Construal Scope effects on Imperfective vs. Perfective Construal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

construal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Construal Scope effects on Imperfective vs. Perfective Construal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Construal Scope effects on Imperfective vs. Perfective Construal Verbs refer to processes Process is relationship seen as persisting through time Imperfective process - does not change over time Perfective process - changes


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Construal

  • Scope effects on Imperfective vs. Perfective
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Construal

  • Verbs refer to processes
  • Process is relationship seen as persisting through time
  • Imperfective process - does not change over time
  • Perfective process - changes over time- has steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Construal

– Perfective

  • Walk, talk, hit, dress, sing

– Starting point, ending point, evolving motor routines, sequences of actions

– Imperfective

  • Believe, know, think, have, resemble

– Indeterminate beginning and end, stable status that persists through time

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Construal

– Linguistic usage reflects the perfective/imperfective contrast

  • Simple present

– I have a car. – I know a lawyer. – *I walk to the bank now. – *I sing you a song.

  • Progressive

– *I am having a car. – *I am knowing a lawyer. – I am walking to the bank now. – I am singing you a song.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Construal

Perfective event - unchanging over time event time

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Construal

Imperfective event - changing over time event time

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Construal

Object well differentiated from surroundings Clear boundaries Complex morphology - change through space

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Construal

Object has no clear boundaries Object is homogenous/amorphous

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Construal

MS IS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Construal

IS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Construal

IS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Construal

IS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Construal

IS Zooming in changes apparent structure

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Construal

IS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Construal

IS IS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Construal

IS IS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Construal

– Claim from Langacker: Progressive marking imposes a narrowed viewing window on a verb’s content in the temporal domain such that processes normally marked by change (inherent perfectives) are viewed as homogenous or unchanging through time. – Since it follows naturally from this claim that it would be somewhat meaningless to impose such a window on a process that is already designated as unchanging over time (imperfectives), this idea is consistent with the observation that imperfectives do not take progressive marking.

IS IS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Construal

MS/IS time Perfective verb, ex. walk

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Construal

MS time IS Perfective with progressive, ex. Be walking

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Construal

  • Prominence (salience)

– Selection of content

  • What is selected is salient relative to background

– Focus

  • Foreground salient relative to background
  • Prototype salient relative to extensions
  • Immediate scope relative to maximal scope

– Profiling – Trajector/landmark

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Construal

  • Profiling -

– Expressions select a certain body of conceptual content from one or more domains as a conceptual base. – Expression’s profile is the specific focus of attention within its immediate scope--its referent – Multiple expressions may share the same conceptual base and differ in terms of profiling

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Construal

MS IS hand elbow hand and elbow profile different parts of body

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Construal

February

IS Days of week profile part of conceived cycle Of days, weeks, years, etc.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Construal

  • Verbs profile processes
  • A process can vary in terms of the complexity of its

conceptual base – Ex. Come, go evoke spatial domain, single action, few components: mover, direction, speaker location – Verb profiles entire process – Hither, thither - profiles the location speaker within that process

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Construal

mover Speaker location time come hither

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Construal

– More complex domains/frames/script may involve multiple processes.

  • Verb profiles one particular process that is

understood against the background of this concepetual base.

  • Buy, sell profile separate processes within a

complex transaction frame

  • Enroll, graduate, test, grade profile separate

processes within an educational institution frame.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Construal

  • Metonomy - profile shift

– If there is a Cognitive domain/frame establishing connection between the two entities, can refer to

  • ne entity by naming another that profiles something

else in domain.

  • 1. I’m the lasagne.

– Restaurant behavior involves people placing orders for

  • food. Customers are not introduced to waitstaff or
  • cooks. Orders organized by dish.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Construal

2. She couldn’t find Tom in the phone book.

  • Phone book is a database of information linked to real

persons

3. He came at precisely 7:45 p.m.

  • come and arrive share the same conceptual base involving

movement from location to another

  • come profiles full event, arrive profiles final stage of

reaching goal

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Construal

  • Adverbs and Adjectives

– Profile relationships between objects/processes and qualities

  • White sock
  • Run quickly
  • Prepositions

– Profile relationships (prototypically spatial) between

  • bjects.
  • In the barn
  • Over the mountain
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Construal

  • Profiled relationships

– Verbs profile processes – Adverbs and adjectives profile other sorts of relationships – Within profiled relationship can distinguish another level of foreground/background alignment - trajector/landmark organization

  • Primary/secondary salience
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Construal

– Trajector seen as participant being located, evaluated

  • r described.

– Landmark - has secondary focus trajector is seen as being located, evaluated or described with respect to landmark

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Construal

above below x y up tr lm x y up tr lm

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Construal

  • Two expressions may describe same objective

content, but differ in tr/lm alignment

1a.The lamp is above the table. 1b.The table is below the lamp. 2a.John resembles Mary. 2b.Mary resembles John.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Construal

  • Where is the lamp?
  • It’s above the table
  • *The table is below it.
  • Who does John look like?
  • *Mary resembles John.
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Construal

  • Subject/object relationship is a particular kind of

trajector/landmark relationship

  • Not all verbs profile processes that have both a

trajector and a landmark. Not all processes that have tr/lm overtly express a landmark

– Verbs with single participant have only tr (walk, run) – Verbs that can be used intransitively may still have landmarks (read, arrive) – Verb can have more than one landmark as well

  • Ex. Dative relationship
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Construal

  • Trajector/landmark organization for other word classes

– Adverbs, adjectives quickly, red

  • Trajector is thing being evaluated (process/object)
  • Landmark is scale trajector is located on

– Nouns

  • Part - characterized with respect to whole
  • Uncle - located with respect to ego
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Construal

  • Trajector/landmark organization - aspect of construal --

speaker chooses form of expression

  • Trajector/landmark designations clearer for

prototypical verbs (physical motion)

  • Run, kick, move, approach, etc.
  • Verbs profiling mental processes -- less clear.
  • I saw, heard, felt, …
  • It looked, sounded, felt…
  • I like it/ it pleases me
  • I think …/ it occurs to me