Consumer Protection: A supervisor’s perspective
Regional Conference on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy Sofia, 10-11 June 2014
Consumer Protection: A supervisors perspective Regional Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Consumer Protection: A supervisors perspective Regional Conference on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy Sofia, 10-11 June 2014 AFM is the conduct of business regulator of the Netherlands DNB AFM How is a financial Is the
Regional Conference on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy Sofia, 10-11 June 2014
Pagina 2 20 augustus 2014
How is a financial institution treating its customers? Consumer: am I treated fairly? Is the financial institution sound? Consumer: is my money safe?
AFM is the conduct of business regulator of the Netherlands
Pagina 3
In which: Problem ≠ Violation of regulations Solving problems = changing behavior sustainably Changing behavior sustainably ≠ enforcing
SUPERVISING = SOLVING PROBLEMS
The AFM’s strategic equation
Pagina 4
Pagina 5
Problem oriented supervision in a nutshell
Signaling and qualifying Prioritizing Intervening Measuring effect
Pagina 6
Problem oriented supervision in a nutshell
Pick Pick important problems, … solve them… and tell everybody about it! Signaling and qualifying Prioritizing Intervening Measuring effect
Why didn’t you see anything? Why were you not there? Why didn’t you do anyhing?
It’s the best way to face the haunting questions…
Pagina 8
Pagina 9
Which problems to pick? 1 2 3 X
What the rules are saying What people are expecting
What is within your abilities
Pagina 10
Intrinsic norms Social norm Ability to comply Deterrence
“This doesn’t feel right” “This is not how we do things around here” “I do not know what this norm requires of me” “We will loose my license if we continue with these practices” “What an individual or institution itself believes to be right” “What people think the groups finds to be right” “Barriers that inhibit the ability to comply with the norms” “The perception of the change of being caught and the damage that then follows”
What drives behavior?
Pagina 12
The old supervisor’s toolbox…
The old supervisor’s toolbox…
Revoking license Removing executives Pressing criminal charges Putting ward Public notice or warning Public fining Ordering Requiring Individual warning
The new supervisor’s toolbox…
Public interviews or speeches Benchmarking Self-assessment Smart communicating enforcements Shaming Product analysis Roundtable with industry Conversation with executives Faming Conversation with non executive directors Activating industry associations Supporting self correcting mechanisms Warning consumers Fit and proper testing Influecing third parties, e.g. consultants and software developers
What was the problem? What did we do?
Mortgageadvice project (2007) confirmed our
Case: Mortgage provisioning
Intermezzo: Role of guidelines and enforcement
misselling
practices
with too many files of inappropriate advice
What has been the impact of our actions?
Mortgageadvice project 2010:
declined from 24% to 15%
(almost collectively) been improved
Case: Mortgage provisioning
aantal instellingen Gemiddelde score
Hypotheekadvisering # 5 2,4 Modern Spaarbeleid # 9 3,1 Beleggen # 5 2,7 Pensioenverzekeringen # 6 2,3 Ketenbeheersing # 7 2,5 Klachtenbehandeling # 9 3,3 klantbelang (Dashboardscore) # 10 2,7
33% 22% 44% spreiding 30% 70% 60% 40% 100% 83% 17% 43% 57% 78% 22%
Treating Customers Fairly total Mortgage advice Deposit products Investment services Pension advice Distribution quality Complaints handling
Treating Customers Fairly:
perspective
Average score # institutions Spread
Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly
Targetting symptoms of harmful behavior
harmful (yet not illegal) behavior are targetted.
Engage in dialogue; clarify as well as make norms explicit
discussions with industry
Stimulate and facilitate accelerated change process with large institutions towards Treating Customers Fairly
tool internally
dialogue as well as stimulates peer pressure
Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly
aantal instellingen Gemiddelde score
Hypotheekadvisering # 5 2,4 Modern Spaarbeleid # 9 3,1 Beleggen # 5 2,7 Pensioenverzekeringen # 6 2,3 Ketenbeheersing # 7 2,5 Klachtenbehandeling # 9 3,3 klantbelang (Dashboardscore) # 10 2,7
33% 22% 44% spreiding 30% 70% 60% 40% 100% 83% 17% 43% 57% 78% 22%
Treating Customers Fairly total Mortgage advice Deposit products Investment services Pension advice Distribution quality Complaints handling
Treating Customers Fairly:
perspective
Average score # institutions Spread
Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly The score has moved up from 2.7 in 2010, to 3.0 in 2011, 3.3 in 2012 and 3.5 in 2013
The new supervisor’s toolbox…
Public interviews or speeches Benchmarking Self-assessment Smart communicating enforcements Shaming Product analysis Roundtable with industry Conversation with executives Faming Conversation with non executive directors Activating industry associations Supporting self correcting mechanisms Warning consumers Fit and proper testing Influecing third parties, e.g. consultants and software developers
Please have a look at the G20/OECD Task Force on Financial Consumer Protection report, that contains a wide range of ‘effective approaches’