Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation January 2017 ( updated - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corporate presentation corporate presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation January 2017 ( updated - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation January 2017 ( updated January 18, 2017 ) David J. Wilson, President & Chief Executive Officer Sadiq H. Lalani, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer www.KeltExploration.com Why Invest in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.KeltExploration.com

Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation

David J. Wilson, President & Chief Executive Officer Sadiq H. Lalani, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

January 2017 ( updated January 18, 2017 )

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

CREATING VALUE DURING DOWNTURNS

 The Kelt management team has a track record of creating shareholder value during downturns, previously in the 2008- 2009 period with Celtic Exploration Ltd., sold in February 2013 for $3.2 billion.  Kelt focuses on long-term growth with emphasis on low-cost land accumulation on resource-style plays and rapid growth

  • f its drilling inventory portfolio.

 Kelt targets a 2.0 times or better recycle ratio over the long- term on a proved plus probable reserve basis.

Why Invest in Kelt? Why Invest in Kelt?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

  • Stock Exchange listing

TSX

  • Trading symbol

KEL

  • Market capitalization

$ 1.2 billion

  • 52-week trading range

$ 2.51 – $ 7.49

  • Common shares issued ( @ Jan/17/2017 )

175.7 million

→ D&O’s have participated in all nine equity offerings completed to date (for aggregate gross proceeds of $615 MM) investing a total of $101 MM

Common Share Information Common Share Information

  • Stock options ( 8.4 MM ) & RSUs ( 0.7 MM )

9.1 million ( 5.2% ) → average exercise price of stock options is $ 6.57 / share

  • Diluted common shares (before convertible debentures)

184.8 million

  • Diluted common shares (debs convert to 16.4 MM shares) 201.2 million
  • Directors & Officers (D&O’s) ownership

18% ( 19% diluted )

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

  • TSX trading symbol

KEL.DB

  • Principal amount outstanding

$ 90.0 million

  • Coupon / Maturity date

5.0% / May 31, 2021

  • 52-week trading range

$ 105.50 – $ 150.02

→ D&O’s purchased $15.0 million (17%) of the total Debenture offering.

Convertible Debentures Convertible Debentures

Conversion privilege: Each debenture will be convertible into common shares of Kelt at the option of the holder at any time prior to close of business on the earliest of: (a) the business day immediately preceding the maturity date; (b) if called for redemption (on or after May 31, 2019), on the business day immediately preceding the date specified by the Company for redemption of the debentures; or (c) if called for repurchase (pursuant to a “Change of Control”), on the business day immediately preceding the payment date; at a conversion price of $5.50 per common share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

Capital Expenditures Capital Expenditures

( $ millions ) 2015 2016 Forecast 2017 Forecast 2017/16 Change Drilling & Completions 100.9 46.5 104.6 + 125% Facilities, Equipment & Pipeline Infrastructure 56.0 28.8 32.0 + 11% Land, Seismic & Asset Acquisitions 26.1 21.7 8.0

  • 63%

E&P Capital Expenditures 183.0 97.0 144.6 + 49% Corporate Acquisitions 313.4 [1]

  • Property Dispositions
  • ( 102.6 ) [2]
  • Net Capital Expenditures

496.4 97.0 42.0

  • 57%

Notes: [1] Acquisition of Artek Exploration Ltd. (public company), including value of debt assumed. [2] Disposition relates to the sale of Karr assets on Jan/18/2017, after estimated closing adjustments.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

Drilling Program Drilling Program

Notes: [1] Alberta drilling prospects include : Grande Prairie :

  • Montney
  • Doig
  • Halfway
  • Charlie Lake

Grande Cache :

  • Cretaceous

[2] B.C. drilling prospects include : Inga/Fireweed/Stoddart :

  • Montney
  • Doig
  • Baldonnel

[3] Six gross ( 6.0 net ) wells drilled in 2016 ( DUCs ) that will be completed in 2017 : [ i ] Pouce Coupe 02/6-18 Montney ( D2 ) [ ii ] Pouce Coupe 04/7-18 Montney ( D2 ) [ iii ] Pouce Coupe 03/7-18 Montney ( D1 ) [ iv ] Pouce Coupe 05/7-18 Montney ( D1 ) [ v ] Pouce Coupe 00/1-9 Montney ( D2 ) [ vi ] Fireweed C-31-I Upper Montney

2017 Completions

Gross Wells Net Wells

Average

WI % Alberta

14 11.8 84%

British Columbia

12 12.0 100%

Total [3]

26 23.8 92%

2017 Drills

Gross Wells Net Wells

Average

WI % Alberta [1]

9 6.8 76%

British Columbia [2]

11 11.0 100%

Total

20 17.8 89%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

Production Outlook Production Outlook

2015 2016 Forecast 2017 Forecast 2017/16 Change Oil ( bbls/d ) 5,091 5,130 6,700 31% NGLs ( bbls/d ) 1,607 2,700 2,500

  • 7%

Gas ( mcf/d ) 71,272 79,020 82,800 5% Combined ( BOE/d ) 18,577 21,000 23,000 10% Per MM Shares ( BOE/d ) 120 121 131 8%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

813 4,337 6,698 7,830 9,200 11,000 3,148 8,419 11,879 13,170 13,800 14,000

3,961 12,756 18,577 21,000 23,000 25,000 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,000 20,000 24,000 28,000 13 14 15 16 [E] 17 [E] 17 Exit [E]

Production Growth ( since inception ) Production Growth ( since inception )

Oil / NGLs Gas

11 36 43 45 53 42 69 77 76 78

53 105 120 121 131 40 80 120 160 13 14 15 16 [E] 17 [E]

PRODUCTION PER MM SHARES ( BOE / d ) PRODUCTION ( BOE / d )

CAGR since 2013 = 55% CAGR since 2013 = 25%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

Commodity Prices Commodity Prices

( CA $, unless otherwise specified ) 2015 2016 (E) 2017 (E) 2017/16 Change WTI Crude Oil ( USD/bbl ) US $ 48.80 US $ 43.25 US $ 52.00 + 20% CLS Crude Oil ( CAD/bbl ) $ 57.45 $ 52.92 $ 65.24 + 23% NYMEX Natural Gas ( USD/mmBtu ) US $ 2.67 US $ 2.45 US $ 3.05 + 24% AECO 5A Natural Gas ( CAD/GJ ) $ 2.55 $ 2.04 $ 2.95 + 45% Exchange Rate ( CAD/USD )

Exchange Rate ( USD/CAD )

$ 1.279

US $ 0.782

$ 1.325

US $ 0.755

$ 1.335

US $ 0.749

+ 1% Kelt realized Oil price ( $/bbl )

Discount to CLS

$ 50.83

( $ 6.62 )

$ 47.06

( $ 5.86 )

$ 57.47

( $ 7.77 )

+ 22% Kelt realized NGLs price ( $/bbl ) $ 23.12 $ 17.08 $ 21.22 + 24% Kelt realized Gas price ( $/mcf )

Premium to AECO/GJ

$ 2.74

7.5%

$ 2.70

32.4%

$ 3.63

23.1%

+ 34% Kelt realized Combined price ( $/BOE ) $ 26.45 $ 23.85 $ 32.12 + 35%

Notes: [1] WTI – West Texas Intermediate – light sweet crude oil (API 40˚) for settlement at Cushing, Oklahoma, priced in USD. [2] CLS – Canadian Light Sweet – light sweet crude oil (API 40˚) for settlement at Edmonton, Alberta, priced in CAD.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

49.80 50.00 51.00 51.00 52.00 52.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 3.14 3.32 3.05 2.80 2.53 2.60 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.71 3.22 3.53

2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00

J [E] F [E] M [E] A [E] M [E] J [E] J [E] A [E] S [E] O [E] N [E] D [E]

Forecast 2017 WTI & AECO Prices Forecast 2017 WTI & AECO Prices

WTI US$/bbl AECO CA$/GJ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

Gas Marketing / Transportation Contracts Gas Marketing / Transportation Contracts

Term of Firm Service Volume ( mmBtu/d ) Market Hub Market Index Nov/1/2016 – Mar/31/2018 Apr/1/2018 – Mar/31/2019 43,600 55,500 NIT AECO 5A ( CAD/GJ ) Nov/1/2016 – Mar/31/2017 Apr/1/2017 – Aug/31/2017 Sep/1/2017 – Oct/31/2017 24,300 21,300 15,800 Chicago City-Gate Chicago City-Gate Gas Daily Index ( USD/mmBtu ) Nov/1/2016 – Oct/31/2020 4,700 Station 2 Sumas Monthly Index less US$0.715/mmBtu

61% 33% 6% 0.0%

Kelt November 2016 Gas Markets

AECO Chicago Sumas Station 2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

Hedging Hedging

( CA $ unless otherwise specified )

Period Quantity Fixed Price USD Currency Swap [1] Jan/1/17 to Dec/31/17 US $1 MM / month CAD 1.330

Notes: [1] The USD currency swap was entered into pursuant to a Swaption from which Kelt previously received option proceeds of $255,000, making the effective swap rate CAD 1.351.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

Netbacks Netbacks

( $ / BOE ) 2015 2016 (E) 2017 (E) 2017/16 Change Oil & gas revenue 26.45 23.85 32.12 + 35% Realized hedging gain ( loss ) ( 0.12 ) 0.02 0.00

  • Royalties ( % of revenue )

( 10.6% ) ( 9.2% ) ( 11.2% ) + 22% Transportation expense ( 2.09 ) ( 2.83 ) ( 2.71 )

  • 4%

Production expense ( 11.34 ) ( 9.36 ) ( 8.88 )

  • 5%

Operating netback [1] 10.09 9.53 16.98 + 78% G&A expense ( 0.77 ) ( 0.91 ) ( 0.91 ) 0% Interest expense ( 0.98 ) ( 1.33 ) ( 0.83 )

  • 38%

Other income ( costs )

  • Funds from operations [1]

8.34 7.29 15.25 + 109%

Note: [1] See “Financial Advisories”.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13

Financial Outlook Financial Outlook

2015 2016 Forecast 2017 Forecast 2017/16 Change Revenue, before royalties ( $ MM ) 179.3 183.3 270.0 + 47% Funds from operations ( $ MM ) [1] 56.5 56.0 128.0 + 129% Per share – diluted ( $/share ) 0.36 0.32 0.73 + 128% Capital expenditures, net ( $ MM ) [2] 497.3 97.0 42.0

  • 57%

Net bank debt, at year-end ( $ MM ) [1,3] 213.0 138.0 52.0

  • 62%

Net bank debt / FFO ratio 3.8 x 2.5 x 0.4 x

Notes: [1] See “Financial Advisories”. [2] Capital expenditures are net of dispositions. [3a] Net bank debt includes amounts outstanding under the Company’s credit facility, net of working capital. The current borrowing base amount of Kelt’s credit facility is $185.0 million. [3b] In addition to net bank debt, the Company has $90.0 million principal amount of 5% convertible subordinated unsecured debentures

  • utstanding, maturing on May 31, 2021 and convertible to common equity at a price of $5.50 per share, subject to certain conditions

and subject to adjustment in certain events.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

Product Mix Product Mix

2017 (E) Production BOE/d Product Split 2017 (E) Operating Income ($MM) Income Split Oil 6,700 29% 88.5 62% NGLs 2,500 11% 9.7 7% Gas 82,800 60% 44.4 31% Combined 23,000 100% 142.6 100% G&A and interest expense ( 14.6 ) Funds from operations 128.0

Note: [1] The 2017 forecasted NGLs production mix is as follows: pentane (25%), butane (25%), propane (30%) and ethane (20%).

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

2017 Commodity Price Sensitivities 2017 Commodity Price Sensitivities

WTI Crude Oil ( USD/bbl ) AECO Nat Gas ( CAD/GJ ) 2017 (E) Funds from Operations ( $MM ) FFO per Share Diluted ( $ ) 2017 Forecast 52.00 2.95 128.0 0.73 WTI plus 10% 57.20

+ 5.20

2.95

n/c

140.1

+ 12.1

0.80

+ 0.07

AECO plus 10% 52.00

n/c

3.25

+ 0.30

138.3

+ 10.3

0.79

+ 0.06

WTI plus 10% & AECO plus 10% 57.20

+ 5.20

3.25

+ 0.30

150.4

+ 22.4

0.86

+ 0.13

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

Core Areas Core Areas

Inga / Fireweed ( BC ) : → Montney condensate-rich gas → Doig condensate-rich gas → Baldonnel light oil Grande Prairie ( AB ) : → Montney light oil → Montney gas → Doig gas → Charlie Lake light oil → Halfway light oil Grande Cache ( AB ) : → Cretaceous gas

Grande Cache Grande Prairie Inga / Fireweed

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17

Reserves Reserves

( $ MM ) DEC/31/2014 ( MMBOE ) DEC/31/2014 NPV 10% BT DEC/31/2015 ( MMBOE ) DEC/31/2015 NPV 10% BT

Proved Developed Producing 26.8 $ 404 33.8 $ 364 Total Proved 61.1 $ 669 83.8 $ 661 Proved plus Probable ( P+P ) 99.1 $ 1,072 150.5 $ 1,185 Oil/NGLs ( P+P % ) 35% 36% Gas ( P+P% ) 65% 64%

Notes: [1] Reserves are per the reports prepared by Sproule Associates Limited. Reserve volumes include Company gross working interest share of remaining reserves, as determined in accordance with NI 51-101. [2] FD&A (proved plus probable reserves) was $14.78/BOE in 2015 compared to $13.42/BOE in 2014. [3] Inception to December 31, 2015 FD&A (proved plus probable reserves) is $13.83/BOE, resulting in a recycle ratio of 1.2 times.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18

Kelt Land Fairway Kelt Land Fairway

Kelt Lands

Alberta British Columbia

Fireweed Inga

Fort

  • St. John

Stoddart Spirit River Valhalla / La Glace Progress Progress Pouce Coupe

Grande Prairie

Corporate Land Holdings

Dec/31 2016 Net Acres Net Sections Developed 208,984 326 Undeveloped 647,605 1,012 Total 856,589 1,338

Net Acres Net Sections British Columbia 259,658 406 Alberta 156,457 244 Total 416,115 650 Montney Rights

Oak Flatrock Pipestone / Wembley

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

British Columbia Montney Lands British Columbia Montney Lands

Kelt Lands

Fireweed Stoddart Inga Oak Flatrock

LAND (Montney Rights) Gross: 264,115 acres ( 412 sections ) Net: 259,658 acres ( 406 sections ) OPERATIONS

  • Kelt has successfully delineated the

upper Montney at Inga/Fireweed and expects to commence multi-well pad development in 2017

  • Initial results from the middle

Montney at Inga/Fireweed are very encouraging as Kelt continues its delineation program in that formation

  • Kelt expects to test the upper-middle

(IBZ) Montney at Inga/Fireweed in 2017

  • Kelt will drill two exploration

horizontal Montney wells at Oak/ Flatrock in 2017

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

British Columbia Montney Wells British Columbia Montney Wells

PRODUCTION

Kelt Montney Drills: slick-water completions Top Wells IP30 ( gross sales, BOE/d ):

(1) Inga 14-24-087-23W6 MM [a] 1,412 ( 29% gas ) (2) Inga 08-31-087-23W6 UM 1,296 ( 26% gas ) (3) Fireweed c-026-A/094-A-13 UM 1,188 ( 35% gas ) (4) Inga 05-07-088-22W6 UM 1,130 ( 48% gas ) (5) Inga 07-17-087-23W6 MM 905 ( 31% gas ) (6) Fireweed c-085-I/094-A-12 UM 844 ( 31% gas ) (7) Fireweed a-058-I/094-A-12 UM [b] 686 ( 32% gas ) (8) Inga 07-12-088-23W6 UM 648 (42% gas )

RESERVES

Typical well EUR’s:

Inga/Fireweed Upper Montney Sproule 2P EUR = 650 MBOE ( 58% gas 42% oil )

Notes: [a] The Inga 14-24 well was the second well drilled into the Middle Montney and was completed with 46 frac stages using 70 tonnes/stage of proppant. [b] During the completion operation of the Fireweed a-058-I Montney well, the Company experienced difficulty getting liner to bottom resulting in only stimulating two-thirds of the well. % oil – includes crude oil and natural gas liquids UM – Upper Montney MM – Middle Montney

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

Inga / Fireweed Inga / Fireweed

LAND Montney Rights: Gross: 188 sections Net: 186 sections OPERATIONS

  • Montney wells completed using slick-

water fractures have shown very encouraging results with high IP30 rates

  • f condensate-rich gas production
  • Montney wells qualify for BC royalty

incentives of approximately $900,000 per well

  • Delineation drilling has been focused in

the Upper Montney where the reservoir is up to 40 metres thick and porosities are up to 9%

Kelt Lands

CNRL West Stoddart 120 MMcf/d Gas Plant c-26-A (sfc a-6-A) c-85-I (sfc a-65-I) 8-31 (sfc B7-29) a-58-I (sfc d-A79-I) 7-17 MM (sfc 7-29) 7-12 (sfc A3-24) 5-7 (sfc 1-24) Fireweed c-31-I (sfc b-B62-I) [well completed] Inga 10-17 (sfc A16-20) [well drilling]

MM – Middle Montney

14-24 MM (sfc A12-36)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22 5 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Inga / Fireweed Montney Type Curve - All Wells Inga / Fireweed Montney Type Curve - All Wells

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count 00/a-058-I/094-A-12 (CTD 67 MBOE) 00/c-085-I/094-A-12 (CTD 177 MBOE) 02/c-026-A/094-A-13 (CTD 235 MBOE) 00/05-07-088-22W6 (CTD 80 MBOE) 00/07-12-088-23W6 (CTD 51 MBOE) 00/07-17-087-23W6 (CTD 86 MBOE) 00/08-31-087-23W6 (CTD 233 MBOE)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23 5 10 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47

Inga / Fireweed Montney Type Curve - Average Well Inga / Fireweed Montney Type Curve - Average Well

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

Average Well Kelt Type Curve Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count Sproule 2P EUR 650 MBOE 24% Oil 18% NGLs 58% Gas Kelt 2P EUR 700 MBOE 31% Oil 19% NGLs 50% Gas

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24

Inga / Fireweed – Middle Montney Isopach Inga / Fireweed – Middle Montney Isopach

OPERATIONS

  • Kelt has drilled its second horizontal

middle Montney well in BC located at 14-24 (surface A12-36). This well had an IP30 rate of 1,412 BOE/d (29% gas)

  • The thickness of the middle Montney

‘C’ Unit on Kelt’s lands at Inga ranges from 30 to 60 metres

  • Kelt is encouraged with the results of

the first two wells into the middle Montney and expects to follow-up with additional drilling in 2017 on its lands

  • With further delineation, the inventory
  • f drilling locations could increase

significantly as the Company moves to the development stage in both the upper and middle Montney horizons

  • Kelt expects to test the upper-middle

(IBZ) Montney in 2017.

Fireweed Inga

7-17 MM (sfc 7-29)

Kelt Lands

14-24 MM (sfc A12-36)

MM – Middle Montney

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25

Inga / Fireweed – Baldonnel Lands Inga / Fireweed – Baldonnel Lands

LAND Baldonnel Rights: Gross: 169 sections Net: 158 sections OPERATIONS

  • Oil exploration activity with plans to

drill initial well in 2017.

  • Competitor activity at Stoddart
  • ffsetting Kelt lands has been

successful in the Baldonnel formation.

  • The Baldonnel “C” oil pool at Birch

has produced 5.0 million barrels of

  • il and 11.0 bcf of associated gas,

cumulative to date, from 55 wells (44 HZ’s).

Kelt Lands

4-36 (sfc 4-1) producing competitor Baldonnel

  • il well

Stoddart Birch Fireweed Inga

Baldonnel “C” Oil Pool (CTD 5.0 MM barrels of oil)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

26

Grande Prairie Montney Lands Grande Prairie Montney Lands

Kelt Lands Pouce Coupe Progress Valhalla / La Glace Pipestone / Wembley

LAND Montney Rights: Gross: 159,040 acres ( 248 sections ) Net: 141,517 acres ( 221 sections ) OPERATIONS

  • Kelt has successfully delineated the lower-

middle and the upper-middle Montney at Pouce Coupe and is currently completing a five-well development pad at Pouce Coupe

  • Kelt has had success with the first two wells

drilled in the middle Montney at Progress and is currently drilling two additional wells

  • Kelt is currently drilling two development

wells in the middle Montney at Valhalla/La Glace

  • Kelt plans to drill its first exploration

Montney well at Pipestone/Wembley in 2017

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

Alberta Montney Wells Alberta Montney Wells

PRODUCTION

Kelt Montney Drills Top 10 Wells IP30 (gross sales, BOE/d):

(1) Pouce Coupe 14-25-077-13W6 MM [a] 1,400 ( 95% gas ) (2) La Glace 13-33-074-08W6 MM 1,090 ( 88% oil ) (3) Pouce Coupe 16-17-077-12W6 Doig/UM [a] 1,071 ( 90% gas ) (4) Pouce Coupe 13-08-078-11W6 LMM 1,068 ( 83% oil ) (5) Pouce Coupe 02/08-18-078-11W6 UMM 1,034 ( 73% oil ) (6) Pouce Coupe 14-08-078-11W6 LMM 995 ( 83% oil ) (7) Pouce Coupe 13-32-077-11W6 Doig/UM 988 ( 80% gas ) (8) Progress 15-13-078-09W6 MM [b] 920 ( 57% oil ) (9) Progress 14-14-078-09W6 MM 875 (73% oil ) (10) Pouce Coupe 00/08-18-078-11W6 LMM 852 (38% oil)

RESERVES

Typical well EUR’s:

(1) Pouce Coupe Doig/Montney Gas Sproule 2P EUR = 1,380 MBOE ( 90% gas 10% oil ) (2) Pouce Coupe Montney Oil Sproule 2P EUR = 485 MBOE ( 67% oil 33% gas ) (3) La Glace Montney Oil Sproule 2P EUR = 675 MBOE ( 70% oil 30% gas )

Notes: [a] The Pouce Coupe 14-25 and 16-17 wells were drilled with approximately two mile horizontal laterals and were put on production at restricted gas rates due to limited compression capacity. [b] The Progress 15-13 well was the initial middle Montney discovery well at Progress. [c] Lower-middle Montney (LMM) also referred to as “Montney Sexsmith” or “D1”. Upper-middle Montney (UMM) also referred to as “Montney H” or “D2”. MM = Middle Montney. UM = Upper Montney. % oil includes crude oil and natural gas liquids.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

28 UM – Upper Montney MM – Middle Montney UMM – Upper-middle Montney (may also be referred to as “Montney H” or “Montney D2”) LMM – Lower-middle Montney (may also be referred to as “Montney Sexsmith” or “Montney D1”)

Pouce Coupe / Progress Pouce Coupe / Progress

Kelt Lands

14-8 LMM 13-8 LMM 13-32 Doig/UM 14-25 MM 16-17 Doig/UM 8-18 LMM 8-18 UMM

Pouce Coupe Compressor Facility (100% WI)

15-5 Charlie Lake 16-11 H2O Disposal 15-13 MM (50%) 14-14 MM (50%)

Progress Gas Plant (20% WI)

Pouce Coupe Progress Spirit River

9-1 MM (50%) 13-3 MM (50%)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29 5 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Pouce Coupe Montney Oil Type Curve - All Wells Pouce Coupe Montney Oil Type Curve - All Wells

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count 02/08-18-078-11W6 (CTD 213 MBOE) 02/12-08-078-11W6 (CTD 136 MBOE) 02/13-08-078-11W6 (CTD 205 MBOE) 02/14-08-078-11W6 (CTD 187 MBOE) 02/14-09-078-11W6 (CTD 258 MBOE)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30 5 10 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47

Pouce Coupe Montney Oil Type Curve - Average Well Pouce Coupe Montney Oil Type Curve - Average Well

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

Average Well Kelt Type Curve Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count Sproule 2P EUR 485 MBOE 61% Oil 6% NGLs 33% Gas Kelt 2P EUR 865 MBOE 36% Oil 16% NGLs 48% Gas

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31

Valhalla / La Glace and Pipestone / Wembley Valhalla / La Glace and Pipestone / Wembley

  • Targeting the Montney formation.
  • Ownership in pipeline

infrastructure, oil battery, gas compression and minor interests in gas plants

  • Drilling has been focused on the

Middle Montney. Upper Montney also productive - tested in the 15-33 well

  • The Kelt La Glace facility has

handling capacity of 3,500 bbls/d of

  • il and 20 mmcf/d of gas
  • Kelt expects to drill an exploration

Montney well at Pipestone/Wembley in the first half

  • f 2017.

Kelt Lands 13-33 2-28 3-28 16-22 1-27 16-32 15-33 UM UM – Upper Montney Encana Sexsmith Gas Plant (0.3% WI) Kelt La Glace Facility (100% WI) Conoco Wembley Gas Plant (0.4% WI)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32 5 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

La Glace Montney Type Curve - All Wells La Glace Montney Type Curve - All Wells

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

02/16-22-074-08W6 (CTD 259 MBOE) 03/16-32-074-08W6 (CTD 295 MBOE) 00/01-27-074-08W6 (CTD 336 MBOE) 00/02-28-074-08W6 (CTD 176 MBOE) 00/03-28-074-08W6 (CTD 71 MBOE) 00/13-33-074-08W6 (CTD 253 MBOE) Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count

slide-34
SLIDE 34

33 5 10 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47

La Glace Montney Type Curve - Average Well La Glace Montney Type Curve - Average Well

10 100 1,000

TOTAL RAW PRODUCTION

(Well Count) ( BOE / d ) Month 5,000

Average Well Kelt Type Curve Sproule 2P Type Curve Well Count Sproule 2P EUR 675 MBOE 62% Oil 8% NGLs 30% Gas Kelt 2P EUR 685 MBOE 63% Oil 9% NGLs 28% Gas

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34

Net Asset Value Net Asset Value

( millions ) Dec/31 2014 Dec/31 2015 P&NG Reserves, NPV10 BT 1,072.3 1,185.2 Decommissioning Obligations, NPV10 BT [1] ( 12.8 ) ( 11.7 ) Undeveloped Land 103.2 168.7 Net Bank Debt ( 104.4 ) ( 212.1 ) Proceeds from exercise of Stock Options [2] 13.1 0.0 NET ASSET VALUE 1,071.4 1,130.1 Diluted Common Shares Outstanding 130.7 169.9 NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE $ 8.20 $ 6.65

Notes: [1] The present value of decommissioning obligations included above is incremental to the amount included in the present value of P&NG reserves as evaluated by Sproule. [2] The calculation of proceeds from exercise of stock options and the diluted number of common shares outstanding only include stock

  • ptions that are “in-the-money” based on the closing price of KEL of $4.24 and $7.00 per common share respectively as at December 31,

2015 and 2014. There were no “in-the-money” stock options at December 31, 2015.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

35

Future Considerations Future Considerations

 FUTURE DRILLING POTENTIAL: Kelt has numerous potential future drilling

  • pportunities on its existing lands that will provide for continued growth in the

years to come.  CRUDE OIL PRICES: the number of rigs drilling for oil in the U.S. was 525 in late- December 2016, after peaking at about 1,600 in November 2014. With low current

  • il prices, we believe that global oil supply will eventually be negatively affected as

a result of significant reductions in capital investment. We believe this could lead to higher WTI oil prices in 2017 compared to average prices for 2015 and 2016.  NATURAL GAS PRICES: the number of rigs drilling for gas in the U.S. was 132 in late-December 2016, after peaking at about 1,600 in September 2008. Despite record high gas supply in the U.S. due to higher productivity shale wells and associated gas production derived from oil wells, we expect U.S. gas supply to be negatively affected as declines on shale production sets in and a decrease in new production additions resulting from massive reductions in gas drilling. In addition, with a drop in the oil rig count in the U.S., supply of associated gas production derived from oil wells will also be negatively affected. We believe these factors bode well for natural gas prices in 2017, especially since the 1.0 tcf year over year storage surplus at the end of last winter has been eliminated.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

36

Management Management

David J. Wilson, President & CEO Sadiq H. Lalani, Vice President & CFO Douglas J. Errico, Vice President, Land Patrick Miles, Vice President, Exploration Douglas O. MacArthur, Vice President, Operations Alan G. Franks, Vice President, Production Bruce D. Gigg, Vice President, Engineering Ashley D. Hohm, Vice President, Finance William C. Guinan, Corporate Secretary

slide-38
SLIDE 38

37

Board of Directors Board of Directors

Robert J. Dales Compensation (Chair), Nominating, Audit, Reserves William C. Guinan Chairman of the Board, HSE Eldon A. McIntyre Reserves (Chair), Nominating, Audit, Compensation Neil G. Sinclair Audit (Chair), Nominating (Chair), Compensation, HSE, Reserves David J. Wilson HSE (Chair)

Note: HSE – Health, Safety & Environment Committee.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

38

Disclaimer Disclaimer

Forward Looking Statements Certain statements included in this corporate presentation (the "Presentation") constitute forward looking statements or forward looking information under applicable securities legislation. Such forward looking statements or information are provided for the purpose of providing information about management's current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward looking statements or information typically contain statements with words such as "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "intend", "estimate", "propose", "project“, “goal”, “objective”, “assume”, “forecast” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Forward looking statements or information in this Presentation include, but are not limited to, statements or information with respect to: Kelt Exploration Ltd.'s (“Kelt" or the "Company") business strategy and objectives; statements with respect to the performance characteristics of Kelt’s oil and natural gas properties and wells; potential future drilling locations; development plans, exploration plans, delineation drilling, in-fill drilling, optimization plans and effect on costs and production; the Company’s focus for 2017, including capital expenditures, budgeted drilling and completion costs per well, drilling program, maintaining a strong balance sheet and cost reductions; anticipated production including production mix; estimated recoverable resources; expansion of infrastructure; timing of drilling and completions; plans to investigate or participate in infrastructure projects; the Company’s plan to continue to evaluate construction of processing facilities and sales pipelines; forecasted pricing; actual and estimated internal rates of return, which include assumptions respecting production and other costs, pricing, well depths, royalty rates and taxes; 2017 budgeted activities; economic metrics including capital, IRR, net present values, EUR, netbacks, and production rates. In addition, the statements contained herein relating to "reserves" and "resources" are by their nature forward looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that the reserves or resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and that the reserves or resources can be profitably produced in the future. Actual reserves or resources may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein. Future Oriented Financial Information This Presentation contains Future Oriented Financial Information ("FOFI") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The FOFI has been prepared by Kelt’s management to provide an outlook of the Company's activities and results. The FOFI has been prepared based on a number

  • f assumptions including the assumptions discussed under the heading "Forward Looking Statements" and assumptions with respect to the

costs and expenditures to be incurred by the Company, capital equipment and operating costs, foreign exchange rates, taxation rates for the Company, general and administrative expenses and the prices to be paid for the Company's production. Management does not have firm commitments for all of the costs, expenditures, prices or other financial assumptions used to prepare the FOFI or assurance that such operating results will be achieved and, accordingly, the complete financial effects of all of those costs, expenditures, prices and operating results are not

