example

  21. Theorem Theorem For a signed poset P ± , which is associated with a signed graph Σ , every B-Sym linear extension of the covering graph of Σ can be associated with exactly one signed permutation in L ( P ± ) and vice versa. Specifically, for a linear extension, β , of the covering graph of Σ we can associate β with a signed permutation π β which has the property that if β ( ǫ v k ) = n-i+1, where ǫ ∈ { + , −} and n is the number of vertices, then π β ( i ) = ǫ k . The theorem states that every π β is an element of L ( P ± ) and every π ∈ L ( P ± ) has π = π β for some β which is a B-Sym linear extension of Σ.

  22. Motivating Example

  23. Intuition It is often more useful to think about the equivalent condition π − 1 P ± ⊂ Φ + π − 1 ( k ) = ǫ i where β ( ǫ v k ) = n − i + 1, i.e. ǫ v k is the ith greatest element under β . Φ + = { e i } ∪ { e 1 − e 2 , e 1 − e 3 , . . . , e 1 − e n , e 2 − e 3 , e 2 − e 4 , . . . , } ∪ { e 1 + e 2 , e 1 + e 3 , . . . , e 1 + e n , e 2 + e 3 , e 2 + e 4 , . . . , } If we consider Φ + as a poset, then the element represented by e 1 would be maximal, the element represented by e 2 would be next maximal and so on. Therefore it makes sense to consider π such that π − 1 sends the maximal element of P to 1 and so on.

  24. Acknowledgements Thank you to: ◮ The YMC ◮ Dr. Sergei Chumtov ◮ Jake Huryn ◮ Kat Husar ◮ Hannah Johnson ◮ The audience

  25. References R.P. Stanley. A symmetric function generalization of the chromatic polynomial of a graph. Advances in Mathematics , 111(1):166 – 194, 1995. Thomas Zaslavsky. Signed graph coloring. Discrete Mathematics , 39(2):215 – 228, 1982. Victor Reiner. Signed posets. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A , 62(2):324 – 360, 1993.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend