Corporate Presentation November 2016 Cautionary statements ALL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corporate presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Corporate Presentation November 2016 Cautionary statements ALL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corporate Presentation November 2016 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Corporate Presentation

November 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary statements

2

ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “targeted”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production; mineral reserve and resource estimates; planned design for the Rainy River project; construction activities at the Rainy River project and their expected progress and timelines, including the timing for, and duration of, underground development and its impact and timing for power energization; expected capital costs and contingency amounts and timing for incurring costs in the future; planned preparations for operations, including the mining rate, removal of overburden and waste and storage of water prior to commissioning and availability of ore; the expected production, costs, economics, grade, mining and milling rate, strip ratio, milling and mill feed schedule, recovery rates and mine life and other operating parameters of the Rainy River project; planned staffing levels; future exploration activities and exploration potential; the capacity of the starter dam; targeted timing for permits; targeted timing for commissioning, start-up, production and ramp-up; statements with respect to the company’s future compliance with its leverage ratio covenants; statements regarding future free cash flow and after-tax cash flow; and statements with respect to the payment of the remaining $75 million from Royal Gold and the percentage of future revenue represented by the total payments from Royal Gold. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s annual and quarterly management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), its Annual Information Form and its Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) equipment, labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) arrangements with Indigenous groups in respect of the Rainy River project being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; (9) the results of the feasibility study for the Rainy River project being realized; (10) conditions to the payment of the remaining $75 million from Royal Gold being satisfied later in 2016; and (11) with respect to guidance for 2016 AISC, refer to “2016 Guidance” in New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 for the key assumptions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements and the availability and management of capital resources; additional funding requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for metals and other commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada and the United States; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Rainy River project; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility study for the Rainy River project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary

  • statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise,

except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The footnotes, endnotes and appendix to this presentation contain important information. The endnotes and appendix are found at the end of the presentation.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history

  • f value

creation

New Gold investment thesis

15.0 Moz gold reserves(1), >85% located in Canada C$50 million investment by Board & Management Q3’2016 all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • f $682/oz

Lowered 2016 cost guidance by $75/oz in Q2 ~800 Koz annual production potential from growth projects(3) Share price

  • utperformed

S&P/TSX Global Gold Index by >215% since beginning

  • f 2009
  • 1. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold production leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to

Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Based on 325Koz annual production from Rainy River and ~485Koz annual production from Blackwater, as outlined in the feasibility studies for the projects.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions

4

  • 1. Source: 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.

Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro Peak Mines Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 12+ years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 7 years + residual leach Mine Life: Final year + residual leach Mine Life: 6+ years

#1

CANADA

#3

UNITED STATES

#5

MEXICO

#2

AUSTRALIA

OPERATING DEVELOPMENT

All Assets Ranked in Top 5 Global Mining Jurisdictions(1)

Mineral Reserves(2)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Experienced and invested team

David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Chairman, PrairieSky Royalty Robert Gallagher Former President & Chief Executive Officer, New Gold Vahan Kololian Founder, TerraNova Partners Martyn Konig Chief Investment Officer, T Wealth Management Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Ian Pearce Partner, X2 Resources Kay Priestly Former Chief Executive Officer, Turquoise Hill Resources Raymond Threlkeld Chairman, Newmarket Gold Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman David Schummer Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer Brian Penny Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Hannes Portmann Executive Vice President, Business Development

Executive Management Team Board of Directors

Significantly invested in company, directly aligned with shareholders

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2016 third quarter highlights

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Margin per ounce is equal to realized gold price per ounce during the period less costs (being cash costs or all-in sustaining costs, as the case may be) per ounce.

95,546oz – Gold

$350 per oz

Total cash costs(1)

$682 per oz

All-in sustaining costs(2)

Production Costs Margin Financial Balance Sheet Rainy River

25.5mlbs – Copper

Overall construction currently 60% complete $131 million in capital expenditures during third quarter

  • Approximately $50 million

in October

$151million

Cash balance at Sept. 30, 2016 Further enhanced financial flexibility by increasing size of credit facility to $400 million and

additional gold option contracts for first six months of 2017

$90million

Cash generated from operations

$0.17

Cash flow per share

$978 per oz

Total cash cost margin(3)

$646 per oz

All-in sustaining cost margin(3)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

$105 $136

7

First nine months 2016 free cash flow generation

New Afton ($ million) Peak Mines ($ million) Mesquite ($ million) Cerro San Pedro ($ million)

All operations generating free cash flow

$15 $49

Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2)

$34

$54 $62

Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)

$15 $16

Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)

$809 $718 $340 $551

FY 2015 First Nine Months 2016

$1,149 $1,269

+62%

First Nine Months 2016 Free Cash Flow Generation Margin Expansion ($/oz)

All-in Sustaining Costs(4) Margin(5) Realized Gold Price

$8 $1

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on operating margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Free cash flow is equal to operating margin less capital expenditures.
  • 3. Capex is inclusive of sustaining and growth capital expenditures.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 5. Margin equal to gold price less all-in sustaining costs

Capex(3) Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)

$31

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Liquidity position

Remaining proceeds Rainy River stream(3) Remaining Rainy River capital(4)

Liquidity Position

$502million

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

$151 million $276 million

Undrawn credit facility(2)

$415 million

  • 1. Cash and cash equivalents as at September 30, 2016.
  • 2. $124 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit at September 30, 2016.
  • 3. Second instalment of $75 million to be paid when 60% of development capital spent and other customary conditions are satisfied.
  • 4. Estimated development capital remaining as at September 30, 2016.

$75 million Ongoing Sustaining Free Cash Flow

Generating free cash flow with gold price certainty through option contracts through June 2017 Payment scheduled for November 2016 Approximately $50 million spent in October

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Reinvesting free cash flow generation

9

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

First Nine Months 2016 All-in Sustaining Cost Margin(1)

~$551 /oz

+75% of expected 2016 company production at lower all-in sustaining costs(2)

Rainy River

Opportunity to extend mine life of New Gold’s most significant cash flow generator

New Afton C-zone

+120% of expected 2016 company production at lower all-in sustaining costs(2)

Blackwater

Investing in longer-lived, larger-scale, lower-cost assets

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Rainy River project summary

  • 1. Source: Based on 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.
  • 2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold production leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to

Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”. Mineral resources are exclusive of reserves.

  • Supportive local government and community
  • ~250 people currently on operations team
  • >70% from local communities, including

>30% from Indigenous communities

  • Close to regional infrastructure with power

line construction substantially complete

Ontario, Canada

Gold Reserves

3.1Moz at 1.0g/t

Open Pit Underground

0.7Moz at 5.0g/t

3.8 Moz

#1

Gold M&I Resources

2.0Moz at 0.8g/t

Open Pit Underground

0.6Moz at 3.7g/t

2.6 Moz

Jurisdiction Resource Scale(2)

Secured low power rates through 2024

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rainy River overview

11

Start-up planned for mid-2017

Overall Construction

60% complete

Through October 2016

Capital Spent Project to Date

$680 million

Through October 2016

Total Remaining Capital

$365 million

Process building Mill building SAG and ball mill Open pit From November 2016 through targeted mid-2017 start-up

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Rainy River project metrics

Pebble crusher Primary crusher CIP tanks Process building

325 Koz

$550 /oz $710 /oz

Gold Production Total Cash Costs(1) All-in Sustaining Costs(2)

~80% of costs denominated in Canadian dollars

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. First nine years based on September 2016 updated operating cost assumptions.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. First nine years based on September 2016 updated operating cost assumptions.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Significant cash flow contributor

$770 $710 $480 $540

FY 2016E Rainy River

$1,250 $1,250

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Margin equal to gold price less all-in sustaining costs.
  • 3. Margin per ounce equal to $1,250 per ounce less all-in sustaining costs of $710 per ounce. Margin in millions (pre-tax) equal to margin per ounce multiplied by average annual gold production of 325Koz.

Rainy River doubles New Gold’s cash margin

~$180million ~$175million

Cash Margin(3)

RAINY RIVER

4 operating mines 1 operating mine

Increases Margins Significantly Increases Cash Flow All-in Sustaining Costs(1) ($/oz) Margin(2) ($/oz) Gold Price ($/oz)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Rainy River value creation through development

Development of Rainy River presents opportunity for ~$1.0 billion

  • f potential value creation

UPSIDE

$300million

Acquisition cost

50% /

Cash

50%

Shares

$1.0billion

Development capital estimate(1)

$1.3billion

Total investment Average annual after-tax cash flow(2) Potential cash flow multiple range Implied value potential

~$225million

~10x ~$2.3billion

Investment Value Potential

  • 1. Based on $1.30 CDN/USD foreign exchange rate.
  • 2. Based on first nine years at $1,250 per ounce gold, $18 per ounce silver and $1.30 CDN/USD foreign exchange rate. Royal Gold stream payments of approximately $20 million per year are treated as a financing activity.

$100 change in gold price

+/- ~$30million +/- ~$300million

~10x

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

New Afton C-zone opportunity

Based on the feasibility study, average annual pre-tax cash flow

  • f ~$200 million
  • Feasibility Study outlined plan to

mine/process 25 million tonnes (over five years) of material from C-zone

  • Added 583 thousand ounces of gold

and 430 million pounds of copper to reserves

  • C-zone gold reserve grade 31%

higher, copper grade 8% lower

  • Development capital of $402 million(1)
  • First three years ~$35 million per

year

  • Additional drilling planned in 2016 to

further expand C-zone

  • Resource remains open at depth and

to the west Feasibility Study Highlights

1,180m

C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level

C-zone

Measured Indicated Inferred

  • 1. Includes $41 million provision for capital escalation and $88 million for contingency.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Blackwater highlights

16

  • 1. Development capital assumes $1.30 CDN/USD exchange rate.
  • 2. Mineral resources are exclusive of reserves. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold production leading to strong cash

flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”.

  • 3. First nine years.
  • 4. Gold revenue at $1,250 per ounce, silver revenue at $18 per ounce.
  • 5. Refer to Endnote on margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Margin per ounce equal to $1,250 per ounce less all-in sustaining costs of $590 per ounce. Margin in millions (pre-tax) equal to margin per ounce multiplied by average annual gold production of 485Koz.

Development Capital(1)

~$1.6billion

Reserves(2)

8.2Moz - Gold 60.8Moz - Silver

Annual Production(3) Life-of-Mine Revenue ($B)(4) Sustaining Cost Margin(5) Regional Upside 2016 Plan: Complete Environmental Assessment process in first half 2017

485Koz - Gold 1.8Moz - Silver $660 /oz ~$320million ~1,100km2

Land Package

$8.7 - Gold $0.5 - Silver

Flagship asset already in portfolio

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Strong Canadian presence

17

  • 1. Source: 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.
  • 2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold production leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to

Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

OPERATING DEVELOPMENT

1.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 1.1 Blb Copper Reserve(2) 2015 operating margin: $187 million

New Afton (production)

3.8 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 9.4 Moz Silver Reserve(2) >190km2 land package

Rainy River (construction)

8.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 60.8 Moz Silver Reserve(2) >1,100km2 land package

Blackwater (permitting)

Top global mining jurisdiction(1) >85% gold reserves(2) in Canada Significant Canadian dollar exposure ~70% of cash flow generated from Canadian

  • perations

~25% gold production from Canadian assets

  • >55% with Rainy River

in full production Our Footprint in Canada

New Gold has multiple organic growth options in its portfolio

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

New Gold looking forward

Organic Growth Projects(2) Current Portfolio

15+ years

~$640 /oz

Average Annual Gold Production Per Asset All-in Sustaining Costs(3) Weighted Average

~7 years ~100 Koz ~$770 /oz

Average Mine Life

Investing in longer-lived, larger-scale, lower-cost assets ~400 Koz

(1)

>2x 4x

($130)/oz

  • 1. Based on 12 years at New Afton (including C-zone), seven years at Mesquite, six years at Peak Mines and one year at Cerro San Pedro.
  • 2. Based on 325Koz annual production from Rainy River (first nine years) and ~485Koz annual production from Blackwater (first nine years) as outlined in the feasibility studies and all-in sustaining costs for the projects as outlined in the feasibility studies.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

A history of value creation

New Gold (NYSE MKT)

185%

Gold Price

46%

S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(2)

(34%)

  • 1. New Gold/Western Goldfields business combination announced in March 2009.
  • 2. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 35 gold companies in various stages of development/production.