  • bjectively determinable.
slide-40
SLIDE 40

39

Disclaimer Disclaimer

The actual results of operations of the Company and the resulting financial results will likely vary from the amounts set forth in the analysis presented in this Presentation, and such variation may be material. The Company and its management believe that the FOFI has been prepared on a reasonable basis, reflecting management’s best estimates and judgments. However, because this information is highly subjective and subject to numerous risks including the risks discussed under the heading "Forward Looking Statements", it should not be relied on as necessarily indicative of future results. Except as required by applicable securities laws, Kelt undertakes no obligation to update such FOFI and forward looking statements and information. Assumptions Forward looking statements or information are based on a number of factors and assumptions which have been used to develop such statements and information but which may prove to be incorrect. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements or information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to other factors and assumptions which may be identified in this Presentation, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: commodity prices; the accuracy of geological and geophysical data and its interpretations of that data; estimated decline rates; the impact of increasing competition; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which the Company operates; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of the Company to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; the ability of the Company to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; the ability of the Company to obtain financing on acceptable terms; that the Company will have sufficient cash flow, debt or equity or other financial resources to fund its capital and operating expenditures as needed; field production rates and decline rates; the ability to replace and expand oil and natural gas reserves through acquisition, development or exploration; the timing and costs of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of the Company to secure adequate product transportation; future oil and natural gas prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; that the estimates of the Company’s reserve volumes and assumptions related thereto are accurate in all material respects; and the ability of the Company to successfully market its oil and natural gas products. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which have been used.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

40

Disclaimer Disclaimer

Risks and Uncertainties Forward looking statements or information are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company and described in the forward looking statements or information. These risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements

  • r information include, among other things: the ability of management to execute its business plan; general economic and business conditions;

the risk of instability affecting the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; the risks of the oil and gas industry, such as operational risks in exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas and market demand; the possibility that government policies or laws may change or governmental approvals may be delayed or withheld; risks and uncertainties involving geology of oil and gas deposits; the uncertainty

  • f reserves estimates and reserves life; the ability of the Company to add production and reserves through acquisition, development and

exploration activities; the Company’s ability to enter into or renew leases; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production (including decline rates), costs and expenses; fluctuations in oil and gas prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; risks inherent in the Company's marketing

  • perations, including credit risk; uncertainty in amounts and timing of royalty payments; health, safety and environmental risks; risks associated

with potential future lawsuits and regulatory actions against the Company; uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing; changes in income tax rates; changes in incentive programs related to the oil and gas industry; and financial risks affecting the value of the Company’s investments. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all possible risks and uncertainties. No Obligation to Update The forward looking statements or information contained in this Presentation are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no

  • bligation to update publicly or revise any forward looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or
  • therwise unless required by applicable securities laws.

The forward looking statements or information contained in this Presentation are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

41

Disclaimer Disclaimer

Oil and Gas Advisories Barrel of Oil Equivalent Presentation This Presentation contains various references to the abbreviation BOE which means barrels of oil equivalent. Where amounts are expressed on a BOE basis, natural gas volumes have been converted to oil equivalence at six thousand cubic feet per barrel and sulphur volumes have been converted to oil equivalence at 0.6 long tons per barrel. The term BOE may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A BOE conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is significantly different than the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil and natural gas. This conversion factor is an industry accepted norm and is not based on current prices. References to oil in this Presentation include crude oil and field condensate. References to natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) include pentane, butane, propane, and ethane. References to gas in this discussion include natural gas and sulphur. Such abbreviation may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. Type Well Production and Economics This Presentation contains references to type well, or “type curve”, production and economics, which are derived, at least in part, from available information respecting the well economics of other companies and, as such, there is no guarantee that Kelt will achieve the stated or similar results, capital costs and return costs per well. Any references to peak rates, test rates or initial production rates or declines are useful for confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates and declines are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long term performance or ultimate recovery. In addition, such rates or declines may also include recovered fluids used in well completion stimulation. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating aggregate production for the Company. Reserves Unless otherwise specified, reserve estimates disclosed in this Presentation were prepared by Sproule Associates Limited (“Sproule”) in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGE Handbook”) and using Sproule’s forecast prices. There is no guarantee that the estimated reserves will be

  • recovered. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements. EUR is not

indicative of reserves. Estimates of the net present value of the future net revenue from Kelt’s reserves do not represent the fair market value of Kelt’s reserves. Reserves estimates contained herein have been made assuming that funding is likely to be available to Kelt for the development of the applicable property.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

42

Disclaimer Disclaimer

Future Drilling Locations Unless otherwise specified, the information in this Presentation pertaining to future drilling locations or drilling inventories is based solely on internal estimates made by management and such locations have not been reflected in any independent reserve or resource evaluations prepared pursuant to NI 51‐101. Similarly, unless otherwise specified, the information in this Presentation pertaining to targeted reserve volumes from future drilling is intended to indicate that in making its internal drilling decisions, the Company seeks to target drilling locations that, based on previous drilling results and its own internal assessments, it believes will on average ultimately generate the indicated volumes. This Presentation discloses drilling locations which are unbooked locations and are internal estimates based on Kelt's prospective acreage and an assumption as to the number of wells that can be drilled per section based on industry practice and internal review. Unbooked locations do not have attributed reserves or resources and have been identified by management as an estimation of multi‐year drilling activities based on evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production and reserves information. There is no certainty that Kelt will drill all unbooked drilling locations and if drilled there is no certainty that such locations will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. The drilling locations on which we actually drill wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained and other factors. While certain of the unbooked drilling locations have been de-risked by drilling existing wells in relative close proximity to such unbooked drilling locations, other unbooked drilling locations are farther away from existing wells where management has less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and if drilled there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. Estimated Ultimate Recovery Estimated Ultimate Recovery (“EUR”) is an approximation of the quantity of oil or gas that is potentially recoverable or has already been recovered from a reserve or well. EUR is not a defined term within the COGE Handbook and therefore any reference to EUR in this Presentation is not deemed to be reported under the requirements of NI 51-101. Readers are cautioned that there is no certainty that the Company will ultimately recover the estimated quantity of oil or gas from such reserves or wells.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

43

Disclaimer Disclaimer

Financial Advisories All dollar amounts are referenced in Canadian dollars, except when otherwise noted. Non-GAAP financial measures This Presentation contains certain financial measures, as described below, which do not have standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP. As these measures are commonly used in the oil and gas industry, the Company believes that their inclusion is useful to investors. The reader is cautioned that these amounts may not be directly comparable to measures for other companies where similar terminology is used. “Operating income” is calculated by deducting royalties, production expenses and transportation expenses from oil and gas revenue, after realized gains or losses on associated financial instruments. The Company refers to operating income expressed per unit of production as an “Operating netback”. “Funds from operations” is calculated by adding back transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, provisions for potential credit losses, settlement of decommissioning obligations and the change in non-cash operating working capital to cash provided by operating activities. Funds from operations per common share is calculated on a consistent basis with profit (loss) per common share, using basic and diluted weighted average common shares as determined in accordance with GAAP. Funds from operations and

  • perating income or netbacks are used by Kelt as key measures of performance and are not intended to represent operating profits nor should

they be viewed as an alternative to cash provided by operating activities, profit or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP. “Production per common share” is calculated by dividing total production by the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding, as determined in accordance with GAAP. In this Presentation, the term “net bank debt” is used synonymously with, and is equal to, “bank debt, net of working capital”. “Net bank debt” is calculated by adding the working capital deficiency to bank debt. The working capital deficiency is equal to total current assets net of total current liabilities, excluding the current portion of bank debt. The Company uses a “net bank debt to trailing funds from operations ratio” as a benchmark on which management monitors the Company’s capital structure and short-term financing requirements. Management believes that this ratio, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, provides investors with information to understand the Company’s liquidity risk. The “net bank debt to trailing funds from operations ratio” is also indicative of the “debt to cash flow” calculation used to determine the applicable margin for a quarter under the Company’s Credit Facility agreement (though the calculation may not always be a precise match, it is representative). For a reconciliation of cash provided by operating activities to funds from operations and the calculation of operating income derived from the individual financial statement line items in accordance with GAAP and for calculations relating to FD&A costs and recycle ratios, see the management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

44

Disclaimer Disclaimer

DEFINITIONS NPV10 BT: The anticipated net present value of the future net cash flow before taxes and after capital expenditures, discounted at a rate of 10%. IRR: Internal rate of return. IRR is the discount rate required to arrive at a NPV equal to zero. Rates of return set forth in this Presentation are for illustrative purposes. There is no guarantee that such rates of return will be achieved in the future. Reserves Replacement: The estimated amount of reserves added to the reserves base during the year relative to the amount of oil and gas produced. IP30: The initial production from a well for the first 720 hours (30 days) based on operating/producing hours. Finding, development and acquisition (“FD&A”) cost: is the sum of capital expenditures incurred in the period and the change in future development capital (“FDC”) required to develop reserves. FD&A cost per BOE is determined by dividing current period net reserve additions into the corresponding period’s FD&A cost. Readers are cautioned that the aggregate of capital expenditures incurred in the year, comprised of exploration and development costs and acquisition costs, and the change in estimated FDC generally will not reflect total FD&A costs related to reserves additions in the year. Recycle ratio: is a measure for evaluating the effectiveness of a company’s re-investment program. The ratio measures the efficiency of capital investment by comparing the operating netback per BOE to FD&A cost per BOE. Operating income: is determined by deducting royalties, production expenses and transportation expenses from oil and gas revenue, after realized financial instruments and cash premiums. Operating netback: is calculated by dividing operating income by aggregate production. Funds from operations: is calculated by adding back transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, provisions for potential credit losses, settlement of decommissioning obligations and the change in non-cash operating working capital to cash provided by operating

  • activities. The Company calculates funds from operations per share using the same method and shares outstanding which are used in the

determination of profit per share. Production per share is calculated by dividing total production by the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Net bank debt to trailing funds from operations ratio: is used as a benchmark on which management monitors the Company’s capital structure and short-term financing requirements. Net bank debt: is calculated by adding (subtracting) the working capital deficiency (surplus) to (from) bank debt. The net bank debt to funds flow ratio is calculated by dividing net bank debt by funds from operations for that period.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

45

Disclaimer Disclaimer

ABBREVIATIONS GAAP: Canadian generally accepted accounting principles as set out in the CPA Canada Handbook – Accounting. IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB’). WTI: West Texas Intermediate CLS: Canadian Light Sweet NYMEX: New York Mercantile Exchange AECO: Alberta Energy Company “C” Meter Station of the NOVA Pipeline System MRF: Modernized Royalty Framework (Alberta) PDP: Proved developed producing reserves. 1P: Proved reserves. 2P: Proved plus probable reserves. BOE/d: barrels of oil equivalent per day bbls/d: barrels per day Mcf/d: thousand cubic feet per day GJ: gigajoules LT: long tonnes MM: million

slide-47
SLIDE 47

www.KeltExploration.com

Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation

Suite 300, 311 – 6th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3H2

January 2017