TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
- greatpanther. com
July 2020
CORPORATE PRESENTATION greatpanther. com July 2020 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL CORPORATE PRESENTATION greatpanther. com July 2020 Cautionary Statements Forward Looking Statements Note on Preliminary Economic Assessment & Inferred Resources This presentation contains forward-looking
July 2020
2
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) (together, "forward-looking statements"). Such forward- looking statements may include but are not limited to the Company's plans for production at Tucano in Brazil, Guanajuato Mine Complex (“GMC”) and Topia in Mexico, Coricancha in Peru and exploring its other, the overall economic potential of its properties, timing and cost to the Company of reactivating the Coricancha, anticipated processing and production rates that may be achieved at the Coricancha upon reactivation, the ultimate cost of reclaiming legacy tailings facilities, results of exploration and potential changes to the Coricancha resource base, the availability of adequate financing, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
implied by such forward-looking statements to be materially different. Such factors include, among others, risks and uncertainties relating to potential political risks involving the Company's operations in a foreign jurisdiction, technical and operational difficulties that may be encountered with reactivation of the Coricancha, uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses, uncertainty in mineral resource estimation, physical risks inherent in mining and reclamation operations, currency fluctuations, fluctuations in the price of silver, gold and base metals, completion of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, permitting risks, the inability or failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis, and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018 and Material Change Reports filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators available at www.sedar.com and reports on Form 40-F and Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov. Statements concerning mineral reserve and resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential” or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. The technical information contained in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Robert F. Brown, P. Eng., for Topia, GMC, and Coricancha, and by Fernando A. Cornejo, P. Eng., Vice President Operations, Brazil, and Nick Winer, Vice President Exploration, for Tucano. All are Qualified Persons (QPs) for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101. Note on Preliminary Economic Assessment & Inferred Resources The mine plan evaluated in the PEA is preliminary in nature and additional technical studies will need to be completed in order to fully assess its viability. There is no certainty that a production decision will be made to reactivate Coricancha. In addition, we may determine to proceed with a production decision without completion of customary feasibility studies demonstrating the economic viability of reactivation of Coricancha. A mine production decision that is made without a feasibility study carries additional potential risks which include, but are not limited to, (i) increased uncertainty as to projected initial and sustaining capital costs and operating costs, rates of production and average grades, and (ii) the inclusion of Inferred Mineral Resources, as defined by NI 43-101 and CIM Definition Standards (see Cautionary Note to United States Investors below) that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be converted to a Mineral Reserve, as defined by NI 43-101 and CIM Definition Standards (see Cautionary Note to United States Investors below). Mine design and mining schedules, metallurgical flow sheets and process plant designs may require additional detailed work and economic analysis and internal studies to ensure satisfactory operational conditions and decisions regarding future targeted
capital and operating costs, with the result that the projected NPV, IRR and cash flows may be adversely impacted. Readers are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of Mineral Resources used in this PEA will ever be converted into reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources, in particular, have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and/or economic and legal feasibility and readers are cautioned not to assume that they will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian standards, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may form part of preliminary economic assessment, but may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves, do not, by definition, have demonstrated economic viability. Note to United States Investors Great Panther prepares its disclosure in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Terms relating to mineral resources and mineral reserves in this presentation in respect of Great Panther are defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101-Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) permits mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. This presentation uses certain terms, such as, ‘‘measured mineral resources’’, ‘‘indicated mineral resources’’ and ‘‘inferred mineral resources’’, that the SEC does not recognize (these terms may be used in this presentation and are included in the public filings of Great Panther which have been filed with securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada
3
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
professionals with regular reports to health authorities
the communities of Pedra Branca and Serra de Navio
4
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
A solid start to 2020
Tucano gold mine
Mexican silver operations
5
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
A growing gold and silver producer focused
Diversified portfolio of assets in Brazil, Mexico and Peru Actively exploring large land packages in highly prospective districts Pursuing acquisition
complement existing portfolio Strong management and board of directors Focus on continuous improvement in operations Attractive re-rating potential
6
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Primary Silver Producer
Silver-Gold Producer
Gold Producer
Primary Gold-Silver Development Project
2020 Guidance 146,000 - 158,000 Au eq oz
Producing mine Development project Exploration project
ARGOSY PLOMO EL HORCÓN SANTA ROSA
7
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
NAME BACKGROUND
Rob Henderson, P.Eng., MBA President and CEO Director since April 2020. Seasoned mining executive with 35 years of experience in operations, capital projects, and mining finance Neil Hepworth, M.Sc. (Eng) COO More than 30 years of experience in underground and open pit mining; extensive experience in Latin America Jim Zadra, CPA, CA, MBA CFO Over 15 years of experience in senior corporate finance roles: financial reporting, taxation, strategic planning, capital markets, and M&A Fernando Cornejo, P.Eng VP Operations, Brazil Over 20 years of mining experience working in Mexico, Peru and Brazil with Jacobs Engineering, SGS Minerals, Rio Tinto Iron Ore and BHP Billiton Brian Peer, B.Sc. (Geology) VP Operations, Mexico More than 30 years of mining experience; prior roles with Alamos, Coeur and Barrick Nick Winer, B.Sc. (Geology) VP Exploration Over 33 years of experience in mineral exploration with a focus on South America, including more than 20 years in Brazil; prior roles with AngloGold and BHP Mariana Fregonese VP Social Responsibility Over 13 years of mining experience focused on building strategic partnerships and fostering relationships with various stakeholders Lucie Gagnon, BA VP People and Culture Over 15 years of human resources experience focused in the finance and mining industry; previously with Kinross Meghan Brown, MBA VP Investor Relations MBA with 25 years of investor relations experience in metals and mining; extensive experience in Latin America; prior roles with Leagold, Endeavour Silver, and Placer Dome
8
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
NAME BACKGROUND
David Garofalo, CPA, CA, ICD.D Independent Chair Director and Chair since April 2020. Former President and CEO of Goldcorp; over 30 years of experience in mining finance, governance, and strategic leadership; extensive experience in LatAm Rob Henderson, P.Eng., MBA President and CEO Director since April 2020. Seasoned mining executive with 35 years of experience in operations, capital projects, and mining finance Joseph Gallucci, MBA Independent Director Director since April 2020. Over 15 years of experience in investment banking and equity research; currently Managing Director and Head of Mining Investment Banking at Laurentian Bank Securities Bob Garnett, CPA, CA, ICD.D Independent Director Director since 2011. Over 50 years of board experience; Chair of $10B financial institution and Vice- Chair of $12B transportation authority. Extensive TSX, NASDAQ and NYSE board experience Alan Hair, P.Eng, ICD.D Independent Director Director since April 2020. Senior executive with over 36 years of experience in the mining and metals industry, including former President and CEO of Hudbay John Jennings, MBA, CFA Independent Director Director since 2012. Over 30 years of board governance experience; 40-year career in precious metals sell-side mining research, investment banking, and Director and C-Suite executive search W.J. (Jim) Mullin, P.Eng. Independent Director Director since 2013. Formerly Senior Vice President of North American Operations for Newmont. Over 30 years experience with the operation of open pits, underground mines and processing plants Elise Rees, FCPA, FCA, ICD.D Independent Director Director since 2017. 35-year career with Ernst & Young; retired Managing Partner of Transaction Advisory for BC; specialist in tax and M&A. Over 30 years of board governance experience Kevin Ross, P.Eng., MBA Independent Director Director since 2019. Over 40 years experience in open pit and U/G operations and brownfield processing plant expansions. COO of Orca Gold, with 20 years of C-Suite operations experience
9
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
2018 2019 2020 Brazil Mexico
Note: 2018 Au eq oz calculated using an 80:1 Ag:Au ratio, and ratios of 1:0.06364 and 1:0.0818 for the price/ounce of silver to price/pound of lead and zinc, respectively.
▪Au ▪Ag ▪Base Metals
Revenue by Metal 2018 2019
K Au eq oz
10
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Jun 2019 Sep 2019 Dec 2019 Mar 2020 (proforma*)
37 39 15
* $15M estimated net proceeds from May 2020 bought deal financing
10 27
11
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
BRAZIL 55,000 metres – $7M (2020)
PERU Potential Restart: ~40K Au eq oz/yr
Producing mine Development project Exploration project
ARGOSY PLOMO EL HORCÓN SANTA ROSA
MEXICO 25,000 metres – $4M (2020)
TUCANO
CORICANCHA
GMC TOPIA
13
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
MINE TYPE Open Pit
~3.15
~22.3 2019 production (Au oz) 123,867 PROCESSING TYPE Conventional CIL
~3.5 Recovery – CIL ~92% Current LOM sulphide ore (%) ~80% Tailings type Low Height Downstream TSF
TUCANO | 100% OWNED | AMAPÁ, BRAZIL
Tucano
TucanoTucano Significant Gold Deposits Lower Proterozoic Terrain
14
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Large, highly prospective land package:
Tucano Significant gold deposits Lower Proterozoic terrain
15
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Objective: Convert 150,000 oz of resources to reserves
and above $1,500/oz pit shell
TAP AB1 TAP AB3 Urucum UG Urucum E Torres TAP C Neo
AB1 — Sec N 93,980 Section showing inferred resources and planned holes (purple)
16
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
17
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
19
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
MINE TYPE Underground Mining method Cut and fill 2019 Ag eq oz production 1,517,853 PROCESSING TYPE Conventional Flotation Products Silver and gold concentrate 2019 ore tonnes processed 187,610 2019 recoveries (Ag/Au %) ~84.7%/85.2% Tailings type Conventional and dry-stack
GMC | 100% OWNED | GUANAJUATO, MEXICO
Historically one of Mexico’s most prolific mining districts
Silver equivalent ounces for 2019 were calculated using an 80:1 Ag:Au ratio.
assets
Exploration drilling metres: 8,500m Exploration drilling metres: 14,400m
20
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
MINE TYPE Underground Mining method Cut and fill 2019 Ag eq oz production 1,785,483 PROCESSING TYPE Conventional Flotation Products Zinc and lead concentrates 2019 ore tonnes processed 79,257 2019 recoveries (Ag/Au %) 93.9%/55.9% Tailings type Dry stack TSF
TOPIA | 100% OWNED | DURANGO, MEXICO
Silver equivalent ounces for 2019 calculated using 80:1 Ag:Au ratio, and ratios of 1:0.0636 and 1:0.0818 for the price/ounce of silver to price/pound of lead and zinc, respectively.
21
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
production potential, per 2018 PEA
results support key assumptions of 2018 PEA
CORICANCHA | 100% OWNED | LIMA, PERU
Permitted & operational existing processing plant and gold bio-leaching facility MINE TYPE Underground Mining method Cut and fill
3.1 M Ag eq oz PROCESSING TYPE Base Metal Sulfide Flotation Products Lead, zinc and copper concentrates Ore tonnes processed (LOM) 1 608 kt LOM avg. recoveries (%) 1 Au / Ag 80% Ag 92% Pb 77% Zn 83% Cu 78% Tailings type Dry stack TSF
1 Source: Coricancha PEA, Golder Associates – July 13, 2018 Effective Date
Development project
22
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
TSX C$296 million NYSE-A US$218
TSX 0.5 million NYSE-A 3.2 million
TSX C$0.32-C$1.28 NYSE-A US$0.23-US$0.98
24
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Property Tonnage (000t) Grade (Au g/t) Contained Metal (000 oz Au) TUCANO PROVEN Open Pit 1,212 1.79 70 Underground 189 3.78 23 Surface Stockpiles 2,446 0.71 56 TUCANO PROBABLE Open Pit 3,297 2.20 233 Underground 1,976 4.17 265 Surface Stockpiles
Open Pit 4,509 2.09 302 Underground 2,164 4.13 288 Surface Stockpiles 2,446 0.71 56 Total P&P 9,119 2.20 646
25
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Property Tonnage (000t) Grade (Au g/t) Contained Metal (000 oz Au) Grade (Ag g/t) Contained Metal (000 oz Ag) Grade (Pb %) Contained Metal (000 lbs Pb) Grade (Zn %) Contained Metal (000 lbs Zn) Grade (Cu %) Contained Metal (000 lbs Cu) Grade (Aueq g/t) Contained Metal (000 oz Aueq) MEASURED Tucano 5,562 0.97 174
174 Topia 311 1.36 14 474 4,733 4.02 27,527 4.20 28,760
124 San Ignacio 315 3.06 31 156 1,575
51 Guanajuato 256 1.72 14 206 1,694
35 Coricancha 404 5.90 77 210 2,729 2.16 19,248 3.43 30,565 0.54 4,812 13.56 176 El Horcon
6,848 309 10,731 46,775 59,325 4,812 2.54 560 INDICATED Tucano 7,920 3.09 786
786 Topia 165 1.34 7 436 2,317 3.57 13,010 3.79 13,812
61 San Ignacio 72 2.87 7 173 398
12 Guanajuato 87 1.62 5 199 561
12 Coricancha 349 5.60 63 189 2,118 1.95 14,984 3.05 23,437 0.52 3,996 12.49 140 El Horcon
8,593 867 5,394 27,994 37,249
3.66 1,010 MEASURED & INDICATED Tucano 13,482 2.22 960
960 Topia 476 1.35 21 461 7,054 3.87 40,603 4.06 42,597
185 San Ignacio 386 3.03 38 159 1,973
62 Guanajuato 344 1.69 19 204 2,254
47 Coricancha 753 5.80 140 200 4,840 2.07 34,353 3.26 54,101 0.53 8,796 13.06 316 El Horcon
15,441 1,177 16,121 74,956 96,698 8,796 3.17 1,570 INFERRED Tucano 11,664 2.16 812
812 Topia 400 1.34 17 434 5,587 2.86 25,246 2.97 26,217
134 San Ignacio 502 2.69 43 149 2,405
73 Guanajuato 209 2.32 16 168 1,129
30 Coricancha 943 5.00 152 209 6,338 1.45 30,150 3.25 67,578 0.64 13,308 12.21 371 El Horcon 162 3.44 18 76 396 2.69 9,616 3.79 13,548
26 Total Inferred 13,880 1,058 15,856 65,012 107,342 13,308 3.26 1,446
26
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
www.greatpanther.com/operations/resources/reports/
September 30, 2019. Reno Pressacco, P. Geo., Goran Andric, P. Eng., and Jason Cox, P. Eng., all of RPA, and all of whom are independent Qualified Persons as defined by National Instrument 43-101 were the Qualified Persons for the mineral update for Tucano.
March 17th, 2020 with an effective date of July 31, 2019. Robert F. Brown, P.Eng., and Mohammad Nourpour, P.Geo were the Qualified Persons for the mineral resource update under NI 43-101.
March 27th, 2020 with an effective date of October 31, 2019. Robert F. Brown, P.Eng., and Mohammad Nourpour, P.Geo were the Qualified Persons for the mineral resource update under NI 43-101.
effective date of December 20th, 2017. Ronald Turner, MAusIMM CP(Geo); Daniel Saint Don, P. Eng.; and Jeffrey Woods, P.E. were the Qualified Persons.
Guanajuato Mine, San Ignacio Mine, and the El Horcon and Santa Rosa Projects. GPR internal report dated February 20th, 2017 with an effective date of August 31,
Guanajuato, San Ignacio, Coricancha, and El Horcon mineral resource estimates.
under "Reserves and Resources".
27
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Tucano
Notes for Tucano Mineral Reserves 1. CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Reserves. 2. Open pit Mineral Reserves are estimated within designed pits above marginal cut-off grades that vary from 0.51 g/t Au to 0.62 g/t Au for oxide ore and 0.65 g/t Au to 0.72 g/t Au for sulphide ore. The cut-off grades are derived based on a gold price of US$1,250/oz Au and operating costs sourced from the current
3. Mineral Reserves incorporate estimates of dilution and mineral losses. 4. Underground Mineral Reserves were estimated using an incremental cut-off grade of 2.4 g/t Au. 5. A minimum mining width of 20 m was used for open pit Mineral Reserves and 3 m was used for underground Mineral Reserves. 6. The Mineral Reserve estimate includes stockpile inventory. 7. Average metallurgical process recovery: 93%. 8. Bulk density is 2.19 t/m3. 9. Numbers may not add due to rounding Notes for Tucano Mineral Resources 1. CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources. 2. Mineral Resources are estimated at various cut-off grades depending on mining method and mineralization style. 3. Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,500/oz Au, and a US$/Brazilian real (R$) exchange rate of 3.8. 4. A minimum mining width of 3 m was used for preparation of mineralization wireframes for the Urucum open pit and Taperebá AB (Tap AB) open pit and underground Mineral Resources. 5. Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. 6. Mineral Resource statements are prepared using constraining surfaces and volumes for open pit and underground Mineral Resources, respectively. 7. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 8. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Guanajuato Mine Complex
Notes for San Ignacio Mineral Resource Estimate: 1. Ven Bulk Density of 2.64t/m³. 2. Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources are reported at a full cost cut-off Net Smelter Return (NSR) of US$100/tonne. 3. Totals may not agree due to rounding. 4. Grades in metric units and contained silver and gold in troy ounces. 5. Minimum true width 0.5m. 6. Mineral Resources are estimated using metal prices of US$15.80/oz Ag and US$1,290/oz Au (based on 3 year back averages); and metallurgical recoveries of 88% Ag, 87% Au. 7. 2019 Mineral Resources Ag Eq oz were calculated using 80:1 Ag:Au ratio. The ratios are reflective of average metal prices for 2019. Notes for Guanajuato Mineral Resource Estimate: 1. Cut-offs are based on the marginal operating costs per mining area being US$113/tonne for Cata, US$75/tonne for Santa Margarita / San Cayetano, US$77/tonne for Los Pozos, US$124/tonne for Guanajuatito, US$60/tonne for Promontorio, and US$197/tonne for Valenciana. 