constance pierson ph d michael dillon ph d university of
play

Constance Pierson, Ph.D. & Michael Dillon, Ph.D. University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Constance Pierson, Ph.D. & Michael Dillon, Ph.D. University of Maryland, Baltimore County MdAIR 2009 Annual Conference October 16, 2009 Are there changes in algebra and calculus test scores? How are test scores related to course


  1. Constance Pierson, Ph.D. & Michael Dillon, Ph.D. University of Maryland, Baltimore County MdAIR 2009 Annual Conference October 16, 2009

  2.  Are there changes in algebra and calculus test scores?  How are test scores related to course performance?  Do students placed in a given course perform better or worse in that course than those taking the paper & pencil tests?

  3. PP (F03 to F05) OL (F06 to F08) Total Fall Cohort # % # % 200309 1487 99.9% 1 0.1% 1424 200409 1402 1311 99.9% 1 0.1% 200509 1414 89.6% 135 10.4% 1166 200609 1419 106 7.9% 1238 92.1% 200709 1424 40 3.1% 96.9% 1238 200809 1557 153 11.2% 1218 88.8% * Subsequent analysis will exclude students taking paper test after Fall 2005 and online test prior to Fall 2006.

  4. Test Type Paper (F03 to F05) Online (F06 to F08) % not % not taking taking # % calc test # % calc test Placement 106 1236 31.7% 49.9% 976 26.4% 70.0% 150 1034 26.5% 20.6% 970 26.3% 46.7% 151 1104 28.3% 0.1% 1340 36.3% 0.1% 99 187 4.8% 78.2% 101 2.7% 88.1% ADV1 340 8.7% 31.4% 307 8.3% 56.0% Total 3901 3694

  5. DISTRIBUTION OF ALGEBRA TEST SCORE BY TEST TYPE Fall 2003 to Fall 2008 350 OL PP 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Algebra Test Score

  6. DISTRIBUTION OF CALCULUS TEST SCORE BY TEST TYPE Fall 2003 to Fall 2008 300 OL PP 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Calculus Test Score

  7. MATH 150 MATH 106 780 780 680 680 625.3 626.5 625.7 609.5 597.7 605.6 575.0 578.0 580.8 557.2 556.4 550.0 580 580 480 480 380 380 280 280 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fall Fall MATH 151 780 684.6 677.0 675.6 660.8 651.8 656.0 680 580 Paper 480 Online 380 280 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fall

  8. Math 150 Math 106 31 30 26.6 26.3 26.3 26.2 26.2 26.0 26 25 21 17.4 17.2 17.1 17.1 17.3 17.1 20 16 15 11 10 6 5 1 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fall Fall Math 151 30 29.4 28.9 28.5 28.8 28.8 28.7 25 20 Paper 15 Online 10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fall

  9. MATH 150 MATH 151 Paper Online Paper Online 25 25 20 20 22.1 21.9 21.7 21.6 21.4 21.3 16.5 16.5 16.1 14.9 14.8 14.2 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fall Fall

  10. % Taking Placement % Taking No Math Course Course Placement PP OL PP OL LRC 099 56.1 61.4 39.0 34.7 MATH 77.1 76.2 19.5 20.6 106 MATH 60.3 60.2 22.1 23.9 150 MATH 58.8 49.6 22.2 30.4 151

  11. LRC 099 MATH 106 C or C or better better <C <C PP (F03-F05) 86.5% 13.5% PP (F03-F05) 73.6% 26.4% OL (F06-F08) 87.1% 12.9% OL (F06-F08) 66.6% 33.4% MATH 150 MATH 151 C or C or better better <C <C PP (F03-F05) 81.4% 18.6% PP (F03-F05) 85.8% 14.2% OL (F06-F08) 70.7% 29.3% OL (F06-F08) 80.4% 19.6%

  12. Grades for Students Placed in LRC099 Taking LRC099 in First Semester 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% A B C D F WX Paper Online N=104 N=62

  13. Grades for Students Placed in Math 106 Taking Math 106 in First Semester 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% A B C D F W WX Paper Online N=949 N=742

  14. Grades for Students Placed in Math 150 Taking Math 150 in First Semester 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% A B C D F W WX Paper Online N=623 N=583

  15. Grades for Students Placed in Math 151 Taking Math 151 in First Semester 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% A B C D F W WX Paper Online N=648 N=664

  16. ALGEBRA TEST SCORE Type <=12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >=23 # Online 41 57 56 64 70 71 95 95 102 105 76 60 # Paper 68 69 72 72 95 112 92 131 134 120 68 68 % of MATH106 students with a grade of C or better by Placement Test Type and Algebra Test Score 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <=12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >=23 Online Paper

  17. ALGEBRA TEST SCORE Type <=20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 # Online 17 16 25 41 101 96 101 90 65 54 25 26 5 # Paper 26 12 16 52 91 123 104 87 88 52 32 9 2 % of MATH150 students with a grade of C or better by Placement Test Type and Algebra Test Score 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <=20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Online Paper

  18. CALCULUS TEST SCORE Type <=7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >=21 No test # Online 6 5 2 7 10 14 16 31 53 49 60 62 15 22 48 262 # Paper 23 25 19 20 25 39 61 60 68 80 80 64 11 10 7 102 % of MATH150 students with a grade of C or better by Placement Test Type and Calculus Test Score 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <=7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >=21 Online Paper

  19. ALGEBRA TEST SCORE Type <=22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 # Online 10 13 35 60 59 91 99 108 109 91 56 # Paper 21 16 40 40 61 74 108 107 130 114 62 % of MATH151 students with a grade of C or better by Placement Test Type and Algebra Test Score 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <=22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Online Paper

  20. CALCULUS TEST SCORE Type <=16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 No test # Online 10 17 24 95 99 125 129 97 90 32 13 # Paper 55 30 64 130 100 113 119 82 50 25 5 % of MATH151 students with a grade of C or better by Placement Test Type and Calculus Test Score 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <=16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Online Paper

  21.  Results presented to key stakeholders on campus.  Decision made to accept online testing methods as reasonably comparable to paper & pencil  More focus needed on advising efforts  Analysis of performance in Math 150 and 151  Determine factors related to success in these courses  Develop model to help students choose their best course of action  Questions/comments – krach@umbc.edu

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend