1
Coherence Spaces for Computable Analysis II
K e i M a t s u mo t
- a
n d K a z u s h i g e T e r u i
( R I M S , K y
- t
- U
n i v e r s i t y )
Supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program
Coherence Spaces for Computable Analysis II K e i M a t s u - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program Coherence Spaces for Computable Analysis II K e i M a t s u mo t o a n d K a z u s h i g e T e r u i ( R I M S , K y o t o U n i v e r s i t y ) 1 Background
1
Coherence Spaces for Computable Analysis II
K e i M a t s u mo t
n d K a z u s h i g e T e r u i
( R I M S , K y
n i v e r s i t y )
Supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program
2
Background
u t a b l e a n a l y s i s s t u d i e s c
u t a t i
e r t
i c a l s p a c e s , b y g i v i n g r e p r e s e n t a t i
s .
– T
y p e t wo t h e
y
E f f e c t i v i t y
– D
i n r e p r e s e n t a t i
s
h e i r a p p r
c h e s a r e t
r a c k c
u t a t i
b y c
t i n u
s ma p s
e r “ s y mb
i c ” s p a c e s .
T h e p r i n c i p l e : C
u t a b l e ⇒ c
t i n u
s
B a i r e s p . , S c
t d
i n s , . . .
3
Our Proposal
O u r p r i n c i p l e : C
u t a b l e ⇒ S t a b l e
[ B e r r y ' 7 8 ]
U s e i n s t e a d
S c
t
i n s c
e r e n c e s p a c e s
[ G i r a r d ' 8 6 ]
, w h e r e
t w
r p h i s ms coexist: s t a b l e / l i n e a r ma p s
Y X F
X Y
f
T
i c a l s p . C
e r e n c e s p .
T r a c k e d b y s t a b l e ma p .
4
Main Result from [MT '15]
R e p r e s e n t a t i
s b a s e d
c
e r e n c e s p a c e s h a v e a n i n t e r e s t i n g f e a t u r e :
f
r e a l f u n c i t
s , w e h a v e s h
n t h a t
t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ c
t i n u
s
i n e a r l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ u n i f
ml y c
t i n u
s .
5
Main Result of This Talk
Conjecture
( b y a L I C S r e v i e w e r ) .
R e p r e s e n t a t i
s b a s e d
s t a b l e f u n c t i
s R e p r e s e n t a t i
s b a s e d
s e q u e n t i a l f u n c t i
s
I would very much like to know whether the author just reinvented John Longley's sequentially realizable functions. If they did, then their notion of computability for coherence spaces will presumably coincide with that for sequentially realizable functionals. (…) I conjecture that your realizability model is equivalent to the category
CohRep ≃ SeqRep
6
Main Result of This Talk
Conjecture
( b y a L I C S r e v i e w e r ) .
T h e c
j e c t u r e i s F A L S E .
I would very much like to know whether the author just reinvented John Longley's sequentially realizable functions. If they did, then their notion of computability for coherence spaces will presumably coincide with that for sequentially realizable functionals. (…) I conjecture that your realizability model is equivalent to the category
CohRep ≃ SeqRep
7
Ⅰ. Review: Coherent Representations Ⅱ. Sequential Representations Ⅲ. Inequivalence Ⅳ. Conclusion and Future Works
8
Coherence Spaces
Def. A c
e r e n c e s p a c e i s
c
n t a b l e s e t
t
e n s wi t h
s y mme t r i c r e f l e x i v e . b i n a r y r e l .
Write x y i f f
x ≠ y a
n d
x y (s
t r i c t c
e r e n c e
)
A c l i q u e i s a s e t
t
e n s wh i c h a r e p a i r wi s e c
e r e n t . T h e c l i q u e s p a c e Clq(X) f
ms a S c
t d
i n w . r . t . t h e s e t i n c l u s i
.
a c t e l e me n t s = f i n i t e c l i q u e s .
X=(|X|, )
( )
|X|
( () ()
|X|
9
Examples
Def. D e f i n e a d i s c r e t e c
e r e n c e s p a c e N b y :
m i f f n=m Clq(N) = {{n}: n ∈ ℕ} ∪ { } ≈
ℕ⊥
T h e s e t
d y a d i c r a t i
a l s
D =
× ℤ ℕ, i
d e n t i f i e d a s
(m,n) ~ m/2n
Def. D e f i n e a c
e r e n c e s p a c e R f
d y a d i c C a u c h y s e q u e n c e s a s f
l
:
e a c h
d=(m,n) and e=(m',n'), d e i f f n≠n' and |d-e| ≤ 2-n + 2-n'
Ma x i ma l c l i q u e s
R ≈
( r a p i d l y c
v e r g i n g ) C a u c h y s e q u e n c e s
|R|=D (
( )
∅ ∅ {0} {1} {2}
…
10
Summary: Coherence Spaces
e r e n c e s p a c e s a r e v e r y s i mp l e S c
t
i n s .
wo k i n d s
mo r p h i s ms c
x i s t : s t a b l e a n d l i n e a r ma p s .
– S
t a b i l i t y i s a n a n a l
u e
p r
r a ms f
wh i c h t h e a mo u n t
i n p u t n e e d e d t
r
u c e a n
t p u t i s u n i q u e l y d e t e r mi n e d ,
– L
i n e a r i t y i s a n a n a l
u e
p r
r a ms wh i c h ma k e s e x a c t l y
e q u e r y d u r i n g c
u t a t i
.
wo c a t e g
i e s
c
e r e n c e s p a c e s
– T
h e c a t e g
y Stbl
c
. s p a c e s a n d s t a b l e ma p s i s c a r t e s i a n c l
e d .
– T
h e c a t e g
y Lin
c
. s p a c e s a n d l i n e a r ma p s i s mo n
d a l c l
e d .
i n e a r d e c
i t i
:
– T
h i s g a v e b i r t h t
i n e a r l
i c [ G i r a r d ' 8 6 ] .
Stbl(X ,Y )≃Lin(! X ,Y )
11
Coh-Representations
Def. A ( C
r e p r e s e n t a t i
i s a t u p l e X → X
a c
e r e n c e s p a c e X, a s e t X, a n d a s u r j e c t i v e ma p ρX:⊆Clq(X)→X . Def. A f u n c t i
f: X→Y i s s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e i f t h e r e e x i s t s a s t a b l e ma p F: X→Y s . t . : Ex. T h e C
e p r e s e n t a t i
N → ℕ⊥ ma p s t h e s i n g l e t
{n} t
h e n u mb e r n a n d t h e e mp t y s e t t
h e b
t
Ex. T h e C
e p r e s e n t a t i
R →
ℝ s
e n d s a C a u c h y s e q u e n c e t
t s l i mi t . Prop. ( [ MT ' 1 5 ] ) ( i ) f :ℕ⊥→ℕ⊥ i s s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ i t i s mo n
e . ( i i ) f :ℝ→ℝ i s s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ i t i s c
t i n u
s . ( i i i ) f :ℝ→ℝ i s l i n e a r l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ i t i s u n i f
ml y c
t i n u
s .
ρX ρY f
Y X Y
F
X
ρX
1 2
…
⊥
ρ0 ρR
12
The Category CohRep
Def. CohRep i s t h e c a t e g
y
c
e r e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i
s a n d s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e f u n c t i
s . I n r e a l i z a b i l i t y t h e
y , r e p r e s e n t a t i
s c
r e s p
d t
d e s t s e t s
e r s
P C A ( p a r t i a l c
i n a t
y a l g e b r a ) .
e t Ucoh b e t h e P C A
t a i n e d f r
t h e u n i v e r s a l c
e r e n c e s p a c e .
) S i n c e c a t e g
i e s
mo d e s t s e t s a r e r e g u l a r c a r t e s i a n c l
e d , s
s CohRep.
≃
13
Ⅰ. Review: Coherent Representations Ⅱ. Sequential Representations Ⅲ. Inequivalence Ⅳ. Conclusion and Future Works
14
Sequential functionals
S e q u e n t i a l i t y : a p r
e r t y
p r
r a ms wh i c h ma k e q u e r i e s t
h e i n p u t i n a p r e
e t e r mi n e d s e q u e n t i a l wa y . Def. ( v a n O
t e n ' s s e q u e n t i a l g a me ) L e t [ ℕ ℕ ] b e t h e s e t
a l l p a r t i a l f u n c t i
s . A f u n c t i
a l F: [ ℕ ℕ ] → ℕ
⊥i s s e q u e n t i a l i f i t i s c
u t e d b y a s t r a t e g y α: ℕ ℕ s u c h t h a t g i v e n β: ℕ ℕ , F(β) = n i f f
。。。 。。。
s
{ui}, {mi},
15
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
16
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
G i v e n β: ℕ ℕ
17
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
q u e r y β(5)
18
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
I f β(5)=2,
19
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
q u e r y β(3)
20
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
i f β(3)=0,
?3
21
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y .
... ...
Output 7
?5 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
?3
22
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
q u e r y β(5)
23
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
i f β(5)=3,
24
Decision Tree Strategy
T h e f
me r p l a y e r α i s a s t r a t e g y d e s c r i b e d b y a d e c i s i
t r e e l i k e t h i s : I t s a c t i
i s e i t h e r
:
q u e r y t h e v a l u e β(n)
t p u t t h e v a l u e m a n d h a l t . T h e c h
c e i s c
l e t e l y d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e l a t t e r p l a y e r ' s h i s t
y . ?5 ?3 ?1 !4 !7 ?0
2 3 1
... ...
No Arrow! =diverge
25
The Category SeqRep Mod(B)
L e t B b e a P C A f
s e q u e n t i a l r e a l i z a b i l i t y p r
e d b y [ v a n O
t e n ' 9 7 ] . Def. SeqRep i s t h e c a t e g
y wh
e
b j e c t s a r e s u r j e c t i v e p a r t i a l ma p s f r
[ ℕ ℕ ]
r p h i s ms a r e s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e f u n c t i
s SeqRep Mod(B) i s a l s
r e g u l a r c . c . c . ≃
σX σY f
Y
[ ℕ ℕ] [ ℕ ℕ]
F
X
s e q u e n t i a l
26
Relationship with Hypercoherence Model
v a n O
t e n ' 9 7 ] [ L
g l e y ' 2 ] : F
f u n c t i
a l s
f i n i t e t y p e s , s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ s t r
g l y s t a b l e
h e l a t t e r i n t e r p r e t a t i
i s d
e i n t h e c a t e g
y
h y p e r c
e r e n c e a n d s t r
g l y s t a b l e ma p s i n t r
u c e d b y E h r h a r d .
e r e n c e s p a c e i s a s p e c i f i c c a s e
h y p e r c
e r e n c e .
e a r e mo t i v a t e d t
a r e s e q u e n t i a l r e a l i z a b i l i t y w i t h
r s t a b l e r e a l i z a b i l i t y .
27
Ⅰ. Review: Coherence Representations Ⅱ. Sequential Representations Ⅲ. Inequivalence Ⅳ. Conclusion and Future Works
28
Main Theorem
Th. T h e c a t e g
i e s CohRep a n d SeqRep a r e n
e q u i v a l e n t . I t i s i n t u i t i v e l y c l e a r : we h a v e a c
n t e r e x a mp l e a s k n
a s G u s t a v f u n c t i
, t h e t r i p l e v e r s i
t h e p a r a l l e l
. I t i s s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e b u t n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e f
s p e c i f i c “ n a t u r a l ” r e p r e s e n t a t i
s
ℕ
⊥.
Continuous Stable Sequential Parallel-or Gustav
29
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
Strategy must make a query first.
30
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
assume that you query f(0) first
31
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
Take an opponent
f(1)=0 f(2)=1 f(0)↑
32
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2 f(0) i
s u n d e f i n e d ,
33
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
Case(III) if f(1)=0, f(2)=1, but f(0)↑
while G(f) i s d e f i n e d .
34
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
×
So, you fail the game
Case(III) if f(1)=0, f(2)=1, but f(0)↑
35
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?1 ?2 1 ?0
Case(II) if f(2)=0, f(0)=1, but f(1)↓
×
Whatever the first query is...
36
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?2 ?0 1 ?1
Case(I) if f(0)=0, f(1)=1, but f(2)↓
×
Whatever the first query is...
37
Gustav Function (1)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ
⊥ → ℕ ⊥] → ℕ ⊥ i
s d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . [ ] ℕ ℕ → ℕ
⊥ ,
wh e r e σ0(α):=n ∈ ℕ
⊥ i
f f α(0)= n a n d α(m+1)= ⊥ f
a n y m.
σ0
?0 ?1 1 ?2
Case(III) if f(1)=0, f(2)=1, but f(0)↓
×
You must fail for some opp.
Contradiction.
38
Gustav Function (2)
A G u s t a v f u n c t i
G: [ℕ⊥ → ℕ⊥] → ℕ
⊥ is d e f i n e d b y
f
e
t h e m i s s a t i s f i e d :
– (I) f(0)=0, f(1)=1, – (II)f(0)=1,
f(2)=0,
– (III) f(1)=0, f(2)=1
t h e r wi s e .
n t h e
h e r h a n d , G i s s t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t . N → ℕ
⊥ :Tr(G):= {(0,0)(1,1) → 0; (0,1)(2,0) → 0; (1,0)(2,1) → 0} S
f u n c t
F: SeqRep → CohRep c a n n
b e p a r t
e q u i v a l e n c e i f i t ma p s σ0 t
ρ0
39
Proof Idea (1)
F
a r i g
s p r
, we h a v e t
h
t h a t n
u n c t
F: SeqRep → CohRep i
s p a r t
e q u i v a l e n c e .
B y c
t r a d i c t i
. A s s u me t h a t F: SeqRep → CohRep i s p a r t
e q u i v a l e n c e . B y t h e l e mma s b e l
, we c a n s h
t h a t i f t h e c
e r e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i
ρX= F(σ0), i
t h a s a s i mi l a r s t r u c t u r e t
S
( mo d i f i e d ) G u s t a v f u n c t i
i s a l s
t a b l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t .
ρX,
wh i l e i t i s n
s e q u e n t i a l l y r e a l i z a b l e w . r . t .
σ0,
wh i c h c
t r a d i c t s t h e a s s u mp t i
.
40
Proof Idea (2)
T h e c
e p r e s e n t a t i
ρX:= F(σ0) s a t i s f i e s t h e f
l
n g p r
e r t i e s : Lem. ρX r e p r e s e n t s
ℕ ⊥
a n d e a c h n ∈ℕ
⊥
h a s e x a c t l y
e r e a l i z e r d e n
e d b y an Clq(X) ∈ . Lem. ∀n≠m ∈
ℕ an, am Clq(X)
∈ a r e n
c
e r e n t . Lem. ∀n∈
ℕ an ⊃ a⊥
N
we h a v e : ∅ {0} {1} {2}
…
N= a0 a1 a2
…
a⊥ X=
ℕ⊥
ρX ρ0
incoherent incoherent
≒
41
Gustav Function is Stably Realizable
42
Ⅰ. Review: Coherence Representations Ⅱ. Sequential Representations Ⅲ. Inequivalence Ⅳ. Conclusion and Future Works
43
a r i s
w i t h s
r e a l i z a b i l i t y mo d e l s
– We
h a v e s h
n ( u s i n g G u s t a v f u n c t i
) :
e q R e p = M
( B ) ≠ M
( U
c
) = C
R e p ,
– We
c a n s i mi l a r l y s e p a r a t e ( u s i n g p a r a l l e l
) :
( P
ω)
≠ M
( U
c
)
( K
2
) ≠ M
( U
c
)
– c
a t e g
y
T T E
e p r e s e n t a t i
s [ B a u e r ' 2 ] .
e r e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i
s a r e n
a r e i n v e n t i
h e r r e a l i z a b i l i t y .
44
ℝ i s l i n e a r l y r e a l i z a b l e ⇔ i t i s u n i f
ml y c
t i n u
s .
a l s
a v e a l i n e a r c
i n a t
y a l g e b r a U
l i n
f
l i n e a r r e a l i z a b i l i t y
( U
l i n
) i s a mo d e l
l i n e a r l
i c .
a n C
u t a b l e A n a l y s i s b e d e c
e d i n t
L i n e a r A n a l y s i s ” ?
– A
n a l
y f r
t h e d i s c
e r y
l i n e a r l
i c :
n t u i t i
i s t i c l
i c i s d e c
e d i n t
i n e a r l
i c .