Comparison of AIRS and MODIS Cloud Top Properties By Van Dang With - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparison of airs and modis cloud top properties
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comparison of AIRS and MODIS Cloud Top Properties By Van Dang With - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comparison of AIRS and MODIS Cloud Top Properties By Van Dang With lots of advice and help from: Brian Kahn, Eric Fetzer, Evan Manning, Mathias Schreier, and John Blaisdell MODIS ECF AIRS ECF MODIS CTT AIRS CTT HISTOGRAM OF MODIS ECF THAT


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Comparison of AIRS and MODIS Cloud Top Properties

By Van Dang With lots of advice and help from: Brian Kahn, Eric Fetzer, Evan Manning, Mathias Schreier, and John Blaisdell

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MODIS ECF AIRS ECF AIRS CTT MODIS CTT

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

HISTOGRAM OF MODIS ECF THAT ARE MATCHED WITH AIRS ECF

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Methods of comparing AIRS’ and MODIS’ Cloud Top Properties

  • Comparing cloud property measurement within an AMSU footprint
  • btained by averaging all the 9 ECF from AIRS FOV regridded to

the nearest .5 degree lat/lon bin with all the averaged MODIS ECF that falls within that .5 lat/lon bin.

  • Comparing the cloud property measurement within an AMSU

footprint obtained by averaging all the 9 ECF from AIRS FOV to the corresponding MODIS footprints weighted according to each individual AIRS top-hat and then averaged. The top-hat function was based on the AIRS channels for cloud property derivation and compared to MODIS’ channel number 32 (12.02µm)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Both filtered for when collection of MODIS data within .5 degree reports 90%

  • f one cloud layer.

.5 deg data

slide-19
SLIDE 19

.5 deg data

Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer

Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer and MODIS

using CO2 slicing to derive values

slide-20
SLIDE 20

.5 deg data

Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer

Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer and MODIS

using CO2 slicing to derive values

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Filtered by AIRS indicating two cloud layer measurement

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Filter by PBest Filter by being neither PBest nor PGood

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Coloring of circles represents AIRS ECF

.5 deg data

No Filtering Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Filtering by AIRS reporting

  • ne cloud layer and MODIS

using CO2 slicing to derive values

.5 deg data

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conclusion:

  • AIRS and MODIS ECF compares well if the cloud is high
  • AIRS and MODIS CTT compares well if the ECF were large and that

there is one cloud layer