16.2% 5.6% (5.8%)

Compound Annual Growth Rate

Performance since beginning of 2009(1)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

New Gold investment thesis

20

Establishing the leading intermediate gold company

Invested and experienced team Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Peer-leading growth pipeline A history

  • f value

creation

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Appendices

21

Appendices Page 1. Corporate 22 2. New Afton 35 3. Other Operations – Mesquite, Peak Mines, Cerro San Pedro 42 4. Rainy River 45 5. Blackwater 57 6. Exploration and Reserves and Resources 58

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary of debt

22

Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) Face Value $400 million(1) $300 million $500 million Maturity 3 years with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Conversion price n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~103 ~101 Key features

  • Interest rate varies

between 2.00%-3.25% based on leverage ratio

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after April 15,

2016 at 103.5% down to 100%

  • f face after 2018
  • Unlimited dividends if leverage

ratio below 2:1

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after November

15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par

  • Unlimited dividends if leverage

ratio below 2:1

  • 1. $124 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit at September 30, 2016.

Appendix 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Credit facility overview

Appendix 1

  • $124 million of the facility was used to issue letters of

credit for closure obligations at the company’s producing mines and development projects

Revolving credit facility (expires August 14, 2019) $400 Letters of credit issued $124 Undrawn credit facility $276

Current Revolving Credit Facility ($mm)

Prior Terms Current Terms Maximum Net Debt/EBITDA Q4’16-Q2’17 4.5x Thereafter 3.5x Q4’16-Q2’17 4.5x Q3’17-Q4’17 4.0x Thereafter 3.5x

Credit Facility Financial Covenants

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Gold production (Koz)

398 436

Silver production (Koz)

1.6 1.9

Copper production (Mlbs)

85 100

Gold reserves(1) (Moz)

15.9 15.0

Copper reserves(1) (Blbs)

1.0 1.2

Operating expenses ($mm)

$436 $420

Corporate administration ($mm)

$27 $20

Exploration and business development ($mm)

$34 $7 $497 $447

24

Producing more and spending less 2015 2013

+10%

  • 1. For comparison purposes, 2013 reserves exclude El Morro which was sold by New Gold in 2015.

+19% +18% (6%) +20% (4%) (26%) (79%) (10%)

  • Comparing 2015 to 2013, New Afton’s first full year of production, demonstrates a marked

improvement in production of all metals at lower costs:

Appendix 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24 19 15

25

Mine-by-mine operating results

Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Afton co-product cash costs: Third quarter: Gold - $552/oz, Copper - $0.91/lb.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Afton co-product all-in sustaining costs: Third quarter: Gold - $719/oz, Copper - $1.18/lb.

2016 Third Quarter

Gold production (Koz)

($633) $633 $522 $897 ($211) $1,202 $632 $912

GOLD PRODUCTION (oz)

95,546

TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)

$350

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)

$682

38

Well positioned to meet full-year production guidance

Appendix 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

74 72 89 51

26

Mine-by-mine operating results

Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Afton co-product cash costs: First nine months 2016: Gold - $526/oz, Copper - $0.90/lb.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Afton co-product all-in sustaining costs: First nine months 2016: Gold - $685/oz, Copper - $1.17/lb.

First Nine Months 2016

Gold production (Koz)

($605) $622 $575 $911 ($202) $1,085 $736 $936

GOLD PRODUCTION (oz)

285,780

TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)

$346

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)

$718

Well positioned to meet full-year production guidance

Appendix 1

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Consolidated financial summary

27 Three months ended September 30 Nine months ended September 30

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

2016 2015 2016 2015 Revenues $179 $177 $514 $514 Operating margin(2) 94 72 262 211 Adjusted net earnings/(loss)(3) 13 (9) 27 (14) Adjusted net earnings/(loss) per share(3) 0.03 (0.02) 0.05 (0.03) Net earnings/(loss) 5 (158) 23 (192) Net earnings/(loss) per share 0.01 (0.31) 0.04 (0.38) Cash generated from operations before changes in non-cash operating working capital(4) 89 58 233 189 Cash generated from operations 90 51 231 178

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on average realized prices under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on operating margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on adjusted net earnings under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on net cash generated from operations before changes in working capital under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Financial Summary

GOLD ($/oz):

19%

COPPER ($/lb):

(3%)

SILVER ($/oz):

37% Average Realized Prices(1)

$1,117 $1,328 $2.23 $2.17 $14.72 $20.15

Appendix 1

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Detailed operating results and assumptions

28

Appendix 1

2015A 2015A 2015A Tonnes processed

(000 tonnes)

5,097 5,400

  • 5,600

19,987 13,900

  • 14,300

723 580

  • 600

Total tonnes mined

(000 tonnes)

5,255 6,900

  • 7,100

58,778 56,500

  • 60,500

693 600

  • 620

Strip ratio

  • 1.9

3.1

  • 3.2
  • Gold grade

(g/t)

0.78 0.66

  • 0.70

0.34 0.43

  • 0.47

4.19 4.80

  • 5.00

Silver grade

(g/t)

  • Copper grade

(%)

0.90% 0.80%

  • 0.84%
  • 1.00%

0.60%

  • 0.70%

Gold recovery(1)

(%)

82.5% 79.0%

  • 81.0%

61.7% 93.0% 91.0%

  • 93.0%

Silver recovery

(%)

  • Copper recovery

(%)

84.9% 81.0%

  • 83.0%
  • 88.3%

87.0%

  • 89.0%

Production Gold production

(Koz)

105.5 90.0

  • 100.0

134.9 130.0

  • 140.0

89.9 80.0

  • 90.0

Silver production

(Koz)

  • Copper production

(Mlbs)

86.0 75.0

  • 85.0
  • 14.0

6.0

  • 8.0

Reserve Grade at December 31, 2015 Gold grade

(g/t)

Silver grade

(g/t)

Copper grade

(%)

1.29% 2.89 6.9 Mesquite 2016E 2016E New Afton Peak Mines 2016E ~65% 0.82%

  • 0.62

0.55 2.1

  • 1. Represents implied recoveries.
slide-29
SLIDE 29

2016 all-in sustaining costs sensitivities

29

Appendix 1

Category Copper Price Silver Price CDN/USD AUD/USD MXN/USD

Base Assumption $2.00 $14.00 $1.40 $1.40 $18.00 Sensitivity +/-$0.25 +/-$1.00 +/-$0.05 +/-$0.05 +/-$1.00 COST PER OUNCE IMPACT New Afton +/-$210

  • +/-$55
  • Mesquite
  • Peak Mines

+/-$20

  • +/-$35
  • Cerro San Pedro
  • +/-$20
  • +/-$30

New Gold Total +/-$55 +/-$5 +/-$20 +/-$10 +/-$5

NEW GOLD 2016 ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(1) - KEY SENSITIVITIES

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • Note: 2016 all-in sustaining costs key sensitivities are based on the company’s

guidance presented in February 2016

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz)

2016 consolidated guidance – First nine months 2016

On track to meet full-year gold production guidance and lowered cost guidance

286 360-400

YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE

77 81-93

YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE

1.0 1.6-1.8

YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE

$346 $360-$400 $718 $750-$790

YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Appendix 1

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

2016 guidance

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Sustaining capital based on New Gold’s 2016 estimated capital expenditures including capitalized exploration and excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.
  • 4. General and administrative and other includes stock-based compensation and asset retirement obligation.

All-in Sustaining Costs(1)

$750-$790 /oz

Total cash costs(2) Sustaining capital(3) General and administrative and other(4) Sustaining exploration expense

$360-$400 ~$280 ~$80

~$30

Gold Production (Koz)

400 360 Appendix 1

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

2016 capital expenditures by category

Sustaining Capital: ~$105 million Growth Capital: ~$510 million

Mesquite $55 million New Afton $38 million Peak Mines $12 million Rainy River $500 million Blackwater $5 million New Afton $5 million

Total Capital Expenditures

~$615 million

Appendix 1

YTD’16A: $72 million YTD’16A: $330 million

  • 1. Year-to-date as at September 30, 2016.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

2016 capital expenditures by category (cont’d)

Rainy River Mesquite New Afton

  • $405 million – mining,

infrastructure and process facilities

  • $95 million – owners’

costs, indirects and

  • ther
  • $35 million –

capitalized stripping

  • $12 million – plant and

equipment

  • $8 million – complete

leach pad expansion

  • $38 million – mine

development, plant and equipment

  • $5 million – C-zone

studies, C-zone capitalized exploration

Sustaining capital

Peak Mines Blackwater

  • $12 million – plant and

equipment and capitalized exploration

  • $5 million – permitting,

environmental studies and site support

$500 million $55 million $43 million $12 million $5 million

Appendix 1

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Stream comparison

34

  • 1. Does note include portion of stream attributable to silver. New Gold to deliver 60% of the project's silver production up to a total of 3.1 million ounces of silver, and 30% of the project's silver production thereafter. Royal Gold to pay 25% of the average

silver spot price.

  • 2. M&I resources are exclusive of Reserves. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold

production leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

Initial gold stream percentage 4% 6.5% Average annual stream ounces (Koz) >16 ~16 Total gold reserves(2) (Moz) 8.9 3.8 Reserves subject to stream (Koz) 357 247 Transfer price pre-threshold ($ per ounce) $400 25% of spot gold price Ounce threshold (Koz) 217 230 Gold stream percentage post-threshold 4% 3.25% M&I gold resources subject to stream (exclusive) (Koz) 49 85 Inferred resources subject to stream (Koz) 258 24 Transfer price post-threshold ($ per ounce) $400 + 1% inflation factor 25% of spot gold price

El Morro Stream Retained Rainy River Stream Sold (gold portion)(1)

Appendix 1

slide-35
SLIDE 35

New Afton – 2016 guidance

35

($335)-($295) $95-$135

  • Gold and copper production

decreases due to lower gold and copper grades

  • Higher costs due to lower by-product

revenues

  • $0.25 per pound change in copper

price equals ~$210 per ounce change in New Afton all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • $0.05 change in Canadian dollar

exchange rate equals ~$55 per

  • unce change in New Afton all-in

sustaining costs(2)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Co-product cash costs guidance: Gold - $505-$545 per ounce, Copper - $0.90-$1.05 per pound.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Co-product all-in sustaining costs guidance: Gold - $660-$700 per ounce, Copper - $1.20-$1.35 per pound.

Gold Production (Koz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)

90-100 75-85

Overview Key Sensitivities

Appendix 2

Full-year costs expected to be below guidance ranges

slide-36
SLIDE 36

$219 $246 $305 $432 $596 $793

$90 $396 $441 $557 $466 $530

$336 $701 $873 $1,153 $1,259 Early 2010 Mid-2010 Early 2011 Mid-2011 Early 2012 Mid 2012 Sept 2016

New Afton value creation

36

VALUE CREATION ($mm)

Development Capital Spend ($mm)

$11million

Value Creation(2)

$904 million

Current NAV Net Investment(1)

$641 million/ $263 million $1.25 per sh.

Significant value creation realized 12-18 months prior to start-up

  • 1. Net investment equal to total development capital of $793 million plus sustaining and growth capital of $342 million (mid-2012 to September 30, 2016) less total operating margin of $872 million (mid-2012 to September 30, 2016). Operating margin

calculated as revenue less operating expenses.

  • 2. Value creation equal to current New Afton analyst consensus net asset value less net investment.

Achieved commercial production Copper Price ($/lb) Gold Price ($/oz) Foreign Exchange (CDN/USD) ~$1,100 ~$3.25 $1.05 $1,300 $2.20 $1.30 NAV ($mm) $1,434

$530 million(1)

  • f free cash

flow since mid-2012 start-up

$793 $904

Appendix 2

slide-37
SLIDE 37

New Afton C-zone update

37 1,180m

C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level C-zone Measured Indicated Inferred

Appendix 2

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

  • 1. M&I resources exclusive of reserves. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 titled “New Gold Announces 2015 financial results with record gold production

leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”.

New Afton C-zone reserves and resources

Resource remains open at depth and to the west

  • Added 583 thousand ounces of

gold and 430 million pounds of copper

  • C-zone originally identified through

limited deep holes drilled from surface prior to 2007

  • Since July 2012 have completed

138 holes totaling 85,585 metres and continually updated resource

  • Additional drilling planned in 2016

to further expand C-zone

Tonnes (000s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Proven

  • Probable

25,040 0.72 0.78 583 430 Total P&P 25,040 0.72 0.78 583 430 Measured 2,230 1.05 1.21 75 59 Indicated 15,462 0.79 0.96 392 326 Total M&I 17,693 0.82 0.99 467 385 Inferred 6,856 0.48 0.54 106 87

2015 Year-End C-zone Reserves and Resources(1)

Appendix 2

slide-39
SLIDE 39

New Afton C-zone – Scoping study versus feasibility study

39 2015 Scoping Study 2016 Feasibility Study Total tonnes mined/processed

(Mt)

21.5 25.0 Average gold grade

(g/t)

0.76 0.72 Average copper grade

(%)

0.80 0.78 Contained metal – Gold

(Koz)

522 583 Contained metal – Copper

(Mlbs)

377 430 Mine life

(years)

5 5.5 Average full-year gold production

(Koz)

107 108 Average full-year copper production

(Mlbs)

77 81 Development capital

($mm)

349 402 Sustaining capital

($mm)

110 107 Average operating cost

($/t)

19.24 19.35

  • The below table compares the 2015 scoping study to the current feasibility study results

C-zone: Scoping Study versus Feasibility Study(1)

16% increase in ore tonnes Increase primarily driven by the inclusion of a $41 million provision for capital escalation given six year development timeline

  • 1. CDN/USD exchange rate of $1.25.

12% increase in contained gold 14% increase in contained copper

Appendix 2

slide-40
SLIDE 40

New Afton C-zone indicative timeline

40

Significant capital spending to begin well after Rainy River start-up

Rainy River start-up + 1 year + 2 years + 3 years + 4 years + 5 years + 6 years

Targeted milestones

FIRST PRODUCTION DEVELOP BLOCK CAVE PRODUCTION LEVELS COMPLETE MAIN ACCESS RAMP

Over 70% of $402 million development capital expected to be spent in the final 3.5 years

  • Based on market conditions and the receipt of permits, development of the C-zone could begin

after the start-up of Rainy River

Appendix 2

slide-41
SLIDE 41

New Afton C-zone – Feasibility study economics

41

2015 Scoping Study 2016 Feasibility Study After-tax 5% NPV

($mm)

68 84 After-tax IRR

(%)

9.7 10.3 After-tax Payback

(years)

3.4 3.4 Gold price

($/oz)

$1,200 Copper price

($/lb)

$2.75 CDN/USD

($)

$1.25

C-zone: Project Economics

(Long-term consensus commodity prices and foreign exchange rates)

C-zone: Key Sensitivities

Based on the feasibility study, during the years of full production, average annual pre-tax cash flow of ~$200 million

$0.25 per pound change in copper price ~$34 million in after-tax NPV and 1.9% change in IRR $100 per ounce change in gold price ~$18 million in after-tax NPV and 1.0% change in IRR $0.05 change in exchange rate ~$24 million in after-tax NPV and 1.5% change in IRR

Appendix 2

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Mesquite – 2016 guidance

42

$590-$630 $1,015-$1,055

  • 2016 production expected to remain

in line with 2015

  • Decrease in costs attributable to

continued operational efficiencies and lower diesel prices

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Gold Production (Koz) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)

130-140

Overview

Appendix 3

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Peak Mines – 2016 guidance

43

$800-$840 $1,020-$1,060

  • Gold production expected to remain

in line with 2015

  • Copper production expected to

decrease as 2016 mine plan intentionally focuses on mining more gold-rich ore bodies

  • $0.25 per pound change in copper

price equals ~$20 per ounce change in Peak Mines all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • $0.05 change in Australian dollar

exchange rate equals ~$35 per

  • unce change in Peak Mines all-in

sustaining costs(2)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Gold Production (Koz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)

80-90 6-8

Overview Key Sensitivities

Appendix 3

Full-year costs expected to be below guidance ranges

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Cerro San Pedro – 2016 guidance

44

$755-$795 $765-$805

  • Decrease in production as mine

transitions to residual leaching

  • Costs to decrease relative to 2015
  • $1.00 per ounce change in silver price

equals ~$20 per ounce change in Cerro San Pedro all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • $1.00 change in Mexican peso

exchange rate equals ~$30 per

  • unce change in Cerro San Pedro

all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Gold Production (Koz) Silver Production (Moz) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)

60-70 1.3-1.5

Overview Key Sensitivities

Appendix 3

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Rainy River site layout

45

Appendix 4

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Rainy River plant site construction photos

46

August 2015 April 2015

Appendix 4

November 2015 October 2015

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)

47

February 2016 December 2015

Appendix 4

July 2016 June 2016

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)

Primary crusher Coarse ore reclaim Pebble crusher Elevated section from coarse ore to transfer tower

September 2016

Appendix 4

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)

SAG mill and ball mill Installation Leach tanks and thickener CIP tank installation Pinewood pumpstation

September 2016

Appendix 4

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)

Main substation Main substation and powerline Temporary truck shop and truck wash Assay lab

September 2016

Appendix 4

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)

Piping installation Gold room Mechanical and piping installation Process plant

October 2016

Appendix 4

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Rainy River update

  • Overall construction progress approximately

60% complete

  • Concrete placement, steelwork erection and

cladding all substantially complete

  • Installation of mechanical, piping, electrical and

instrumentation in processing facilities over 30% complete

  • Construction complete on two of five dams in

water management facility

  • Over 16 million tonnes of overburden and

waste stripping completed to date

  • Currently mining at a rate of

approximately 85,000 tonnes per day

  • Three million hours lost time incident free

Rainy River (as at end of October 2016)

Process plant and leach thickener Aerial view of plant site

Appendix 4

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Remaining capital breakdown

Description Total Remaining Capital ($mm) % complete at end

  • f October 2016

Target % complete at year-end 2016 Process Plant $90 60% 75%

  • Majority of process plant equipment purchased
  • Mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation

installation

  • Remainder of steel and concrete contracts
  • Primarily fixed price and fixed unit contracts

Mining $85 40% 75%

  • Overburden and waste stripping
  • Providing material for earthworks structures and

purchase of additional mobile equipment WMP/TMA $85 40% 55%

  • Construction cost of tailings and water management

structures

  • $50 contingency mainly allocated to WMP/TMA

Other(1) $105 70% 80%

  • Powerline and power infrastructure, site buildings,

EPCM, camp costs, commissioning and owners costs Total $365 60% 70%

Power infrastructure to be completed in November 2016

  • Remaining 2016 capital spend estimate of ~$130 million
  • First half 2017 capital spend estimate of $235 million
  • 1. Includes $25 million of investment tax credits receivable resulting from project development.

Appendix 4

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Key areas of focus

54

2016 2017 Q4 Q1 Q2 Targeted milestones

First production on target for mid-2017

PRE-STRIP & PIT DEVELOPMENT TAILINGS & WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION PROCESS PLANT CONSTRUCTION

  • Majority of process facility well advanced
  • Mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation installation over 30% complete

Water management pond

  • Dams 1 and 2 complete
  • Completing WMP construction

(dams 3,4 and 5)

  • Overburden and waste stripping – over 16 million tonnes mined to date
  • Provide material for TMA construction
  • Plan to have approximately 1.2 million tonnes of ore available by start-up

60%

% complete

40% 40%

Tailings management area

  • Complete starter dam in second

quarter 2017

  • Progress tailings dam and complete

by year-end 2017

Appendix 4

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Water management facility

  • Restarted construction of water

management facility after receiving approval in August 2016

  • Flattening of slopes and the

addition of rock toe buttresses

  • Two of five dams complete to date
  • Targeting approximately three

million cubic metres of water at commissioning

Redesign in alignment with emerging industry best practices

Water management pond

Appendix 4

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Tailings management facility

  • Final tailings redesign approval received in

November 2016

  • Initial geotechnical drilling did not detect

discrete shear zones/slickensides within foundations

  • Early in 2016, cracks developed in water dam

during construction

  • Extensive geotechnical investigation program

carried out site-wide, including inspection of large open excavations during construction (open pit, crusher) which showed pre-shear zones/ slickensides in some areas

  • Final design changes incorporated:
  • Design all dams to assume presence of

slickensides/pre-shear zones

  • Design all dams for factor of safety of 1.5 (in line with new Canadian Dam Association

recommendation); original design factor of safety was 1.3

  • Incorporate wick drains in undrained low areas to reduce pore pressure responses
  • Slope designs increased from 5.5:1 to 11:1
  • Incorporate starter dam so as not to be dependent on Schedule 2 timing
Starter Dam

Appendix 4

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Blackwater – Project economics

  • Assumes construction begins in 2018
  • $0.05 change in exchange rate equals

~$100 million change in after-tax NAV and 1.2% change in IRR

  • $100 per ounce change in gold price

equals ~$240 million change in after-tax NAV and 2.3% change in IRR

Gold Price ($/oz) Silver Price ($/oz) CDN/USD ($) $1,250 $18.00 $1.30 After-tax 5% NPV ($mm) $940 IRR (%) 14.4 Payback (years) 4.8

Appendix 5

17-year base case mine life

slide-58
SLIDE 58

2016 exploration program overview

58

Rainy River

$4 million

Expensed - $2 million New Afton

Sustaining exploration Growth exploration

$12 million

Capitalized - $2 million Peak Mines Capitalized - $2 million Expensed - $6 million New Afton Expensed - $4 million

Appendix 6

slide-59
SLIDE 59

2016 exploration program overview

59 1,180m

C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level

C-zone

Measured Indicated Inferred

2016 Program New Afton

  • Test potential to extend

C-zone block cave resource to west

  • Underground and surface

reconnaissance drilling to test newly identified satellite targets

  • 10,000 metre drill program

Appendix 6

slide-60
SLIDE 60

2016 exploration program overview (cont’d)

60

2016 Program

Rainy River

  • Continue to advance district reconnaissance and target identification

Peak Mines

  • Chronos – underground diamond drilling to expand inferred status and upgrade central gold lens to M&I status
  • Anjea – surface diamond drilling to delineate resource to inferred status
  • Mine Corridor – surface and underground drilling to test newly identified mine corridor targets at Burrabungie,

Dapville, Gladstone, Mt. Pleasant, Young Australian

Appendix 6

Positive results from initial reconnaissance drilling Proteus 2016: 10,000 metres of drilling 2016: 10,000 metres of drilling

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

  • 1. 2014 information per Annual Information Form dated March 27, 2015.

Reserves and resources summary

Appendix 6

Gold Koz Silver Moz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Moz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable reserves 14,985 76 1,193 17,646 82 2,821 New Afton 1,228 4 1,112 760 3 781 Mesquite 1,492

  • 1,679
  • Peak Mines

267 1 82 375 1 89 Cerro San Pedro 13

  • 215

8

  • Rainy River

3,814 9

  • 3,772

9

  • Blackwater

8,170 61

  • 8,170

61

  • El Morro (30%) - Sold interest during 2015
  • 2,675
  • 1,951

Measured and Indicated resources (exclusive of reserves) 6,659 34 1,065 8,094 34 1,728 Inferred resources 1,844 24 194 3,488 21 1,746

MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES SUMMARY TABLE

As at December 31, 2015 As at December 31, 2014

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

Mineral Reserves estimate as at December 31, 2015

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B Zones Proven

  • Probable

36,510 0.55 2.4 0.85 646 2,765 681 C Zone Proven

  • Probable

25,040 0.72 1.8 0.78 583 1,447 430 Total New Afton P&P 61,550 0.62 2.1 0.82 1,228 4,212 1,112 MESQUITE Proven 8,473 0.51

  • 139
  • Probable

75,807 0.56

  • 1,353
  • Total Mesquite P&P

84,280 0.55

  • 1,492
  • PEAK MINES

Proven 1,520 3.31 7.2 1.30 162 349 44 Probable 1,360 2.42 6.7 1.29 105 291 38 Total Peak Mines P&P 2,870 2.89 6.9 1.29 267 640 82 CERRO SAN PEDRO Proven 289 0.35 9.7

  • 3

90

  • Probable

748 0.41 13.7

  • 10

329

  • Total CSP P&P

1,038 0.40 12.6

  • 13

419

  • Metal grade

Contained metal

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

Mineral Reserves estimate as at December 31, 2015

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs RAINY RIVER Direct processing material Open Pit Proven 17,001 1.40 2.0

  • 763

1,075

  • Probable

52,950 1.18 2.8

  • 2,003

4,690

  • Open Pit P&P (direct processing)

69,952 1.23 2.6

  • 2,766

5,765

  • Underground

Proven

  • Probable

4,499 5.00 11.8

  • 723

1,709

  • Underground P&P (direct processing)

4,499 5.00 11.8

  • 723

1,709

  • Stockpile material

Open Pit Proven 5,496 0.37 1.5

  • 65

259

  • Probable

23,302 0.35 2.3

  • 261

1,701

  • Open Pit P&P (stockpile)

28,798 0.35 2.1

  • 325

1,959

  • Total P&P

Proven 22,498 1.14 1.8

  • 828

1,333

  • Probable

80,752 1.15 3.1

  • 2,987

8,100

  • Total Rainy River P&P

103,250 1.15 2.8

  • 3,814

9,433

  • BLACKWATER

Direct processing material Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5

  • 3,790

22,100

  • Probable

169,700 0.68 4.1

  • 3,730

22,300

  • P&P (direct processing)

294,200 0.79 4.7

  • 7,520

44,400

  • Stockpile material

Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6

  • 325

2,300

  • Probable

30,100 0.34 14.6

  • 325

14,100

  • P&P (stockpile)

50,200 0.40 10.2

  • 650

16,400

  • Total Blackwater P&P

344,400 0.74 5.5

  • 8,170

60,800

  • Total P&P

14,985 75,504 1,193

Metal grade Contained metal

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimate (exclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2015

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B zones Measured 16,940 0.69 2.1 0.87 377 1,134 325 Indicated 10,512 0.46 2.2 0.68 156 749 157 A&B Zone M&I 27,451 0.60 2.1 0.80 534 1,878 482 C-zone Measured 2,230 1.05 2.2 1.21 75 161 59 Indicated 15,462 0.79 2.2 0.96 392 1,075 326 C-zone M&I 17,693 0.82 2.2 0.99 467 1,226 386 HW Lens Measured

  • Indicated

10,560 0.51 2.1 0.44 174 703 102 HW Lens M&I 10,560 0.51 2.1 0.44 174 703 102 Total New Afton M&I 55,704 0.66 2.1 0.79 1,175 3,809 971 MESQUITE Measured 4,595 0.40

  • 60
  • Indicated

50,524 0.47

  • 771
  • Total Mesquite M&I

55,119 0.47

  • 831
  • PEAK MINES

Measured 2,000 3.56 5.9 0.94 220 370 41 Indicated 2,100 3.20 8.9 1.14 220 610 53 Total Peak Mines M&I 4,100 3.37 7.5 1.04 440 980 94 CERRO SAN PEDRO Measured

  • Indicated
  • Total CSP M&I
  • Metal grade

Contained metal

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimate (exclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2015

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs RAINY RIVER Direct processing material Open Pit Measured 3,294 1.19 1.8

  • 127

185

  • Indicated

37,530 1.15 3.5

  • 1,391

4,189

  • Open Pit M&I (direct processing)

40,824 1.15 3.3

  • 1,518

4,374

  • Underground

Measured

  • Indicated

4,834 3.74 12.6

  • 581

1,952

  • Underground M&I (direct processing)

4,834 3.74 12.6

  • 581

1,952

  • Stockpile material

Open Pit Measured 1,244 0.35 1.3

  • 14

51

  • Indicated

36,360 0.43 2.5

  • 500

2,942

  • Open Pit M&I (stockpile)

37,604 0.43 2.5

  • 514

2,993

  • Total M&I

Measured 4,538 0.97 1.6

  • 141

236

  • Indicated

78,724 0.98 3.6

  • 2,472

9,083

  • Total Rainy River M&I

83,262 0.98 3.5

  • 2,613

9,319

  • BLACKWATER

Direct processing material Measured 289 1.39 6.6

  • 13

61

  • Indicated

41,128 0.86 4.5

  • 1,135

5,950

  • M&I (direct processing)

41,417 0.86 4.5

  • 1,147

6,012

  • Stockpile material

Measured

  • Indicated

14,070 0.32 4.0

  • 144

1,809

  • M&I (stockpile)

14,070 0.32 4.0

  • 144

1,809

  • Total Blackwater M&I

55,487 0.72 4.4

  • 1,292

7,821

  • CAPOOSE

Indicated 17,671 0.54 22.1

  • 308

12,562

  • Total M&I

6,659 34,491 1,065

Metal grade Contained metal

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

Inferred Resource estimate as at December 31, 2015

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B-zones 6,875 0.35 1.3 0.36 77 296 55 C-zone 6,856 0.48 1.5 0.54 106 328 87 HW Lens 969 0.69 1.5 0.46 21 45 10 Total New Afton Inferred 14,702 0.43 1.4 0.45 205 672 145 MESQUITE 4,858 0.37

  • 59
  • PEAK MINES

2,000 3.14 10.9 1.13 200 690 49 CERRO SAN PEDRO

  • RAINY RIVER

Direct processing Open Pit 10,699 0.84 1.8

  • 289

621

  • Underground

2,591 4.21 7.8

  • 351

646

  • Total Direct Processing

13,290 1.50 3.0

  • 640

1,267

  • Stockpile

Open Pit 9,876 0.36 1.1

  • 113

339

  • Total Rainy River Inferred

23,166 1.01 2.2

  • 753

1,606

  • BLACKWATER

Direct processing 10,378 0.80 3.7

  • 266

1,235

  • Stockpile

2,493 0.33 3.1

  • 27

248

  • Total Blackwater Inferred

12,871 0.71 3.6

  • 293

1,483

  • CAPOOSE

23,591 0.44 26.3

  • 334

19,948

  • Total Inferred

1,844 24,399 194

Metal grade Contained metal

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 6

New Gold Interest (4%)

Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Copper % Gold Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Mineral Reserves Proven 321,814 0.56 0.55 5,820 3,877 233 Probable 277,240 0.35 0.43 3,097 2,626 124 Total P&P 599,054 0.46 0.49 8,917 6,503 357 Mineral Resources Measured 19,790 0.53 0.51 340 223 14 Indicated 72,563 0.38 0.39 880 630 35 Total M&I 92,353 0.41 0.42 1,220 853 49 Inferred 678,066 0.30 0.35 6,453 5,190 258

Metal grade Contained metal

El Morro Property Mineral Reserves & Resources as at December 31, 2015 (Goldcorp 50% - Teck 50% Joint Venture)

The table below sets out the Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates, on a 100% basis, for the El Morro project, as well as New Gold’s 4% stream interest. The El Morro project, together with the Relincho project in Chile, is now held by a 50/50 joint venture between Goldcorp and Teck Resources Limited. The following information is based on information available to the Company as of February 17, 2016.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

  • 1. New Gold’s Mineral Reserves and the El Morro Mineral Reserves and Resources have been estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute
  • f Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, which are incorporated by reference

in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”).

  • 2. Year-end 2015 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been estimated based on the following metal prices and foreign exchange rate

criteria: Lower cut-offs for the company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are outlined in the following table:

Reserves and resources notes

Appendix 6

Gold ($/oz) Silver ($/oz) Copper ($/lb) CAD/USD AUD/USD MXN/USD

Mineral Reserves $1,200 $15.00 $2.75 $1.25 $1.35 $17.00 Mineral Resources $1,300 $17.00 $3.00 $1.25 $1.35 $17.00

Reserves Resources Lower Cut-Off Lower Cut-Off

New Afton Main Zone – B1 Block: C$ 21.00/t Main Zone – B2 Block: C$ 33.00/t B3 Block & C-Zone: C$ 24.00/t Mesquite Oxide & Transitional: 0.21 g/t Au (0.006 oz/t Au) 0.12 g/t Au (0.0035 oz/t Au) Sulphide: 0.41 g/t Au (0.012 oz/t Au) 0.24 g/t Au (0.007 oz/t Au) Peak Mines All ore types: A$ 110/t to A$ 156/t A$ 113/t to A$ 150/t Cerro San Pedro All ore types: US$ 6.00/t NA Rainy River O/P direct processing: 0.30 – 0.60 g/t AuEq 0.30 – 0.45 g/t AuEq O/P stockpile: 0.30 g/t AuEq 0.30 g/t AuEq U/G direct processing: 3.50 g/t AuEg 2.50 g/t AuEq Blackwater O/P direct processing: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq All Resources: 0.40% AuEq

Mineral Property

All Resources: 0.40% CuEq

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

  • 3. Year-End 2015 El Morro Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been estimated using $1,200/oz gold, US$2.75/lb copper, and 550

Chilean Pesos to one United States dollar, and a lower cut-off of 0.20% CuEq.

  • 4. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence, economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are likewise exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Numbers may not add due to rounding.

  • 5. Mineral resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred based on relative levels of confidence in their estimation and on technical

and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a Mineral Resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likewise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to the appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries, and the designators ‘direct processing’ and stockpile’ have been applied to differentiate between material envisioned to be mined and processed directly and material to be mined and stored in a stockpile for future processing. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other risks and relevant issues. Additional details regarding Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s material properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are available at www.sedar.com.

  • 6. Rainy River Project: In addition to the criteria described above, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Rainy River project are

reported according to the following additional criteria: Underground mineral reserves are reported peripheral to and/or below the open pit mineral reserve pit shell which has been designed and optimized based on an $800/oz gold price. Underground Mineral Resources are reported below a larger mineral resource pit shell which has been defined based on a $1300/oz gold price. Approximately 44% of the gold metal content defined as underground mineral reserves derives from material located between the mineral reserve pit shell and the mineral resource pit shell; the remaining 56% of mineral reserves derives from material located below the mineral resource pit shell. Open pit mineral resources exclude material reported as underground mineral reserves.

  • 7. All Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for New Gold’s properties and projects are effective December 31, 2015.
  • 8. Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold's Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates has been done by Qualified Persons as

defined under NI 43-101, under the oversight and review of Mr. Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.

Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)

Appendix 6

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

2016 guidance assumptions Spot:

2016 Silver price ($/oz) 14.00 Copper price ($/lb) 2.00 AUD/USD 1.40 CDN/USD 1.40 MXN/USD 18.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,200 Silver price ($/oz) 16.50 Copper price ($/lb) 2.55 AUD/USD 1.35 CDN/USD 1.35 MXN/USD 20.70

Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions

Appendix 6

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Endnotes

71

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and mineral resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Petersen is an AIPG Certified Professional Geologist and a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101. For additional technical information on New Gold’s material properties, including a detailed breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category, as well as key assumptions, parameters and risks, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2015.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Endnotes (cont’d)

72

NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and assists analysts, investors and

  • ther stakeholders of the company in assessing the company’s operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This data is furnished

to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under IFRS. Further details regarding historical all-in sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided below and in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (2) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other

  • companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. The company believes that certain investors use this information to evaluate the company’s performance and ability to

generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund future capital expenditures and working capital needs. This measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this presentation is net of by-product sales. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding historical total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided below and in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (3) AVERAGE REALIZED PRICE “Average realized price per ounce or pound sold” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold, silver, and copper sales. Average realized price is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Endnotes (cont’d)

73

(4) ADJUSTED NET (LOSS)/EARNINGS “Adjusted net (loss)/earnings” and “adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net (loss)/earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net (loss)/earnings from continuing operations. The company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and

  • ther mining companies. Adjusted net (loss)/earnings and adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning

under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flows from operations as determined under IFRS. (5) OPERATING MARGIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s aggregated and mine-by-mine contribution to net earnings before non-cash depreciation and depletion charges. (6) CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE CHANGES IN NON-CASH OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL “Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital” and “cash generated from operations before changes in working capital per share” are non-GAAP financial measures with no standard meaning under IFRS, which exclude changes in non-cash operating working capital. Management uses this measure to evaluate the Company’s ability to generate cash from its

  • perations before temporary working capital changes.
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Contact information

74

Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Executive Vice President, Business Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com