2. Block model grades converted to US$/t value using process plant recoveries of 88% Ag, 87% Au, and net smelter terms negotiated for pyrite concentrates. 3. Rock Density for all veins is 2.68t/m³. 4. Totals may not agree due to rounding. 5. Grades in metric units. 6. Contained silver and gold in troy ounces. 7. Minimum true width 1.0m. 8. Ag:Au ratio of 80:1 was used for Ag eq (oz) Notes for El Horcón Mineral Resource Estimate: 1. US$110 per tonne Cut-off, considering plant recoveries of %Ag, %Au, %Pb, and net smelter terms typical for Pb concentrates. 2. Rock Density for all veins for Diamantillo is 2.77t/m³, San Guillermo 2.78t/m³, Diamantillo HW is 2.62t/m³, Natividad 2.57t/m³. 3. Totals may not agree due to rounding. 4. Grades in metric units. 5. Contained silver and gold in troy ounces. 6. Minimum true width 1.5m 7. Metal Prices US$18.00/oz silver, US$1,300/oz gold, and US$0.80/lb lead. 8. Silver equivalent calculations for El Horcón include gold and lead content but not zinc, as the zinc would not be recovered in the Guanajuato plant. 9. Report effective date of August 31, 2016.
28
TSX GPR | NYSE American GPL
Topia
Notes for Topia Mineral Resource Estimate: 1. 2018 Mineral Resource Ag eq oz were calculated using 80:1 Ag:Au ratio, and ratios of 1:0.0636 and 1:0.0818 for the price/ounce of silver to price/pound of lead and zinc, respectively. The ratios are reflective of average metal prices for 2018. 2. CIM Definitions were followed for Mineral Resources. 3. Area-Specific vein bulk densities as follows: Argentina - 3.06t/m3; 1522 - 3.26t/m3; Durangueno - 3.12t/m3; El Rosario - 3.00t/m3; Hormiguera - 2.56t/m3; La Prieta - 2.85t/m3; Recompensa - 3.30t/m3; Animas - 3.02t/m3; San Miguel - 2.56t/m3. 4. Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off Net Smelter Return (NSR) as follows: 1522 Mine US$193/t, Argentina Mine US$172/t, Durangueno Mine US$144/t, Recompensa Mine US$151/t, Hormiguera Mine US$152/t, El Rosario Mine US$173/t, La Prieta US$235/t, Animas US$149/t, and San Miguel US$248/t. 5. Totals may not agree due to rounding. 6. A minimum mining width of 0.30 metres was used. 7. Mineral Resources are estimated using metal prices of US$1,225/oz Au, US$15.50/oz Ag, US$1.00/lb Pb, and US$1.15/lb Zn; and metallurgical recoveries of 94% for Ag, 60% for Au, 94% for Pb, and 93% for Zn.
Coricancha
Notes for Coricancha Mineral Resource Estimate: 1. Cut-offs are based on an estimated $140 Net Smelter Return (NSR)/tonne. 2. Metal prices used to calculate NSR: $1,300 per ounce (oz) Au, $17/oz Ag, $1.15 per pound (lb) Pb, $1.50/lb Zn, $3.00/lb Cu 3. Block model grades converted to United States Dollar (US$) value using plant recoveries of 92.1% Ag, 80.2% Au, 77.3% Pb, 82.6% Zn, 52.7% Cu. 4. Rock Density for Constancia: 3.3 tonnes per cubic meter (t/m³), Wellington, Constancia East, Escondida, San Jose: 3.2 t/m Colquipallana: 2.9 t/m³. 5. Totals may not agree due to rounding. 6. Grades in metric units. 7. All currencies US dollars. 8. Ag equivalent ounces (eq oz) million (M) is calculated from gpt data 9. AgEq g/t = Ag g/t + (Pb grade x ((Pb price per lb/Ag price per oz) x 0.0685714 lbs per Troy Ounce x 10000 g per %)) +(Zn grade x ((Zn price per lb/Ag price per oz) x 0.0685714 lbs per Troy Ounce x 10000 g per %)) + (Cu grade x ((Cu price per lb/Ag price per oz) x 0.0685714 lbs per Troy Ounce x 10000 g per %)) + (Au grade x (Au price per oz/Ag price per oz)).
VP, INVESTOR RELATIONS
T 778 899 0518 | M 236 558 4485 mbrown@greatpanther.com