CORE METRICS & UNIVERSITY BENCHMARKS Core Metric Subject or - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

core metrics university benchmarks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CORE METRICS & UNIVERSITY BENCHMARKS Core Metric Subject or - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ANNUAL MONITORING 2020 (ABOUT 2019-20) Inputs: Data analysis: Core Metrics, University KPIs, Gap Metrics (new) , External Examiners Reports Benchmarks set by Office for Students for University Evaluation: Evaluation of performance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ANNUAL MONITORING 2020 (ABOUT 2019-20)

Inputs:

  • Data analysis: Core Metrics, University KPIs, Gap Metrics (new), External Examiner’s Reports
  • Benchmarks set by Office for Students for University

Evaluation:

  • Evaluation of performance against benchmark at programme, subject and University levels

Outputs:

  • Reports including action plans produced at Programme, Subject and University level
  • Exception Reporting: when benchmark is not met specify action to improve: Action Plan
  • Remember to celebrate good practice
slide-2
SLIDE 2

CORE METRICS & UNIVERSITY BENCHMARKS

Core Metric Subject or Programme actual (%) University Benchmark set by OfS (%)

  • 1. Teaching on my course

xx 84.42

  • 2. Assessment and Feedback

xx 74.26

  • 3. Academic Support

xx 79.93

  • 4. Course Non-continuation (revised metric)

xx 12.2 (Max.)

  • 5. Employment and further study

xx 93.4

  • 6. Highly Skilled employment and further study

xx 72.3

slide-3
SLIDE 3

UNIVERSITY KPIs & BENCHMARKS

University Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Source of data University Benchmark set by Exec Board (%)

  • 1. Applications (n)

UNiPULSE

  • 2. Conversion Rate (%)

(applications to enrolment)

UNiPULSE 40 +

  • 3. Enrolments (n)

UNiPULSE

  • 4. Attendance (%)

UNiPULSE 80 +

  • 5. Average Module Mark

(mean %)

UNiPULSE 55 +

  • 6. Modules passed first time (%)

UNiPULSE 86 +

  • 7. Achievement of good honours degrees (%)

UNiPULSE 65+

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW)

  • To monitor our progress in relation to the University’s APP targets
  • Access Metrics – to show the student profile
  • Attainment Gaps by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), by young participation

rate in HE (POLAR 4) and by ethnicity: for full time students

  • Continuation Gaps by ethnicity: for full time students
  • Progression Gaps by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) for part time students; and

by ethnicity for full time students

  • In the Subject QEP NOT in the Programme Plan this year
slide-5
SLIDE 5

SUBJECT QEP: ACCESS METRICS (NEW)

Proportion of New UK Enrolments for Under-Represented Demographic Groups

  • Number of students enrolling: New UK enrolments (N)
  • Proportion of students who are Male (%)
  • Proportion of students who are Female (%)
  • Proportion of students who report that they have a disability: Disabled (%)
  • Proportion of students who are from a Black, Asian, or other Minority Ethnic backgrounds:

BAME (%)

  • Proportion of students who are Mature (%)
  • Proportion of students who are from Polar4 Quintile (%)
  • Proportion of students who are from IMD Quintile (%)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW)

GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Attainment gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 1: attainment gap between POLAR4 Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 for full time undergraduate students 9% or less GAP 2: attainment gap between IMD Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 for full time undergraduate students 24% or less GAP 3: attainment gap between full time undergraduate Black students and White students 27% or less GAP 4: attainment gap between full time undergraduate Asian students and White students 15% or less

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW)

GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Continuation gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 5 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Black students and White students 3% or less GAP 6 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Asian students and White students 7% or less GAP 7 The continuation gap between full time undergraduate Mixed Ethnicity students and White students 8% or less

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SUBJECT QEP: GAP METRICS (NEW)

GAP Metrics University Milestone Benchmark (%) Progression gaps identified in the University’s APP GAP 8 The progression gap between part time undergraduate IMD Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 students 2% or less GAP 9 The progression gap between full time undergraduate Asian and White students 2% or less

slide-9
SLIDE 9

UNIPULSE REPORTS: PROGRAMME LEVEL

  • Core metrics and University KPIs with benchmark ranges shown

visually, as before

  • UNiPULSE data allows drill through from University level to

named student – to enable analysis/ understanding

  • Three year trend data
  • UNiPULSE Annual Monitoring Report
slide-10
SLIDE 10

A WORD ABOUT REPORT TEMPLATES

  • Reporting templates ensure standardised approach
  • Templates available on the SEO web page for annual monitoring:

https://www.bolton.ac.uk/Quality/RM/AnnualMonitoring/Home.aspx#gsc.tab=0

  • Evolving - over past four years, now includes GAP metrics at Subject and

University level (to measure targets given in Access and Participation Plan)

  • Programme Report
  • Subject Report includes analyses of performance against benchmark in all

metrics for every programme, on & off campus

slide-11
SLIDE 11

REPORTS AND DATA 2020

  • 1. Programme Plan – using internal data in new look UNiPULSE database
  • 2. SUBJECT Quality Enhancement Plan – using data at CAH2 level

Data generated by Student Data Management team in pre-populated tables on the internal UoB shared drive: L:\Corporate Intelligence\Annual Quality Monitoring\Nov-2020 Release Date for the data: 16 November 2020

Submission Dates for completed reports

  • Programme Plans: 11 December 2020
  • Subject QEPs: 17 December 2020
slide-12
SLIDE 12

LIVE DEMONSTRATION BY SDM COLLEAGUES:

  • UNiPULSE data tables and charts
  • UNiPULSE How to guide
  • Subject Annual Monitoring Reports

L:\Corporate Intelligence\Annual Quality Monitoring\Nov-2020

  • Q&A