completion of partially known second order statistics of
play

Completion of partially known second-order statistics of turbulent - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Completion of partially known second-order statistics of turbulent flows Armin Zare Joint work with: Mihailo R. Jovanovi c Tryphon T. Georgiou 67th APS DFD Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2014 1 / 17 Low-complexity models of turbulent


  1. Completion of partially known second-order statistics of turbulent flows Armin Zare Joint work with: Mihailo R. Jovanovi´ c Tryphon T. Georgiou 67th APS DFD Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2014 1 / 17

  2. Low-complexity models of turbulent flows I Control-oriented modeling - Stochastically forced NS equations ψ t = A ψ + f v = C ψ I Motivation - linear mechanisms in self-sustaining cycle of near-wall structures Hamilton, Kim, Waleffe, JFM ’95 - forcing statistics influence performance of flow estimators Chevalier, Hœpffner, Bewley, Henningson, JFM ’06 2 / 17

  3. Proposed Approach I view second-order statistics as data for an inverse problem I identify forcing statistics to account for partially known statistics 3 / 17

  4. White-in-time stochastic forcing I State statistics - white-in-time u A X + X A ∗ = � B WB ∗ Lyapunov equation � ! I Success in capturing qualitative features Farrell & Ioannou, POF ’93 Bamieh & Dahleh, POF ’01 Jovanovi´ c & Bamieh, JFM ’05 Moarref & Jovanovi´ c, JFM ’12 4 / 17

  5. I Key observation λ i ( A X DNS + X DNS A ∗ ) - White-in-time stochastic excitation too restrictive! Jovanovi´ c & Georgiou, APS ’10 5 / 17

  6. Colored-in-time stochastic forcing I State statistics - colored-in-time u A X + X A ∗ = � ( B H ∗ + H B ∗ ) | {z } Q Georgiou, IEEE TAC ’02 Chen, Jovanovi´ c, Georgiou, CDC ’13 6 / 17

  7. An example I Response of a boundary layer to free-stream turbulence 7 / 17

  8. Inverse problem I Covariance completion problem k Q k ∗ minimize Q , X A X + X A ∗ + Q = 0 subject to trace ( T k X ) = g k , k = 1 , . . . , N X ⌫ 0 X I k Q k ∗ := σ i ( Q ) � ! proxy for rank minimization Fazel, Recht, Parrilo, Candès, ... 8 / 17

  9. k Q k ∗ minimize Q , X A X + X A ∗ + Q = 0 subject to trace ( T k X ) = g k , k = 1 , . . . , N X ⌫ 0 velocity correlation matrix 9 / 17

  10. k Q k ∗ minimize Q , X A X + X A ∗ + Q = 0 subject to trace ( T k X ) = g k , k = 1 , . . . , N X ⌫ 0 I Customized algorithms Zare, Jovanovi´ c, Georgiou, ACC ’14 Zare, Jovanovi´ c, Georgiou, ACC ’15, Submitted 10 / 17

  11. Turbulent channel flow Φ ( κ ) := t → ∞ E ( v v ∗ ) lim v = [ u v w ] T I Covariance completion + 11 / 17

  12. One-point velocity correlations y y I Direct Numerical Simulations � I Covariance completion problem (CCP) 12 / 17

  13. Two-point velocity correlations Simulations CCP Φ 11 Φ 33 13 / 17

  14. Low rank solution Q = � ( A X + X A ∗ ) i σ i ( Q ) feasibility problem − → no clear cut σ i ( Q ) covariance completion problem − → low-rank solution 14 / 17

  15. Filter design key result: ( linearized dynamics filter design using completed correlations 15 / 17

  16. Verification in linear stochastic simulations I R τ = 180; k x = 2 . 5, k z = 7 uu uv y y Direct Numerical Simulations E k � Linear Stochastic Simulations t 16 / 17

  17. Concluding remarks I Acknowledgments NSF Award CMMI 1363266 2014 CTR Summer Program Minnesota Supercomputing Institute 17 / 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend