Consumer Protection: A supervisors perspective Regional Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

consumer protection a supervisor s perspective
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Consumer Protection: A supervisors perspective Regional Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Consumer Protection: A supervisors perspective Regional Conference on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy Sofia, 10-11 June 2014 AFM is the conduct of business regulator of the Netherlands DNB AFM How is a financial Is the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Consumer Protection: A supervisor’s perspective

Regional Conference on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy Sofia, 10-11 June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pagina 2 20 augustus 2014

AFM DNB

How is a financial institution treating its customers? Consumer: am I treated fairly? Is the financial institution sound? Consumer: is my money safe?

AFM is the conduct of business regulator of the Netherlands

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pagina 3

In which: Problem ≠ Violation of regulations Solving problems = changing behavior sustainably Changing behavior sustainably ≠ enforcing

SUPERVISING = SOLVING PROBLEMS

The AFM’s strategic equation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SUPERVISING = SOLVING PROBLEMS

Pagina 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pagina 5

Problem oriented supervision in a nutshell

Signaling and qualifying Prioritizing Intervening Measuring effect

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pagina 6

Problem oriented supervision in a nutshell

Pick Pick important problems, … solve them… and tell everybody about it! Signaling and qualifying Prioritizing Intervening Measuring effect

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why didn’t you see anything? Why were you not there? Why didn’t you do anyhing?

It’s the best way to face the haunting questions…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PROBLEM ≠ VIOLATION OF REGULATIONS

Pagina 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pagina 9

Which problems to pick? 1 2 3 X

What the rules are saying What people are expecting

  • f you

What is within your abilities

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SOLVING PROBLEMS = CHANGING BEHAVIOR SUSTAINABLY

Pagina 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Intrinsic norms Social norm Ability to comply Deterrence

“This doesn’t feel right” “This is not how we do things around here” “I do not know what this norm requires of me” “We will loose my license if we continue with these practices” “What an individual or institution itself believes to be right” “What people think the groups finds to be right” “Barriers that inhibit the ability to comply with the norms” “The perception of the change of being caught and the damage that then follows”

What drives behavior?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CHANGING BEHAVIOR SUSTAINABLY ≠ ENFORCING

Pagina 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The old supervisor’s toolbox…

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

The old supervisor’s toolbox…

Revoking license Removing executives Pressing criminal charges Putting ward Public notice or warning Public fining Ordering Requiring Individual warning

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

The new supervisor’s toolbox…

Public interviews or speeches Benchmarking Self-assessment Smart communicating enforcements Shaming Product analysis Roundtable with industry Conversation with executives Faming Conversation with non executive directors Activating industry associations Supporting self correcting mechanisms Warning consumers Fit and proper testing Influecing third parties, e.g. consultants and software developers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What was the problem? What did we do?

Mortgageadvice project (2007) confirmed our

  • hypotheses. AFM made a mix of interventions:
  • Restrict amount of mortgage credit provisioning
  • Strong enforcement of worst advisors
  • Publish Guidelines on good mortgage advice
  • Publish online check list tool for consumers
  • Engage software-developers
  • Focus on banks to improve products
  • Consumers borrowing too much
  • Poor quality of advice leading to misselling

Case: Mortgage provisioning

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Intermezzo: Role of guidelines and enforcement

  • Law provided the principle of “appropriate advice”
  • What does that then means in individual cases?
  • We fined advisors with too many files of evident

misselling

  • We published guidelines and examples of good and bad

practices

  • Subsequently we could where necessary fine advisors

with too many files of inappropriate advice

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What has been the impact of our actions?

Mortgageadvice project 2010:

  • Percentage moderate and inadequate advice

declined from 24% to 15%

  • Less irresponsible borrowing
  • More attention for risks regarding loss of income
  • Term and conditions of certain products have

(almost collectively) been improved

Case: Mortgage provisioning

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Totaalbeeld banken en verzekeraars

aantal instellingen Gemiddelde score

Hypotheekadvisering # 5 2,4 Modern Spaarbeleid # 9 3,1 Beleggen # 5 2,7 Pensioenverzekeringen # 6 2,3 Ketenbeheersing # 7 2,5 Klachtenbehandeling # 9 3,3 klantbelang (Dashboardscore) # 10 2,7

33% 22% 44% spreiding 30% 70% 60% 40% 100% 83% 17% 43% 57% 78% 22%

Treating Customers Fairly total Mortgage advice Deposit products Investment services Pension advice Distribution quality Complaints handling

Treating Customers Fairly:

  • verall

perspective

Average score # institutions Spread

Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Targetting symptoms of harmful behavior

  • In most of the items on the dashboard elements concerning illegal as well as

harmful (yet not illegal) behavior are targetted.

Engage in dialogue; clarify as well as make norms explicit

  • Benchmarking definitions are determined and defined in some detail after

discussions with industry

Stimulate and facilitate accelerated change process with large institutions towards Treating Customers Fairly

  • Dashboard: benchmarking is very effective in accelerating laggards
  • Results are discussed in detail bilaterally on C-suite level
  • The dashboard serves for institutions as an important change management

tool internally

  • Annual discussions with CEO’s of all benchmarked institutions facilitates

dialogue as well as stimulates peer pressure

Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Totaalbeeld banken en verzekeraars

aantal instellingen Gemiddelde score

Hypotheekadvisering # 5 2,4 Modern Spaarbeleid # 9 3,1 Beleggen # 5 2,7 Pensioenverzekeringen # 6 2,3 Ketenbeheersing # 7 2,5 Klachtenbehandeling # 9 3,3 klantbelang (Dashboardscore) # 10 2,7

33% 22% 44% spreiding 30% 70% 60% 40% 100% 83% 17% 43% 57% 78% 22%

Treating Customers Fairly total Mortgage advice Deposit products Investment services Pension advice Distribution quality Complaints handling

Treating Customers Fairly:

  • verall

perspective

Average score # institutions Spread

Case: Benchmarking Treating Customers Fairly The score has moved up from 2.7 in 2010, to 3.0 in 2011, 3.3 in 2012 and 3.5 in 2013

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The new supervisor’s toolbox…

Public interviews or speeches Benchmarking Self-assessment Smart communicating enforcements Shaming Product analysis Roundtable with industry Conversation with executives Faming Conversation with non executive directors Activating industry associations Supporting self correcting mechanisms Warning consumers Fit and proper testing Influecing third parties, e.g. consultants and software developers

Please have a look at the G20/OECD Task Force on Financial Consumer Protection report, that contains a wide range of ‘effective approaches’