1
Corporate Presentation
May 2016
TSX : HWO
Corporate Presentation May 2016 TSX : HWO 2 DISCLAIMER Certain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
1 Corporate Presentation May 2016 TSX : HWO 2 DISCLAIMER Certain information contained within this These statements are derived from certain this presentation and statements made in presentation and statements made in assumptions and
1
May 2016
TSX : HWO
2
These statements are derived from certain assumptions and analyses made by the Corporation based on its experience and perception
historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and
the circumstances. These statements
predictions are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Corporation’s expectations. These risks and uncertainties include the items discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Corporations' most recently filed Annual Information Form as well as the Corporation’s
public disclosure documents located on SEDAR (www.sedar.com). Consequently, all of the forward-looking information contained within this presentation and statements made in conjunction with this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that actual results
will be realized or that they will have the expected consequences or effects on the Corporation or its business or operations. Other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Corporation assumes no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result
Certain information contained within this presentation and statements made in conjunction with this presentation, including information and statements that contain words such as “seek”, “anticipate,” “plan”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “project”, “predict”, “potential”, “targeting”, “intend”, “could”, “might”, “should”, “believe”, “forecast”, “can” and similar expressions, are forward- looking statements. In particular, forward- looking statements in this presentation include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future capital expenditures, future financial resources, anticipated equipment utilization levels, future oil and gas well activity, projections of market prices and costs,
2
3
High Arctic Energy Services is a market leader with diversified operations in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and Canada.
PNG
completion and rental services in PNG.
energy companies under long-term contracts.
short-term oil & gas price volatility.
Canada
alone snubbing units.
acquisition
2015 Revenue
PNG $177.8 mm Canada $32.1 mm
4
Shares outstanding (May 10, 2016):
52.6 million
Share Price (May 10, 2016):
$3.83
Market Cap (May 10, 2016):
$204.5 million
Net Cash & Marketable Securities (Mar 31, 2016):
$32.4 million
30 Day Average Daily Trading Volume
94,842 shares
Trailing 12 Month Adjusted EBITDA (Mar 31, 2016):
$75.4 Million
Annual Dividend
$0.198
Dividend Yield
5.17%
Cyrus Capital 42% Insiders 9% Public 49%
5
T R A C K R E C O R D O F
4
50 100 150 200 250 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TTM Canadian Revenue PNG Revenue 32 33 40 42 49 64 75.4 27% 26% 27% 27% 29% 30% 34% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TTM Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA (%)
REVENUE
(as at March 31, 2016)
ADJUSTED EBITDA
(as at March 31, 2016)
6
Overview – Stable and Growing
Oil and Gas Activities – Long History, with New Growth
Macro Drivers for Growth
6
7
Overview – Stable and Growing
anticipated demand by 2020
Asia resulting from changes in:
supply Asian buyers
9 tcf, Papua LNG: 8.6 tcf, encourages long-term drilling
THE PNG ADVANTAGE
East Africa $8.76 West Africa $8.76 US Gulf Coast $10.76 West Australia $8.73 East Australia $14.49 PNG $7.59
Cost of LNG to Japan
10% return (US$/mmbtu)
Source: Wood Mackenzie
Proximity to growing Asian market’s provides incentive to develop LNG projects despite industry downturn
8
P’nyang Juha Kutubu Kumul Gobe Kopi Triceratops InterOil New Discovery PNG LNG Operating Papua LNG Proposed Port Moresby Elk / Antelope Hides and Angore Valve and pigging station Oil/gas fields Oil export platform LNG Facility Oil / gas refinery Proposed pipeline Pipeline
PNG LNG:
associated liquids over 30 years
(e.g. P’nyang)
Elk / Antelope (Papua LNG):
to size LNG facility
LNG facility.
OSL:
10 year growth platform.
discovered in PNG.
InterOil:
8
NATURAL GAS + OIL PRODUCTION Customer Base
9
P A P U A N E W G U I N E A
Rig Type Owner / Operator Details Classification
Heli Portable OSL / High Arctic 2 Rigs (103 /104) Tier 1 High Arctic 2 Rigs (115 /116) Tier 1 Contractor A 1 Rig circa mid 1970's Tier 2 Contractor B 1 Rig modified for limited heli use Tier 2 Heli Portable Work Over Rig High Arctic 1 Rig 102 Tier 1 Land Rigs Contractor C 1 Land based rig Operator 1 Land based rig
High Arctic is the dominant Tier 1 drilling provider in PNG
10
Rig 103 / 104 (leased from OSL)
mid 2016 (three year term)
contract renewals
Rig 115 / 116 (High Arctic owned)
with spud of first well
Rig 102 (High Artic owned)
11
Matting
Camp Services
Other Rental Equipment
MATTING CONTRACTS
11
41% 6% 53%
Term Contract Prospective Idle
11
12
Snubbing
Nitrogen
Rentals
OUR CUSTOMERS
Dominant Western Canadian Stand Alone Snubbing Position Provides Platform to Expand
13
Western Canada
come friction in extended reach horizontal wells
resulted in additional demand for higher capacity units
long-reach horizontal wells
# OF SNUBBING UNITS AVAILABLE AVE VERAGE WELL ELL DEP DEPTH (WESTERN CANADA)
13
High Arctic Owns and Operates Canada’s Largest Fleet of Stand Alone Snubbing Units
19 11 8 6 2 2 High Arctic Precision Quattro Powerstroke Northern Snub Co.
60% 58% 63% 70%
1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 Well Depth Well Type (%) Horizontal Vertical Other
Sources: Geoactivity Sources: Company Reports, High Arctic
14
$ millions (except per share amounts)
2016 2016 2015
Revenue 54.7 54.7 44.7
22% 22%
Adjusted EBITDA 21.8 21.8 10.4
110% 110%
Adjusted EBITDA % of revenue 40% 40% 23%
74% 74%
Funds From Ops. 18.9 18.9 8.2
130% 130%
Net Earning per share (basic and diluted) 0.21 0.21 0.09
133% 133%
Fund From Ops. per share (basic and diluted) 0.35 0.35 0.15
133% 133%
Dividends per share 0.05 0.05 0.05
$44.7 $54.7 $0.0 $20.0 $40.0 2015 2016 $10.4 $21.8 $0.0 $10.0 $20.0 2015 2016 $8.2 $18.9 $0.0 $10.0 2015 2016
REVENUE ADJUSTED EBITDA FUNDS FROM OPS.
14
15 $0.07 $0.15 $0.17 $0.20 $0.07 $0.01 $0.00 $0.10 $0.11
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 YTD* Dividends per share Repurchases per share
T R A C K R E C O R D O F
Established history of dividend growth while maintaining conservative payout ratios Additional distributions to shareholders through share repurchases Disciplined distributions, without sacrificing capital resources to execute on growth opportunities
4
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS THREE YEAR DIVIDEND GROWTH 1
1 Changes in dividend from March 31 2012 to March 31, 2016 2 Canadian energy services yield cos: AKT.A, CET, CFW, ESI, ESN, FRC, TDG, TCW and WRGCanadian Energy Services Yield Cos2
32%
(100%) (80%) (60%) (40%) (20%) 0% 20% 40%
2016 YTD figure shown as at April 30, 2016
HWO
16
Balance Sheet
Credit Facility
Significant Cash Balance
LIQUIDITY
Credit Facility $45.0 million Cash $20.5 million Short-term Investments $11.9 million
(as at March 31, 2016)
W E L L P O S I T I O N E D W I T H S O L I D
Total $77.4 Million
17
INDEXED SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE ENTERPRISE VALUE / EBITDA HISTORICAL RETURN ON EQUITY High Arctic’s share price has historically outperformed industry peers High Arctic consistently delivers strong returns to shareholders High Arctic is trading at the lower end of the industry valuation spectrum
17
Sources: Lightyear Capital, Altacorp Comps include AKT.A, ESN, TDG, PD, WRG, SVY, XDC
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% High Arctic Competitors
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Competitors High / Low High Arctic 0.0 x 1.0 x 2.0 x 3.0 x 4.0 x 5.0 x 6.0 x 7.0 x 8.0 x 9.0 x 10.0 x Competitors High / Low High Arctic
18
acquisition targets.
International experience
18
19
rentals
short-term oil and gas volatility
20