core metrics university benchmarks
play

CORE METRICS & UNIVERSITY BENCHMARKS Core Metric Subject or - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ANNUAL MONITORING 2020 (ABOUT 2019-20) Inputs: Data analysis: Core Metrics, University KPIs, Gap Metrics (new) , External Examiners Reports Benchmarks set by Office for Students for University Evaluation: Evaluation of performance


  1. ANNUAL MONITORING 2020 (ABOUT 2019-20) Inputs: • Data analysis: Core Metrics, University KPIs, Gap Metrics (new) , External Examiner’s Reports • Benchmarks set by Office for Students for University Evaluation: • Evaluation of performance against benchmark at programme, subject and University levels Outputs: • Reports including action plans produced at Programme, Subject and University level • Exception Reporting: when benchmark is not met specify action to improve: Action Plan • Remember to celebrate good practice

  2. CORE METRICS & UNIVERSITY BENCHMARKS Core Metric Subject or Programme University Benchmark actual set by OfS (%) (%) 1. Teaching on my course xx 84.42 2. Assessment and Feedback xx 74.26 3. Academic Support xx 79.93 4. Course Non-continuation (revised metric) xx 12.2 (Max.) 5. Employment and further study xx 93.4 6. Highly Skilled employment and further study xx 72.3

  3. UNIVERSITY KPIs & BENCHMARKS University Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Source of data University Benchmark set by Exec Board (%) 1. Applications (n) UNiPULSE - 2. Conversion Rate (%) UNiPULSE 40 + (applications to enrolment) 3. Enrolments (n) UNiPULSE - 4. Attendance (%) UNiPULSE 80 + 5. Average Module Mark UNiPULSE 55 + (mean %) 6. Modules passed first time (%) UNiPULSE 86 + 7. Achievement of good honours degrees (%) UNiPULSE 65+

  4. SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW) • To monitor our progress in relation to the University’s APP targets • Access Metrics – to show the student profile • Attainment Gaps by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), by young participation rate in HE (POLAR 4) and by ethnicity: for full time students • Continuation Gaps by ethnicity: for full time students • Progression Gaps by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) for part time students; and by ethnicity for full time students • In the Subject QEP NOT in the Programme Plan this year

  5. SUBJECT QEP: ACCESS METRICS (NEW) Proportion of New UK Enrolments for Under-Represented Demographic Groups • Number of students enrolling: New UK enrolments (N) • Proportion of students who are Male (%) • Proportion of students who are Female (%) • Proportion of students who report that they have a disability: Disabled (%) • Proportion of students who are from a Black, Asian, or other Minority Ethnic backgrounds: BAME (%) • Proportion of students who are Mature (%) • Proportion of students who are from Polar4 Quintile (%) • Proportion of students who are from IMD Quintile (%)

  6. SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW) GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Attainment gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 1: attainment gap between POLAR4 Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 for full 9% or less time undergraduate students GAP 2: attainment gap between IMD Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 for full time 24% or less undergraduate students GAP 3: attainment gap between full time undergraduate Black students and 27% or less White students GAP 4: attainment gap between full time undergraduate Asian students and 15% or less White students

  7. SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW) GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Continuation gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 5 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Black students 3% or less and White students GAP 6 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Asian students 7% or less and White students GAP 7 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Mixed 8% or less Ethnicity students and White students

  8. SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW) GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Progression gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 8 The progression gap between part time undergraduate IMD Quintile 2% or less 1 and Quintile 5 students GAP 9 The progression gap between full time undergraduate Asian and 2% or less White students

  9. UNIPULSE REPORTS: PROGRAMME LEVEL • Core metrics and University KPIs with benchmark ranges shown visually, as before • UNiPULSE data allows drill through from University level to named student – to enable analysis/ understanding • Three year trend data • UNiPULSE Annual Monitoring Report

  10. A WORD ABOUT REPORT TEMPLATES • Reporting templates ensure standardised approach • Templates available on the SEO web page for annual monitoring: https://www.bolton.ac.uk/Quality/RM/AnnualMonitoring/Home.aspx#gsc.tab=0 • Evolving - over past four years, now includes GAP metrics at Subject and University level (to measure targets given in Access and Participation Plan) • Programme Report • Subject Report includes analyses of performance against benchmark in all metrics for every programme, on & off campus

  11. REPORTS AND DATA 2020 1. Programme Plan – using internal data in new look UNiPULSE database 2. SUBJECT Quality Enhancement Plan – using data at CAH2 level Data generated by Student Data Management team in pre-populated tables on the internal UoB shared drive: L:\Corporate Intelligence\Annual Quality Monitoring\Nov-2020 Release Date for the data: 16 November 2020 Submission Dates for completed reports • Programme Plans: 11 December 2020 • Subject QEPs: 17 December 2020

  12. LIVE DEMONSTRATION BY SDM COLLEAGUES : • UNiPULSE data tables and charts • UNiPULSE How to guide • Subject Annual Monitoring Reports L:\Corporate Intelligence\Annual Quality Monitoring\Nov-2020 • Q&A

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend